Advertisement

Journal of Urban Health

, Volume 95, Issue 3, pp 361–371 | Cite as

Adult Connection in Assault Injury Prevention among Male Youth in Low-Resource Urban Environments

  • Alison J. Culyba
  • Elizabeth Miller
  • Kenneth R. Ginsburg
  • Charles C. Branas
  • Wensheng Guo
  • Joel A. Fein
  • Therese S. Richmond
  • Bonnie L. Halpern-Felsher
  • Douglas J. Wiebe
Article

Abstract

Strengths-based strategies to reduce youth violence in low-resource urban communities are urgently needed. Supportive adolescent-adult relationships may confer protection, but studies have been limited by self-reported composite outcomes. We conducted a population-based case-control study among 10- to 24-year-old males in low-resource neighborhoods to examine associations between supportive adult connection and severe assault injury. Cases were victims of gunshot assault injury (n = 143) and non-gun assault injury (n = 206) from two level I trauma centers. Age- and race-matched controls (n = 283) were recruited using random digit dial from the same catchment. Adolescent-adult connections were defined by: (1) brief survey questions and (2) detailed family genograms. Analysis used conditional logistic regression. There were no significant associations between positive adult connection, as defined by brief survey questions, and either gunshot or non-gun assault injury among adolescents with high prior violence involvement (GSW OR = 2.46, 95% CI 0.81–7.49; non-gun OR = 1.59, 95% CI 0.54–4.67) or low prior violence involvement (GSW OR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.34–2.44; non-gun OR = 1.96, 95% CI 0.73–5.28). In contrast, among adolescents with high levels of prior violence involvement, reporting at least one supportive adult family member in the family genogram was associated with higher odds of gunshot assault injury (OR = 4.01, 95% CI 1.36–11.80) and non-gun assault injury (OR = 4.22, 95% CI 1.48–12.04). We were thus unable to demonstrate that positive adult connections protected adolescent males from severe assault injury in this highly under-resourced environment. However, at the time of injury, assault-injured adolescents, particularly those with high prior violence involvement, reported high levels of family support. The post-injury period may provide opportunities to intervene to enhance and leverage family connections to explore how to better safeguard adolescents.

Keywords

Youth violence Violence victimization Adult support Family connection Case-control 

Notes

Funding

The study was supported by NIH grants F32 HD084028 and R01 AA014944.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Financial Disclosure

The authors have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.

