, 19:113 | Cite as

Reduplication in Slavic and Baltic: loss and renewal

Open Access
Original Paper


The exposition comprises three parts. Part 1 surveys the Indo-European reduplication patterns (RPs) that have been lost in Slavic and Baltic: the languages show little or no evidence of inherited RPs in present and perfect formations, and in intensive verbs (Sect. 2.1), but some vestiges of reduplication in nouns can be identified (Sect. 2.2). Part 2 describes innovated RPs in the Slavic verb; they can be posited on the basis of scanty evidence that has survived the Late Common Slavic loss of coda obstruents. Part 3 describes Baltic innovations reflected in Lithuanian: reduplicative root formations (Sect. 4.1), several minor lexicalized RPs (Sect. 4.2.), and the para-lexical part of speech called eventives (Sect. 4.3). Their content categories, types of expression, patterns of iconicity, and grammatical function are analysed and exemplified in some detail. It is suggested that formations such as these may form the natural background for the creation of new patterns of morphological expression including patterns of reduplication.


Aspect Elative Eventive Iconicity Intensive Onomatopoeia 


Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.


  1. Ambrazas, V. (Ed.). (1997). Lithuanian grammar. Vilnius: Baltos LankosGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen H. (1986) Protoslavic and common Slavic: Questions of periodization and terminology, Slavic Linguistics, Poetics, Cultural History. In: Flier M.S., Worth D.S.(eds) Honor of Henrik Birnbaum on his Sixtieth Birthday, 13 December 1985 (= International Journal of Slavic Linguistics and Poetics 31/32). Slavica Publishers, Columbus OH, pp 67–82Google Scholar
  3. Andersen, H. (1993/1998). Le lingue slave. In P. Ramat & A. Giacalone-Ramat (Eds.), Le lingue indoeuropee (pp. 441–480). Bologna: Il Mulino. English version: “[Chapter] 14. Slavic”. In P. Ramat & A. Giacalone-Ramat (Eds.), The Indo-European Languages (pp. 415–453). London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Fraenkel, E. (1962–1965). Litauisches etymologisches Wörterbuch (Vols. 1–2). Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag & Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar
  5. Gamkrelidze, T. V., & Ivanov, V. V. (1984). Indoevropejskij jazyk i indoevropejcy. Rekonstrukcija i istoriko-tipologičeskij analiz prajazyka i protokul’tury (Vols. 1–2). Tbilisi: Izdatel’stvo tbilisskogo universiteta.Google Scholar
  6. Hurch, B., & Mattes V. (2005). Ueber die Entstehung von partieller Reduplikation. In G. Fenk-Oczlon & C.Winkler (Eds.), Sprache und Natürlichkeit. Gedenkband für Willi Mayerthaler (pp. 137–156). Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
  7. Jašinskaitė, J. (1971). Ištiktukai. In V. Ambrazas (Ed.), Lietuvių kalbos gramatika (Vol. 2). Morfologija (pp. 734–746). Vilnius: Mintis.Google Scholar
  8. Kulikov, L. I. (2005). Reduplication in the Vedic verb: Indo-European inheritance, analogy and iconicity. In B. Hurch (Ed.), with editorial assistance of V. Mattes, Studies on reduplication. Empirical approaches to language typology, 28 (pp. 431–454). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  9. Leskien, A. (1902/1903). Schallnachahmungen und Schallverba im Litauischen. Indogermanische Forschungen, 13, 165–212.Google Scholar
  10. Nöth W. (1990) Handbook of semiotics. Indiana University Press, Bloomington/IndianapolisGoogle Scholar
  11. Otrębski, J. (1956). Gramatyka języka litewskiego (Vol. 3). Nauka o formach. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
  12. Rasmussen, J. E. (1984/1988). The make-up of Indo-European morphology. Arbejdspapirer fra Institut for Lingvistik, Københavns Universitet, 4, 119–133. Also in Diachronica, 4, 107–122 (1988).Google Scholar
  13. Rasmussen J.E. (1997) Processes of grammaticalization in Indo-European verbal morphology. In: Lubotsky A.(eds) Sound law and analogy. Papers in honor of Robert S. P. Beekes on the occasion of his 60th birthday. Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp 249–262Google Scholar
  14. Senn, A. (1966). Handbuch der litauischen Sprache (Vol. 1). Grammatik. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
  15. Stang, C. S. (1966). Vergleichende Grammatik der Baltischen Sprachen. Oslo/Bergen/Tromsø: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  16. Trubačev, O. N. (1973–). Ètimologičeskij slovar’ slavjanskix jazykov. Praslavjanskij leksičeskij fond [Etymological Dictionary of the Slavic Languages. The Proto-Slavic Lexical Stock] (Vols. 1–.) Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar
  17. Vaillant, A. (1966). Grammaire comparée des langues slaves (Vol. 3, pp. 1–2). Le verbe. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
  18. Vasmer, M. (1953–1957). Russisches etymologisches Wörterbuch (Vols. 1–3). Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
  19. Zinkevičius, Z. (1966). Lietuvių dialektologija. Lyginamoji tarmių fonetika ir morfologija (su 75 z.emėlapiais). Vilnius: Mintis.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations