Lessons from personal photography: The digital disruption of selectivity and reflection
- First Online:
- 215 Downloads
Recent technological, cultural and economic factors have shifted the balance between recalling and reconstructing internalised information and accessing externalised information. While digital artefacts constitute an enormous and valuable set of resources, human engagement and reflection are important to the meaningful synthesis and application of knowledge in specific contexts. This is particularly clear in the case of personal photography, where recordings of life events are used to cue not just the facts and details of what happened, but associated subjective, sensory and emotional memory. This article draws on research into personal photography to highlight contrasting drivers of engagement and detachment with digital media, and applies these to students’ use of digital media within education. The posing of complex, situated problems that require the use of technology to construct creative, collaborative, multimodal projects is suggested as a way of cultivating social obligation and encouraging selectivity, engagement and reflection with digital media.
Keywordsdigital media distributed cognition memory multimodal assessment photography reflection selectivity
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2008). Writing in multimodal texts: A social semiotic account of designs for learning. Written Communication, 25(2), 166–195. dGoogle Scholar
- Chalfen, R. (1987) Snapshot versions of life. Wisconson: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
- Clark, A. (2003). Natural-born cyborgs. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
- Doidge, N. (2007). The Brain that changes itself: Stories of personal triumph from the frontiers of brain science. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Erasmus, D. (2001). The adages of Erasmus. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
- Fawns, T. (2013). Blended memory: The changing balance of technologically-mediated semantic and episodic memory. In T. Fawns (Ed.), Memory and meaning: Digital differences (pp. 75-98). Oxford: Inter-Disciplinary Press.Google Scholar
- Gibbs, G. (1988). Learning by doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods. London: Further Education Unit.Google Scholar
- Harris, J. (2011). m ss ng p eces [Video file]. Retrieved from http://vimeo.com/20729065.
- Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Kress, G. (2009). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge. Google Scholar
- Moon, J. (2001). PDP working paper 4: Reflection in Higher Education learning. Retrieved from http://www.york.ac.uk/admin/hr/researcher-development/students/resources/pgwt/reflectivepractice.pdf.
- Musello, C. (1979) Family photography. In J. Wagner (Ed.), Images of information (pp. 101–18). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Norman, D. (1993). Things that make us smart: Defending human attributes in the age of the machine. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing.Google Scholar
- O’Shea, C. & Fawns, T. (2014). Disruptions and dialogues: Supporting collaborative connoisseurship in digital environments. In C. Kreber, C. Anderson, N. Entwistle, & J. McArthur (Eds.), Advances and innovations in university assessment and feedback (pp. 259-273). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
- Papert, S. & Harel, I. (1991) Situating constructionism. In I. Harel, & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 1-11). Westport, USA: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
- Ross, J. (2012). The spectacle and the placeholder: Digital futures for reflective practices in higher education. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Networked Learning. Google Scholar
- Rowntree, D. (1987). Assessing students: How shall we know them? London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
- Roy, D. (2011). Deb Roy: The birth of a word [Video file]. Retrieved from http://www.ted.com/talks/deb_roy_the_birth_of_a_word.html.
- Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Slater, D. (1995). Domestic photography and digital culture. In M. Lister (Ed.), The photographic image in digital culture (pp. 129–146). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Sorapure, M., Takayoshi, P., Zoetewey, M., Staggers, J., & Yancey, K. (2005). Between modes: Assessing student new media compositions. Kairos 10(2), 1–15.Google Scholar
- Whittaker, S., Kalnikaitė, V., Petrelli, D., Sellen, A. Villar, N., Bergman, O., Clough, P., & Brockmeier, J. (2012). Socio-technical lifelogging: Deriving design principles for a future proof digital past. Human–Computer Interaction, (April), 37–62.Google Scholar