Advertisement

Journal of Urban Health

, Volume 95, Issue 3, pp 372–382 | Cite as

Closer to Guns: the Role of Street Gangs in Facilitating Access to Illegal Firearms

  • Elizabeth Roberto
  • Anthony A. Braga
  • Andrew V. PapachristosEmail author
Article

Abstract

Criminal offenders often turn to social networks to gain access to firearms, yet we know little about how networks facilitate access to firearms. This study conducts a network analysis of a co-offending network for the City of Chicago to determine how close any offender may be to a firearm. We use arrest data to recreate the co-offending network of all individuals who were arrested with at least one other person over an eight-year period. We then use data on guns recovered by the police to measure potential network pathways of any individual to known firearms. We test the hypothesis that gangs facilitate access to firearms and the extent to which such access relates to gunshot injury among gang members. Findings reveal that gang membership reduces the potential network distance (how close someone is) to known firearms by 20% or more, and regression results indicate that the closer gang members are to guns, the greater their risk of gunshot victimization.

Keywords

Street gangs Social networks Gun markets Guns Gun injuries 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank our fellow collaborators on the Multi-City Underground Gun Market Study and the University of Chicago Crime Lab for their comments and support of this project. Parts of this research were funded by grants to the corresponding author including a CAREER award (SES-1151449) from the Sociology, and Law and Social Science Programs at the National Science Foundation. This research was also supported in part by the facilities and staff of the Yale University Faculty of Arts and Sciences High Performance Computing Center, and a James S. McDonnell Foundation Postdoctoral Fellowship Award in Studying Complex Systems awarded to the first author. The findings of this article represent the opinions of the authors and not those of the City of Chicago or the Chicago Police Department.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

All data and protocols for this project were approved by appropriate IRB.

Supplementary material

11524_2018_259_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 1035 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Braga AA, Cook PJ. The criminal records of gun offenders. Georgetown J Law and Publ Policy. 2016;14(1):1–16.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    McGonigal MD, Cole J, Schwab CW, Kauder DR, Rotondo MF, Angood PB. Urban firearm deaths: a five-year perspective. Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 1993;35(4):532–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Papachristos AV, Wildeman C, Roberto E. Tragic, but not random: the social contagion of nonfatal gunshot injuries. Social Sci Med. 2015;125(1):139–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Braga AA. Serious youth gun offenders and the epidemic of youth violence in Boston. J Quant Criminol. 2003;19(1):33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zeoli AM, Grady SC, Pizarro JM, Melde C. Modeling the movement of homicide by type to inform public health prevention interventions. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(10):2035–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Weisburd DL, Bushway S, Lum C, Yang S-M. Trajectories of crime at places: a longitudinal study of street segments in the city of Seattle. Criminology. 2004;42(2):283–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Morenoff JD, Sampson RJ, Raudenbush SW. Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the spatial dynamics of urban violence. Criminology. 2001;39(3):517–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Peterson RD, Krivo LJ. Divergent social worlds: neighborhood crime and the racial-spatial divide. New York, NY: Russell Sage; 2010.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Green B, Horel T, Papachristos AV. Modeling contagion through social networks to explain and predict gunshot violence in Chicago, 2006 to 2014. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(3):326–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cook PJ, Ludwig J, Venkatesh SA, Braga AA. Underground gun markets. Econ J. 2007;117(1, 524):–588.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cook PJ, Parker ST, Pollack HA. Sources of guns to dangerous people: what we learn by asking them. Prev Med. 2015;79(1):28–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lizotte AJ, Tesoriero JM, Thornberry TP, Krohn MD. Patterns of adolescent firearms ownership and use. Justice Q. 1994;11(1):51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lizotte AJ, Bordua DJ, White CS. Firearms ownership for sport and protection: two not so divergent models. Am Sociol Rev. 1981;46(4):499–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thornberry TP, Krohn MD, Lizotte AJ, Smith CA, Tobin K. Gangs and delinquency in development perspective. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2003.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Peterson D, Taylor TJ, Esbensen F-A. Gang membership and violent victimization. Justice Q. 2004;21(4):793–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Warr M. Companions in crime: the social aspects of criminal conduct. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pyrooz DC, Moule RK Jr, Decker SH. The contribution of gang membership to the victim–offender overlap. J Res Crime Delinq. 2014;51(3):315–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Papachristos AV, Braga AA, Piza E, Grossman L. The company you keep? The spillover effects of gang membership on individual gunshot victimization in social networks. Criminology. 2015;53(4):624–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pyrooz DC. Uncovering the pathways between gang membership and violent victimization. J Quant Criminol. 2015;32(4):531–59.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bjerregaard B, Lizotte AJ. Gun ownership and gang membership. J Crim Law Criminol. 1995;86(1):37–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Braga AA, Wintemute GJ, Pierce GL, Cook PJ, Ridgeway G. Interpreting the empirical evidence on illegal gun market dynamics. J Urban Health. 2012;89(5):779–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Papachristos AV, Hureau D, Braga AA. The corner and the crew: the influence of geography and social networks on gang violence. Am Sociol Rev. 2013;78(3):417–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tita GE, Radil SM. Spatializing the social networks of gangs to explore patterns of violence. J Quant Criminol. 2011;27(4):521–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Klein MW, Maxson CL, Cunningham LC. Crack, street gangs, and violence. Criminology. 1991;29(4):623–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Block R, Block CR. Street gang crime in Chicago. In: Klein MW, Maxson CL, Miller J, editors. The Modern Gang Reader. Thousand Oaks, CA: Roxbury; 1995.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hureau D, Braga AA. The trade in tools: the market for illicit guns in high-risk networks. Criminology. 2018; 56 (3).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cook PJ, Harris RJ, Ludwig J, Pollack HA. Some sources of crime guns in Chicago: dirty dealers, straw purchasers, and traffickers. J Crim Law and Criminol 2014:717–759.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Adamic L, Adar E. How to search a social network. Soc Networks. 2005;27(3):187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Howell N. The Search for an Abortionist. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1969.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wintemute GJ. The epidemology of firearm violence in the twenty-first century United States. Annu Rev Public Health. 2015;36:5–19.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Decker SH, Katz CM, Webb VJ. Understanding the black box of gang organization: implications for involvement in violent crime, drug sales, and violent victimization. Crime and Delinquency. 2007;54(1):153–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Core Team R. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2014.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Csardi G, Nepusz T. The igraph software package for complex network research. Int J Complex Syst. 2006;1695(5):1–9.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kane MJ, Emerson JW, Weston S. Scalable strategies for computing with massive data. J Stat Softw. 2013;55(14):1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Revolution Analytics and Steve Weston. foreach: foreach looping construct for R. R package, CRAN.Rproject.org/package=foreach. 2014.
  36. 36.
    Levitt S, Venkatesh SA. An economic analysis of a drug-selling gang’s finances. Q J Econ. 2000;115(3):755–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Venkatesh SA, Levitt SD. Are we a family or a business?; history and disjuncture in the urban American street gang. Theory and Society. 2000;29(4):427–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Dawley D. A nation of lords; the autobiography of the Vice Lords. [1st ] ed. Garden City: N.Y., Anchor Press; 1973.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Perkins UE. Explosion of Chicago’s Black street gangs: 1900 to the present. 1st ed. Chicago, Ill.: Third World Press; 1987.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Moore NY, WIlliams L. The Almighty Black P Stone Nation: the Rise, Fall, and Resurgence of an American Gang. Chicago, IL: Lawrence Hill Books; 2011.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hagedorn JM. The In$ane Chicago Way: the Daring Play by Chicago Gangs to Create a Spanish Mafia. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press; 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Butts JA, Roman CG, Bostwick L, Porter JRP. Cure violence: a public health model to reduce gun violence. Annu Rev Public Health. 2015;36:39–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hanson RF, Sawyer GK, Begle AM, Hubel GS. The impact of crime victimization on quality of life. J Trauma Stress. 2010;23(2):189–97.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Lee J. Wounded: life after the shooting. Ann Am Acad Pol Social Sci. 2012;642(1):244–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kennedy DM, Piehl AM, Braga A. Youth violence in Boston: gun markets, serious youth offenders, and a use-reduction strategy. Law and Contemp Prob. 59(1):147–96.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Academy of Medicine 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elizabeth Roberto
    • 1
  • Anthony A. Braga
    • 2
  • Andrew V. Papachristos
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of SociologyRice UniversityHoustonUSA
  2. 2.School of Criminology and Criminal JusticeNortheastern UniversityBostonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Sociology and Institute for Policy ResearchNorthwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA

Personalised recommendations