, Volume 60, Issue 4, pp 320–329 | Cite as

Creating an Intentional Web Presence: Strategies for Every Educational Technology Professional

  • Patrick R. Lowenthal
  • Joanna C. Dunlap
  • Patricia Stitson
Original Paper


Educators are pushing for students, specifically graduates, to be digitally literate in order to successfully read, write, contribute, and ultimately compete in the global market place. Educational technology professionals, as a unique type of learning professional, need to be not only digitally literate – leading and assisting teachers and students toward this goal, but also model the digital fluency expected of an educational technology leader. Part of this digital fluency involves effectively managing one’s web presence. In this article, we argue that educational technology professionals need to practice what they preach by attending to their own web presence. We share strategies for crafting the components of a vibrant and dynamic professional web presence, such as creating a personal website, engaging in social networking, contributing and sharing resources/artifacts, and attending to search engine optimization (SEO).


Web presence Social media presence Persona Branding Identity Social presence Self-promotion Privacy Digital footprint Digital literacy Digital fluency Image Thought leadership 


  1. Atkins, D. E., Brown, J. S., & Hammond, A. L. (2007). A review of the Open Educational Resources (OER) movement: Achievements, challenges, and new opportunities. Retrieved from
  2. Bauer, R. (2009). Construction of one’s identity: A student’s view on the potential of eportfolios. In P. Baumgartner, S. Zauchner, & R. Bauer (Eds.), The potential of e-portfolios in higher education (pp. 173–183). Innsbruck: Studienverlag.Google Scholar
  3. Bozarth, J. (2013, May). Show your work. Training and Development. Retrieved from
  4. Bozarth, J. (2014). Show your work. San Francisco: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, J. S., & Adler, R. P. (2008). Minds on fire: open education, the long tail, and learning 2.0. EDUCAUSE Review, 43(1), 16–20.Google Scholar
  6. (2006). One-in-four hiring managers have used Internet search engines to screen job candidates; one-in-ten have used social networking sites, survey finds. Retrieved from
  7. (2009). Forty-five percent of employers use social networking sites to research job candidates, careerbuilder survey finds. Retrieved from
  8. (2012). Thirty-seven percent of companies use social networks to research potential job candidates, according to new CareerBuilder Survey. Retrieved from
  9. (2014). Number of employers passing on applicants due to social media posts continues to rise, according to new careerbuilder survey. Retrieved from
  10. Carroll, C. L., & Ramachandran, P. (2014). The intelligent use of digital tools and social media in practice management. Chest Journal, 145(4), 896–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark, D. (2011). E-portfolios: 7 reasons why I don’t want my life in a shoebox. Donald Clark Plan B. Retrieved from
  12. Colombi, M. C., & Schleppegrell, M. J. (2002). Theory and practice in the development of advanced literacy. In M. J. Schleppegrell & M. C. Colombi (Eds.), Developing advanced literacy in first and second languages: Meaning with power (pp. 1–19). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  13. Corbyn, Z. (2010). All about me, dot com. Times Higher Education. Retrieved from
  14. Couros, A. (2010). Developing personal learning networks for open and social learning. In G. Veletsianos (Ed.), Emerging technologies in distance education (pp. 109–128). Athabasca: Athabasca University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Croxall, B. (2014). How to overcome what scares us about our online identities. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from
  16. Davison, H. K., Maraist, C. C., Hamilton, R. H., & Bing, M. N. (2012). To screen or not to screen? Using the Internet for selection decisions. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 24(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Downes, S. (2007). Learning networks in practice. Institute for Information Technology, National Research Council Canada. Retrieved from
  18. Dunlap, J. C., & Lowenthal, P. R. (2009a). Horton hears a tweet. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 32(4).Google Scholar
  19. Dunlap, J. C., & Lowenthal, P. R. (2009b). Tweeting the night away: Using Twitter to enhance social presence. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), 129–136.Google Scholar