Supplementary material

11524_2018_260_MOESM1_ESM.docx (19 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 18 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS). Available at www.cdc.gov/injury. Accessed 15 Jan 2018.
  2. 2.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. YRBSS Data, Questionnaires, & Documentation. http://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/data/yrbs/data.htm. Accessed 1 Nov 2017.
  3. 3.
    Hardaway CR, McLoyd VC, Wood D. Exposure to violence and socioemotional adjustment in low-income youth: an examination of protective factors. Am J Community Psychol. 2012;49(1–2):112–26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    McDonald CC, Deatrick JA, Kassam-Adams N, Richmond TS. Community violence exposure and positive youth development in urban youth. J Community Health. 2011;36(6):925–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Losel F, Farrington DP. Direct protective and buffering protective factors in the development of youth violence. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(2 Suppl 1):S8–S23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Resnick MD, Bearman PS, Blum RW, Bauman KE, Harris KM, Jones J, et al. Protecting adolescents from harm. Findings from the National Longitudinal Study on Adolescent Health. JAMA. 1997;278(10):823–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Resnick MD, Ireland M, Borowsky I. Youth violence perpetration: what protects? What predicts? Findings from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. J Adolesc Health. 2004;35(5):424.e421–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Viner RM, Ozer EM, Denny S, Marmot M, Resnick M, Fatusi A, et al. Adolescence and the social determinants of health. Lancet. 2012;379(9826):1641–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fergus S, Zimmerman MA. Adolescent resilience: a framework for understanding healthy development in the face of risk. Annu Rev Public Health. 2005;26:399–419.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lerner RM, Lerner JV, von Eye A, Bowers EP, Lewin-Bizan S. Individual and contextual bases of thriving in adolescence: a view of the issues. J Adolesc. 2011;34(6):1107–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Henrich CC, Brookmeyer KA, Shahar G. Weapon violence in adolescence: parent and school connectedness as protective factors. J Adolesc Health. 2005;37(4):306–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    DuBois DL, Silverthorn N. Natural mentoring relationships and adolescent health: evidence from a national study. Am J Public Health. 2005;95(3):518–24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gorman-Smith D, Tolan P. The role of exposure to community violence and developmental problems among inner-city youth. Dev Psychopathol. 1998;10(01):101–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Miller LS, Wasserman GA, Neugebauer R, Gorman-Smith D, Kamboukos D. Witnessed community violence and antisocial behavior in high-risk, urban boys. J Clin Child Psychol. 1999;28(1):2–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Houltberg BJ, Henry CS, Morris AS. Family interactions, exposure to violence, and emotion regulation: perceptions of children and early adolescents at risk. Fam Relat. 2012;61(2):283–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gorman-Smith D, Henry DB, Tolan PH. Exposure to community violence and violence perpetration: the protective effects of family functioning. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2004;33(3):439–49.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Culyba AJ, Ginsburg KR, Fein JA, Branas CC, Richmond TS, Miller E, et al. Examining the role of supportive family connection in violence exposure among male youth in urban environments. J Interpers Violence. 2016; 088626051664609.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Laursen B, Collins WA. Parent–child relationships during adolescence. In: Handbook of adolescent psychology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2009.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Carlivati J, Collins WA. Adolescent attachment representations and development in a risk sample. In: MO SM, editor. Attachment in adolescence Reflections and new angles. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, vol. 117. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco; 2007. p. 91–106.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Waksberg J. Sampling methods for random digit dialing. J Am Stat Assoc. 1978;73(361):40–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hartge P, Brinton LA, Rosenthal JF, Cahill JI, Hoover RN, Waksberg J. Random digit dialing in selecting a population-based control group. Am J Epidemiol. 1984;120(6):825–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Perneger TV, Myers TL, Klag MJ, Whelton PK. Effectiveness of the Waksberg telephone sampling method for the selection of population controls. Am J Epidemiol. 1993;138(8):574–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Baruch Y, Holtom BC. Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Hum Relat. 2008;61(8):1139–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Groves R. Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys. Public Opin Q. 2006;70(5):646–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nance ML, Branas CC, Stafford PW, Richmond T, Schwab CW. Nonintracranial fatal firearm injuries in children: implications for treatment. J Trauma. 2003;55(4):631–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Basta LA, Richmond TS, Wiebe DJ. Neighborhoods, daily activities, and measuring health risks experienced in urban environments. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71(11):1943–50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wiebe DJ, Richmond TS, Guo W, Allison PD, Hollander JE, Nance ML, et al. Mapping activity patterns to quantify risk of violent assault in urban environments. Epidemiology. 2016;27(1):32–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Greenland S. Partial and marginal matching in case control studies. In: Moolgavkar SH, Prentice RL, editors. Modern Statistical Methods in Chronic Disease Epidemiology New York: Wiley; 1986. p. 35–49.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    King G, Zeng L. Estimating risk and rate levels, ratios and differences in case-control studies. Stat Med. 2002;21(10):1409–27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hosmer DWLS, Sturdivant R. Applied Logistic Regression. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Crum RM, Lillie-Blanton M, Anthony JC. Neighborhood environment and opportunity to use cocaine and other drugs in late childhood and early adolescence. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1996;43(3):155–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
  33. 33.
    Philadelphia Health Management Corporation. Southeastern Pennsylvania Household Survey http://www.chdbdata.org/.
  34. 34.
    Fox MP, Lash TL, Greenland S. A method to automate probabilistic sensitivity analyses of misclassified binary variables. Int J Epidemiol. 2005;34(6):1370–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lyles RH, Lin J. Sensitivity analysis for misclassification in logistic regression via likelihood methods and predictive value weighting. Stat Med. 2010;29(22):2297–309.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Theokas C, Lerner RM. Observed ecological assets in families, schools, and neighborhoods: conceptualization, measurement, and relations with positive and negative developmental outcomes. Appl Dev Sci. 2006;10(2):61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Youngblade LM, Theokas C, Schulenberg J, Curry L, Huang IC, Novak M. Risk and promotive factors in families, schools, and communities: a contextual model of positive youth development in adolescence. Pediatrics. 2007;119(Suppl 1):S47–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lerner RM, Lerner JV, Benson JB. Positive youth development: research and applications for promoting thriving in adolescence. Adv Child Dev Behav. 2011;41:1–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Proctor LJ. Children growing up in a violent community: the role of the family. Aggress Violent Beh. 2006;11(6):558–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Li ST, Nussbaum KM, Richards MH. Risk and protective factors for urban African-American youth. Am J Community Psychol. 2007;39(1–2):21–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Culyba AJ, Ginsburg KR, Fein JA, Branas CC, Richmond TS, Wiebe DJ. Protective effects of adolescent-adult connection on male youth in urban environments. J Adolesc Health. 2016;58(2):237–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Culyba AJ, Jacoby SF, Richmond TS, Fein JA, Hohl BC, Branas CC. Modifiable neighborhood features associated with adolescent homicide. JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170(5):473–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Gorman-Smith D FL, Cosey-Gay F, Coeling M. Strengthening families and communities to prevent youth violence: a public health approach. Children's Legal Rights J. 2013–2014;34(265).Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Branas CC, Cheney RA, MacDonald JM, Tam VW, Jackson TD, Ten Have TR. A difference-in-differences analysis of health, safety, and greening vacant urban space. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;174(11):1296–306.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    MacDonald J, Golinelli D, Stokes RJ, Bluthenthal R. The effect of business improvement districts on the incidence of violent crimes. Inj Prev. 2010;16(5):327–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Garvin EC, Cannuscio CC, Branas CC. Greening vacant lots to reduce violent crime: a randomised controlled trial. Inj Prev. 2013;19(3):198–203.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kondo M, Hohl B, Han S, Branas C. Effects of greening and community reuse of vacant lots on crime. Urban Stud. 2015.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Branas CC, Kondo MC, Murphy SM, South EC, Polsky D, MacDonald JM. Urban blight remediation as a cost-beneficial solution to firearm violence. Am J Public Health. 2016:e1–7.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    DuBois DL, Silverthorn N. Characteristics of natural mentoring relationships and adolescent adjustment: evidence from a national study. J Prim Prev. 2005;26(2):69–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Haddad E, Chen C, Greenberger E. The role of important non-parental adults (VIPs) in the lives of older adolescents: a comparison of three ethnic groups. J Youth Adolescence. 2011;40(3):310–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Parker EM, Johnson SRL, Jones VC, Haynie DL, Cheng TL. Discrepant perspectives on conflict situations among urban parent–adolescent dyads. J Interpers Violence. 2016;31(6):1007–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Beam MR, Gil-Rivas V, Greenberger E, Chen C. Adolescent problem behavior and depressed mood: risk and protection within and across social contexts. J Youth Adolescence. 2002;31(5):343–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Cheng TL, Haynie D, Brenner R, Wright JL, Chung S-E, Simons-Morton B. Effectiveness of a mentor-implemented, violence prevention intervention for assault-injured youths presenting to the emergency department: results of a randomized trial. Pediatrics. 2008;122(5):938–46.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Zun LS, Downey L, Rosen J. The effectiveness of an ED-based violence prevention program. Am J Emerg Med. 2006;24(1):8–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Aboutanos MB, Jordan A, Cohen R, Foster RL, Goodman K, Halfond RW, et al. Brief violence interventions with community case management services are effective for high-risk trauma patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2011;71(1):228–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Shibru D, Zahnd E, Becker M, Bekaert N, Calhoun D, Victorino GP. Benefits of a hospital-based peer intervention program for violently injured youth. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205(5):684–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Becker MG, Hall JS, Ursic CM, Jain S, Calhoun D. Caught in the crossfire: the effects of a peer-based intervention program for violently injured youth. J Adolescent Health. 2004;34(3):177–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Academy of Medicine 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alison J. Culyba
    • 1
    • 2
  • Elizabeth Miller
    • 2
  • Kenneth R. Ginsburg
    • 1
  • Charles C. Branas
    • 3
    • 4
  • Wensheng Guo
    • 3
  • Joel A. Fein
    • 5
  • Therese S. Richmond
    • 6
  • Bonnie L. Halpern-Felsher
    • 7
  • Douglas J. Wiebe
    • 3
  1. 1.Craig-Dalsimer Division of Adolescent MedicineThe Children’s Hospital of PhiladelphiaPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Department of PediatricsUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghUSA
  3. 3.Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Perelman School of MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  4. 4.Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public HealthColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  5. 5.Division of Emergency MedicineThe Children’s Hospital of PhiladelphiaPhiladelphiaUSA
  6. 6.Biobehavioral and Health Systems Department, School of NursingUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  7. 7.Division of Adolescent MedicineStanford UniversityPalo AltoUSA

Personalised recommendations