Self-Reported Interest to Participate in a Health Survey if Different Amounts of Cash or Non-Monetary Incentive Types Were Offered

  • Guili Zheng
  • Sona Oksuzyan
  • Shelly Hsu
  • Jennifer Cloud
  • Mirna Ponce Jewell
  • Nirvi Shah
  • Lisa V. Smith
  • Douglas Frye
  • Tony Kuo
Article
  • 18 Downloads

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess monetary and non-monetary factors that can influence the decision to participate in a future health survey. A questionnaire was administered to eligible, low-income participants (n = 1502) of the 2012 Los Angeles County Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (LAHANES-II). Multivariable regression analyses were performed to describe factors potentially associated with future intent to participate in similar survey designs. The results of the survey suggest that, overall, female participants had a greater interest in participating under a variety of incentive scenarios. Compared to the 25–34 age group, older participants (35–44, 45–84) reported more interest to participate if $10 cash [prepaid gift/debit card], a coupon for product/travel, or a small item [e.g., granola bar, t-shirt, pen] was offered, whereas younger participants (18–24) reported greater interest for $25 cash or a coupon for product/travel. Non-Whites, when compared to Whites/Non-Hispanics, reported greater interest to participate if any of the incentives was offered. High school graduates, when compared to those with some college education, reported greater interest to participate if $10 cash, a small item, or a lottery ticket was offered. Presence of two or more chronic conditions increased interest while concerns about participation in LAHANES-II was associated with reduced interest to participate in future health-related surveys. The results suggest that both incentives and non-monetary considerations (e.g., personal concerns about participating and individual level characteristics) can influence the decision to participate in health-related surveys and offer insights into strategies that can improve response rates for these assessments that are often used to inform community planning.

Keywords

Survey incentives Health survey Health assessment Response rates 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Elizabeth Rubin, Ashley Stegall, Ekaterina Gee, Delia Bedair, Jerome Blake, Heena Hameed, Brenda Robles, Susie Tang, Frank Sorvillo, Deborah Davenport, Angel Aquino, Rachel Lee, Elaine Massengill, Violet Williams, David Caley, the CHS Administration and the Area Health Officers for their assistance in facilitating the LAHANES-II data collection. The authors also thank Leila Family for reviewing the manuscript prior to submission. This study utilized information from a project that was previously supported in part by a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention initiative (3U58DP002485-01S1). No funding was received for this analysis.