  20. Dunlap, J. C., & Lowenthal, P. R. (2011). Learning, unlearning, and relearning: Using Web 2.0 technologies to support the development of lifelong learning skills. In G. D. Magoulas (Ed.), Einfrastructures and technologies for lifelong learning: Next generation environments (pp. 292–315). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  21. Driscoll, E. (2013). What your social media reputation says to employers. Fox Business. Retrieved from
  22. Eyre, S., Lindsay, K., Noble, H., Edwards, A., & Paddock, A. (2014). Online presence: Developing your presence. Retrieved from
  23. Fallows, D. (2005). Search engine users: Internet searchers are confident, satisfied and trusting—But they are also unaware and naïve. Report for the Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved from
  24. Fraser, J. (2012). 20 ways of thinking about digital literacy in higher education. The Guardian. Retrieved from
  25. Godin, S. (2008). Tribes: We need you to lead us. New York: Portfolio/Penguin Group.Google Scholar
  26. Goodier, S., & Czerniewicz, L. (2015). Academics’ online presence guidelines: A four step guide to taking control of your visibility (3rd ed.). Retrieved from
  27. Greysen, S. R., Kind, T., & Chretien, K. C. (2010). Online professionalism and the mirror of social media. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 25(11), 1227–1229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hargittai, E., & King, B. (2013). You need a website. Inside HigherEd. Retrieved from
  29. Henry, A. (2012). Should I keep my personal and professional identities completely separate online? Lifehacker. Retrieved from
  30. Hewson, K. (2013). What size is your digital footprint? A powerful professional learning network can give a boost to a new teaching career. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(7), 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hilligoss, B., & Rieh, S. Y. (2008). Developing a unifying framework of credibility assessment: construct, heuristics, and interaction in context. Information Processing and Management, 44, 1467–1484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hodgkinson-Williams, C., & Gray, E. (2009). Degrees of openness: the emergence of open education resources at the University of Cape Town. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 5(5), 101–116.Google Scholar
  33. Hollandsworth, R., Dowdy, L., & Donovan, J. (2011). Digital citizenship in K-12: it takes a village. TechTrends, 55(4), 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Huhman, H. R. (2014). 4 things employers look for when they Google you. Business Insider. Retrieved from
  35. ISTE (n.d.). ISTE Standards: Students. Retrieved from
  36. Jones, B., & Flannigan, S. L. (2006). Connecting the digital dots: literacy of the 21st century. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 29(2), 8–10.Google Scholar
  37. Joosten, T. (2012). Social media for educators: Strategies and best practices. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  38. Joosten, T., Pasquini, L., & Harness, L. (2013). Guiding social media at our institutions. Planning for Higher Education, 41(2), 125–135.Google Scholar
  39. Joyce, S. P. (2014). To land a job, know how employers use technology to hire. The Huffington Post. Retrieved from
  40. Joyce, S. P. (2014). What 80% of employers do before inviting you for an interview. The Huffington Post. Retrieved from
  41. Kimmons, R., & Veletsianos, G. (2014). The Fragmented educator 2.0: Social networking sites. Acceptable identity fragments, and the identity constellation. Computers & Education, 72, 292–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kimmons, R., & Veletsianos, G. (2015). Teacher professionalization in the age of social networking sites. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(4), 480–501.Google Scholar
  43. Koltay, T. (2011). The media and the literacies: media literacy, information literacy, digital literacy. Media, Culture & Society, 33(2), 211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kop, R., & Hill, A. (2008). Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past? International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(3). Retrieved from
  45. Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Lattanner, M. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: a critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1073–1137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lowenthal, P., & Wilson, B. G. (2010). Labels do matter! A critique of AECT’s redefinition of the field. TechTrends, 54(1), 38–46.Google Scholar
  47. Lowenthal, P. R., & Dunlap, J. C. (2012). Intentional web presence: Ten SEO strategies every academic should know. EDUCAUSE Review Online. Retrieved from
  48. Lowenthal, P., White, J. W., & Cooley, K. (2011). Remake/remodel: Using eportfolios and a system of gates to improve student assessment and program evaluation. International Journal of ePortfolio, 1(1), 61–70.Google Scholar
