Improving Timely Linkage to Care among Newly Diagnosed HIV-Infected Youth: Results of SMILE
- 43 Downloads
Delayed linkage to care deprives youth living with HIV of the benefits of HIV treatment and risks increased HIV transmission. Developing and testing linkage-to-care models that are capable of simultaneously addressing structural and individual obstacles are necessary to attain national goals for timely linkage of newly diagnosed youth to care. We assessed an integrated, multi-pronged strategy for improving youth’s timely linkage to care carried out in eight adolescent medicine clinical trials units (AMTUs) in the USA. In phase I, the intervention strategy paired intensive medical case management with formalized relationships to local health departments, including granting of public health authority (PHA) to four of the AMTUs. In phase II, local coalitions run by the AMTUs to address structural changes to meet youth’s HIV prevention and HIV testing needs began to advocate for local structural changes to improve timely access to care. Results of an ARIMA model demonstrated sustained decline in the average number of days to link to care over a 6-year period (ARIMA (1,2,1) AIC = 245.74, BIC = 248.70, p < .01)). By the end of the study, approximately 90% of youth linked to care had an initial medical visit in 42 or fewer days post-diagnosis. PHA improved the timeliness of linkage to care (b = − 69.56, p < .05). A piecewise regression suggested the addition of structural change initiatives during phase II made a statistically significant contribution to reducing time to linkage over and above achievements attained via case management alone (F (3,19) = 5.48, p < .01; Adj. R2 = .3794). Multi-level linkage-to-care interventions show promise for improving youth’s timely access to HIV medical care.
KeywordsYouth Adolescence HIV/AIDS Linkage-to-care Structural change
This work was supported by Grants No. 5 U01 HD040533 and 5 U01 HD 40474 to the Adolescent Medicine Trials Network for HIV/AIDS Interventions (ATN) from the National Institutes of Health through the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (B. Kapogiannis, MD), with supplemental funding from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (K. Davenny, PhD) and National Institute on Mental Health (S. Allison, PhD, P. Brouwers, PhD). The study was scientifically reviewed by the ATN’s Community and Prevention Leadership Group. Network scientific and logistical support was provided by the ATN Coordinating Center (C. Wilson, C. Partlow, J. Merchant) at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. ATN Data and Operations support was provided by Westat, Inc. (Jim Korelitz, PhD, Barbara Driver, RN, MS). We are grateful to Chitrak Banerjee, Timothy Thompson, and Taylor Whittington for their research assistance.
- 1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV among Youth. HIV and Youth CDC Fact Sheet 2018. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/group/age/youth/index.html. Retrieved March 22, 2019.
- 3.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Estimated HIV incidence and prevalence in the United States, 2010–2015. HIV Surveillance Supplement Report 2016; 23 (Suppl 1). Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/library/reports/surveillance/cdc-hiv-surveillance-supplemental-report-vol-23-1.pdf. Retrieved February 11, 2019.
- 4.Centers for disease control and prevention. HIV among African American gay and bisexual men. HIV and African American Gay and Bisexual Men CDC Fact Sheet 2018. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/group/msm/bmsm.html. Retrieved February 13, 2019.
- 5.Millett GA, Peterson JL, Flores SA, et al. Comparisons of disparities and risks of HIV infection in black and other men who have sex with men in Canada, UK, and USA: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2012; July:11–8.Google Scholar
- 7.White House Office of National AIDS Policy National HIV/AIDS strategy for the United States: updated to 2020. AIDS Policy 2015; https://files.hiv.gov/s3fs-public/nhas-update.pdf. Retrieved September 7, 2018.
- 9.Philbin, MM, Tanner, AE, DuVal, A, et al. Factors affecting linkage to care and engagement in care for newly diagnosed HIV-positive adolescents within fifteen adolescent medicine clinics in the United States. AIDS Behav. 2014;18:1501–1510.Google Scholar
- 11.Fortenberry, JD, Martinez, J, Rudy, BJ, et al. Linkage to care for HIV-positive adolescents: A multisite study of adolescent medicine trials units of the Adolescent Trials Network. J Adolesc Health. 2012;51:551–556.Google Scholar
- 12.Chiaramonte, D, Strzyzykowski, T, Acevedo-Polakovich, I, et al. Ecological barriers to HIV service access among youth men who have sex with men and high-risk young women from low-resourced urban communities. J HIV AIDS Soc Serv. 2018;31:1–22.Google Scholar
- 13.Griffin-Tomas M, Cahill S, Kapadia F, et al. Access to health services among young adult gay men in New York City. Am J Mens Health. 2018, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988318818683.
- 18.Fortenberry, JD., Koenig, LJ, Kapogiannis, BG, et al. Implementation of an integrated approach to the National HIV/AIDS Strategy for improving Human Immunodeficiency Virus care for youths. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171:687–693.Google Scholar
- 19.Boyer, CB., Walker, BB, Chutuape, KS, et al. Creating systems change to support goals for HIV continuum of care: The role of community coalitions to reduce structural barriers for adolescents and young adults. J HIV AIDS Soc Serv. 2016;15:158–179.Google Scholar
- 20.Miller, RL., Reed, SJ, Chiaramonte, D, et al. Structural and community change outcomes for the Connect-to-Protect coalitions: Trials and triumphs securing adolescent access to HIV prevention, testing, and medical care. Am J Community Psychol. 2017;60:199–214.Google Scholar
- 27.Bendetson J, Dierst-Davies R, Flynn R, Beymer MR, Wohl AR, Amico KR, et al. Evaluation of a client-centered linkage intervention for patients newly diagnosed with HIV at an urban United States LGBT center: the linkage to care specialist project. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2017;31(7):283–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Miller, RL., Reed, SJ, Chiaramonte, D, et al. Structural and community change outcomes for the Connect-to-Protect coalitions: Trials and triumphs securing adolescent access to HIV prevention, testing, and medical care. Am J Community Psychol. 2017;60:199–214.Google Scholar
- 33.Tanner AE, Philbin M, DuVal A, et al. ‘Youth friendly’ clinics: Considerations for linking and engaging HIV-infected adolescents into care. AIDS Care. 2014; 26(2):199–205.Google Scholar
- 34.Cheung YW, Lai KS. Lag order and critical values of the augmented dickey-fuller test. J Bus Econ Stat. 1995;13(3):277–80.Google Scholar