References

  1. 1.
    Barclay S, Todd C, Finlay I, Grande G, Wyatt P. Not another questionnaire! Maximizing the response rate, predicting non-response and assessing non-response bias in postal questionnaire studies of GPs. Fam Pract. 2002;19(1):105–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cummings SM, Savitz LA, Konrad TR. Reported response rates to mailed physician questionnaires. Health Serv Res. 2001;35(6):1347–55.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kamb ML, Rhodes F, Hoxworth T, Rogers J, Lentz A, Kent C, et al. What about money? Effect of small monetary incentives on enrollment, retention, and motivation to change behaviour in an HIV/STD prevention counselling intervention. The project RESPECT study group. Sex Transm Infect. 1998;74(4):253–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Church A. Estimating the effect of incentives on mail survey response rates: a meta-analysis. Public Opin Q. 1993;57(1):62–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kalantar JS, Talley NJ. The effects of lottery incentive and length of questionnaire on health survey response rates: a randomized study. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52(11):1117–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shaw MJ, Beebe TJ, Jensen HL, Adlis SA. The use of monetary incentives in a community survey: impact on response rates, data quality, and cost. Health Serv Res. 2001;35(6):1339–46.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Singer E, Ye C. The use and effects of incentives in surveys. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci. 2013;645(1):112–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Asch DA, Troxel AB, Stewart WF, Sequist TD, Jones JB, Hirsch AMG, et al. Effect of financial incentives to physicians, patients, or both on lipid levels. JAMA. 2015;314(18):1926–35.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bernstein SL, Feldman J. Incentives to participate in clinical trials: practical and ethical considerations. Am J Emerg Med. 2015;33(9):1197–200.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen K, Lei H, Li G, Huang W, Mu L. Cash incentives improve participation rate in a face-to-face survey: an intervention study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(2):228–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Friedman DB, Foster C, Bergeron C, Tanner A, Kim SH. A Qualitative study of recruitment barriers, motivators, and community-based strategies for increasing clinical trials participation among rural and urban populations. Am J Health Promot. 2015;29(5):332–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nguyen TT, Jayadeva V, Cizza G, Brown RJ, Nandagopal R, Rodriguez LM, et al. Challenging recruitment of youth with type 2 diabetes into clinical trials. J Adolesc Health : Off Publ Soc Adolesc Med. 2014;54(3):247–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Siedner MJ, Santorino D, Lankowski AJ, Kanyesigye M, Bwana MB, Haberer JE, et al. A combination SMS and transportation reimbursement intervention to improve HIV care following abnormal CD4 test results in rural Uganda: a prospective observational cohort study. BMC Med. 2015;13:160.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    CDC/National Center for Health Statistics. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/participant.htm#benefits. Accessed Nov 2015.
  15. 15.
    CDC/National Center for Health Statistics. NHANES Response Rates and Population Totals. [Web]. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/response_rates_cps.htm. Accessed 2 Nov 2015.
  16. 16.
    CDC/National Center for Health Statistics. 2011–2012 NHANES Response Rates. [Web]. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/response_rates_cps/rrt1112.pdf. Accessed 4 Apr 2016.
  17. 17.
    Office of Health Assessment and Epidemiology. 2011 Los Angeles County Health Survey Background Summary & Methodology. Los Angeles, CA: Los Angeles County Department of Public Health 2013.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Los Angeles County Department of Public Health. Key indicators of health by service planning area. Los Angeles, CA: Los Angeles County Department of Public Health; 2011. p. 2013.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Langellier BA, Chaparro MP, Wang MC, Koleilat M, Whaley SE. The new food package and breastfeeding outcomes among women, infants, and children participants in Los Angeles County. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(Suppl 1):S112–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sastry N, Ghosh-Dastidar B, Adams J, Pebley AR. The design of a multilevel survey of children, families and communities: the Los Angeles family and neighborhood survey. Soc Sci Res. 2006;35(4):24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    California Health Interview Survey. CHIS 2011–2012 methodology series: report 4—response rates. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Center for Health Policy Research; 2014.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bhatia N, Chao SM, Higgins C, Patel S, Crespi CM. Association of mothers’ perception of neighborhood quality and maternal resilience with risk of preterm birth. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12(8):9427–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Maternal Child and Adolescent Health Programs. Los Angeles Mommy and Baby (LAMB) Project, First 5 LA 14 Best Start Community Report, 2010 and 2012. Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, 2014.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    CDC/Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. BRFSS Combined Landline and Cell Phone Weighted Response Rates by State, 2011. Annual Survey Data 2011; http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/annual_data/2011/response_rates_11.htm. Accessed Apr 2016.
  25. 25.
    Barragan NC, Chang M, Felderman J, Readhead H, Kuo T. A case study of a hepatitis B screening and blood pressure assesment program in Los Angeles County, 2012-2013. Prev Chronic Dis. 2015;12:E19.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pendleton L, Martin N, Webster DG. Public perceptions of environmental quality: a survey study of beach use and perceptions in Los Angeles County. Mar Pollut Bull. 2001;42(11):1155–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Los Angeles County Department of Public Health/Abt SRBI. 2011 Los Angeles County health survey methodology report. Los Angeles County Department of Public Health; June 2011 2011.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zipf G, Chiappa, M, Porter, KS, et al. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: Plan and operations, 1999–2010. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat. 2013;1(56):1–37Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    CDC/National Center for Health Statistics. 2009–2010 NHANES Response Rates. Los Angeles, CA: Los Angeles County Department of Public Health. [Web]. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/response_rates_cps/RRT0910.pdf. Accessed 2 Nov 2015.
  30. 30.
    Hosmer D Jr, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. New York: Wiley; 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Baumeister L, Marchi K, Pearl M, Williams R, Braveman P. The validity of information on “race” and “Hispanic ethnicity” in California birth certificate data. Health Serv Res. 2000;35(4):869–83.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Reyes BCJ. A portrait of race and ethnicity in California: an assessment of social and economic well-being. San Francisco, CA: Public Policy Institute of California; 2001.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Boing AFMG, Boing AC, Perez KG, Perez MA. Association between depression and chronic diseases: results from a population-based study. Rev Saude Publica. 2012;46(4):617–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    SAS statistical software. [computer program]. Cary, North Carolina 2006.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Penslar R. Incentives for participation. In: Porter J, ed. Institutional Review Board Guidebook: Office for Human Research Protection from Research Risks. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh; 1993.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Cull WL, O'Connor KG, Sharp S, Tang SF. Response rates and response bias for 50 surveys of pediatricians. Health Serv Res. 2005;40(1):213–26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Glass DC, Kelsall HL, Slegers C, Forbes AB, Loff B, Zion D, et al. A telephone survey of factors affecting willingness to participate in health research surveys. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):1017.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Mindell JS, Giampaoli S, Goesswald A, et al. Sample selection, recruitment and participation rates in health examination surveys in Europe—experience from seven national surveys. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015;15:78.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sogaard AJ, Selmer R, Bjertness E, Thelle D. The Oslo health study: the impact of self-selection in a large, population-based survey. Int J Equity Health. 2004;3(1):3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Beebe TJ, Davern ME, McAlpine DD, Call KT, Rockwood TH. Increasing response rates in a survey of Medicaid enrollees: the effect of a prepaid monetary incentive and mixed modes (mail and telephone). Med Care. 2005;43(4):411–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mindell J, Aresu M, Becares L, Tolonen H. Representativeness of participants in a cross-sectional health survey by time of day and day of week of data collection. Eur J Pub Health. 2012;22(3):364–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Academy of Medicine 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Office of Planning and Data Analytics, Los Angeles County Department of Health ServicesLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Research and Innovations, Department of HIV and STD Programs, Los Angeles County Department of Public HealthLos AngelesUSA
  3. 3.Community Health Services, Los Angeles County Department of Public HealthLos AngelesUSA
  4. 4.Office of Health Assessment and Epidemiology, Los Angeles County Department of Public HealthLos AngelesUSA
  5. 5.Division of Chronic Disease and Injury Prevention, Los Angeles County Department of Public HealthLos AngelesUSA
  6. 6.The New York Department of Health and Mental HygieneNew YorkUSA
  7. 7.Department of EpidemiologyUCLA Fielding School of Public HealthLos AngelesUSA
  8. 8.Department of Family MedicineDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLALos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations