Advertisement

TechTrends

, Volume 58, Issue 5, pp 62–69 | Cite as

Using Nearpod in elementary guided reading groups

  • Stacy Delacruz
Article

Abstract

A student teacher placed at a school with a high English Language Learner population used mini iPads, and an application called Nearpod, during guided reading instruction. Groups of students in a fourth grade classroom used this application. The students and the teacher were interviewed to determine the benefits and challenges of this approach. An analysis of data revealed that all of the students found this type of guided reading to be beneficial and motivating in learning the content presented through the application. Students also explained how they could transfer the knowledge gained into their independent work. The teacher discussed how it improved organization in a guided reading group, but how careful consideration and planning must be done to ensure the technology will work properly during guided reading. It is recommended that the Nearpod application be used in guided reading lessons because of its user-friendliness, ability to engage students, and monitor their progress.

Keywords

educational technology English Language Learners guided reading iPads Nearpod tablet computers 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Avalos, M. A., Plasencia, A., Chavez, C., & Rascon, J. (2007). Modified guided reading: Gateway to English as a second language and literacy learning. The Reading Teacher, 61(4), 318-329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burke, L. A., & James, K. E. (2008). Powerpointbased lectures in business education: An empirical investigation of student-perceived novelty and effectiveness. Business Communication Quarterly, 71(3), 277-296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brien, D. O., & Voss, S. (2011). Reading multimodally: What is afforded? Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 55(1), 75-78.Google Scholar
  4. Chadband, E. (2012). Should schools embrace “Bring your own device”? NEA Today. Retrieved from: http://neatoday.org/2012/07/19/should-schools-embracebring-your-own-device/
  5. El Khoury, R. M., & Mattar, D. M. (2012). PowerPoint in accounting classrooms: Constructive or deconstructive? International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(10), 240-259.Google Scholar
  6. Emerson, R. (2013). Nearpod Gets 1.5M From NewSchools, Salesforce Exec to Bring its Mobile “Powerpoint on Steroids” to Classrooms. Aol Tech. Retrieved from; http://techcrunch.com/2013/03/21/nearpod-gets-1-5m-from-newschools-salesforce-exec-tobring-its-mobile-powerpoint-on-steroidsinto-the-classroom/
  7. Fawson, P. C., & Reutzel, R. D. (2000). But I only have a basal: Implementing guided reading in the early grades. The Reading Teacher, 54(1), 84-97.Google Scholar
  8. Fountas, I. C., & Pinnell, G. S. (1996). Guided reading: Good First Teaching for all Children. Portsmouth, NH: HeinemannGoogle Scholar
  9. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldine.Google Scholar
  10. Hill, R. (2011). Mobile digital devices. Teacher Librarian, 39(1), 22-26.Google Scholar
  11. Hsu, I. C., & Geist, E. A. (2012). A qualitative examination of social interaction during cooperative computer activities. Education, 133(2), 383-390.Google Scholar
  12. Iaquinta, A. (2006). Guided reading: A research-based response to the challenges of early reading instruction. Early Childhood Education Journal, 33(6), 413-418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Karchmer-Klein, R., & Shinas, V. H. (2012). Principles for supporting new literacies in your classroom. The Reading Teacher, 65(5), 288-293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  15. Larson, L. C. (2010). Digital readers: The next chapter in e-book reading and response. The Reading Teacher, 64(1), 15-22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mertens, D. M. (2010). Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. McClanahan, B., Williams, K., Kennedy, E., & Tate, S. (2012). How use of an iPad facilitated reading improvement. TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 56(3), 20-28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mantei, E. J. (2000). Using internet class notes and Powerpoint in the physical geography lecture: Comparing the success of computer technology with traditional teaching techniques. Journal of College Science Teaching, 29, 301-205.Google Scholar
  19. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nielson (2012). American families see tablets as playmate, teacher, and babysitter. Retrieved from: http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/newswire/2012/american-familiessee-tablets-as-playmate-teacher-andbabysitter.html
  21. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On The Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Readinga-z (2013). Level O Book Features. Retrieved from: http://www.readinga-z.com/book/guided-reading.php?level=o&context=guided-reading
  23. Robinson, S., & Stubberud, H. A. (2012). Student preferences for educational materials: Old meets new. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal 16(1), 367-379.Google Scholar
  24. Schirmer, B. R., & Schaffer, L. (2010). Guided reading approach: Teaching reading to students who are deaf and others who struggle. Teaching Exceptional Children, 42(5), 52-58.Google Scholar
  25. Schoen, S. (2007). Action research: A developmental model of professional socialization. The ClearingHouse, 80(5), 211-216.Google Scholar
  26. Schwab, K. (2013). Nearpod. Dance Teacher, 35(2), 22.Google Scholar
  27. Siegle, D. (2012). Embracing e-books: Increasing students’ motivation to read and write. Gifted Child Today, 35(2), 137-143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Suits, B. (2003). Guided reading and secondlanguage learners. Multicultural Education, 11(2), 27-34.Google Scholar
  29. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.Google Scholar
  30. Weber, C., & Cavanaugh, T. W. (2006). Promoting reading: Using ebooks with gifted and advanced readers. Gifted Child Today, 29(4), 56-63.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kennesaw State UniversityKennesawUSA

Personalised recommendations