, Volume 54, Issue 5, pp 62–68 | Cite as

Using Blogs to Identify Misconceptions in a Large Undergraduate Nutrition Course

  • Trena Paulus and Marsha Spence
The Instructional Design Portfolio


We describe two iterations of the design, development, implementation and evaluation of small online activity and reflection blogging groups into a large undergraduate lecture course in nutrition. Our goal was to promote student learning and conceptual change through reflection and interaction in blog conversations. We found the blog conversations to be highly useful to the instructors as a source of data on student understandings and misconceptions of course topics. These misconceptions could then be addressed with further instruction. We found that, even with initial training, graduate teaching assistants needed significant guidance in facilitation strategies and that finding the ideal balance between structure and autonomy is a design challenge.


Instructional Design Blogging 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Blackburn, G.L. (2005). Teaching, learning, doing: Best practices in education. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 82, 218s–221s.Google Scholar
  2. Bouldin, A.S., Holmes, E.R. & Fortenberry, M.L. (2006). “Blogging” about course concepts: Using technology for reflective journaling in a communications class. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 70(4), article 84. Retrieved from
  3. Boulous, M., Maramba, I., & Wheeler, S. (2006). Wikis, blogs and podcasts: a new generation of Web-based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice and education. BMC Medical Education 6. Retrieved from
  4. Bransford, J., Brophy, S. & Williams, S. (2000). When computer technologies meet the learning sciences: Issues and opportunities. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 21(1), 59–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L. & Cocking, R.R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. National Research Council. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brescia, W.F., Swartz, J., Pearman, C., Balkin, R., & Williams, D. (2004). Peer teaching in web based threaded discussions. Journal of Interactive Online Learning 3(2). Retrieved from
  7. Carew, L. B., & Chamberlain, V. M. (1997). Evaluation of a computer-assisted instructional component in a college-level nutrition course. Journal of Nutrition Education, 29(6), 327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deng, L. & Yuen, A.H.K. (2009). Blogs in higher education: Implementation and issues. TechTrends 53(3), 95–98.Google Scholar
  9. Ebner, M. & Maurer, H. (2007). Blogging in higher education. Proceedings of E-Learn 2007. Quebec City, Canada, pp. 767–774.Google Scholar
  10. Ertmer, P. A, Richardson, J. C., Belland, B., Camin, D., Connolly, P., Coulthard, G. et. al. (2007). Using peer feedback to enhance the quality of student online postings: An exploratory study. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(2), article 4. Retrieved from
  11. Fox, M.A. & Hackerman, N. (2003). Evaluating and improving undergraduate teaching in science, technology, engineering and math. National Research Council. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  12. Francom, G., Bybee, D., Wolfersberger, M. & Merrill, M.D. (2009). Biology 100: A taskcentered, peer-interactive redesign. Tech-Trends 53(3), 35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Henry, C. J., & Garcia, A. C. (1999). Teaching nutrition to a multidisciplinary classroom: Use of small-group discussions. Journal of Nutrition Education, 31(5), 283B.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Knous, B. L. (2000). Outcomes associated with e-mail delivery of a general nutrition course. Journal of Nutrition Education, 32(3), 169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Laraia, B.A., Dodds, J.M., Benjamin, S., Jones, S.J., & Carbone, E.T. (2008). Can distance education prepare future public health nutritionists? A case study. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 40, 34–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Oravec, J. (2003). Blending by blogging: Weblogs in blended learning environments. Journal of Educational Media, 28, 225–233.Google Scholar
  17. Paulus, T., Payne, R.L. & Jahns, L. (2009). “Am I making sense here?”: What blogging reveals about undergraduate student understanding. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(1). Retrieved from
  18. Rodriguez, J. C. (2000). Web Page and Online Response Activities in an Undergraduate Nutrition Education Course. Journal of Nutrition Education, 32(2), 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shaffer, S.C., Lackey, S.P. & Bolling, G.W. (2006). Blogging as a venue for nurse faculty development. Nursing Education Perspectives 27(3), 126–128.Google Scholar
  20. Twigg, C.A. (1999). Improving learning & reducing costs: redesigning large-enrollment courses. The Pew Learning and Technology Program. Center for Academic Transformation at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.Google Scholar
  21. Varma-Nelson, P., Cracolice, M.S. & Gosser, D.K. (2004). Peer-led team learning: A student-faculty partnership for transforming the learning environment. In S. Cunningham & Y.S. George (Eds.) Invention and Impact: Building Excellence in Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education (pp. 43–48). Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science.Google Scholar
  22. Xie, Y., Ke, F. & Sharma, P. (2008). The effect of peer feedback for blogging on college students’ reflective learning processes. Internet and Higher Education 11, 18–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zubas, P., Heiss, C., & Pedersen, M. (2006). Comparing the effectiveness of a supplemental online tutorial to traditional instruction with nutritional science students. Journal of Interactive Online Learning 5(1). Retrieved from:

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Trena Paulus and Marsha Spence

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations