, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 205–237

The order of meaningful elements in the Japanese verbal complex

Original Paper


This paper explores the order of meaningful elements in the Japanese verbal complex. The ‘verbal complex’ refers to the verbal predicate extended both by affixes and by morphologically independent items in periphrastic constructions, corresponding to auxiliaries in other languages. The main focus in this paper is on the relationship between the order of meaningful elements and semantic scope. It is shown that the order of meaningful elements overwhelmingly obeys semantic scope. Exceptions concern cases with scope ambiguity and cases where surface order is irrelevant because categories do not interact with each other. The study shows that although morphosyntactic restrictions on the combination of meaningful elements exist, these restrictions mostly conform to semantic scope, and where they do not, the restrictions can often be circumvented by the use of alternative constructions with light verbs and formal nouns. As a corollary of the investigation a scopal hierarchy of categories in the Japanese verbal complex is proposed.


Morpheme order Verbal complex Scope Scope ambiguity Modality Japanese 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alfonso, A. (1980). Japanese language patterns (Vol. 2). Tokyo: Sophia University.Google Scholar
  2. Cinque G. (1999) Adverbs and functional heads. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. De Haan F. (1997) The interaction of modality and negation. A typological study. Garland, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Declerck R. (1991) A comprehensive descriptive grammar of English. Tōkyō, KaitakushaGoogle Scholar
  5. Dik, S. (1997). In K. Hengeveld (Ed.), The theory of functional grammar—part 1: The structure of the clause (2nd revised edn.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  6. Foley W., Van Valin R.D. Jr. (1984) Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Fukushima E., Uehara S. (2003) Nihongo no teineitai hiteiji nikeishiki ni kansuru tsūjiteki kenkyū [Diachronic research on the two negated forms in Japanese polite style]. Journal of Graduate School of International Cultural Studies 11: 79–89Google Scholar
  8. Givón, T. (1985). Iconicity, isomorphism and non-arbitrary coding in syntax. In J. Haiman (Ed.), Iconicity in Syntax. Proceedings of a symposium on iconicity in syntax, Stanford, June 24–6, 1983, 187–219. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  9. Givón, T. (2001a). Syntax. An introduction (2nd ed., Vol. I). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  10. Givón, T. (2001b). Syntax. An introduction (2nd ed., Vol. II). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  11. Hayashi, S. (1960). Kihon Bunkei no Kenkyū [Research on basic sentence patterns]. Tōkyō: Meiji Tosho.Google Scholar
  12. Hinds J. (1986) Japanese. Croom Helms, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Horn, L. R. (1978). Some aspects of negation. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of human language (Vol. 4, pp. 127–170). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Iwasaki S. (2002) Japanese. Benjamins, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  15. Kawashima, N. (2004). Hiteikei o motsu modariti keishiki to meidai no hyōkasei. Kibō hyōgen no hitei taku nai o rei ni [Negated modal forms and the evaluation of the proposition—taking negated wish taku nai as an example]. Nihongo Kyōiku, 118, 57–66.Google Scholar
  16. Kitahara, Y. (1981). Nihongo Jodōshi no Kenkyū [The study of Japanese auxiliaries]. Tokyo: Taishūkan Shoten.Google Scholar
  17. Maynard S.K. (2001) Falling in love. with style Expressive functions of stylistic shifts in a Japanese television drama series. Functions of Language 8(1): 1–39Google Scholar
