# Improving college students’ attitudes toward mathematics

- 579 Downloads
- 6 Citations

## Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of a treatment designed to improve college algebra students’ attitudes toward mathematics. Keller’s ARCS motivational design model was used as a guiding framework for the development of a motivational video, which was delivered online. The application of motivational design to improve mathematics attitudes in an online environment extends the use of motivational design. A pretest-posttest control group design was used to test the effectiveness of the treatment. The participants in this study were 43 students enrolled in a college algebra course offered at a large state university in the mid-Atlantic region of the United States. Statistically significant results were observed for improved attitudes toward mathematics.

## Keywords

Mathematics Attitude Motivational Design College Algebra## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- Aiken, L. R. J. (1976). Update on attitudes and other affective variables in learning mathematics.
*Review of Educational Research, 46*(2), 293–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Alkhateeb, H. M., & Mji, A. (2005). Attitudes of university precalculus students toward mathematics.
*Psychological Reports, 96*(2), 257–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Bleyer, D., Pedersen, K., & Elmore, P. (1981). Mathematics: A critical filter for career choices.
*Journal of Career Development, 8*(1), 46–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Chamberlin, S.A. (2010). A review of instruments created to assess affect in mathematics.
*Journal of Mathematics Education, 3*(1), 167–182.Google Scholar - Dogbey, G. Y. (2010).
*Attitudes of community college developmental students toward mathematics and their perception of mathematically intensive careers.*Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Ohio University, Athens, OH.Google Scholar - Evans, B. (2007). Student attitudes, conceptions, and achievement in introductory undergraduate college statistics.
*The Mathematics Educator, 17*(2), 24–30.Google Scholar - Fennema, E., & Peterson, P.L. (1985). Autonomous learning behavior: A possible explanation of sex-related differences in mathematics.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 16*(3), 309–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Fennema, E., & Sherman, J. A. (1976). Fennema-Sherman mathematics attitudes scales: Instruments designed to measure attitudes towards the learning of mathematics by males and females.
*JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 6*(1), 31–32.Google Scholar - Galbraith, P., & Haines, C. (1998). Disentangling the nexus: Attitudes to mathematics and technology in a computer learning environment.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 36*(3), 275–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Hemmings, B., & Kay, R. (2010). Prior achievement, effort, and mathematics attitude as predictors of current achievement.
*Australian Educational Researcher, 37*(2), 41–58. Retrieved from http://0-www.eric.ed.gov.novacat.nova.edu/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ907917 - House, J. D. (1995). Student motivation, previous instructional experience, and prior achievement as predictors of performance in college mathematics.
*International Journal of Instructional Media, 22*(2), 157–167.Google Scholar - Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design.
*Journal of Instructional Development, 10*(3), 2–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Keller, J. M., & Subhiyah, R. (1993). Manual for the Course Interest Survey (CIS). Florida State University.Google Scholar
- Kim, C., & Keller, J. M. (2007). Effects of motivational and volitional email messages (MVEM) with personal messages on undergraduate students’ motivation, study habits and achievement.
*British Journal of Educational Technology, 39*(1), 36–51.Google Scholar - Kim, C., & Keller, J. M. (2010). Motivation, volition, and belief change strategies to improve mathematics learning.
*Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26*(5), 407–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Kim, C., & Keller, J. M. (2011). Towards technology integration: The impact of motivational and volitional email messages.
*Educational Technology Research and Development, 59*(1), 91–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Kim. C., & Pekrun, R. (in press). Emotions and motivation in learning and performance. Chapter to appear in the
*Handbook for Research on Educational Communications and Technology.*Google Scholar - Lent, R. W., Lopez, F. G., & Bieschke, K. J. (1991). Mathematics self-efficacy: Sources and relation to science-based career choice.
*Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38*(4), 424–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Ma, X., & Kishor, N. (1997). Assessing the relationship between attitude toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics: A meta-analysis.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28*(1), 26–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Ma, X., & Willms, J. D. (1999). Dropping out of advanced mathematics: How much do students and schools contribute to the problem?
*Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21*(4), 365–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Mathematics Association of America, Curriculum Renewal Across the First Two Years, subcommittee of the Committee on the Underraduate Program in Mathematics (2007).
*CRAFTY guidelines for college algebra*. Retrieved February 6, 2009, from http://www.maa.org/cupm/crafty - Mayer, R. E. (2001).
*Multimedia learning*. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Mayes, R., Chase, P. N., & Walker, V. L. (2008). Supplemental practice and diagnostic assessment in an applied college algebra course.
*Journal of College Reading and Learning, 38*(2), 7–30.Google Scholar - McLeod, D.B. (1988). Affective issues in mathematical problem solving: Some theoretical considerations.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19*(2), 134–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008).
*Foundations for success: The final report of the national mathematics advisory panel*. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/mathpanel/report/final-report.pdf. - Neale, D. C. (1969). The role of attitudes in learning mathematics.
*Arithmetic Teacher, 16*, 631–640.Google Scholar - Pedhazur, E. J., & Schmelkin, L. P. (1991).
*Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach*. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar - Song. S.H., & Keller, J.M. (2001). Effectiveness of motivationally adaptive computer-assisted instruction on the dynamic aspects of motivation.
*Educational Technology Research & Development, 49*(2), 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Twigg, C. A. (2003). Improving learning and reducing costs: New models for online learning.
*EDUCAUSE Review*(September/October), 28–38.Google Scholar - Wadsworth, L. M., Husman, J., Duggan, M. A., & Pennington, M. N. (2007). Online mathematics achievement: Effects of learning strategies and self-efficacy.
*Journal of Developmental Education, 30*(3), 6–14.Google Scholar - Zan, R., & Di Martino, P. (2007). Attitude toward mathematics: Overcoming the positive/negative dichotomy.
*The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, Monograph 3*, 157–168.Google Scholar