Advertisement

Journal of Urban Health

, Volume 95, Issue 3, pp 313–321 | Cite as

Criminal Use of Assault Weapons and High-Capacity Semiautomatic Firearms: an Updated Examination of Local and National Sources

  • Christopher S. KoperEmail author
  • William D. Johnson
  • Jordan L. Nichols
  • Ambrozine Ayers
  • Natalie Mullins
Article

Abstract

Policies restricting semiautomatic assault weapons and large-capacity ammunition magazines are intended to reduce gunshot victimizations by limiting the stock of semiautomatic firearms with large ammunition capacities and other military-style features conducive to criminal use. The federal government banned such weaponry from 1994 to 2004, and a few states currently impose similar restrictions. Recent debates concerning these weapons have highlighted their use in mass shootings, but there has been little examination of their use in gun crime more generally since the expiration of the federal ban. This study investigates current levels of criminal activity with assault weapons and other high-capacity semiautomatics in the USA using several local and national data sources including the following: (1) guns recovered by police in ten large cities, (2) guns reported by police to federal authorities for investigative tracing, (3) guns used in murders of police, and (4) guns used in mass murders. Results suggest assault weapons (primarily assault-type rifles) account for 2–12% of guns used in crime in general (most estimates suggest less than 7%) and 13–16% of guns used in murders of police. Assault weapons and other high-capacity semiautomatics together generally account for 22 to 36% of crime guns, with some estimates upwards of 40% for cases involving serious violence including murders of police. Assault weapons and other high-capacity semiautomatics appear to be used in a higher share of firearm mass murders (up to 57% in total), though data on this issue are very limited. Trend analyses also indicate that high-capacity semiautomatics have grown from 33 to 112% as a share of crime guns since the expiration of the federal ban—a trend that has coincided with recent growth in shootings nationwide. Further research seems warranted on how these weapons affect injuries and deaths from gun violence and how their regulation may impact public health.

Keywords

Firearms Assault weapons Violence 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the police agencies that provided data for this study: the Hartford (CT) Police Department, the New York State Police, the Baltimore Police Department, the Richmond (VA) Police Department, the Minneapolis Police Department, the Milwaukee Police Department, the Kansas City (MO) Police Department, the Sacramento Police Department, the Seattle Police Department, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The authors also thank Grace Beya, Mark Ecleo, and Thomas Prifti for additional research assistance. The opinions expressed in this manuscript are those of the authors and should not be attributed to any of the aforementioned organizations or individuals.

