Advertisement

Journal of Urban Health

, Volume 95, Issue 3, pp 383–390 | Cite as

Association between Firearm Laws and Homicide in Urban Counties

  • Cassandra K. Crifasi
  • Molly Merrill-Francis
  • Alex McCourt
  • Jon S. Vernick
  • Garen J. Wintemute
  • Daniel W. Webster
Article

Abstract

Laws related to the sale, use, and carrying of firearms have been associated with differences in firearm homicide rates at the state level. Right-to-carry (RTC) and stand your ground (SYG) laws are associated with increases in firearm homicide; permit-to-purchase (PTP) laws and those prohibiting individuals convicted of violent misdemeanors (VM) have been associated with decreases in firearm homicide. Evidence for the effect of comprehensive background checks (CBC) not tied to PTP is inconclusive. Because firearm homicide tends to concentrate in urban areas, this study was designed to test the effects of firearm laws on homicide in large, urban U.S. counties. We conducted a longitudinal study using an interrupted time series design to evaluate the effect of firearm laws on homicide in large, urban U.S. counties from 1984 to 2015 (N = 136). We used mixed effects Poisson regression models with random intercepts for counties and year fixed effects to account for national trends. Models also included county and state characteristics associated with violence. Homicide was stratified by firearm versus all other methods to test for specificity of the laws’ effects. PTP laws were associated with a 14% reduction in firearm homicide in large, urban counties (IRR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.82–0.90). CBC-only, SYG, RTC, and VM laws were all associated with increases in firearm homicide. None of the laws were associated with differences in non-firearm homicide rates. These findings are consistent with prior research at the state level showing PTP laws are associated with decreased firearm homicide. Testing the effects of PTP laws specifically in large, urban counties strengthens available evidence by isolating the effects in the geographic locations in which firearm homicides concentrate.

Keywords

Gun policy Firearm Homicide 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a grant from The Joyce Foundation to the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Policy and Research http://www.joycefdn.org/grants).

References

  1. 1.
    CDC WISQARS - Fatal Injury Reports, National and Regional, 2016: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2017 [Available from: https://webappa.cdc.gov/sasweb/ncipc/mortrate.html.
  2. 2.
    CDC WONDER: Compressed Mortality, 2016 [Available from: https://wonder.cdc.gov/mortSQL.html2018.
  3. 3.
    Miller M, Hepburn L, Azrael D. Firearm acquisition without background checks: results of a national survey firearm acquisition without background checks. Ann Intern Med. 2017;166(4):233–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vittes KA, Vernick JS, Webster DW. Legal status and source of offenders’ firearms in states with the least stringent criteria for gun ownership. Injury Prevention 2012;epub doi:  https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2011-040290
  5. 5.
    ATF Crime Gun Trace Reports: The youth crime gun interdiction initiative. In: Firearms BoAT, ed. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Treasury, 2002.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Webster D, Vernick J, McGinty E, et al. Preventing the diversion of guns to criminals through effective firearm sales laws. In: Webster D, Vernick J, editors. Reducing gun violence in America: informing policy with evidence and analysis. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 2013.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Webster D, Crifasi CK, Vernick J. Effects of the repeal of Missouri’s handgun purchaser licensing law on homicides. J Urban Health. 2014;91:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-014-9865-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rudolph KE, Stuart EA, Vernick JS, et al. Association between Connecticut’s permit-to-purchase handgun law and homicides. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(8):e49–54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    SEARCH. Improving the National Instant Background Screening System for firearms purchases: recommendations by SEARCH. Version 2 ed: The National Consortium for Justice Information and Statistics, 2013.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Andrés AR, Hempstead K. Gun control and suicide: the impact of state firearm regulations in the United States, 1995–2004. Health Policy. 2011;101(1):95–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Donohue JJ, Aneja A, Weber KD. Right-to-carry laws and violent crime: a comprehensive assessment using panel data and a state-level synthetic controls analysis: National Bureau of Economic Research. Stanford, CA: Stanford University; 2017.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cheng C, Hoekstra M. Does strengthening self-defense law deter crime or escalate violence? Evidence from expansions to castle doctrine. J Hum Resour. 2013;48(3):821–54.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Humphreys DK, Gasparrini A, Wiebe DJ. Evaluating the impact of Florida’s “stand your ground” self-defense law on homicide and suicide by firearm: an interrupted time series study. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(1):44–50.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.6811.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wintemute GJ, Wright MA, Drake CM, Beaumont JJ. Subsequent criminal activity among violent misdemeanants who seek to purchase handguns: risk factors and effectiveness of denying handgun purchase. JAMA. 2001;285(8):1019–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zeoli AM, McCourt A, Buggs S, Frattaroli S, Lilley D, Webster DW. Analysis of the strength of legal firearms restrictions for perpetrators of domestic violence and their association with intimate partner homicide. Am J Epidemiol. 2017;Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    CDC. Wide-ranging ONline Data for Epidemiologic Research (WONDER) [Available from: https://wonder.cdc.gov/2018.
  17. 17.
    Census United States Census Bureau Washington, D.C.: United States Department of Commerce; [Available from: https://www.census.gov/# accessed November 10 2013.
  18. 18.
    BLS Local Area Unemployment Statistics Washington, D.C.: United States Department of Labor; [Available from: http://www.bls.gov/lau/ accessed November 7 2012.
  19. 19.
    BJS Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics: University at Albany; [Available from: http://www.albany.edu/sourcebook/ accessed November 1 2012.
  20. 20.
    Census State & Local Government Finances Washington, D.C.: United States Department of Commerce; [Available from: http://www.census.gov/govs/estimate/.
  21. 21.
    Stata Statistical Software: Release 14 [program]. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP, 2015.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Castillo-Carniglia A, Kagawa RMC, Webster DW, Vernick JS, Cerdá M, Wintemute GJ Comprehensive background check policy and firearm background checks in three US states. Injury Prevention 2017, injuryprev-2017-042475Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Crifasi CK, Merrill-Francis M, Webster DW, Wintemute GJ, Vernick JS Changes in the legal environment and enforcement of firearm transfer laws in Pennsylvania and Maryland. Injury Prevention 2018:injuryprev-2017-042582.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Academy of Medicine 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cassandra K. Crifasi
    • 1
  • Molly Merrill-Francis
    • 1
  • Alex McCourt
    • 1
  • Jon S. Vernick
    • 1
  • Garen J. Wintemute
    • 1
    • 2
  • Daniel W. Webster
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Gun Policy and ResearchJohns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public HealthBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.Violence Prevention Research Program, Department of Emergency MedicineUniversity of California DavisSacramentoUSA

Personalised recommendations