Morphology

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 89–130

A Construction Morphology account of derivation in Mandarin Chinese

Original Paper

Abstract

In the Chinese language, morphologically complex words have been attested since the remote past of the language, including both stem-modifying processes and agglutination of morphemes, mostly lexical and free in the classical language. However, in Chinese, grammaticalization typically entails no phonological alteration (Bisang, Studies in Language 20:519–597, 1996) and it is still a matter of debate whether compounding and derivation are two distinct phenomena in Modern Mandarin Chinese (see, among others, Pan et al, The research on word formation in Chinese, 2004). In this paper we shall tackle this issue in the framework of Construction Morphology (Booij, In: Dressler et al (eds) Morphology in demarcations, 2005; In: Montermini et al (eds) Selected proceedings of the 5th Décembrettes: morphology in Toulouse, 2007), also taking into account the diachronic perspective. Our proposal is that it is possible to analyse as instances of grammaticalized derivational formants the right-hand elements in word formation schemas such as [[X]x 性]n [[X]x xìng]n ‘the quality of X/connected with X’ (抽象性 chōuxiàngxìng “abstractness”), which undergo processes of semantic shift analogous to those of e.g. English -hood.

Keywords

Mandarin Chinese Word-formation Construction morphology Derivation Grammaticalization Lexicalization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aikhenvald, S. (2007). Typological distinctions in word formation. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, volume III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon (2n ed) (pp. 1–65). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
  2. Amha, A. (2001). The Maale language. Leiden: Research School of Asian, African, and Amerindian Studies, University of Leiden.Google Scholar
  3. Amiot D. (2005) Between compounding and derivation—elements of word-formation corresponding to prepositions. In: Dressler W., Kastovsky D., Pfeiffer O.E., Rainer F. (eds) Morphology and its demarcations. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Philadelphia, pp 183–195Google Scholar
  4. Arcodia G.F. (2008) La derivazione lessicale in cinese mandarino. Franco Angeli, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  5. Bauer L. (1998) Is there a class of neoclassical compounds, and if so is it productive?. Linguistics 36: 403–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bauer, L. (2001). Compounding. In M. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Oesterreicher, & W. Raible (Eds.), Language typology and language universals (pp. 695–707). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  7. Bauer, L. (2002). What can you do with derivational morphology. In S. Bendjaballah, W. U. Dressler, O. E. Pfeiffer, & M. D. Voeikova (Eds.), Morphology 2000. Selected papers from the 9th morphology meeting (pp. 37–48). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  8. Bauer L. (2005) The borderline between derivation and compounding. In: Dressler W., Kastovsky D., Pfeiffer O.E., Rainer F. (eds) Morphology and its demarcations. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Philadelphia, pp 97–108Google Scholar
  9. Bauer L. (2006). Compound. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (II volume, pp. 719–726). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  10. Beard, R. (1998). Derivation. In A. Spencer, & A. M. Zwicky (Eds.), Handbook of morphology (pp. 44–65). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. Bisang W. (1996) Areal typology and grammaticalization: Processes of grammaticalization based on nouns and verbs in East and mainland South East Asian languages. Studies in Language 20: 519–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blank, A. (2001). Pathways of lexicalization. In M. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Oesterreicher, & W. Raible (Eds.), Language typology and language universals (pp. 1596–1608). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  13. Booij, G. (2005). Compounding and derivation—evidence for Construction Morphology. In W. Dressler, D. Kastovsky, O. E. Pfeiffer, & F. Rainer (Eds.), Morphology and its demarcations (pp.109–132). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  14. Booij, G. (2007). Construction morphology and the lexicon. In F. Montermini, G. Boyé, & N. Hathout (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 5th Décembrettes: Morphology in Toulouse (pp. 34–44). Somerville, (MA): Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
  15. Booij, G. (2009). Compounding and construction morphology. In R. Lieber, & P. Štekauer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding (pp. 201–216). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Booij G. (2010) Compound construction: Schemas or analogy?. In: Scalise S., Vogel I. (eds) Crossdisciplinary issues in compounding. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Philadelphia, pp 93–108Google Scholar
  17. Brinton L.J., Traugott E. (2005) Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bybee J., Perkins R., Pagliuca B. (1994) The evolution of grammar. Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  19. Campbell, L. (2001). What’s wrong with grammaticalization. In L. Campbell (Ed.), Grammaticalization: A critical assessment. Language Sciences (special issue), 23, 113–161.Google Scholar
  20. Carstairs-McCarthy A. (1992) Current morphology. Routledge, London and New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. CCD (2002). 现 代 汉 语 词 典. The contemporary Chinese dictionary. Beijing, Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Google Scholar
  22. Ceccagno A., Basciano B. (2007) Compound headedness in Chinese: An analysis of neologisms. Morphology 17: 207–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chen, R. (1986). 谈词缀 “性” (On the affix “-xìng”). Xinjiang Shifan Daxue Xuebao, 2, 87–90.Google Scholar
  24. Cheng, L. (2004). 语訁接触, 类推与形态化 (Language contact, analogy and morphologization). Waiyu yu waiyu jiaoxue, 4. 53–56Google Scholar
  25. Dong, Z. (2003). 关于几个新兴“词缀”的探讨 [A study on some newly coined affixes]. Tangshan Shifan Xueyuan Xuebao, 1, 8–10.Google Scholar
  26. Dong, X. (2004).汉 语 的 词 库 与 词 法 [Chinese lexicon andmorphology]. Beijing: PekingUniversity Press.Google Scholar
  27. Fabb N. (1998) Compounding. In: Spencer A., Zwicky A.M. (eds) Handbook of morphology. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 66–83Google Scholar
  28. Fan, L. (2002). 从“吧”谈汉语词的词缀化倾向 [A discussion on ba and the tendency of Chinese words to turn into affixes]. Xinjiang daxue Xuebao, 30, 136–137.Google Scholar
  29. GHYDCD (2000). 古汉语大词典 [The grand dictionary of ancient Chinese]. Shanghai: Shanghai Cishu Chubanshe.Google Scholar
  30. Goldberg A. (1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  31. Grandi, N. (2006). Considerazioni sulla definizione e la classificazione dei composti. Annali dell’Universitá di Ferrara (Sezione di Lettere), 1, 31–52.Google Scholar
  32. Hagège, C. (2005). World classes in isolating languages. In A. D. Cruse, et al. (Eds.), Lexikologie/ Lexicology (pp. 976–980). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  33. Haspelmath M. (2002) Understanding morphology. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  34. Heine B., Kuteva T. (2002) World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Heine B., Claudi U., Hünnemeyer F. (1991) Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  36. Himmelmann, N. P. (2004). Lexicalization and grammaticalization: Opposite or orthogonal? In W. Bisang, N. P. Himmelmann, & B. Wiemer (Eds.),What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components (pp. 21–42). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  37. Hopper P., Traugott E.C. (2003) Grammaticalization (2nd ed). Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  38. HYDCD (1991). 汉语大词典 [The Grand Dictionary of Chinese]. Shanghai: Hanyu Dacidian Chubanshe.Google Scholar
  39. Jackendoff R.S. (2002) Foundations of language. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jurafsky D. (1996) Universals tendencies in the semantics of the diminutive. Language 72: 533–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kuryłowicz J. (1936) Dérivation lexicale et dérivation syntactique. Bulletin de la Société Linguistique de Paris 37: 79–92Google Scholar
  42. Lehmann, C. (1982/1995). Thoughts on grammaticalization. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
  43. Lehmann C. (1989) Grammatikalisierung und Lexikalisierung. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 42: 11–19Google Scholar
