Morphology

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 31–56 | Cite as

Historical gender change in West Frisian

Open Access
Original Paper

Abstract

In Frisian, grammatical gender is an abstract lexical property, which is not spelled out on the noun. It manifests itself in an indirect way, through the agreement relations the noun enters into. It is, thus, understandable that phonological regularities and residual (abstract) case marking in a prepositional context can be crucial for two instances of historical gender change in Frisian. In the Dutch–Frisian language contact situation, however, factors which are strictly speaking non-linguistic in nature play a role as well. These are, first, the low degree of standardisation of Frisian at the time the gender change set in and, secondly, distancing from Dutch at the time when Frisian developed its own standard vis-à-vis Dutch, which implies the propagation of the gender which diverges from the Dutch one. It is the interplay between these factors which lends the case of gender change in Frisian an inherent linguistic significance. Not every Frisian de-word could become an it-word and vice versa, since the language system puts its limits here. For instance, all nouns ending in schwa are de-words, a formal regularity which prevented them from switching to it-words. Neither are there only regular patterns of gender change in Frisian. The general tendencies are clear, but as far as individual words are concerned, there is much which must be left unexplained.

Keywords

Gender Gender assignment Gender change Minority language 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am deeply indebted to Geert Booij, without whose help and encouragement this article would not have existed. Thanks are due to my colleagues Siebren Dyk, for his comments on a preliminary version, and Jarich Hoekstra, with whom I once wrote an article, in Frisian, on the same subject (Hoekstra and Visser 1996). I would also like to thank the editors of Morphology and three anonymous reviewers for their generous and valuable comments. All disclaimers apply.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. Booij G.E. (1995) The Phonology of Dutch (=The phonology of the world’s languages; 2). Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Booij G.E. (1996) Cliticization as prosodic integration: The case of Dutch. The Linguistic Review 13: 219–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Booij G.E. (2002) The morphology of Dutch. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Bremmer R.H. Jr. (2009) An introduction to Old Frisian: History, grammar, reader, glossary. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins publishing CompanyGoogle Scholar
  5. Breuker, P. (1993). Noarmaspekten fan it hjoeddeiske Frysk [Aspects of the standard of present-day Frisian] (Doctoral dissertation, Rijksuniversiteit, Groningen).Google Scholar
  6. Brouwer, J. H. (Ed.). (1959). De Fryske fersen fan Durk Lenige en oare Makkumers [The Frisian poems of Durk Lenige and other people from Makkum] (=Magnus-rige; 8). Boalsert: A.J. Osinga.Google Scholar
  7. Corbett G.G. (1991) Gender (Cambridge textbooks in linguistics). Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. Croft W. (2003) Typology and universals (Cambridge textbooks in linguistics) (2nd ed). Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. de Haan G.J. (1997) Contact-induced changes in modern West Frisian. Us Wurk 46: 61–89Google Scholar
  10. Dresher B.E., van der Hulst H. (1998) Head-dependent asymmetries in phonology: Complexity and visibility. Phonology 15: 317–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Enger H.-O. (2009) The role of core and non-core semantic rules in gender assignment. Lingua 119: 1281–1299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Feitsma, A. (Ed.). (1956a). Oude Friesche spreeck-woorden, Franeker 1641, synoptysk mei Friesche bywirden, Hs. Gabbema, mei dêroan taheakke oantekeningen fan Franciscus Junius F.F. en Janus Vlitius [text edition of collections of early Modern Frisian proverbs, with scholarly notes] (= Estrikken; XI). Grins: Frysk Ynstitút oan de Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.Google Scholar
  13. Feitsma, A. (Ed.). (1956b). Frysk út de 17de ieu, teksten en fragminten, mei chronologysk en alfabetysk register [Frisian from the 17th century, texts and fragments, with a chronological and alphabetical index] (= Estrikken; XV). Grins: Frysk Ynstitút oan de Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.Google Scholar
  14. Feitsma, A., & Bosma, R. (Eds.). (1961). Frysk út de 18de ieu, teksten en fragminten, diel III: 1763–1779 [Frisian from the 18th century, texts and fragments, part III: 1763–1779] (= Estrikken; XXII). Grins: Frysk Ynstitút oan de Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.Google Scholar
  15. Frysk Wurdboek. (1984). (Frisian-Dutch desk dictionary, edited by J.W. Zantema).Google Scholar
  16. Greenberg, J. H. (1966). Language universals, with special reference to feature hierarchies (Janua Linguarum, Series Minor, 59). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  17. Hayes B. (1989) Compensatory lengtening in moraic phonology. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 253–306Google Scholar
  18. Hilarides, J. (1705). Niewe Taalgronden/ Der Neederdujtsche Taal;/ Weegens/ Het Gebrujk der Voorleedekens/,/ de/, den: die; deeze/, dit/, dat/, het;/ en de/ Neederlantsche Woordrekkinge;/ voor/ Daavid van Hoochstraaten Med. Doct./ en conrector t’ Amsterdam./ Opgesteld door/ Johannes Hilarides. Fraaneker: Jacobus Horreus.Google Scholar
  19. Hoekstra, J. (2001). Standard West Frisian. In: H. H. Munske (Ed.; in collaboration with Århammar, N., Faltings, V. F., Hoekstra, J. F., Vries, O., Walker, A. G. H., & Wilts, O.), Handbuch des Friesischen/Handbook of Frisian Studies (pp. 83–98). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
  20. Hoekstra J. (2006) Westerlauwerskfrysk etymologysk griemmank (III) [Westerlauwers Frisian etymological miscellany]. Us Wurk 55: 140–154Google Scholar
  21. Hoekstra J., Visser W. (1996) De- en it-wurden yn it Frysk [de- and it-words in Frisian]. Us Wurk 45: 55–78Google Scholar
  22. Kocks H.G. (1996) Woordenboek van de Drentse dialecten, A-L [Dictionary of the dialects of Drente, A-L]. Assen, Van GorcumGoogle Scholar
  23. Laycock D.C. (1982) Melanesian linguistic diversity: A Melanesian choice?. In: May R., Nelson H. (eds) Melanesia: beyond diversity. Australian National University Press, Canberra, pp 33–38Google Scholar
  24. Lombardi L. (1999) Positional faithfulness and voicing assimilation in optimality theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17: 267–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nielsen, H. F. (1981). Old English and the continental Germanic languages: a survey of morphological and phonological interrelations (= Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft; Band 33). Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität.Google Scholar
  26. Overdiep, G. S. (1940). De volkstaal van Katwijk aan Zee [The vernacular of Katwijk aan Zee]. Antwerpen: N.V. Standaard-Boekhandel.Google Scholar
  27. Pauwels J.L. (1931) Substantieven met een dubbel Grammatisch Geslacht [nouns with a double grammatical gender]. Leuvensche bijdragen op het gebied van de Germaanse philologie 23: 84–104Google Scholar
  28. Shields K. (1979) A theory of gender change. Glossa 13: 27–38Google Scholar
  29. Sijens H. (2004) Neologismen yn it Frysk. ‘Wat wy net hawwe, dat liene wy’ [Neologisms in Frisian. ‘What we do not have, that we loan’]. It Beaken 66: 256–298Google Scholar
  30. Spenter A. (1971) Die Genuskategorie in der Schiermonnikooger Mundart. Us Wurk 20: 27–36Google Scholar
  31. Thomason, S. G. (2006). Language change, intentional. In: K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd ed., pp. 346–349). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  32. Thornton A.M. (2009) Constraining gender assignment rules. Language Sciences 31: 14–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tiersma P.M. (1982) Local and general markedness. Language 58: 832–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tiersma P.M. (1985) Frisian reference grammar. Foris Publications, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  35. van der Kuip, F. J. (2003). De Burmania-sprekwurden. Santjinde-ieuske Fryske sprekwurden ferklearre en yn har tiid besjoen [The (so-called) Burmania-proverbs. Seventeenth century Frisian proverbs explained and viewed in the context of their time]. Ljouwert/Leeuwarden: Fryske Akademy.Google Scholar
  36. Visser, W. (1988a). In pear klitisearringsferskynsels yn it Frysk [Some cliticisation phenomena in Frisian]. In: S. Dyk & G. de Haan (Eds.), Wurdfoarried en Wurdgrammatika. In bondel leksikale stúdzjes [Lexis and word grammar. A collection of lexical studies] (pp. 175–222). Ljouwert: Fryske Akademy.Google Scholar
  37. Visser W. (1988) Wêrom’t progressive assimilaasje yn it Frysk net bestiet [Why progressive assimilation does not exist in Frisian]. Tydskrift foar Fryske Taalkunde 4: 1–20Google Scholar
  38. Visser, W. (1990). From modern Frisian to old Frisian: On cliticisation of the definite article. In: R. H. Bremmer Jr., G. v.d. Meer, & O. Vries (Eds.), Aspects of old Frisian philology (pp. 466–482). (= Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik, Band 31/32 / Estrikken; 69). Amsterdam: Rodopi and Groningen/Grins: SSFYRUG.Google Scholar
  39. Visser, W. (1997). The syllable in Frisian (Doctoral dissertation, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
  40. Visser W. (2000) Frjemd wurdt eigener. Oer de âlde Frânske lienwurden yn it Frysk [Foreign becomes more familiar. On the old French loan words in Frisian]. It Beaken 62: 141–218Google Scholar
  41. WFT. (1989–2010). Wurdboek fan de Fryske taal/Woordenboek der Friese taal [Dictionary of the Frisian language]. Ljouwert: Fryske Akademy.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Linguistics DepartmentFryske AkademyLjouwert/LeeuwardenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.University of Groningen, Centre for Language and Cognition GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations