TechTrends

, Volume 59, Issue 4, pp 32–45

Teaching and Learning with Mobile Computing Devices: Case Study in K-12 Classrooms

  • Michael M. Grant
  • Suha Tamim
  • Dorian B. Brown
  • Joseph P. Sweeney
  • Fatima K. Ferguson
  • Lakavious B. Jones
Article

Abstract

While ownership of mobile computing devices, such as cellphones, smartphones, and tablet computers, has been rapid, the adoption of these devices in K-12 classrooms has been measured. Some schools and individual teachers have integrated mobile devices to support teaching and learning. The purpose of this qualitative research was to describe the early uses of mobile computing devices in these K-12 classrooms. With data from nine purposively selected teachers, participant descriptions were developed and five themes emerged that included (a) ownership and control impacted use of mobile computing devices; (b) administrators champion teachers’ uses of mobile computing devices especially for student accountability; (c) teachers use devices to enhance their curricula and as motivation for their students; (d) teachers receive and seek out rele vant professional development; and (e) technical issues were common, but support was available. Implications of these themes are also considered.

Keywords

mobile learning mobile computing devices K-12 education mobile devices in the classroom 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bazely, P. (2009). Analysing qualitative data: More than ‘identifying themes’. Malaysian Journal of Qualitative Research, 2, 6-22.Google Scholar
  2. Bogdan, R. C & Biklen, S. K. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (4th ed.). New York: Pearson.Google Scholar
  3. Cavus, N., Bicen, H., & Akcil, U. (2008, June ). The opinions of information technology students on using mobile learning. Paper presented at the International Conferences on Educational Sciences, Eastern Mediterranean University, Magosa, North Cyprus.Google Scholar
  4. Cheung, A. C., & Slavin, R. E. (2011, July). The effectiveness of educational technology applications for enhancing mathematics achievement in K–12 classrooms: A meta-analysis. The best evidence encyclopedia (ERE). Johns Hopkins University School of Education’s Center for Data-Driven Reform in Education (CDDRE). Retrieved from http:// www.bestevidence.org/word/tech_math_Sep_09_2011.pdf
  5. Clark, R.E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445-459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 124-130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crompton, H. (2013). A historical overview of mobile learning: Toward learner-centered education. In Z. L. Berge & L. Y. Muilenburg (Eds.), Handbook of mobile learning (pp. 3-14). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Edwards, M. A. (April, 2003). The lap of learning. School Administrator, 60, 10–12.Google Scholar
  9. Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and secondorder barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47-61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Farenga, S.J. & Joyce, B.A. (2001). Hardware versus brainware: Where are technology dollars being invested? Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(3), 313-319Google Scholar
  11. Ferlander, K. (2012, May 22). 21st-century technology in the classroom: ten elementary schools doing it right. OnlineSchools.com. Retrieved from http://www.onlineschools.com/blog/21st-century-technology-inthe-classroom-ten-elementary-schools-doing-it-right
  12. Fleischer, H. (2012). What is our current understanding of one-to-one computer projects: A systematic narrative research review. Educational Research Review, 7(2), 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Garet, M., Porter, A., Desimone, L., Briman, B., & Yoon, K. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Analysis of a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gikas, J. (2011). Understanding change: Implementing MCDs in higher education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Memphis, Memphis, TN.Google Scholar
  15. Gleason, B.J. (2012, March). The unlimited textbook - Schools in the age of the e-book. Paper presented at the International Conference on Technology and Business Management. Retrieved from http://www.ictbm.org/ictbm12/ICTBM12CD/pdf/D2018-done.pdf
  16. Grant, M. M. (2011, November 8-12). Definite and indefinite: A critical perspective on defining mobile learning and mobile learning environments. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communications & Technology, Jacksonville, FL.Google Scholar
  17. Grant, M.M. & Barbour, M.K. (2013). Mobile teaching and learning in the classroom and online: Case studies in K-12. In Z. Berge & L. Muilenburg (Eds.), Handbook of mobile learning (pp. 285–292). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Grant, M.M., Ross, S.M., Wang, W., & Potter, A. (2005). Computers on wheels (COWS): An alternative to ‘each one has one’. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(6), 1017-1034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Herrington, A., (2009). Incorporating mobile technologies within constructivist-based curriculum resources In J. Herrington, A. Herrington, J. Mantei, I. Olney, & B. Ferry (Eds.), New technologies, new pedagogies: Mobile learning in higher education (pp. 56-62). Wollongong: University of Wollongong. Retrieved from http://ro.uow.edu.au/
  20. Hew, K.F. & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223-252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hu, W. (2011, January 4). Math that moves: Schools embrace the iPad. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.pearsonschool.com/drm/2010/ipadpilot/NY_Times_iPad_story_1-4-11.pdf
  22. Johnson, L., Adams, S., and Cummins, M. (2012).NMC Horizon Report: 2012 K-12 Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium. Retrieved from http://nmc.org/pdf/2012-horizon-report-K12.pdf
  23. Katz, J. E. (2005). Mobile phones in educational settings. In K. Nyiri (Ed.), A sense of place: The global and the local in mobile communication (pp. 305-317). Vienna: Passagen Verlag.Google Scholar
  24. Keegan, D. (2005, October 25-28). The incorporation of mobile learning into mainstream education and training. Paper presented at mLearn 2005 – 4th World Conference on mLearning, Cape Town, South Africa. Retrieved January 6, 2012 from http://www.iamlearn.org/public/mlearn2005/www.mlearn.org.za/CD/papers/keegan1.pdf
  25. Kiger, D., Herro, D., & Prunty, D. (2012). Examining the influence of a mobile learning intervention on third grade math achievement. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(1), 61-82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lenhart, A. (2010). Teens, cell phones and texting: Text messaging becomes centerpiece communication. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1572/teens-cell-phones-text-messages
  27. Lenhart, A., Ling, R., Campbell, S. & Purcell, K. (2010). Teens and mobile phones. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Teens-and-Mobile-Phones.aspx
  28. Liu, T. C. (2007). Teaching in a wireless learning environment: A case study. Educational Technology & Society, 10 (1), 107-123. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/journals/10_1/11.pdf
  29. Liu, Y., Han, S., & Li, H. (2010). Understanding the factors driving m-learning adoption: A literature review. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 27(4), 210-226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lowther, D.L., Inan, F.A., Strahl, J.D., & Ross, S.M. (2008). Does technology integration “work” when key barriers are removed? Educational Media International, 45(3), 195–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Maniar, N., Bennett, E., Hand, S., & Allan, G. (2008). The effect of mobile phone screen size on video based learning. Journal of Software, 3(4), 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  33. Meyer, D.Z. & Avery, L.M. (2009). Excel as a qualitative data analysis tool. Field Methods 21(1), 91-112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Nair, A. (2006). Mobile phones and the Internet: Legal issues in the protection of children. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 20(1-2), 177–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. National Center for Educational Statistics. (2001). The digest of education statistics: 2001. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.Google Scholar
  37. Osmon, P. (2011a). Tablets are coming to a school near you. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 31(1), 115-120.Google Scholar
  38. Osmon, P. (2011b). Paperless classrooms: A networked tablet PC in front of every child. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 31(2), 55-60.Google Scholar
  39. Penuel, W., Fishman, B., Yamaguchi, R., & Gallagher, L. (2007). What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44(4), 921-958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Polly, D. & Hannafin, M.J. (2010). Reexamining technology’s role in learner-centered professional development. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(5), 557-571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Project Tomorrow. (2012). Mapping a personalized learning journey: K–12 students and parents connects the dots with digital learning. Irvine, CA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.tomorrow.org/speakup/pdfs/SU11_PersonalizedLearning_Students.pdf
  42. Rogers, E.M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  43. Roschelle, J., Pea, R., Hoadley, C., Gordin, D., & Means, B. (2000). Changing how and what children learn in school with computer-based technologies. The Future of Children, 10(2), 76-101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. (2007). A theory of learning for the mobile age. In R. Andrews and C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Elearning Research (221-247). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  45. Shuler, C. (2009) Pockets of potential: Using mobile technologies to promote children’s learning. New York: The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop.Google Scholar
  46. Silvernail, D. L. & Lane, D. M. M. (2004). The impact of Maine’s one-to-one laptop on middle school teachers and students: phase one summary evidence (Online): Maine Education Policy Research Institute, University of Southern Maine Office. Retrieved, from http://www.usm.maine.edu/cepare/pdf/mlti/MLTI%20Phase%20One%20Evaluation%20Report%201.pdf.
  47. Swan, K., Kratcoski, A., & van’t Hooft, M. (2007). Highly mobile devices, pedagogical possibilities and how teaching needs to be reconceptualized to realize them. Educational Technology Magazine: The Magazine for Managers of Change in Education, 47(3), 10-12.Google Scholar
  48. Thurmond, V. (2001). The point of triangulation. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(3), 254–256. Retrieved from http://www.ruralhealth.utas.edu.au/gr/resources/docs/the-point-of-triangulation.pdf.
  49. Traxler, J. (2007). Defining, discussing and evaluating mobile learning: The moving finger writes and having writ…The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(2), 1-11.Google Scholar
  50. Valk, J., Rashid, A.T., & Elder, L. (2010). Using mobile phones to improve educational outcomes: An analysis of evidence from Asia. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 11(1), 117- 140.Google Scholar
  51. Vavoula, G., Sharples, M., Rudman, P., Meek, J., & Lonsdale, P. (2009). Myartspace: Design and evaluation of support for learning with multimedia phones between classrooms and museums. Computers & Education, 53, 286-299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ward, L. & Parr, J.M. (2010). Revisiting and reframing use: Implications for the integration of ICT. Computers & Education, 54(1), 113–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael M. Grant
    • 1
  • Suha Tamim
    • 2
  • Dorian B. Brown
    • 2
  • Joseph P. Sweeney
    • 3
  • Fatima K. Ferguson
    • 2
  • Lakavious B. Jones
    • 2
  1. 1.University of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.The University of MemphisMemphisUSA
  3. 3.The University of MississippiOxfordUSA

Personalised recommendations