The digital neighborhood is the amalgamation of the spaces online where youth connect with others. Just as Black and Hispanic youth live in neighborhoods that influence their health, they are also influenced by online digital neighborhoods. Youth are exposed to social media content featuring substance use, sexual risk, and violence, yet little is known about the extent to which youth engage with such content. Using a modified venue sampling strategy, we administered CASI surveys to 145 Black and Hispanic youth aged 13–24 living in low-income urban neighborhoods. Across social media platforms, respondents reported high levels of exposure to sexual, alcohol, drug, and violence-related content (65–84%). Users reported lower levels of engagement with risk-related content (on an engagement continuum), ranging from passive exposure to dissemination. While negative risks may be amplified in the digital neighborhood, youth appear to strategically limit their engagement with that content. However, because risk behavior messaging is common in these digital neighborhoods, these spaces provide opportunities for health promotion interventions.
Social media Youth Sexual health Substance Alcohol Drug Violence
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
The study was funded, in part, by Rutgers University ‐Camden.
Kwate NO. Take one down, pass it around, 98 alcohol ads on the wall: outdoor advertising in New York City’s black neighbourhoods. Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36:988–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Kwate NOA, Jernigan M, Lee T. Prevalence, proximity and predictors of alcohol ads in Central Harlem. Alcohol Alcohol. 2007;42:635–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Bauermeister JA, Zimmerman MA, Caldwell CH. Neighborhood disadvantage and changes in condom use among African American adolescents. J Urban Health. 2011;88:66–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Baumer EP, South SJ. Community effects on youth sexual activity. J Marriage Fam. 2001;63:540–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowleg L, Neilands TB, Tabb LP, Burkholder GJ, Malebranche DJ, Tschann JM. Neighborhood context and black heterosexual men’s sexual HIV risk behaviors. AIDS Behav. 2014;18:2207–18.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Elliott DS, Wilson WJ, Huizinga D, et al. The effects of neighborhood disadvantage on adolescent development. J Res Crime Delinq. 1996;33:389–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens R, Gilliard-Matthews S, Dunaev J, Woods MK, Brawner BM, et al. The digital hood: social media use among youth in disadvantaged neighborhoods. New Media Soc. 2017;19(6):950–967. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815625941.
Lenhart A. Teen, social media and technology overview. Retrieved from Washington, DC. 2015.Google Scholar
Kann L, McManus T, Harris WA, et al. Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States, 2015. Morbidity and mortality weekly report surveillance summaries (Washington, DC : 2002) 2016;65:1–174.Google Scholar
Bleakley A, Hennessy M, Fishbein M, Jordan A. It works both ways: the relationship between exposure to sexual content in the media and adolescent sexual behavior. Media Psychol. 2008;11:443–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Brown J, Halpern C, L’Engle K. Mass media as a sexual super peer for early maturing girls. J Adolesc Health. 2005;36:420–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Anderson P, de Bruijn A, Angus K, Gordon R, Hastings G. Impact of alcohol advertising and media exposure on adolescent alcohol use: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. Alcohol Alcohol. 2009;44:229–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Farrelly MC, Davis KC, Haviland ML, Messeri P, Healton CG. Evidence of a dose-response relationship between “truth” antismoking ads and youth smoking prevalence. Am J Public Health. 2005;95:425–31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Wong C, Merchant R, Moreno M. Using social media to engage adolescents and young adults with their health. Healthcare: the Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation 2014.Google Scholar
Morgan EM, Snelson C, Elison-Bowers P. Image and video disclosure of substance use on social media websites. Comput Hum Behav. 2010;26:1405–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patton DU, Eschmann RD, Butler DA. Internet banging: new trends in social media, gang violence, masculinity and hip hop. Comput Hum Behav. 2013;29:A54–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison S, Bauermeister JA, Bull S, Lightfoot M, Mustanski B, Shegog R, et al. The intersection of youth, technology, and new media with sexual health: moving the research agenda forward. J Adolesc Health. 2012;51:207–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Guse K, Levine D, Martins S, Lira A, Gaarde J, Westmorland W, et al. Interventions using new digital media to improve adolescent sexual health: a systematic review. J Adolesc Health. 2012;51:535–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Patton DU, Hong JS, Ranney M, Patel S, Kelley C, Eschmann R, et al. Social media as a vector for youth violence: a review of the literature. Comput Hum Behav. 2014;35:548–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreno MA, Parks MR, Zimmerman FJ, Brito TE, Christakis DA. Display of health risk behaviors on MySpace by adolescents: prevalence and associations. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009;163:27–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Moreno MA, Christakis DA, Egan KG, Brockman LN, Becker T. Associations between displayed alcohol references on Facebook and problem drinking among college students. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;166:157–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Boyer CB, Shafer M-A, Wibbelsman CJ, Seeberg D, Teitle E, Lovell N. Associations of sociodemographic, psychosocial, and behavioral factors with sexual risk and sexually transmitted diseases in teen clinic patients. J Adolesc Health. 2000;27:102–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Niederdeppe J, Hornik RC, Kelly BJ, Frosch DL, Romantan A, Stevens RS, et al. Examining the dimensions of cancer-related information seeking and scanning behavior. Health Commun. 2007;22:153–67.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Muhib FB, Lin LS, Stueve A, Miller RL, Ford WL, Johnson WD, et al. A venue-based method for sampling hard-to-reach populations. Public Health Rep. 2001;116(Suppl 1):216–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Van Schuur WH. Mokken scale analysis: between the Guttman scale and parametric item response theory. Polit Anal. 2003;11:139–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar