, Volume 53, Issue 4, pp 28–31 | Cite as

Effectiveness of Cyber Charter Schools: A Review of Research on Learnings



Online Learning Distance Education Charter School Online Teacher Virtual School 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alaska Department of Education and Early Development. (2003). Spring 2003 benchmarks, Delta/Greely School District—Delta Charter Cyber School.Google Scholar
  2. Beldarrain, Y. (2006, August). Distance education trends: Integrating new technologies to foster student interaction and collaboration. Distance Education, 27(2), 139-153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., & Borokhovski, E. (2004). A methodological morass: How can we improve the quality of quantitative research in distance education? Distance Education, 25(2), 176-198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bigbie, C., & McCarroll, W. (2000). The Florida high school evaluation 1999-2000 report. Tallahassee, FL: Florida State University.Google Scholar
  5. Buddin, R., & Zimmer, R. (2005). Student achievement in charter schools: A complex picture. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24, 351–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cavanaugh, C., Barbour, M. & Clark, T. (in press). Research and practice in K-12 online learning: A review of open access literature. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. Google Scholar
  7. Cavanaugh, C., Gillan, K. J., Kromrey, J., Hess, M., & Blomeyer, R. (2004). The effects of distance education on K–12 student outcomes: A meta-analysis. Naperville, IL: Learning Point Associates.Google Scholar
  8. Center for Education Reform. (2009).National Charter School Directory. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  9. Clark, T., Lewis, E., Oyer, E., & Schreiber, J. (2002). Illinois virtual high school evaluation, 2001-2002. Carbondale, IL: TA Consulting and Southern Illinois University.Google Scholar
  10. Colorado Department of Education. (2003b). Branson alternative school, grades 7–8 school accountability report. Denver, CO: Author.Google Scholar
  11. Colorado Department of Education. (2003c). Connections Academy, grades 7–8 school accountability report. Denver, CO: Author.Google Scholar
  12. Department of Education. (2008). Evaluating online learning challenges and strategies for success: Innovations in education. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  13. EdSource. (2005, May). How are California’s Charter Schools Performing? Palo Alto, CA: Author.Google Scholar
  14. Espinoza, C., Dove, T., Zucker, A., & Kozma, R. (1999). An evaluation of the virtual high school after two years in operation. Arlington, VA: SRI International.Google Scholar
  15. Huerta, L., Gonzalez, M. & d’Entremont, C. (2006). Cyber and home school charter schools: adopting policy to new forms of public schooling. Peabody Journal of Education, 81(1), 103–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hughes, J. E., McLeod, S., Brown, R., Maeda, Y., & Choi, J. (2007). Academic achievement and perceptions of the learning environment in virtual and traditional secondary mathematics classrooms. American Journal of Distance Education, 21(4), 199-214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Indiana Department of Education. (2004). School snapshot: Irvington community school. Indianapolis, IN: Author.Google Scholar
  18. Lehman, S., Kauffman, D., White, M., Horn, C., & Bruning, R. (2001, Fall). Teacher interaction: Motivating at-risk students in web-based high school courses. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(5), 1-19.Google Scholar
  19. Lowes, S. (2008). Online teaching and classroom change: The trans-classroom teacher in the age of the internet. Innovate, 4(3).Google Scholar
  20. Minnesota Department of Education. (2003). 2003 report card: Cyber Village Academy. Minneapolis, MN: Author.Google Scholar
  21. National Center for Education Statistics. (2006). Public teacher questionnaire. Schools and staffing survey (SASS), 2003–04. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  22. Newman, A., Stein, M., & Trask, E. (2003). What can virtual learning do for your school? Boston, MA: Eduventures, Inc.Google Scholar
  23. O’Dwyer, L., Carey, R., & Kleiman, G. (2007). A study of the effectiveness of the Louisiana algebra I online course. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(3), 289-306.Google Scholar
  24. Rice, K. (2006). A comprehensive look at distance education in the K-12 context. Journal of Research on Technology in Education (38)4, 425 448.Google Scholar
  25. Rice, K., Dawley, L., Gasell, C. & Flores, C. (2008). Going virtual! Unique needs and challenges of K-12 online teachers. Washington, DC: North American Council for Online Learning.Google Scholar
  26. Rose, R. & Blomeyer, R. (2007). Access and equity in online classes and virtual schools. Washington, DC: International Council for K-12 Online Learning.Google Scholar
  27. Schollie, B. (2001). Student achievement and performance levels in online education research study. Edmonton, Alberta: Alberta Online Consortium.Google Scholar
  28. Shaffer, D. W., Squire, K. R., Halverson, R. & Gee, J (2005, October). Video games and the future of learning. Phi Delta Kappan (87)2, 104-11.Google Scholar
  29. Texas Education Agency. (2003). 2002–2003 campus performance: Southwest Virtual Preparatory School. Austin, TX: Author.Google Scholar
  30. Thomas, W. (2002). Virtual learning and charter schools: Issues and potential impact. Atlanta, GA: Southern Regional Educational Board.Google Scholar
  31. Tucker, B. (2007). Virtual schools: Laboratories of reform. Washington, DC: Education Sector.Google Scholar
  32. Washington Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction. (2003). Internet Academy 2002–2003 WASL results. Olympia, WA: Author.Google Scholar
  33. Watson, J. & Gemin, B. (2008). Using online learning for at-risk students and credit recovery. Washington, DC: International Council for K-12 Online Learning.Google Scholar
  34. WestEd. (2008). Evaluating online learning: Challenges and strategies for success. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  35. Zimmer, R., Buddin, R., Chau, D., Gill, B., & Guarino, C. (2003). Charter school operations and performance: Evidence from California. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2009

Personalised recommendations