  18. McCready E., Ogata N. (2006) Evidentiality, modality and probability. Linguistics and Philosophy 30(2): 147–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Miller, R.A. (eds) (1970) Bernard Bloch on Japanese. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  20. Mithun, M. (2000). The reordering of morphemes. In S. Gildea (Ed.), Reconstructing grammars. Comparative linguistics and grammaticalization (pp. 231–255). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
  21. Narrog H. (1999) Japanische Verbflexive und flektierbare Verbalsuffixe. Harrassowitz, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  22. Narrog H. (2009) Modality in Japanese—the layered structure of the clause and hierarchies of functional categories. John Benjamins, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  23. Nitta, Y. (1984). Kakarimusubi ni tsuite [On kakarimusubi agreement]. In K. Suzuki & Ō. Hayashi. (Eds.), Kenkyū Shiryō Nihon Bunpō 5. Joji-hen (1) Joshi (pp. 102–135). Tōkyō: Meiji Shoin.Google Scholar
  24. Nitta, Y. (1989). Bun no kōzō [The structure of the sentence]. In Y.o. Kitahara (Ed.), Nihongo no Bunpō, Buntai 1 (Kōza Nihongo to Nihongo Kyōiku 4) (pp. 25–52). Tōkyō: Meiji Shoin.Google Scholar
  25. Nitta Y. (1997) Nihongo Bunpō Kenkyū Josetsu [Preliminaries to the study of Japanese grammar]. Tōkyō, KuroshioGoogle Scholar
  26. Ōno S. et al (1977) Iwanami Kōza Nihongo 7 (BunpōII). Iwanami Shoten, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  27. Palmer, F. R. (1995). Negation and the modals of possibility and necessity. In J. Bybee, & S. Fleischman, (Eds.), Modality in grammar and discourse (pp. 453–471). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
  28. Rice K. (2000) Morpheme order and semantic scope. Word formation in the Athabaskan verb. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  29. Rickmeyer J. (1994) Ein taxonomisch-dependentielles Modell für eine deskriptive Grammatik der japanischen Sprache. Bochumer Jahrbuch zur Ostasienforschung 18: 249–258Google Scholar
  30. Rickmeyer J. (1995) Japanische Morphosyntax. Julius Groos Verlag, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  31. Saeki, T. (1998). Yōsetsu Nihongo no Gojun [Essentials of Japanese word order]. Tōkyō: Kuroshio Shuppan.Google Scholar
  32. Saji, K. (1989). Bunpō [Grammar]. In A. Katō, K. Saji, & Y. Morita (Eds.), Nihongo Gaisetsu (pp. 107–185). Tōkyō: ōfūsha.Google Scholar
  33. Shibatani M. (2006) On the conceptual framework for voice phenomena. Linguistics 44(2): 217–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shinzato R. (2007) (Inter)subjectification, Japanese syntax and syntactic scope increase. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 8(2): 171–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shirakawa, H., et al. (2001). Chūjōkyū o oshieru hito no tame no nihongo bunpō handobukku [Handbook for teachers of intermediate and advanced Japanese]. Tōkyō: Surii Ee Nettowaaku.Google Scholar
  36. Takanashi S. (2004) Hyōka no modariti keishiki no Ta-kei ni tsuite–beki-datta, nakute-wa ikenakatta, zaru-o enakatta [The Ta-form of valuative modality—beki-datta, nakute-wa ikenakatta, zaru-o enakatta]. Nihongo Bunpō 4(1): 38–54Google Scholar
  37. Takanashi, S. (2006). Hyōka no modariti to kibō hyōgen–Ta-kei no seishitsu o chūshin ni [Valuative modality and expression of desires—the Ta-form in focus]. In T. Masuoka, H. Noda, & T. Moriyama (Eds.), Nihongo Bunpō no Shinchihei (pp. 77–97). Tōkyō: Kuroshio Shuppan.Google Scholar
  38. Teramura, H. (1979). Muudo no keishiki to hitei [Mood forms and negation]. In H. Eiichi, K. Kanreki, K. Ronbunshū, & K. Iinkai (Eds.), Eigo to Nihongo to. Hayashi Eiichi kyōju kanreki kinen ronbunshū (pp. 191–222). Tōkyō: Kuroshio.Google Scholar
  39. Van Valin R.D., LaPolla R.J. (1997) Syntax: Structure, meaning, and function. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  40. Watanabe, M. (1971). Kokugo Kōbunron [Syntax of the national language]. Tōkyō: Hanawa Shobō.Google Scholar
  41. Yang, B.-S. (1994). Morphosyntactic phenomena of korean in role and reference grammar. PhD dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.GSICSTohoku UniversitySendaiJapan

Personalised recommendations