Advertisement

TechTrends

, Volume 60, Issue 2, pp 167–175 | Cite as

Design Guidelines for Graduate Program Social Media Use

  • Joshua M. Rosenberg
  • Colin A. Terry
  • John Bell
  • Virginia Hiltz
  • Tracy E. Russo
Original Paper

Abstract

Social media provides a promising platform for members of informal and formal educational communities to build community, collaborate, and support institutional goals such as student recruitment. Despite burgeoning research on the educational uses of social media, we are not aware of any to guide graduate program social media use. In order to contribute a framework for the use of social media platforms associated with graduate programs and to provide direction, guidance, and cohesion to a social media initiative began with our graduate program, we conducted a design-based research project. We describe the design guidelines that comprise the framework—establish why, establish how, be authentic, respect privacy, coordinate channels, and engage volunteers—and provide examples of each from our practice and references to prior research. We conclude with potential benefits and promising directions for future research and practice on graduate program social media use.

Keywords

Social media Design-based research Doctoral education 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the contributions of Spencer Greenhalgh, Rohit Mehta, William Cain, April Niemela, Yining Zhang, Holly Marich, and Brian Arnold, without whom the Educational Psychology and Educational Technology Social Media Council and this paper would not be possible. The authors are thankful to Mete Akcaoglu and Christine Greenhow for their feedback on an earlier version of this article and to Matthew Koehler, Leigh Graves Wolf, and Robin Dickson for their efforts establishing the Social Media Council.

References

  1. Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 1–14. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls1301_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnes, N. G., & Lescault, A. M. (2012). Social media adoption soars as higher-ed experiments and reevaluates its use of new communications tools. Retrieved from http://www.umassd.edu/cmr/studiesandresearch/socialmediaadoptionsoars/.
  3. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13. doi: 10.3102/0013189x032001009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. DiVall, M. V., & Kirwin, J. L. (2012). Using Facebook to facilitate course-related discussion between students and faculty members. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 76(2), 32. doi: 10.5688/ajpe76232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Duggan, M., & Smith, A (2013). Social media update 2013. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/2013/social-media-update/main-findings.aspx.
  6. Edelson, D. C. (2002). What we learn when we engage in design. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11, 105–121. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls1101_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”: social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143–1168. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Greenhow, C., & Robelia, E. (2009). Old communication, new literacies: social network sites as social learning resources. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 1130–1161. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01484.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hendrix, D., Chiarella, D., Hasman, L., Murphy, S., & Zacfron, M. L. (2009). Use of Facebook in academic health sciences libraries. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 97, 43–46. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.97.1.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kelly, A. E. (2003). Theme issue: research as design. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 3–4. doi: 10.3102/0013189x032001003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kim, H. N. (2008). The phenomenon of blogs and theoretical model of blog use in educational contexts. Computers & Education, 51, 1342–1345. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.12.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lai, C., Yang, J., Chen, F., Ho, C., & Chan, T. (2007). Affordances of mobile technologies for experiential learning: the interplay of technology and pedagogical practices. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 326–337. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00237.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Manago, A. M., Taylor, T., & Greenfield, P. M. (2012). Me and my 400 friends: the anatomy of college students’ Facebook networks, their communication patterns, and well-being. Developmental Psychology, 48, 369–380. doi: 10.1037/a0026338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2013). Is it a tool suitable for learning? A critical review of the literature on Facebook as a technology-enhanced learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29, 487–504. doi: 10.1111/jcal.12007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Moran, M., Seaman, J., & Tinti-Kane, H. (2011). Teaching, learning, and sharing: How today’s higher education faculty use social media. New York: Pearson Learning Solutions.Google Scholar
  16. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108, 1017–1054.Google Scholar
  17. Newton, C., Bainbridge, L., Ball, V., Baum, K. D., Bontje, P., Boyce, R. A., & Wagner, S. J. (2015). The Health Care Team Challenge: Developing an international interprofessional education research collaboration. Nurse Education Today, 35, 4–8.Google Scholar
  18. Penuel, W.R., & Frank, K. (2015). Modes of inquiry in educational psychology and the learning sciences. In L. Corno & E. M. Anderman (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (3rd ed., pp. 30-60).Google Scholar
  19. Penuel, W. R., & Spillane, J. P. (2014). Learning sciences and policy design and implementation: Key concepts and tools for implementation. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed., pp. 649–667). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pidaparthy, U. (2011). How colleges use, misuse social media to reach students. CNN Tech. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2011/10/20/tech/social-media/universities-social-media/.
  21. Sandoval, W. A., & Bell, P. (2004). Design-based research methods for studying learning in context: introduction. Educational Psychologist, 39, 199–201. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep3904_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schwartz, H. (2009). Facebook: the new classroom commons? The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/facebook-the-new-classroom/48575/.
  23. Shaltry, C., Henriksen, D., Wu, M. L., & Dickson, W. P. (2013). Situated learning with online portfolios, classroom websites and Facebook. TechTrends, 57(3), 20–25. doi: 10.1007/s11528-013-0658-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wallace, R. M. (2003). Online Learning in higher education: a review of research on interactions between teachers and students. Education, Communication and Information, 3, 241–280. doi: 10.1080/14636310303143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5–23. doi: 10.1007/bf02504682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications & Technology 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joshua M. Rosenberg
    • 1
  • Colin A. Terry
    • 1
  • John Bell
    • 1
  • Virginia Hiltz
    • 1
  • Tracy E. Russo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology, and Special EducationMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations