, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 151–178 | Cite as

Inflectional paradigms have a base: evidence from s-Dissimilation in Southern German dialects

  • T. A. HallEmail author
  • John H. G. Scott
Original Paper


In many varieties of Southern German the contrast between /s/ and /\(\int\) / is neutralized to \([\int]\) before /p t/ anywhere within a word (e.g. \(Post \,[{\rm po}\int t]\) ‘mail’), but neutralization does not occur before inflectional suffixes (e.e. küss-t [kyst] ‘kiss (3 SG)’). It will be argued that the underapplication of neutralization before inflectional suffixes is an example of a Paradigm Uniformity effect: Neutralization is blocked from applying to the final /s/ of a stem so that it will retain a constant shape in a paradigm. Underapplication in examples like [kyst] follows from a requirement that the stem in a derived word be identical to the unaffixed base. By contrast, the German data will be shown to be problematic for the Optimal Paradigms model (McCarthy 2005), since this approach does not allow for a base in inflectional paradigms.


Paradigm uniformity Base identity Optimality Theory German Swabian Realize Morpheme Homophony 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alber B. (2001) Regional variation and edges: Glottal stop epenthesis and dissimilation in standard and Southern varieties of German. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 20: 3–41Google Scholar
  2. Albright A. (2004) Sub-optimal paradigms in Yiddish. WCCFL 23: 1–14Google Scholar
  3. Benua, L. (1997) Transderivational identity: Phonological relations between words. Ph.D. dissertation, Amherst: University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  4. Berger J. (1913) Die Laute der Mundarten des St. Galler Reintals und der angrenzenden vorarlbergischen Gebiete. Beträge zur Schweizerdeutschen Grammatik 3: 1–231Google Scholar
  5. Bertram O. (1937) Die Mundart der mittleren Vorderpfalz. Erlangen, Palm & EnkeGoogle Scholar
  6. Bohnenberger K. (1928) Die Mundarten Würtenbergs. Eine heimatkundliche Sprachlehre. Stuttgart, SilberburgGoogle Scholar
  7. Booij G. (1985) Coordination reduction in complex words: a case for prosodic phonology. In: van der Hulst H., Smith N. (eds) Advances in nonlinear phonology. Dordrecht, Foris, pp. 143–160Google Scholar
  8. Clements G.N. (1999) Affricates as noncontoured stops. In: Fujimura O. et al (eds) Item, order in Language and Speech. Prague, Charles University Press, pp. 271–299Google Scholar
  9. Crosswhite, K. (1999) Intra-paradigmatic homophony avoidance in two dialects Matthew K. Gordon (Ed.), UCLA working papers in linguistics 1. Papers in phonology 2. UCLA.Google Scholar
  10. Downing L., Hall T.A., Raffelsiefen R. (Eds) (2005) Paradigms in phonological theory. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  11. Eisenberg, P. (1998) Grundriss der deutschen Grammatik. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler.Google Scholar
  12. Fleischer W., Barz I. (1995) Wortbildung der deutschen Gegenwartssprache (2nd ed). Tübingen, NiemeyerGoogle Scholar
  13. Frey E. (1975) Stuttgarter Schwäbisch Laut-und Formenlehre eines Stuttgarter Idiolekts. Marburg, N. G. ElwertGoogle Scholar
  14. Grijzenhout J. (1998) The role of coronal underspecification in German and Dutch phonology and morphology. In: Kehrein W., Wiese R. (eds) Phonology and morphology of the Germanic languages. Tübingen, Max Niemeyer, pp. 27–50Google Scholar
  15. Haag C. (1898) Die Mundarten des oberen Neckar-und Donaulandes. Reutlingen, Eugen HutzlerGoogle Scholar
  16. Hall T.A. (1992) Syllable structure and syllable related processes in German. Tübingen, NiemeyerGoogle Scholar
  17. Hall T.A. (2002) The distribution of superheavy syllables in Standard German. The Linguistic Review 19:377–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hall, T. A. (2007) Middle high German \([rs] > [r\int ]\) as height dissimilation. Ms. Indiana University.Google Scholar
  19. Hoffmann, K. (1900) Laut-und Flexionslehre der Mundart der Moselgegend von Oberham bis zur Reinprovinz. Metz: Buchdruckerei der Lothringer Zeitung.Google Scholar
  20. Holthausen F. (1921) Alsächsisches Elementarbuch. Heidelberg, Carl Winter’s Universit ätsbuchhandlungGoogle Scholar
  21. Ichimura, L. (2006) Anti-homophony blocking and its productivity in transparadigmatic relations. Ph.D. dissertation: Boston University [ROA–881–1006].Google Scholar
  22. Itô J., Mester A. (1999) Realignment. In: Kager R., van der Hulst H., Zonneveld W. (eds) The prosody-morphology interface. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 188–217Google Scholar
  23. Jakobson R., Fant G., Halle M. (1952) Preliminaries to speech analysis: The distinctive features and their correlates. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. Jutz, L. (1931) Die alemannischen Mundarten (Abriss der Lautverhältnisse). Halle (Saale): Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
  25. Kager R. (1999) Optimality theory. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  26. Kehrein W. (2002) Phonological representation and phonetic phrasing: Affricates and laryngeals. Tübingen, NiemeyerGoogle Scholar
  27. Kenstowicz M. (1996) Base-identity and uniform exponence: Alternatives to cyclicity. In: Durand J., Laks B. (eds) Current trends in phonology: models and methods. Man- chester, European Studies Research Institute, pp. 363–393Google Scholar
  28. Kenstowicz, M. (2005). Paradigmatic uniformity and contrast. In: Downing L., Hall T.A., Raffelsiefen R. (eds) Paradigms in Optimality Theory. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 145–169. Google Scholar
  29. Kim H. (2001) A phonetically based account of phonological stop assibilation. Phonology 18: 81–108Google Scholar
  30. Kurisu, K. (2001) The phonology of morpheme realization. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California at Santa Cruz [ROA-490–0102].Google Scholar
  31. LaCharité , D. (1993) The internal structure of affricates. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
  32. Lahiri A., Evers V. (1991) Palatalization and coronality. In: Paradis C., Prunet J.-F. (eds) The special status of coronals. Internal and external evidence. San Diego, Academic Press, pp. 79–100Google Scholar
  33. McCarthy J. (2005) Optimal paradigms. In: Downing L., Hall T.A., Raffelsiefen R. (eds) Paradigms in phonological theory. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 170–210Google Scholar
  34. McCarthy, J., & Prince, A. (1995) Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In J. Beckman, L. Walsh Dickey, & S. Urbanczyk (Eds.), Papers in optimality theory (pp. 249–384) University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18. Amherst, Mass.Google Scholar
  35. Moser V. (1951) Frühneuhochdeutsche Grammatik. Heidelberg, Carl Winter UniversitätsverlagGoogle Scholar
  36. Muthmann G. (1988) Phonologisches Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. Tübingen, NiemeyerGoogle Scholar
  37. Nelson, N. A. (2003) Asymmetric anchoring. Ph.D. dissertation, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
  38. Ní Chiosáin, M. (1991) Topics in the phonology of Irish. Ph.D. dissertation, Amherst: University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  39. Noske M. (1997) Feature spreading as dealignment: the distribution of [ç] and [x] in German. Phonology 14, 221–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Prince A., Smolensky P. (2004) Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Blackwell, Malden, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  41. Raffelsiefen, R. (1995) Conditions for stability: The case of schwa in German. Arbeiten des Sonderforschungsbereichs 282. Düsseldorf: Heinrich-Heine-Universität.Google Scholar
  42. Raffelsiefen R. (1996) Gaps in word formation. In: Kleinhenz U. (Eds) Interfaces in Phonology. Akademie Verlag, Berlin pp 194–209Google Scholar
  43. Raffelsiefen R. (2000) Evidence for word-internal phonological words in German. In: Thieroff R. et al. (eds) Deutsche Grammatik in Theorie und Praxis. Tübingen, Niemeyer, pp. 43–56Google Scholar
  44. Raffelsiefen R. (2004) Phonological Effects in Word formation. Habilitationsschrift, Freie University of BerlinGoogle Scholar
  45. Reiss C. (2003) Language change without constraint reranking. In: Holt D.E. (eds) Optimality theory and language change. Dordrecht, Kluwer, pp. 143–168Google Scholar
  46. Rubach J. (1994) Affricates as strident stops in Polish. Linguistic Inquiry 25: 119–143Google Scholar
  47. Russ C.V.J. (1978) Historical German phonology and morphology. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  48. Russ C.V. (1982) Studies in historical German phonology. Bern, Peter LangGoogle Scholar
  49. Schatz J. (1897) Die Mundart von Imst. Laut-und Flexionslehre. Strassburg, Karl J. TrübnerGoogle Scholar
  50. Schirmunski V.M. (1962) Deutsche Mundartkunde. Vergleichende Lautund Formenlehre der deutschen Mundarten. Akademie-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  51. Scott, J. H. G. (2006) Dissimilation of coronal fricatives in Swabian German tautomorphemic /sC/clusters. Ms. Indiana University.Google Scholar
  52. Steriade D. (2000) Paradigm uniformity and the phonetics-phonology boundary. In: Broe M., Pierrehumbert J. (eds) Papers in laboratory phonology V. Acquisition and the lexicon. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 313–334Google Scholar
  53. Tarral N. (1903) Laut-und Formenlehre der Mundart des Kantons Falkenberg in Lothr. Strassburg, Heitz & MündelGoogle Scholar
  54. van Oostendorp M. (2000) Wieringse nasaalvelarisiering. Taal en Tongval LLL 1: 163–188Google Scholar
  55. Vogt E.F. (1977) Schwäbisch in Laut und Schrift. Stuttgart, J. F. SteinkopfGoogle Scholar
  56. Wiese R. (1991) Was ist extrasilbisch im Deutschen und warum? Zeitschrift für Sprachwissen-schaft 10.1: 112–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wiese R. (1996) The phonology of German. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  58. Wipf E. (1910) Die Mundart von Visperterminen im Wallis. Beträge zur Schweizerdeutschen Grammatik 2: 1–198Google Scholar
  59. Wurzel W.U. (1984) Flexionsmorphologie und Natürlichkeit. Akademie-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  60. Zinser R. (1933) Die Mundart des Oberen Gäus südlich von Herrenberg nach Lauten und Flexion. Stuttgart, J. FinkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Germanic StudiesIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations