TechTrends

, Volume 60, Issue 3, pp 260–267 | Cite as

Enhancing Teacher Education with Simulations

Original Paper
First Online:

Abstract

As calls for accountability in our schools increase, teaching quality faces scrutiny and, often, criticism. These realities challenge teacher education programs to find new ways to ensure that their graduates will be effective in highly demanding work settings. In this article the authors draw on literature and practice examples to highlight ways that simulations can strengthen critical aspects of teacher preparation as teacher education programs look for ways to better equip their graduates for future challenges. Experience shows that simulations can support screening for program admission, practice for improving teaching and classroom management skills and development of teaching dispositions. Their potential is increasing as technological advances provide greater realism, distributed access and simulation applications for mobile devices.

Keywords

Classroom practice Dispositions Practicum Simulations Teacher education Teaching quality 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Author Note

Limited portions of this article have been published as part of a discussion of simulations for teacher assessment in Canada, in Kaufman and Ireland (2015).

References

  1. Alessi, S., & Trollip, S. (2001). Multimedia for learning: methods and development (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, M., Coble, C., & Crowe, E. (2014). Building an evidence-based system for teacher preparation. Washington, DC: Teacher Preparation Analytics. Retrieved February 14, 2015 from https://caepnet.files.wordpress.com/2014/09/building_an_evidence_based_system_for_teacher_preparation_201409151.pdf.Google Scholar
  3. Arnett, S. E., & Freeburg, B. W. (2008). Family and consumer sciences pre-service teachers: impact of an early field experience[electronic version]. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences Education, 26(1), 48–55.Google Scholar
  4. Aten Intelligent Educational Systems Inc. (2015). Classroom teacher training 3D simulation. Durham, NC: Aten, Inc.. Retrieved from http://www.a10ed.com/explore/professional-development/classroom-teacher-training-3d-simulation.Google Scholar
  5. Badiee, F., & Kaufman, D. (2014). Effectiveness of an online simulation for teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 22(2), 167–186.Google Scholar
  6. Ball, D. L., & Forzani, F. M. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education [electronic version]. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 497–511. doi: 10.1177/0022487109348479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. M. (1980). Problem-based learning. New York, NY: Springer Publishing.Google Scholar
  8. Billingsley, G. M., & Scheuermann, B. K. (2014). Using virtual technology to enhance field experiences for pre-service special education teachers [electronic version]. Teacher Education and Special Education, 37(3), 255–272. doi: 10.1177/0888406414530413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boulet, J. R. (2008). Summative assessment in medicine: the promise of simulation for high-stakes evaluation [electronic version]. Academic Emergency Medicine, 15(11), 1017–1024. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00228.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bradley, E. G., & Kendall, B. (2014). A review of computer simulations in teacher education [electronic version]. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 43(1), 3–12. doi: 10.2190/ET.43.1.b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Butvilofsky, S. A., Escamilla, K., Soltero-González, L., & Aragon, L. (2012). Promoting reflective teaching through simulation in a study in México program [electronic version]. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 11(2), 197–212. doi: 10.1177/1538192711435561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carrington, L., Kervin, L., & Ferry, B. (2011). Enhancing the development of pre-service teacher professional identity via an online classroom simulation [electronic version]. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 19(3), 351–368.Google Scholar
  13. Choi, I., & Lee, K. (2009). Designing and implementing a case-based learning environment for enhancing ill-structured problem solving: classroom management problems for prospective teachers [electronic version]. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(1), 99–129. doi: 10.1007/s11423-008-9089-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Christensen, R., Knezek, G., Tyler-Wood, T., & Gibson, D. (2011). SimSchool: an online dynamic simulator for enhancing teacher preparation [electronic version]. International Journal of Learning Technology, 6(2), 201–220. doi: 10.1504/IJLT.2011.042649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Crookall, D. (2010). Serious games, debriefing, and simulation/gaming as a discipline [electronic version]. Simulation and Gaming, 41(6), 898–920. doi: 10.1177/1046878114559879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-century teacher education [electronic version]. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 310–314. doi: 10.1177/0022487105285962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Darling-Hammond, L., Amrein-Beardsley, A., Haertel, E., & Rothstein, J. (2012). Evaluating teacher evaluation [electronic version]. Phi Delta Kappan, 93(6), 8–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Deale, D., & Pastore, R. (2014). Evaluation of simSchool, an instructional simulation for pre-service teachers [electronic version]. Computers in the Schools, 31(3), 197–219. doi: 10.1080/07380569.2014.932650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dede, C. (2009). Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning [electronic version]. Science, 323(5910), 66–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. DeMuth, L. (2012). Teaching dispositions: Shared understandings for teacher preparation. Ed.D. dissertation. Retrieved March 1, 2015 from ProQuest Dissertations database (UMI 3532736).Google Scholar