  49. Madden, M., Fox, S., Smith, A., & Vitak, J. (2007). Online identify management and search in the age of transparency. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from
  50. Marshall, K. (2015). How to maintain your digital identity as an academic. Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from
  51. Martin, F., & Winzler, B. (2008). Multimedia competencies for instructional technologist. Paper presented at the UNC Teaching and Learning with Technology Conference, Raleigh, NC.Google Scholar
  52. Mathews, J. (2014). Screen yourself in: 5 tips to make your online presence interview-worthy. TalentEgg. Retrieved from
  53. Metzger, M. (2007). Making sense of credibility on the web: models for evaluating online information and recommendations for future research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2078–2091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Microsoft. (n.d.). Take charge of your online reputation. Microsoft. Retrieved from
  55. Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ohler, J. (2011). Digital citizenship means character education for the digital age. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 47, 25–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pettiward, J., &. O’Reilly, C. (n.d.). Get clued up! Find yourself online. Retrieved from
  58. Poppick, S. (2014). 10 social media blunders that cost a millennial a job – or worse. Money. Retrieved from
  59. Posner, M., Varner, S., & Croxall, B. (2011). Creating your web presence: A primer for academics. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from
  60. Reicher, A. (2013). Background of our being: internet background checks in the hiring process. The Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 28, 116–154.Google Scholar
  61. Ritzhaupt, A., Martin, F., & Daniels, K. (2010). Multimedia competencies for an educational technologist: a survey of professionals and job announcement analysis. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 19(4), 421–449.Google Scholar
  62. Sheninger, E. (2014). Digital leadership: changing paradigms for changing times. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.Google Scholar
  63. Siemens, G. (2008). Learning and Knowing in Networks: Changing roles for Educators and Designers. Retrieved from
  64. Stoughton, J. W., Thompson, L. F., & Meade, A. W. (2013). Examining applicant reactions to the use of social networking websites in pre-employment screening. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(1), 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Street, B. (1995). Social Literacies: Critical approaches to literacy development, ethnography and education. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  66. Tapscott, D. (2012). Four principles for the open world [transcript of TED Talk video]. Retrieved from
  67. Tucker, K. (2014). Personal branding in career communications. Career Planning and Adult Development Journal, 30(2), 47–52.Google Scholar
  68. Van Ouytsel, J., Walrave, M., & Ponnet, K. (2014). How schools can help their students to strengthen their online reputations. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 87(4), 180–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Veletsianos, G., & Kimmons, R. (2013). Scholars and faculty members’ lived experiences in online social networks. The Internet and Higher Education, 16, 43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Veletsianos, G., Kimmons, R., & French, K. D. (2013). Instructor experiences with a social networking site in a higher education setting: expectations, frustrations, appropriation, and compartmentalization. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(2), 255–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Von Drasek, L. (2011). Hang in there: how to get a library job against all odds. School Library Journal, 57(2), 24–29.Google Scholar
  72. Weiner, S. (2011). Information literacy and the workforce: a review. Education Libraries, 34(2), 7–14.Google Scholar
  73. Weller, M. (2011). The digital scholar: How technology is transforming scholarly practice. New York: Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Yamamoto, Y., & Tanaka, K. (2011). Enhancing credibility judgment of web search results. CHI’11 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1235–1244). Association of Computing Machinery: New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications & Technology 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patrick R. Lowenthal
    • 1
  • Joanna C. Dunlap
    • 2
  • Patricia Stitson
    • 3
  1. 1.Boise State UniversityBoiseUSA
  2. 2.University of Colorado DenverDenverUSA
  3. 3.

Personalised recommendations