, Volume 58, Issue 2, pp 93–98 | Cite as

Social Networking Sites, Literacy, and the Authentic Identity Problem

  • Royce Kimmons


Current interest in social media for educational purposes has led many to consider the importance of literacy development in online spaces (e.g., new media literacies, digital literacies, etc.). Relying heavily upon New Literacy Studies (NLS) as a base, these approaches treat literacy expansively to include socio-cultural factors beyond mere skill acquisition and behavior modification. Within such expansive views, we need to better understand the relationship between identity and social participation within online spaces. In particular, we need to better understand issues of identity and literacy within social networking sites (SNS) and consider how embedded values of such media influence social participation and identity construction within them. A problem exists, however, because most prominent SNS rely upon an authentic identity model of participation that is interpreted in an essentialist manner and is contradictory to NLS views of identity. In this paper, I highlight the complexities of this issue, identify the authentic identity problem, and offer some beginning remarks for working through this problem of developing literacy in a medium while utilizing a model that may contradict the medium’s assumptions.


Social Medium Social Networking Site Social Participation Identity Construction Digital Literacy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Brown, A. (2011). Relationships, community, and identity in the new virtual society. Futurist, 45(2), 29-34.Google Scholar
  2. Cazden, C., Cope, B., Fairclough, N., Gee, J., Kalantzis, M., Kress, G., Nakata, M. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 60-92.Google Scholar
  3. Coiro, J., Knobel, M., Lankshear, C., & Leu, D. (2008). Handbook of Research on New Literacies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Gee, J. (1999). An introduction to Discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar
  5. Gilpin, D. (2010). Working the Twittersphere: Microblogging as professional identity construction. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 232-250). Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Greenhow, C., & Robelia, B. (2009). Informal learning and identity formation in online social networks. Learning, Media & Technology, 119-140.Google Scholar
  7. Ha, K. C. (2011, July 29). D.C. teacher fired for “Mr. Teachbad” blog, he says. Retrieved October 29, 2011, from TBD:
  8. Heath, S. (1982). Protean shapes in literacy events: Ever-shifting oral and literate traditions. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy (pp. 91-117). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  9. Hoffman, C. (2010, September 15). The battle for Facebook. Rolling Stone Magazine. Google Scholar
  10. Ivanic, R. (1998). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jenkins, H. (2007). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. MIT Press.Google Scholar
  12. Jenkins, H., Clinton, K., Purushotma, R., Robison, A., & Weigel, M. (2007). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. MacArthur Foundation.Google Scholar
  13. Jones, J. (2011). Social media and social movements. International Socialism, 130.Google Scholar
  14. Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2008). Digital literacies. Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar
  15. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2003). New literacies. Open University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Lewis, A. (2012, April 16). UCLA Professors Say eHarmony Is Unscientific and Its Customers Are ‘Duped.’ Here’s Why. LA Weekly. Google Scholar
  17. Lindner, C. (2011, May 26). Teacher fired over ‘friending’. Retrieved October 29, 2011, from
  18. Marwick, A., & Boyd, D. (2010). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13, 114133.Google Scholar
  19. Mazer, J., Murphy, R., & Simonds, C. (2009). The effects of teacher self-disclosure via Facebook on teacher credibility. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 175-183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Papacharissi, Z. (2010). A networked self: Identity, community and culture on social network sites. Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Poole, C. (2011, October 17). Self expression through social media. Retrieved October 29, 2011, from Web 2.0 Summit:
  22. Stern, L. A., & Taylor, K. (2007). Social networking on facebook. Journal of the Communication, Speech & Theatre Association of North Dakota, 20, 9-20.Google Scholar
  23. Stross, R. (2007, December 30). How to lose your job on your own time. Retrieved October 29, 2011, from The New York Times:
  24. Wertsch, J. (1993). Voices of the mind: Sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of IdahoIdahoUSA

Personalised recommendations