References

  1. 1.
    Fowler KA, Dahlberg LL, Haileyesus T, Annest JL. Firearm injuries in the United States. Prev Med. 2015;79:5–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Koper CS. An Updated Assessment of the Federal Assault Weapons Ban: Impacts on Gun Markets and Gun Violence, 1994-2003. Report to the National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice. Philadelphia, PA: Jerry Lee Center of Criminology, University of Pennsylvania; 2004.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Law center to prevent gun violence. http://smartgunlaws.org. Accessed May 2016.
  4. 4.
    Adler WC, Bielke FM, Doi DJ, Kennedy JF. Cops under fire: law enforcement officers killed with assault weapons or guns with high capacity magazines. Washington, DC: Handgun Control, Inc.; 1995.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beck A, Gilliard, D, Greenfeld L, et al. Survey of state prison inmates, 1991. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice. 1993.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hargarten SW, Karlson TA, O’Brien M, Hancock J, Quebbeman E. Characteristics of firearms involved in fatalities. JAMA. 1996;275:42–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hutson HR, Anglin D, Pratts MJ Jr. Adolescents and children injured or killed in drive-by shootings in Los Angeles. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:324–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hutson HR, Anglin D, Kyriacou DN, Hart J, Spears K. The epidemic of gang-related homicides in Los Angeles county from 1979 through 1994. JAMA. 1995;274:1031–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kleck G. Targeting guns: firearms and their control. New York: NY; Aldine de Gruyter; 1997.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    McGonigal MD, Cole J, Schwab CW, Kauder DR, Rotondo MF, Angood PB. Urban firearm deaths: a five-year perspective. J Trauma. 1993;35:532–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services. Assault weapons and homicide in New York City. Albany, NY: Author; 1994.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zawitz MW. Guns used in crime. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice; 1995.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Koper CS. America’s experience with the federal assault weapons ban, 1994–2004: key findings and implications. In: Webster DW, Vernick JS, editors. Reducing gun violence in America: informing policy with evidence and analysis, vol. 2013. Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2013. p. 157–71.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fallis D VA. Data show drop in criminal firepower during assault gun ban. The Washington Post, 2011; January 23.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lee J, editor. Gun digest 2015. Iola, WI: Krause Publications; 2014.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Violence Policy Center. The militarization of the U.S. civilian firearms market. Washington, DC: Author; 2011.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Reedy DC, Koper CS. Impact of handgun types on gun assault outcomes: a comparison of gun assaults involving semiautomatic pistols and revolvers. Injury Prevention. 2003;9:151–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Planty M, Truman JL. Firearm violence, 1993–2011. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice; 2013.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Smith EL, Cooper A. Homicides in the U.S. known to law enforcement, 2011. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice; 2013.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms. Crime gun trace reports. In: National report. Washington, DC: United States Department of the Treasury; 2000. p. 2002.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brill S. Firearm abuse: a research and policy report. Washington, DC: Police Foundation; 1977.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Braga AA, Wintemute GJ, Pierce GL, Cook PJ, Ridgeway G. Interpreting the empirical evidence on illegal gun market dynamics. J Urban Health: Bull New York Acad Med. 2012;89:779–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Braga AA, Pierce GL. Disrupting illegal firearms markets in Boston: the effects of operation ceasefire on the supply of new handguns to criminals. Criminol Public Policy. 2005;4(4):717–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cook PJ, Braga AA. Comprehensive firearms tracing: strategic and investigative uses of new data on firearms markets. Arizona Law Review. 2001;43:277–309.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Koper CS. Federal legislation and gun markets: how much have recent reforms of the federal firearms licensing system reduced criminal gun suppliers? Criminol Public Policy. 2002;1:151–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Koper CS. Crime gun risk factors: buyer, seller, firearm, and transaction characteristics associated with gun trafficking and criminal gun use. J Quant Criminol. 2014;30:285–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pierce GL, Braga AA, Hyatt RR Jr, Koper CS. Characteristics and dynamics of illegal firearms markets: implications for a supply-side enforcement strategy. Justice Q. 2004;21:391–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vernick JS, Webster DW, Hepburn LM. Effects of Maryland’s law banning saturday night special handguns on crime guns. Injury Prev. 1999;5:259–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Webster DW, Vernick JS, Hepburn LM. Effects of Maryland’s law banning saturday night special handguns on homicides. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155:406–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Webster DW, Bulzacchelli MT, Zeoli AM, Vernick JS. Effects of undercover police stings of gun dealers on the supply of new guns to criminals. Injury Prev. 2006;12:255–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Webster DW, Vernick JS, Bulzacchelli MT. Effects of a gun dealer’s change in sales practices on the supply of guns to criminals. J Urban Health: Bull New York Acad Med. 2006;83:778–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Webster DW, Vernick JS, Hepburn LM. Relationship between licensing, registration, and other gun sales laws and the source state of crime guns. Injury Prev. 2006;7:184–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Webster DW, Vernick JS, Bulzacchelli MT. Effects of state-level firearm seller accountability policies on firearm trafficking. J Urban Health: Bull New York Acad Med. 2009;86:525–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wintemute GJ. Ring of fire: the handgun makers of southern California. Davis, CA: Violence Prevention Research Program, University of California, Davis; 1994.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wintemute GJ, Romero MP, Wright MA, Grassel KM. The life cycle of crime guns: a description based on guns recovered from young people in California. Ann Emerg Med. 2004;43:733–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wintemute GJ, Cook PJ, Wright MA. Risk factors among retail handgun dealers for frequent and disproportionate sales of guns used in violent and firearm related crimes. Injury Prev. 2005;11:357–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wright MA, Wintemute GJ, Webster DW. Factors affecting a recently purchased handgun’s risk for use in crime under circumstances that suggest gun trafficking. J Urban Health: Bull New York Acad Med. 2010;87:352–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Koper CS. Purchase of multiple firearms as a risk factor for criminal gun use: implications for gun policy and enforcement. Criminol Public Policy. 2005;4:749–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kleck GBATF. Gun trace data and the role of organized gun trafficking in supplying guns to criminals. Saint Louis Univ Public Law Rev. 1999;18:23–45.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    National Research Council. Firearms and violence: a critical review. Washington, DC: The national academies press; 2005.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Citizens Crime Commission of New York City. Mass shooting incidents in America (1984–2012). http://www.nycrimecommission.org/mass-shooting-incidents-america.php. Accessed March 2015.
  42. 42.
    Everytown for Gun Safety. Analysis of recent mass shootings. New York: NY; Author; 2014.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Everytown for Gun Safety. Mass shootings in the United States: 2009-2016. New York: Author; 2017.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mass shooting tracker, gun violence archive. http://www.shootingtracker.com/. Accessed Aug. 2016.
  45. 45.
    Federal Bureau of Investigation. A study of active shooter incidents in the United States between 2000 and 2013. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kaminski Leduc JL. Weapons used in mass shootings. Report 2013-R-0057. Hartford: Connecticut; Office of Legislative Research, Connecticut General Assembly; 2013.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Aronsen G, Follman M, Pan D. A guide to mass shootings in America. Mother Jones. http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/07/mass-shootings-map. Accessed Feb. 2015, Jul. 2016.
  48. 48.
    New York City Police Department. Active shooter: recommendations and analysis for risk mitigation. New York: counterterrorism bureau, New York City Police Department; New York, NY; 2012.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Violence Policy Center. Mass shootings in the United States involving high-capacity ammunition magazines. http://www.vpc.org/fact_sht/VPCshootinglist.pdf. Accessed June 18, 2017.
  50. 50.
    Berkowitz B, Gamio L, Lu D, Uhrmacher K, and Lindeman T. The math of mass shootings. The Washington Post https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/national/mass-shootings-in-america/. Accessed Aug. 2016.
  51. 51.
    Assault Weapons Act of 2013. OLL13047, 113th Cong. (2013).Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Freskos B. Baltimore police are recovering more guns loaded with high-capacity magazines, despite ban on sales. The trace. 2017; Apr. 1. https://www.thetrace.org/2017/03/high-capacity-magazine-ban-baltimore-police/ Accessed Apr. 1, 2017.
  53. 53.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Injury Center. https://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/. Accessed March 2015.
  54. 54.
    Federal Bureau of Investigation. Uniform crime reporting. https://ucr.fbi.gov/ucr. Accessed March 2015.
  55. 55.
    Richmond TS, Branas CC, Cheney RA, Schwab CW. The case for enhanced data collection of gun type. J Trauma. 2004;57:1356–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Academy of Medicine 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Evidence-Based Crime Policy, Department of Criminology, Law and SocietyGeorge Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA

Personalised recommendations