  44. Lieber, R. (2003). Compound interpretation: Lexical semantics, not syntax. In G. Booij, J. DeCesaris, A. Ralli, & S. Scalise (Eds.), Topics in morphology: Selected papers from the third Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (pp. 241–253). Barcelona: IULA.Google Scholar
  45. Lin H. (2001) A grammar of Mandarin Chinese. Lincom Europa, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  46. Lü, S. (1941). 中国文法要略 [An outline of Chinese grammar]. Shanghai: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
  47. Luo, J. (2004). “X性” 词族探微 [On the “X xìng” [On the “X xìng” word family]. Jiangtan Shifan Xueyuan Xuebao, 3, 91–94.Google Scholar
  48. Ma, Q. (1995). 现代汉语词缀的性质, 范围和分类 [Nature, domain and classification of affixes in Modern Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuyanxuebao, 6, 101–137.Google Scholar
  49. Magni, E. (2008). Conservazione e innovazione nella morfologia derivazionale dell’italiano: analisi sincronica e diacronica del suffisso -aio. In E. Cresti (Ed.), Prospettive nello studio del lessico italiano (pp. 497–506). Firenze: Firenze University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Michaelis L.A., Lambrecht K. (1996) Toward a construction-based theory of language function: The case of nominal extraposition. Language 72: 215–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Naumann, B., & Vogel, P.M. (2000) Derivation. In G. Booij, et al. (Eds.), Morphologie—Morphology (pp. 929–943). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  52. Olsen, S. (2000). Composition. In G. Booij, J. Mugdan, & C. Lehmann (Eds.), Morphologie – Morphology (pp. 897–916). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  53. Packard J.L. (2000) The morphology of Chinese. A linguistic and cognitive approach. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pan, W., Ye, B., & Han, Y. (2004) 汉语的构词法研究 [The research on word formation in Chinese]. Shanghai: Huadong Shifan Daxue Chubanshe.Google Scholar
  55. Ramat P. (1992) Thoughts on degrammaticalization. Linguistics 30: 549–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Renouf, A., & Baayen, H. (1998). Aviating among the hapax legomena: Morphological grammaticalization in current British newspaper English. In A. Renouf (Ed.), Explorations in corpus linguistics (pp. 181–189). Amsterdam, Atlanta: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  57. Ricca D. (2005) Appunti per una tipologia degli universali morfologici. In: Grandi N. (eds) Morfologia e dintorni. Franco Angeli, Milano, pp 28–46Google Scholar
  58. Scalise, S., Bisetto, A., & Guevara, E. (2005). Selection in compounding and derivation. In W. Dressler, D. Kastovsky, O. E. Pfeiffer, & F. Rainer (Eds.), Morphology and its demarcations (pp. 133–150). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  59. Shi Y. (2002) The estabilishment of Modern Chinese grammar. The formation of the resultative construction and its effects,. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  60. SOED (1993). The new shorter Oxford English dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  61. Sun, Y. (2000). 现代汉语词缀问题探讨 [A study on some problems related to Modern Chinese affixes]. Hebei Shifan Daxue Xuebao, 23, 55–58.Google Scholar
  62. Tekavčić, P. (1980). Grammatica storica dell’Italiano (Vol. III. Lessico). Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  63. Ten Hacken, P. (2000). Derivation and compounding. In G. Booij, J. Mugdan, & C. Lehmann (Eds.), Morphologie-Morphology (pp. 349–360). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  64. VD (2005). Van Dale Groot Woordenboek van de nederlandse taal. Utrecht, Antwerpen: Van Dale Lexicografie.Google Scholar
  65. Wu, Y. (2000). 吧 - 新产生的类后缀 [Ba—a newly coined suffixoid]. Jiangxi Shifan Daxue Xuebao, 4, 73–77.Google Scholar
  66. XH (2003). 新华新词语词典 [The Xinhua Dictionary of new words]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
  67. Xing J.Z. (2003) Grammaticalization of verbs in Mandarin Chinese. Lincom Europa, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  68. Yip P. (2000) The Chinese Lexicon A comprehensive survey. Routledge, London, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  69. Zhou X., Marslen-Wilson W. (1994) Words, morphemes and syllables in the Chinese mental lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 9: 393–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Scienze Umane per la Formazione “R. Massa”Università degli Studi di Milano – BicoccaMilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations