, Volume 54, Issue 6, pp 20–28 | Cite as

A Faculty Development Program for Nurse Educators Learning to Teach Online

  • By Debra Lee, Trena M. Paulus, Iryna Loboda, Gina Phipps, Tami H. Wyatt, Carole R. Myers, Sandra J. Mixer
The Instructional Design Portfolio


As the College of Nursing at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville prepared to move their graduate programs online, a nursing faculty grass-roots movement led to the implementation of a faculty development program. This instructional design portfolio describes the design, development, implementation, and evaluation of this program, with the goal of identifying best practices in the design of programs for learning to teach online.

These include understanding the importance of just-in-time learning, developing the ability to meet diverse needs, defining workshop expectations and workload requirements, increased integration of technology and pedagogy training, and the importance of modeling.


distance education facilitation faculty development instructional design nursing education online learning teacher training technology training 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Caffarella, R. S. & Zinn, L. F. (1999). Professional development for faculty: A conceptual framework of barriers and supports. Innovative Higher Education, 23(4), 241–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cennamo, K. & Kalk, D. (2005). Real world instructional design. Toronto, Canada: Wadsworth Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  3. Collison, G., Elbaum, B., Haavind, S., & Tinker, R. (2000). Facilitating online learning: Effective strategies for moderators. Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A., & O’Malley, C. (1996). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In E. Spada & P. Reiman (Eds.) Learning in humans and machine: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 189–211). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  5. Feist, L. (2003). Removing barriers to professional development. Technology Horizons in Education (T.H.E.) Journal 30(11). Available online at:
  6. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical thinking in a community of inquiry. Internet and Higher Education, 2(2), 87–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Higdon, J. & Topaz, C. (2009). Blogs and wikis as instructional tools: A social software adaptation of just-in-time teaching. College Teaching 57(2), 105–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(3), 335–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Koehler, M., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers & Education, 49(3), 740–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  11. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Mainemelis, C., Boyatzis, R. E., & Kolb, D. A. (2002). Learning styles and adaptive flexibility: Testing experiential learning theory. Management Learning, 33(1), 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mezirow, J., & Associates. (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  14. Mishra, P. & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Molenda, M. (2003). In search of the elusive ADDIE model. Performance Improvement, 42(5), 34–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Novak, G. M., Patterson, E. T., Garvin, A. D., & Christianson, W. (1999). Just-in-time teaching: Blending active learning with Web technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  17. Rock, M., Gregg, M., Ellis, E., & Gable, R. (2008). REACH: A framework for differentiating classroom instruction. Preventing School Failure, 52(2), 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sherer, P. D., Shea, T. P., & Kristensen, E. (2003). Online communities of practice: A catalyst for faculty development. Innovative Higher Education 27(3), 183–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Smolen, D. (1996). Constraints that nursing program administrators encounter in promoting faculty change and development. Journal of Professional Nursing 12(2), 91–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). Mapping a route toward a differentiated instruction. Educational Leadership, 57(1), 12–16.Google Scholar
  21. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Webb, N. M. (1982). Student interaction and learning in small groups. Review of Educational Research, 52(3), 421–445.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • By Debra Lee, Trena M. Paulus, Iryna Loboda, Gina Phipps, Tami H. Wyatt, Carole R. Myers, Sandra J. Mixer

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations