, Volume 56, Issue 3, pp 20–28 | Cite as

A Breakthrough for Josh: How Use of an iPad Facilitated Reading Improvement

  • Barbara McClanahan
  • Kristen Williams
  • Ed Kennedy
  • Susan Tate


As part of a diagnosis and tutoring project in an elementary education reading course, a pre-service teacher was encouraged to use an iPad as the vehicle for intervention strategies with a fifth grade struggling reader with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. The device not only helped the student focus attention, it facilitated his becoming much more metacognitive in his reading. Comparisons of pre- and post-assessments showed that the student had gained one year’s growth in reading within a sixweeks time period. The student also gained in confidence and sense of being in control of his learning. While generalizations to other struggling readers with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder cannot be made, the success this student experienced suggests that the use of this device is worth serious consideration and research in similar contexts.


ADHD eBooks eReaders intervention iPad reading strategies struggling readers tablet computers educational technology tutoring 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allen, R. (2011, February). Can mobile devices transform education? Education Update, 53(2), 2, 67. Google Scholar
  2. Ash, K. (2011, February 4). Calif. district pushes digitaltext initiative forward. Education Week Digital Directions. Retrieved February 9, 2011, from
  3. Balajthy, E. (2006). Using text-to-speech software with struggling readers. In Sampson, M. B., Szabo., S., Falk-Ross, F., Foote, M. F., & Linder, P. E. (Eds.) College Reading Association Yearbook 28, (pp. 364-370). Retrieved from
  4. Beam, A. P. (2009). Standards-based differentiation: Identifying the concept of multiple intelligence for use with students with disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 5(4), 213. Google Scholar
  5. Carter, K. (1993). The place of story in the study of teaching and teacher education. Educational Researcher, 22(1), 5–12, 18. Retrieved from
  6. Cavanaugh, T. (2002). EBooks and accommodations: Is this the future of print accommodation? Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(2), 5661. Retrieved from
  7. Chalmers, L. (1991). Classsroom modifications for the mainstreamed student with mild handicaps. Intervention in School and Clinic, 17(1), 40–42, 51. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chunzhen, X., Reid, R., & Steckelberg, A. (2002). Technology Applications for Children with ADHD: Assessing the Empirical Support. Education & Treatment of Children, 25. 224–248. Retrieved from
  9. DuPaul, G. J. (1991). Attention deficithyperactivity disorder: Classroom intervention strategies School Psychology International, 12, 85–94. doi:  10.1177/0143034391121007 Google Scholar
  10. Evans, S, W., Axelrod, J., & Langberg, J. M. (2004). Efficacy of a school-based treatment program for middle school youth with ADHD. Behavior Modification, 28, 528–547. doi:  10.1177/0145445503259504 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Evans, S. W., Pelham, W. E., and Grudberg, M. V. (1995). The efficacy of note taking to improve behavior and comprehension of adolescents with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Exceptionality, 5, 1–17. Retrieved from
  12. Fenstermacher, K., Olympia, D., & Sheridan, S. (2006). Effectiveness of a computer–facilitated, interactive social skills training program for boys with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. School Psychology Quarterly, 21(2), 197–224. Retrieved from
  13. Ferrance, E. (2000). Action research. Providence, RI: LAB at Brown University. Retrieved from
  14. Ferriter, W. (2010). E-readers: Get ready for the revolution. Educational Leadership, 68(3), 84–85.Google Scholar
  15. Gillet, J.W., Temple, C., & Crawford, A. N. (2008). Understanding reading problems: Assessment and instruction (7th ed.) New York : Pearson Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  16. Hasselbring, T. S., & Goin, L. I. (2004). Literacy instruction for older struggling readers: What is the role of technology? Reading & Writing Quarterly, 20, 123–144. doi: 10.1080/10573560490262073 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Horney, M., & Anderson-Inman, L. (1999). Supported text in electronic reading environments. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 15, 127–168. Retrieved from
  18. Horton, S. V., Lovitt, T. C., Givens, A., & Nelson, R. (1989). Teaching social studies to high school students with academic handicaps in a mainstreamed setting: Effects of a computerized study guide. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 102–107. Retrieved from Google Scholar
  19. Houghton, S., Milner, N., West, J., Douglas, G., Lawrence, V., Whiting, K., & … Durkin, K. (2004). Motor control and sequencing of boys with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) during computer game play. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1), 21–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2004.00365.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Larson, L. C. (2010). Digital readers: The next chapter in eBook reading and response. The Reading Teacher, 64, 15–22. doi: 10.1598/RT.64.1.2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J. L., & Cammack, D. W. (2004). Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from the Internet and other information and communication technologies. In R. B. Ruddell & N. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 1570-1613). Newark, DE: International Reading Association. Retrieved from
  22. Ludlow, B. (2010). The future of reading. Teaching Exceptional Children, 43(1), 4. Retrieved from
  23. Mills, G. E. (2000). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.Google Scholar
  24. Moody, A. (2010). Using electronic books in the classroom to enhance emergent literacy skills in young children. Journal of Literacy and Technology, 11(4), 22–52. Retrieved from Google Scholar
  25. MTA Cooperative Group. (1999a). A 14-month randomized clinical trial of treatment strategies for Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry, 56, 1073–1086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. MTA Cooperative Group. (1999b). Moderators and mediators of treatment response for children with Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry, 56, 1088–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. MTA Cooperative Group (2004a). National Institute of Mental Health Multimodal Treatment Study of ADHD follow-up: 24-month outcomes of treatment strategies for Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Pediatrics, 13, 754–761. Retrieved from
  28. MTA Cooperative Group (2004b). National Institute of Mental Health Multimodal Treatment Study of ADHD follow-up: Changes in effectiveness and growth after the end of treatment. Pediatrics, 13, 762–769. Retrieved from
  29. Newton, J. S., Ard, W. R. Jr., & Horner, R. H. (1993). Validating predicted activity preferences of individuals with severe disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 239–245. Retrieved from Google Scholar
  30. Noffke, S. (1997). Professional, personal, and political dimensions of action research. Review of Research in Education, 22, 305–343. Retrieved from
  31. Nowacek, E. J., & Mamlin, N. (2007). General education teachers and students with ADHD: What modifications are made? Preventing School Failure, 51(3), 2835. Retrieved from
  32. Raggi, V. L., & Chronis, A. M. (2006). Interventions to address the academic impairment of children and adolescents with ADHD. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 9, 85–111. doi: 10.1007/s10567-006-0006-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rhodes, J. A., & Milby, T. M. (2007). Teachercreated electronic books: Integrating technology to support readers with disabilities. The Reading Teacher, 61, 255–259. Retrieved from
  34. Sherman, J., Rasmussen, C., & Baydala, L. (2008). The impact of teacher factors on achievement and behavioural outcomes of children with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): a review of the literature. Educational Research, 50, 347–360. doi: 10.1080/00131880802499803 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Smith, S. J., & Okolo, C. (2010). Response to Intervention and evidence-based practices: Where does technology fit? Learning Disability Quarterly 33, 257–272. Retrieved from
  36. Tatum, K. (2010, August 30.) 21st Century Classroom: Sylvester (pseudonym). Oklahoma News Report, Oklahoma Educational Television Authority.
  37. Vaughan, J., & Estes, T. (1986). Reading and reasoning beyond the primary grades. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  38. Zentall, S. (1975). Optimal stimulation as theoretical basis of hyperactivity. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 45, 549–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara McClanahan
    • 1
  • Kristen Williams
    • 1
  • Ed Kennedy
    • 2
  • Susan Tate
    • 3
  1. 1.Southeastern Oklahoma State UniversityOklahomaUSA
  2. 2.Grandview Public SchoolGrandviewUSA
  3. 3.Swink Public School, OKOklahomaUSA

Personalised recommendations