, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 41–69 | Cite as

Rich inflection and the production of finite verbs in child language

Original Paper


Children acquiring languages with rich inflection produce verbal morphology earlier in development than those learning languages with more impoverished inflection. In this paper, I present data from bilingual children acquiring Basque and Spanish, two null-subject languages with rich morphology which show a lead-lag pattern in the acquisition of inflection. Verbal inflection appears earlier in Spanish than in Basque, and although children produce few root infinitives in either language, they produce fewer in Spanish than in Basque. This is surprising, given that Basque has even “richer” verbal inflection than Spanish insofar as Basque has more obligatory morphological distinctions than Spanish does. These results lead me to propose that a combination of factors facilitate the early emergence of inflection in languages such as Spanish, including nominative/accusative case marking as well as morphological complexity, rather than solely the richness of the verbal paradigm.


Basque Spanish Morphological acquisition Root infinitives Verbal inflection Bilingualism 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aguirre C. (2003) Early verb development in one Spanish-speaking child. In: Bittner D., Dressler W., Kilani-Schoch M. (eds) Development of verb inflection in first language acquisition: A crosslinguistic perspective. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin/New York, pp 1–26Google Scholar
  2. Barreña, A. (1993). Haur euskaldunen hizkuntzaren jabekuntza-garapena: INFL eta KONP funtziokategorien erabileraz. Doctoral dissertation, University of the Basque Country.Google Scholar
  3. Barreña A. (1995) Gramatikaren jabekuntzagarapena eta haur euskaldunak. Servicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco, BilbaoGoogle Scholar
  4. Bates E., MacWhinney B. (1987) Competition, variation and language learning. In: MacWhinney B. (eds) Mechanisms of language acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 157–163Google Scholar
  5. Bel, A. (1998). Teoria lingüística i adquisició del llenguatge. Análisi comparada dels trets morfologics em catalá i en castellá. Doctoral dissertation, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar
  6. Bel A. et al (2001) projection of Aspect: A key in the acquisition of finiteness?. In: Almgren M. (eds) Proceedings of the 8th conference of the international association for the study of child language. Cascadilla Press, Somerville, MA, pp 1297–1313Google Scholar
  7. Bittner D., Dressler W., Kilani-Schoch M. (2003) Development of verb inflection in first language acquisition: A cross-linguistic perspective. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Blom E. (2007) Modality, infinitives, and finite bare verbs in Dutch and English child language. Language Acquisition 14(1): 75–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blom E. (2008) The acquisition of finiteness. Mouton de Gruyter, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blom, E., & Wijnen, F. (2006). Development need not be embarrassing: The demise of the root infinitive and related changes in Dutch child language. Ms, University of Amsterdam/Utrecht University.Google Scholar
  11. Blume, M. (2002). Tenseless verb forms in the acquisition of Spanish as a first language. Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
  12. Brown R. (1973) A first language. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  13. Buesa García, C. (2007). Early root infinitives in a null-subject language: A longitudinal case study of a Spanish child. In A. Belikova, L. Meroni, & M. Umeda (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd conference on generative approaches to language acquisition North America (pp. 39–50). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
  14. Crago M., Allen S. (2001) Early finiteness in Inuktitut: The role of language structure and input. Language Acquisition 9(1): 59–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Deuchar M., Quay S. (2000) Bilingual acquisition: Theoretical implications of a case study. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Dye, C., Foley, C., Blume, M., & Lust, B. (2004). Mismatches between morphology and syntax in first language acquisition suggest a ‘Syntax-First’ Model. Online proceedings of the twenty-eighth Boston University conference on child Language development. Retrieved from
  17. Ezeizabarrena, M. (1996). Adquisición de la morfología verbal en euskera y castellano por niños bilingües. Bilbao: Servicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco.Google Scholar
  18. Ezeizabarrena M. (2002) Root infinitives in two pro-drop languages. In: Pérez-Leroux A., Liceras J. (eds) The acquisition of Spanish morphosyntax: The L1/L2 connection. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 33–94Google Scholar
  19. Ezeizabarrena M., Larrañaga P. (1996) Ergativity in Basque: A problem for language acquisition?. Linguistics 34: 955–991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gathercole V., Sebastián E., Soto P. (1999) The early acquisition of Spanish verbal morphology: Across-the-board or piecemeal knowledge?. The International Journal of Bilingualism 3: 133–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guasti M. (1993/1994) Verb syntax in Italian child grammar: Finite and nonfinite verbs. Language Acquisition 3: 1–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Guilfoyle E., Noonan M. (1992) Functional categories and language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 37: 241–272Google Scholar
  23. Harris T., Wexler K. (1996) The optional infinitive stage in child grammars. In: Clahsen H. (eds) Generative perspectives on language acquisition. John Benjamins, Philadelphia, pp 1–42Google Scholar
  24. Hoekstra T., Hyams N. (1998) Aspects of root infinitives. Lingua, 106: 81–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hyams N. (1994) V2, null arguments and COMP positions. In: Hoekstra T., Schwartz B. (eds) Language acquisition studies in generative grammar. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 21–56Google Scholar
  26. Hyams N. (1996) The underspecification of functional categories in early grammar. In: Clahsen H. (eds) Generative perspectives on language acquisition. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 91–128Google Scholar
  27. Laka, I. (1988). Configurational heads in inflectional morphology: The structure of the inflected forms in Basque. Ms., MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  28. Laka, I. (1993a). Unergatives that assign ergative, Unaccusatives that assign accusative. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 18 (pp. 149–172). Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  29. Laka I. (1993) The structure of inflection: A case study in Xo syntax. In: Hualde I., Ortizde Urbina J. (eds) Generative studies in Basque linguistics. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 21–70Google Scholar
  30. Levin, B. (1983). On the nature of ergativity. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  31. Liceras J., Valenzuela E., Díaz L. (1999) L1/L2 Spanish grammars and the pragmatic deficit hypothesis. Second Language Research 15(2): 161–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Meisel J., Ezeizabarrena M. (1996) Subject-verb and object-verb agreement in early Basque. In: Clausen H. (eds) Language acquisition: Empirical findings, theoretical considerations, cross-linguistic comparisons. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 201–239Google Scholar
  33. Montrul S. (2004) The acquisition of Spanish: Morphosyntactic development in monolingual and bilingual L1 acquisition and adult L2 acquisition. John Benjamins, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  34. Ortizde Urbina J. (1989) Parameters in the grammar of Basque. Foris Publications, ProvidenceGoogle Scholar
  35. Paradis J., Genesee F. (1997) On continuity and the emergence of functional categories in bilingual first-language acquisition. Language Acquisition 6(2): 91–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Phillips C. (1995) Syntax at two: Cross-linguistic differences. In: Schütze C., Ganger J., Broihier K. (eds) Papers on language processing and acquisition. Cambridge, MA, MIT, pp 225–282Google Scholar
  37. Phillips, C. (1996). Root infinitives are finite. In: A. Stringfellow, D. Cahana-Amitay, E. Hughes, & A. Zukowski (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th annual Boston University conference on language development (pp. 588–599). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
  38. Pinker S. (1984) Language learnability and language development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  39. Pinker S. (1989) Language learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument Structure. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  40. Platzack C. (1992) Functional categories and early Swedish. In: Meisel J. (eds) The acquisition of verb placement. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 63–82Google Scholar
  41. Pratt, A. & Grinstead, J. (2007). The optional infinitive stage in child Spanish. In A. Belikova, L. Meroni, & M. Umeda (Eds.), Proceedings of generative approaches to language acquisition-North America (pp. 351–362). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
  42. Pye C. (1990) The acquisition of ergative languages. Linguistics 28: 1291–1330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pye, C. Pfeiler, B., de León, L., Brown, P., & Mateo, P. (2007). Roots or edges? Explaining variation in children’s early verb forms across five Mayan languages. In B. Pfeiler (Ed.), Learning indigenous languages: Child language acquisition in Mesoamerica (pp. 15–46). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  44. Radford A. (1990) Syntactic theory and the acquisition of English syntax. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  45. Rhee J., Wexler K. (1995) Optional Infinitives in Hebrew. In: Schütze C., Ganger J., Broihier K. (eds) Papers on language processing and acquisition. Cambridge, MA, MIT, pp 383–402Google Scholar
  46. Sano, T., & Hyams, N. (1994). Agreement, finiteness, and the development of null arguments. In Proceedings of NELS 24. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
  47. Santelmann L., Berk S., Lust B. (2000) Assessing the strong continuity hypothesis in the development of English inflection: Arguments for the grammatical mapping paradigm. In: Billery R. (eds) Proceedings of the 19th West coast conference on formal linguistics. Cascadilla Press, Somerville. MA, pp 439–452Google Scholar
  48. Serratrice L. (2001) The emergence of verbal morphology: An English-Italian case study. In: Cenoz J., Genesee F. (eds) Trends in bilingual acquisition. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 43–70Google Scholar
  49. Sinka I., Schelletter C. (1998) Morphosyntactic development in bilingual children. International Journal of Bilingualism 2: 301–326Google Scholar
  50. Slobin D. (1982) Universal and particular in the acquisition of language. In: Wanner E., Gleitman L. (eds) Language acquisition: The state of the art. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 128–172Google Scholar
  51. Slobin D. (eds) (1985) The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (Vols. 1 and 2). Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
  52. Snyder W. (2007) Child language: The parametric approach. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  53. Soderstrom, M., Wexler, K., & Jusczyk, P. (2002). English-learning toddlers’ sensitivity to agreement morphology in receptive grammar. In B. Skarabela, S. Fish, & A. H.-J. Do (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Boston University conference on language development (pp. 643–652). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
  54. Soderstrom M., White K.S., Conwell E., Morgan J.L. (2007) Receptive grammatical knowledge of familiar content words and inflection in 16-month-olds. Infancy 12: 1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tomasello M. (2000) Do young children have adult syntactic competence?. Cognition 74: 209–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tomasello M. (2001) The item-based nature of children’s early syntactic development. In: Tomasello M., Bates E. (eds) Language development: The essential readings. Blackwell, Malden, MA, pp 169–186Google Scholar
  57. Torrens, V. (1995). The acquisition of inflection in Spanish and Catalan. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 26 (pp. 451–472). Cambridge, MA: MITGoogle Scholar
  58. Tsimpli, I. (1992). Functional categories and maturation: The prefunctional stage. PhD Thesis, University College, London.Google Scholar
  59. Wexler K. (1994) Optional Infinitives, head movement, and the economy of derivations. In: Lightfoot D., Hornstein N. (eds) Verb movement. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 305–350Google Scholar
  60. Wexler, K. (1995). Feature interpretability and optionality in early child grammar. Paper presented at the Workshop on Optionality, University of Utrecht.Google Scholar
  61. Wijnen F., Kempen M., Gillis S. (2001) Bare infinitives in Dutch early child language: An effect of input?. Journal of Child Language 28(3): 629–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zagona K. (2002) The syntax of Spanish. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Classical and Modern Languages and LiteraturesRutgers UniversityNewarkUSA

Personalised recommendations