Morphology

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 109–131

Modeling affix order

Original Paper

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, M. (1978). Morphological investigations. PhD thesis, University of Conneticut.Google Scholar
  2. Alsina A. (1999) Where’s the mirror principle?. The Linguistic Review 16(1): 1–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson S.R. (1992) A-morphous morphology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Aronoff M. (1992) Noun classes in Arapesh. In: Booij G., van Marle J. (eds) Yearbook of morphology 1991. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 21–32Google Scholar
  5. Aronoff M., Fuhrhop N. (2002) Restricting suffix combinations in German and English: Closing suffixes and the monosuffix constraint. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 451–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baayen R.H. (1992) Quantitative aspects of morphological productivity. In: Booij G., van Marle J. (eds) Yearbook of morphology 1991. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 109–149Google Scholar
  7. Baayen R.H. (2008) Analyzing linguistic data. A practical introduction to statistics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. Baayen, H. R., Kryuchkova, T., & Vickerman, A. (2009). Ordering constraints in English derivation and compounds. Paper presented at the Second Vienna workshop on affix order, Vienna, June 5–6, 2009. Abstract available at http://homepage.univie.ac.at/stela.manova/2nd_workshop_abstracts/abstract_baayen_et_al.pdf.
  9. Baayen R.H., Lieber R. (1991) Productivity and English derivation: A corpus based study. Linguistics 29: 801–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gullikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  11. Baker M. (1985) The Mirror Principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 373–415Google Scholar
  12. Bickel B., Banjade G., Gaenszle M., Lieven E., Paudyal N.P., Rai P.I. et al (2007) Free prefix ordering in Chintang. Language 83: 1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bybee J.L. (1985) Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. John Benjamins, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  14. Caballero, G. (2010). Scope, phonology and morphology in an agglutinating language: Choguita Rarámuri (Tarahumara) variable suffix ordering. Morphology. doi:10.1007/s11525-010-9147-4
  15. Dressler W.U. (1989) Prototypical differences between inflection and derivation. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft and Kommunikationsforschung 42: 3–10Google Scholar
  16. Dressler, W. U., Aksu-Koç, A., Laalo, K., & Pfeiler, B. (2009). Early phases in the acquisition of affix order. Paper presented at the Second Vienna workshop on affix order, Vienna, June 5–6, 2009. Abstract available at http://homepage.univie.ac.at/stela.manova/2nd_workshop_abstracts/abstract_dressler_et_al.pdf.
  17. Fabb N. (1988) English suffixation is constrained only by selectional restrictions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 527–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gaeta L. (2005) Combinazioni di suffissi in Italiano. In: Grossmann M., Thornton A. (eds) La Formazione delle Parole. Atti del XXXVII Congresso Internazionale di Studi della Societa di Linguistica Italiana (SLI). Roma, Bulzoni, pp 229–247Google Scholar
  19. Giegerich H.J. (1999) Lexical strata in English. Morphological causes, phonological effects. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Givón T. (1971) Historical syntax and synchronic morphology: An archaeologist’s field trip, CLS #7. University of Chicago, Chicago Linguistics Society, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  21. Greenberg J. (1963) Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In: Greenberg J. (eds) Universals of language. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Hay J. (2001) Lexical frequency in morphology: Is everything relative?. Linguistics, 39: 1041–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hay J. (2002) From speech perception to morphology: Affix-ordering revisited. Language 78(3): 527–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hay J. (2003) Causes and consequences of word structure. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Hay J., Baayen H. (2002) Parsing and productivity. In: Booij G.E., van Marle J. (eds) Yearbook of morphology 2001. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 203–255Google Scholar
  26. Hay J., Plag I. (2004) What constrains possible suffix combinations? On the interaction of grammatical and processing restrictions in derivational morphology. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 565–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hyman L. (2003) Suffix ordering in Bantu: A morphocentric approach. In: Booij G., van Marle J. (eds) Yearbook of morphology 2002. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 245–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hyman, L. (2006). Affixation by place of articulation: Rare and mysterious. UC Berkeley Phonology Lab annual report (2006). Available at http://linguistics.berkeley.edu/phonlab/annual_report/documents/2006/Hyman_Tiene.pdf.
  29. Inkelas S. (1993) Nimboran position class morphology. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11: 559–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ivanova-Mirčeva D., Xaralampiev I. (1999) Istorija na bălgarskija ezik [A history of Bulgarian Language]. Veliko Tărnovo, FaberGoogle Scholar
  31. Kim, Y. (2010). Phonological and morphological conditions on affix order in Huave. Morphology. doi:10.1007/s11525-010-9149-2
  32. Kiparsky, P. (1982). Lexical morphology and phonology. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm (pp. 1–91). Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  33. Manova S. (2005) Derivation versus inflection in three inflecting languages. In: Dressler W.U., Kastovsky D., Pfeiffer O., Rainer F. (eds) Morphology and its demarcations. Selected papers from the eleventh International morphology meeting, Vienna, pp 233–252Google Scholar
  34. Manova S. (2008) Closing suffixes and the structure of the Slavic word: Movierung. In Austrian contributions to the fourteenth international congress of Slavists, Ohrid, Macedonia, September, 2008, Wiener Slavistisches Jahrbuch 54: 91–104Google Scholar
  35. Manova, S. (2009a). Closing suffixes in Bulgarian, Russian and German: the role of semantics. In: Farkas Baráthi, Mónika (Eds), Bulgarian language and literature in Slavic and non-Slavic contexts. Available at: http://homepage.univie.ac.at/stela.manova/manova_szeged2009.pdf (to appear) .
  36. Manova, S. (2009b). A cognitive approach to SUFF1-SUFF2 combinations. Manuscript of a paper given at the Second Vienna workshop on affix order. Vienna, June 5–6, 2009. Abstract available at http://homepage.univie.ac.at/stela.manova/2nd_workshop_abstracts/abstract_manova.pdf.
  37. Manova S. (2010a) Understanding morphological rules Conversion and Subtraction in Bulgarian, Russian and Serbo-croatian. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  38. Manova, S. (2010b). Suffix combination in Bulgarian: Parsability and hierarchy-based ordering. Morphology. doi:10.1007/s11525-010-9148-3
  39. Mirčev K. (2000) Starobălgarski ezik [Old Bulgarian]. Veliko Tărnovo, FaberGoogle Scholar
  40. Mithun M. (1999) The languages of native North America. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  41. Mohanan K.P. (1986) The theory of lexical phonology. Reidel, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  42. Narrog, H. (2010). The order of meaningful elements in the Japanese verbal complex. Morphology. doi:10.1007/s11525-010-9150-9
  43. Paster M. (2005) Pulaar verbal extensions and phonologically driven affix order. In: Booij G., van Marle J. (eds) Yearbook of morphology 2005. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 155–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Plag I. (1996) Selectional restrictions in English suffixation revisited. A reply to Fabb (1988). Linguistics 34: 769–798Google Scholar
  45. Plag I. (1999) Morphological productivity. Structural constraints in English derivation. Mouton de Gruyter, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  46. Plag I. (2002) role of selectional restrictions, phonotactics and parsing in constraining suffix ordering in English. In: Booij G., van Marle J. (eds) Yearbook of morphology 2001. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 285–314Google Scholar
  47. Plag I., Baayen H. (2009) Suffix ordering and morphological processing. Language 85: 109–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rice K. (2000) Morpheme order and semantic scope. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  49. Rice, K. (2009). Principles of affix ordering: An overview. Paper presented at the Second Vienna workshop on affix order, Vienna, June 5–6, 2009. Handout available at http://homepage.univie.ac.at/stela.manova/Keren_Rice_Principles_of_Affix_Ordering_Handout.pdf.
  50. Selkirk E. (1982) The syntax of words. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  51. Siegel D. (1974) Topics in English morphology. Cambridge, MITGoogle Scholar
  52. Simpson J., Withgott M. (1986) Pronominal clitic clusters and templates. In: Borer H. (eds) The syntax of pronominal clitics Syntax and semantics vol. 19. Academic Press, New York, pp 149–174Google Scholar
  53. Spencer A. (1991) Morphological theory. Blackwell Publishers, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  54. Spencer A. (2006) Morphological universals. In: Mairal R., Gil J. (eds) Linguistic universals. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 101–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stump G.T. (1992) On the theoretical status of position class restriction in inflectional affixes. In: Booij G., van Marle J. (eds) Yearbook of morphology 1991. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 211–241Google Scholar
  56. Stump G.T. (1997) Template morphology and inflectional morphology. In: Booij G., van Marle J. (eds) Yearbook of morphology 1996. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 217–241Google Scholar
  57. Zirkel, L. (2010). Prefix combinations in English: structural and processing factors. Morphology. doi:10.1007/s11525-010-9151-8

Articles to appear in the second issue of Morphology, 20:

  1. Aronoff, M., & Xu, Z. (to appear). A realization OT approach to affix order.Google Scholar
  2. Korotkova, N., & Lander, Y. (to appear). Deriving affix ordering in polysynthesis: Evidence from Adyghe.Google Scholar
  3. Melissaropoulou, D., & Ralli, A. (to appear). Structural combinatorial properties of Greek derivational suffixes.Google Scholar
  4. Mykhaylyk, R. (to appear). Diachronic universal and morpheme order in the Ukrainian synthetic imperfective future.Google Scholar
  5. Nordlinger, R. (to appear). Verbal morphology in Murrinh-Patha: Evidence for templates.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Slavic StudiesUniversity of ViennaWienAustria
  2. 2.Department of LinguisticsSUNY at Stony BrookStony BrookUSA

Personalised recommendations