Advertisement

TechTrends

, Volume 57, Issue 3, pp 47–53 | Cite as

Introducing the First Hybrid Doctoral Program in Educational Technology

  • Matthew J. Koehler
  • Andrea L. Zellner
  • Cary J. Roseth
  • Robin K. Dickson
  • W. Patrick Dickson
  • John Bell
Rethinking the Doctorate:

Abstract

In 2010 Michigan State University launched the first hybrid doctoral program in Educational Technology. This 5-year program blends face-to-face and online components to engage experienced, working education professionals in doctoral study. In this paper, we describe the design and evolution of the program as well as the response from students. We outline key programmatic challenges and opportunities in offering a hybrid doctoral program side by side with an existing face-to-face program. We conclude with two examples of the hybrid doctoral program in action (redesigning coursework and virtual talks) to demonstrate how we confronted these challenges and opportunities in the design of the program.

Keywords

hybrid learning online learning e-learning higher education doctoral education 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atwell, R. H. (1996). Doctoral education must match the nation’s needs and the realities of the marketplace. Chronicle of Higher Education, 43(14).Google Scholar
  2. Barnett, M., Harwood, W., Keating, T., & Saam, J. (2010). Using emerging technologies to help bridge the gap between university theory and classroom practice: Challenges and successes. School Science and Mathematics, 102(6), 299–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Flanagan, L., & Jacobsen, M. (2003). Technology leadership for the twenty-first century principal. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(2), 124–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kezar, A. (2000). Understanding the research-to- practice gap: A national study of researchers’ and practitioners’ perspectives. New Directions for Higher Education, 2000 (110), 9–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. The Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Roblyer, M. D., & Knezek, G. (2003). New millennium research for educational technology: A call for a national research agenda. Journal of research on Technology in Education, 36(1), 60–71.Google Scholar
  7. Rust, F. (2009). Teacher research and the problem of practice. The Teachers College Record, 111(8), 1882–1893.Google Scholar
  8. Shulman, L. S., Golde, C. M., Bueschel, A. C., & Garabedian, K. J. (2006). Reclaiming education’s doctorates: A critique and a proposal. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthew J. Koehler
    • 1
  • Andrea L. Zellner
    • 1
  • Cary J. Roseth
    • 1
  • Robin K. Dickson
    • 1
  • W. Patrick Dickson
    • 1
  • John Bell
    • 1
  1. 1.Michigan State UniversityMichiganUSA

Personalised recommendations