Morphology

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 75–92 | Cite as

On homophony and methodology in morphology

Original Paper

Abstract

An analysis of the Afro-Asiatic prefixal conjugation is presented, arguing that the prefixal t of second and some third persons comprises two distinct morphemes. The claim is supported by intralinguistic evidence, from other verbal and non-verbal forms, and historical/comparative evidence, that has not generally been considered in this context before. The results highlight several methodological and conceptual issues in morphological theory, including the status of homophones, paradigms, and diachronic development.

Keywords

Afro-Asiatic (Semitic) Diachrony Homophony Impoverishment Morphology Syncretism 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson S. (1992) A-morphous morphology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Arad M. (2005) Roots and patterns: Hebrew morpho-syntax. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  3. Bachrach, A., Nelvins, A. (eds) (2008) Inflectional identity. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Benmamoun E. (2000) The feature structure of functional categories: A comparative study of Arabic dialects. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Bobaljik J. (2001) Syncretism without paradigms: Remarks on Williams 1981, 1984. In: Booij G., van Marle J. (eds) Yearbook of morphology 2001. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 53–86Google Scholar
  6. Borer H. (1983) Parametric syntax. Case studies in Semitic and Romance languages. Studies in Generative Grammar 13. Dordrecht, ForisGoogle Scholar
  7. Buccellati G. (1997) Akkadian. In: Hetzron R. (eds) The Semitic languages. Routledge, New York, NY, pp 69–99Google Scholar
  8. Fischer W. (1997) Classical Arabic. In: Hetzron R. (eds) The Semitic languages. Routledge, New York, NY, pp 187–219Google Scholar
  9. Frampton J. (2002) Syncretism, impoverishment, and the structure of person features. In: Andronis M., Debenport E., Pycha A., Yoshimori K. (eds) Papers from the Chicago Linguistics Society 38. Chicago Univerity Press, Chicago, pp 207–222Google Scholar
  10. Gragg G. (1997) Ge‘ez (Ethiopic). In: Hetzron R. (eds) The Semitic languages. Routledge, New York, NY, pp 242–260Google Scholar
  11. Gutt E.-A. (1997) The Silte group (East Gurage). In: Hetzron R. (eds) The Semitic languages. Routledge, New York, NY, pp 509–534Google Scholar
  12. Halle, M. (1997). Distributed Morphology: Impoverishment and Fission. In B. Bruening, Y. Kang, & M. McGinnis (Eds.), MIT working papers in linguistics 30: PF: Papers at the interface (425–449). MIT. (Reprinted in Research in Afroasiatic Grammar: Papers from the Third Conference on Afroasiatic Languages, Sophia Antipolis, France 1996, pp. 125–150, by Jacqueline Lecarme and Jean Lowenstamm & Ur Shlonsky, (Eds.), 2003, Amsterdam: Benjamins.).Google Scholar
  13. Halle M., Marantz A. (1993) Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In: Hale K., Keyser S.J. (eds) The view from Building 20. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 111–176Google Scholar
  14. Harbour D. (2007) Against PersonP. Syntax 10: 223–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harbour D. (2008) Discontinuous agreement and the Syntax–Morphology interface. In: Harbour D., Adger D., Béjar S. (eds) Phi theory: Phi-features across modules and interfaces. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 185–220Google Scholar
  16. Harley H. (2008) When is a syncretism more than a syncretism? Impoverishment, metasyncretism, and underspecification. In: Harbour D., Adger D., Béjar S. (eds) Phi theory: Phi-features across modules and interfaces. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 251–294Google Scholar
  17. Hetzron R. (1997) Outer South Ethiopic. In: Hetzron Robert (eds) The Semitic languages. Routledge, New York, NY, pp 535–549Google Scholar
  18. Hudson G. (1997) Amharic and Argobba. In: Hetzron R. (eds) The Semitic languages. Routledge, New York, NY, pp 457–485Google Scholar
  19. Huehnergard, J. (2002). Comparative Semitic linguistics. Israel Oriental Studies, 20, 119–150. [Special issue, Shlomo Izre’el, ed., Semitic Linguistics: The State of the Art at the Turn of the Twenty-First Century].Google Scholar
  20. Jastrow O. (1997) The neo-Aramaic languages. In: Hetzron R. (eds) The Semitic languages. Routledge, New York, NY, pp 334–377Google Scholar
  21. Johnstone T.M. (1977) Ḥarsūsi Lexicon and English–Ḥarsūsi Word-List. Oxford University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Kautzsch, E. (1910). Genesius’ Hebrew grammar (2nd ed.). (A. E. Cowley, Trans./Ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kaye A., Rosenhouse J. (1997) Arabic dialects and Maltese. In: Hetzron R. (eds) The Semitic languages. Routledge, New York, NY, pp 263–311Google Scholar
  24. Kogan L. (1997) Tigrinya. In: Hetzron R. (eds) The Semitic languages. Routledge, New York, NY, pp 424–445Google Scholar
  25. Lieber R. (1992) Deconstructing morphology. Chicago University Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  26. Noyer R. (1992) Features, positions and affixes in autonomous morphological structure. MITWPL, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  27. Raz S. (1997) Tigré. In: Robert Hetzron (eds) The Semitic languages. Routledge, New York, NY, pp 446–456Google Scholar
  28. Rosenthal F. (1961) A grammar of Biblical Aramaic 5th ed., 1983). Otto Harrassowitz, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  29. Segert S. (1997) Phoenician and the eastern Canaanite languages. In: Hetzron R. (eds) The Semitic languages. Routledge, New York, NY, pp 174–186Google Scholar
  30. Simeone-Senelle M.-C. (1997) The modern South Arabian languages. In: Hetzron R. (eds) The Semitic languages. Routledge, New York, NY, pp 378–423Google Scholar
  31. Sivan R., Levenston E. (1975) The new Bantam-Megiddo Hebrew and English dictionary. Bantam Books, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  32. Wagner E. (1997) Harari. In: Hetzron R. (eds) The Semitic languages. Routledge, New York, NY, pp 486–508Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Queen Mary University of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations