, 19:135

Ancient Egyptian verbal reduplication: typology, diachrony, and the morphology–syntax interface

Original Paper


We explore the diachronic development of verbal reduplication in Ancient Egyptian (Afro-Asiatic) by systematically comparing reduplicative stem formations in Old Egyptian (2500–2000 BC) and in Coptic Egyptian (3rd–12th c. AD). Old Egyptian is a language with a rich inventory of reduplication patterns, which have been reduced in the course of almost four thousand years of uninterrupted language history. Coptic retains only a limited number of reduplicative stem formations, frequently with concomitant loss of the simple stem. We show that the decreasing productivity of verbal reduplication in the language correlates with broad morphological and syntactic changes in the verbal domain.


Reduplicative stem formations Templates ‘Weak’ verbs Affix externalisation 


  1. Allen J.P. (1984). The inflection of the verb in the Pyramid Texts Bibliotheca Aegyptia (Vol. 2). Malibu, Undena Publications.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, M. C. (1985). The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry, 16, 373–416.Google Scholar
  3. Baker, M. C. (1988). Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bendjaballah, S., & Haiden, M. (2003). Templatic architecture. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes, 32, 157–168.Google Scholar
  5. Bendjaballah, S., & Haiden, M. (2008). A typology of emptiness in templates. In J. Hartmann, V.Hegedüs, & H. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), Sounds of silence: Empty elements in phonology and syntax (pp. 21–57). Amsterdam: Elsevier North Holland.Google Scholar
  6. Bendjaballah, S., & Reintges, C. H. (2007). Réduplication et temps-aspect-mode: l’exemple de l’égyptien ancien. In A. Michaud & A. Morgenstern (Eds.), Réduplication/Redoublement. Faits de langues (Vol. 29, pp. 145–160). Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
  7. Chomsky, N. (1996). The minimalist program. Current studies in linguistic theory (Vol. 28, 2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect—An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Comrie, B. (1982). Aspect and voice: Some reflections on perfect and passive. In P. J. Tedeschi & A. Zaenen (Eds), Tense and aspect. Syntax and semantic (Vol. 14, pp. 65–78). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  10. Doron, E. (2003). Agency and voice: The semantics of the Semitic template. Natural Language Semantics, 11, 1–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dryer, M. S. (2005). The position of tense-aspect affixes. In: M. Haspelmath, M. S. Dryer, D. Gil, & B. Comrie (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures (pp. 282–285). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Edel, E. (1955/1964). Altägyptische Grammatik. Analecta Orientalia (Vol. 34/39). Rome: Pontificial Biblical Institute.Google Scholar
  13. Gardiner, A. H. (1957). Egyptian grammar. Being an introduction to the study of hieroglyphs. Griffith Institute, Ashmolean Museum (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Guerssel, M., & Lowenstamm, J. (1990). The derivational morphology of the Classical Arabic verbal system. Ms. UQAM and Paris 7.Google Scholar
  15. Hale, K., & Keyser, S. J. (1993). On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Current studies in linguistics (Vol. 24, pp. 53–109). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hale, K., & Keyser, S. J. (2002). Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure. Linguistic Inquiry monographs (Vol. 39). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  17. Haspelmath, M. (1993). The diachronic externalization of inflection. Linguistics, 31, 279–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hintze, F. (1947). Die Haupttendenzen der ägyptischen Sprachentwicklung. Zeitschrift für Phonetik und allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, 1, 85–108.Google Scholar
  19. Inkelas, S., & Zoll, C. (2005). Reduplication: Doubling in morphology. Cambridge studies in linguistics (Vol. 106). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Junge, F. (1985). Sprachstufen und Sprachgeschichte. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft, (Supplement VI), 17–34.Google Scholar
  21. Keenan, E. L. (1985). Passive in the world’s languages. In T. Shopen (Ed.) Language universals and syntactic description (Vol. I, 1st ed., pp. 243–281). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kiparsky, P. (1986). The phonology of reduplication. Ms. Stanford University.Google Scholar
  23. Larson, R. K. (1988). On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry, 19, 335–391.Google Scholar
  24. Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M. (1995). Unaccusativity at the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Linguistic inquiry monographs (Vol. 26). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  25. Loprieno, A. (1995). Ancient Egyptian—A linguistic introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Lowenstamm, J. (2003). À propos des gabarits. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes, 32, 7–30.Google Scholar
  27. Mallon, A. (1953). Grammaire copte. Bibliographie, chrestomathie et vocabulaire. Beirut: Dar el Machreq.Google Scholar
  28. Marantz, A. (1982). Re Reduplication. Linguistic Inquiry, 13, 435–482.Google Scholar
  29. Marantz, A. (1997). No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. In A Dimitriadis, et al. (Eds.), University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4.2 (pp. 201–225).Google Scholar
  30. McCarthy, J. (1979). Formal problems in Semitic phonology and morphology. New York: Garland Press.Google Scholar
  31. McCloskey, J. (1997). Subjecthood and subject positions. In L. Haegeman (Ed.), Elements of grammar (pp. 197–235). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  32. Moravcsik, E. (1978). Reduplicative constructions. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of human language (pp. 297–334). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Newman, P. (2000). The Hausa Language: An encyclopedic reference grammar. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Polotsky, H. J. (1976). Les transpositions du verbe en égyptien classique. Israel Oriental Studies, 6, 1–50.Google Scholar
  35. Polotsky, H. J. (1987/1990). Grundlagen des koptischen Satzbaus. American studies in papyrology (Vol. 28/29). Decatur, GA: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
  36. Quack, J. F. (2003). Zum Charakter der “zweiradikaligen” Verben des Ä gyptischen. In M. L. Bender, G. Takàcs, & D. Appleyard (Eds.), Selected comparative-historical Afrasian linguistics studies in memory of Igor M. Diakonoff. LINCOM studies in Afro-Asiatic linguistics (Vol. 14, pp. 167–174). Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
  37. Reintges, C. H. (1994). Egyptian root-and-pattern morphology. Proceedings of the International Conference on Egyptian Grammar. Crossroads III (Yale 1994). Lingua Aegyptia, 4, 213–244.Google Scholar
  38. Reintges, C. H. (1997). Passive voice in Older Egyptian—A morpho-syntactic study. HIL dissertations (Vol. 28). The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar
  39. Reintges, C. H. (2003). The reduplicative passive in Older Egyptian: Description and typology. In M. L. Bender, G. Takàcs, & D. Appleyard (Eds.), Selected comparative-historical Afrasian linguistic studies in memory of Igor M. Diakonoff. LINCOM studies in Afro-Asiatic linguistics (Vol. 14, pp. 175–186). Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
  40. Reintges, C. H. (2004). Coptic Egyptian (Sahidic Dialect): A learner’s grammar. Afrikawissenschaftliche Lehrbücher (Vol. 15). Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Google Scholar
  41. Reintges, C. H. (2008). The diachronic typology of passive and stative voice in Ancient Egyptian. In L. Kulikov & S. Kittilä (Eds.), The diachronic typology of voice and valency-changing categories. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins (to appear).Google Scholar
  42. Smith, C. S. (1997). The parameter of aspect. Studies in linguistics and philosophy (Vol. 43). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  43. Till, W. C. (1960). Koptische Grammatik (Saïdischer Dialekt) mit Bibliographie, Lesestücken und Wörterverzeichnissen. Leipzig: Enzyklopädie Verlag.Google Scholar
  44. Travis, L. (1999). A syntactician’s view of reduplication. In C. Smallwood & C. Kitto (Eds.), Proceedings of sixth meeting of the Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association (AFLA 6) (Toronto 16–18 April 1999). Toronto working papers in linguistics (pp. 313–331).Google Scholar
  45. Travis, L. (2003). Reduplication feeding syntactic movement. In S. Somesfalean (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2003 Canadian Linguistic Association annual conference (pp. 236–247). Montréal: Département de linguistique et de didactique des langues, Université du Québec à Montréal.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CNRS/UMR/7110 LLF & University Paris 7ParisFrance

Personalised recommendations