  21. Dieker, L. A., Rodruiguez, J. A., Lignugaris/Kraft, B., Hynes, M. C., & Hughes, C. E. (2014). The potential of simulated environments in teacher education: current and future possibilities [electronic version]. Teacher Education and Special Education, 37(1), 21–33. doi: 10.1177/0888406413512683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dotger, B. H. (2009). From a medicinal to educational context: implementing a signature pedagogy for enhanced parent–teacher communication [electronic version]. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy, 35(1), 93–94. doi: 10.1080/02607470802587186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dotger, B., & Alger, A. (2012). Challenging parent, challenged curricula: utilizing simulated interactions to enhance school leader preparation [electronic version]. Planning and Changing, 43(3/4), 344–362.Google Scholar
  24. Drews, F. A., & Backdash, J. D. (2013). Simulation training in health care. Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 8(1), 191–234. doi: 10.1177/1557234X13492977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. eduSIMS. (2015). What are Sims? Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University School of Education. Retrieved February 12, 2015 from http://edusims.syr.edu/what-are-sims/.Google Scholar
  26. Eppich, W., Howard, V., Vozenilek, J., & Curran, I. (2011). Simulation-based team training in healthcare [electronic version]. Simulation in Healthcare, 6(7 suppl.), s14–s19. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e318229f550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Eva, K. W., Rosenfeld, J., Reiter, H. I., & Norman, G. R. (2004). An admissions OSCE: the multiple mini-interview [electronic version]. Medical Education, 38(3), 314–326. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2004.01776.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ferry, B., Kervin, L., Cambourne, B., Turbill, J., Puglisi, S., Jonassen, D., et al. (2004). Online classroom simulation: the ‘next wave’ for pre-service teacher education? In R. Atkinson, C. McBeath, D. Jonas-Dwyer, & R. Phillips (Eds.), Beyond the comfort zone: proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE conference (pp. 294–302). Perth, Western Australia: Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. Retrieved March 11, 2013 from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/perth04/procs/ferry.html.Google Scholar
  29. Ferry, B., Kervin, L., Hedberg, J. G., Turbill, J., Cambourne, B., & Jonassen, D. (2005). In P. Kommers & G. Richards (Eds.), Proceedings, World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Communication (EdMedia) (pp. 3096–3103). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).Google Scholar
  30. Forzani, F. M. (2014). Understanding “core practices” and “practice-based” teacher education: learning from the past [electronic version]. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(4), 357–368. doi: 10.1177/0022487114533800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gaba, D. M. (2007). The future vision of simulation in healthcare [electronic version]. Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare, 2(2), 126–135. doi: 10.1097/01.SIH.0000258411.38212.32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gibson, D. (2007). SimSchool and the conceptual assessment framework. In D. Gibson, C. Aldrich, & M. Prensky (Eds.), Games and simulations in online learning: research & development frameworks (pp. 308–322). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gibson, D. (2013). Assessing teaching skills with a mobile simulation. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 30(1), 4–10. doi: 10.1080/21532974.2013.10784720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gibson, D. & Halverson, B. (2004). Simulation as a framework for preservice assessment. In R. Ferdig et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2004 (pp. 3322–3325). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).Google Scholar
  35. Girod, G. R. (2002). Connecting teaching and learning: a handbook for teacher educators on teacher work sample methodology. Washington, DC: AACTE publications.Google Scholar
  36. Girod, M., & Girod, G. R. (2006). Exploring the efficacy of the cook school district simulation [electronic version]. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(5), 481–497. doi: 10.1177/0022487106293742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Girod, M., & Girod, G. (2008). Simulation and the need for quality practice in teacher preparation [electronic version]. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(3), 307–337.Google Scholar
  38. Girod, G., Girod, M., & Denton, J. (2007). Lessons learned modeling “connecting teaching and learning”. In D. Gibson, C. Aldrich, & M. Prensky (Eds.), Games and simulations in online learning: research and development frameworks (pp. 206–222). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Goldhaber, D. (2002). The mystery of good teaching [electronic version]. Education Next, 2(1), 50–55. Retrieved February 15, 2015 from http://educationnext.org/the-mystery-of-good-teaching/.Google Scholar
  40. Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009). Re-defining teaching, re-imagining teacher education [electronic version]. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 273–289. doi: 10.1080/13540600902875340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hanushek, E. A. (2014). Boosting teacher effectiveness. In C. E. Finn Jr. & R. Sousa (Eds.), What lies ahead for America’s children and their schools (pp. 23–35). Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.Google Scholar
  42. Harrison, J., Smithey, G., McAffey, H., & Weiner, C. (2006). Assessing candidate disposition for admission into teacher education: can just anyone teach? [electronic version]. Action in Teacher Education, 27(4), 72–80. doi: 10.1080/01626620.2006.10463403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Heinrichs, W. L., Youngblood, P., Harter, P. M., & Dev, P. (2008). Simulation for team training and assessment: case studies of online training with virtual worlds [electronic version]. World Journal of Surgery, 32(2), 161–170. doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9354-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Helm, C. M. (2006a). Teacher dispositions as predictors of good teaching [electronic version]. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies Issues and Ideas, 79(3), 117–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Helm, C. M. (2006b). The assessment of teacher dispositions [electronic version]. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies Issues and Ideas, 79(6), 237–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hixon, E., & So, H.-J. (2009). Technology’s role in field experiences for preservice teacher training [electronic version]. Educational Technology and Society, 12(4), 294–304.Google Scholar
  47. Horsley, T. L., Bensfield, L. A., Sojka, S., & Schmitt, A. (2014). Multiple-patient simulations: guidelines and examples [electronic version]. Nurse Educator, 39(6), 311–315. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hume, A. C. (2012). Primary connections: simulating the classroom in initial teacher education [electronic version]. Research in Science Education, 42(3), 551–565. doi: 10.1007/s11165-011-9210-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Issenberg, S. B., McGaghie, W. C., Petrusa, E. R., Gordon, D. L., & Scalese, R. J. (2005). Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review [electronic version]. Medical Teacher, 27(1), 10–28. doi: 10.1080/01421590500046924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Jin, J., & Bridges, S. M. (2014). Educational technologies in problem-based learning in health sciences education: a systematic review [electronic version]. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(12), e251–e269. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kahn, K. Z., Gaunt, K., Ramachandran, R., & Pushkar, P. (2013). The objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): AMEE guide No. 81. Part II: organisation & administration [electronic version]. Medical Teacher, 35(9), e1447–e1463. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.818635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kane, T. J., Kerr, K. A., & Pianta, R. C. (Eds.). (2014). Designing teacher evaluation systems: new guidance from the measures of effective teaching project. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  53. Kaufman, D., & Ireland, A. (2015). The potential of simulation for teacher assessment. In N. Maynes & B. E. Hatt (Eds.), When the interview is not enough: examining new teacher hiring practices in the Canadian context. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Association for Teacher Education.Google Scholar
  54. Khanal, P., Vankipuram, A., Ashby, A., Vankipuram, M., Gupta, A., Drumm-Gurnee, D., et al. (2014). Collaborative virtual reality based advanced cardiac life support training simulator using virtual reality principles [electronic version]. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 51, 49–59. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.04.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Knight, S. L., Lloyd, G. M., Arbagh, F., Gamson, D. A., McDonald, S. P., Nolan, J., Jr., et al. (2015). Taking stock in 2015 [electronic version]. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(1), 3–6. doi: 10.1177/0022487114561741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Levine, A. (2006). Educating school teachers. Washington, DC: The Education Schools Project. Retrieved March 1, 2015 from http://www.edschools.org/pdf/educating_teachers_report.pdf.Google Scholar
  57. Liston, D. P. (2012). Reconsidering university-based teacher education [electronic version]. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 14(1–2), 15–20.Google Scholar
  58. Lu, J., Hallinger, P., & Showanasai, P. (2014). Simulation-based learning in management education: a longitudinal quasi-experimental evaluation of instructional effectiveness [electronic version]. Journal of Management Development, 33(3), 218–244. doi: 10.1108/JMD-11-2011-0115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lyons, J. (2012). Learning with technology: Theoretical foundations underpinning simulations in higher education. In M. Brown, M. Hartnett, & T. Stewart (Eds.), Future challenges, sustainable futures, proceedings Ascilite Wellington 2012, p. 582–586.Google Scholar
  60. Maier, F. H., & Grössler, A. (2000). What are we talking about? - a taxonomy of computer simulations to support learning [electronic version]. System Dynamics Review, 16(2), 135–148. doi: 10.1002/1099-1727(200022)16:2<135::AID-SDR193>3.0.CO;2-P.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. McLean, M., Brazil, V., & Johnson, P. (2014). How we “breathed life” into problem-based learning cases using a mobile application [electronic version]. Medical Teacher, 36(10), 849–852. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.886771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. McMaster University (2015). Standardized patient program. Retrieved March 10, 2015 from http://simulation.mcmaster.ca/spp.html.
  63. McPherson, R., Tyler-Wood, T., Mcenturff, A., & Peak, P. (2011). Using a computerized classroom simulation to prepare pre-service teachers [electronic version]. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 19(1), 93–110.Google Scholar
  64. Melnick, D. (1990). Computer-based clinical simulation: state of the art [electronic version]. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 13(1), 104–120. doi: 10.1177/016327879001300106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pappano, L. (2011). Using research to predict great teachers. Harvard Education Letter, 27(3). Retrieved February 15, 2015 from http://hepg.org/hel-home/issues/27_3/helarticle/using-research-to-predict-great-teachers_501.
  66. Pell, G., Fuller, R., Homer, M., & Roberts, T. (2010). How to measure the quality of the OSCE: a review of metrics – AMEE guide no. 49 [electronic version]. Medical Teacher, 32(10), 802–811. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.507716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? [electronic version]. Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15. doi: 10.3102/0013189X029001004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rayner, C., & Fluck, A. (2014). Pre-service teacher’s perceptions of simSchool as preparation for inclusive education: a pilot study [electronic version]. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 42(3), 212–227. doi: 10.1080/1359866X.2014.927825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sauvé, L., Renaud, L., Kaufman, D., & Marquis, J.-S. (2007). Distinguishing between games and simulations: a systematic review. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 10(3), 247–256.Google Scholar
  70. Schools, C. (2015). Teaching fellowship application process. Boston, MA: Citizen Schools. Retrieved February 10, 2015 from http://www.citizenschools.org/careers/teaching-fellowship/application-process/.Google Scholar
  71. Schroffel, A. (2012). The use of in-basket exercises for the recruitment of advanced social service workers [electronic version]. Public Personnel Management, 41(1), 151–160. doi: 10.1177/009102601204100108.Google Scholar
  72. Srinivasan, M., Wilkes, M., Stevenson, F., Nguyen, T., & Slavin, S. (2007). Comparing problem-based learning with case-based learning: effects of a major curricular shift at two institutions [electronic version]. Academic Medicine, 82(1), 74–82. doi: 10.1097/01.ACM.0000249963.93776.aa.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Stanford University (2014). Screening of international teaching assistants. Retrieved February 1, 2015 from https://web.stanford.edu/group/efs/tascreen.html.
  74. Stearns, J. M., Ronald, K., Greenlee, T. B., & Crespy, C. T. (2003). Contexts for communication: teaching expertise through case-based in-basket exercises [electronic version]. Journal of Education for Business, 78(4), 213–219. doi: 10.1080/08832320309598603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Stronge, J. H., Ward, T. J., & Grant, L. W. (2011). What makes good teachers good? a cross-case analysis of the connection between teacher effectiveness and student achievement [electronic version]. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(4), 339–355. doi: 10.1177/0022487111404241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sturpe, D. A., & Schaivone, K. A. (2014). A primer for objective structured teaching exercises [electronic version]. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 78(5), 104. doi: 10.5688/ajpe785104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Tambouris, E., Panopoulou, E., Tarabanis, K., Ryberg, T., Buus, L., Peristeras, V., et al. (2012). Enabling problem based learning through web 2.0 technologies: PBL 2.0 [electronic version]. Educational Technology and Society, 15(4), 238–251.Google Scholar
  78. Teach for America (2015). The full-day interview. Retrieved March 1, 2015 from https://www.teachforamerica.org/why-teach-for-america/how-to-apply/preparation-tips.
  79. Trowbridge, R. L., Snydman, L. K., Skolfield, J., Hafler, J., & Bing-You, R. G. (2011). A systematic review of the use and effectiveness of the objective structured teaching encounter [electronic version]. Medical Teacher, 33(11), 893–903. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.577463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wilson, S. M., Floden, R. F., & Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2001). Teacher preparation research: current knowledge, recommendations, and priorities for the future. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching Policy, University of Washington. Retrieved March 1, 2015 from https://depts.washington.edu/ctpmail/PDFs/TeacherPrep-WFFM-02-2001.pdf.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications & Technology 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationSimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada

Personalised recommendations