Journal of Urban Health

, Volume 93, Issue 5, pp 758–769 | Cite as

Perceived and Objectively-Measured Neighborhood Violence and Adolescent Psychological Distress

  • Sidra Goldman-Mellor
  • Claire Margerison-Zilko
  • Kristina Allen
  • Magdalena Cerda
Article

Abstract

Prior research examining links between neighborhood violence and mental health has not been able to establish whether it is perceived levels of neighborhood violence, or actual levels of violent crime, that matter most for adolescents’ psychological well-being. In this study, we ascertained both perceived neighborhood safety and objectively-measured neighborhood-level violent crime (using a novel geospatial index of police-reported crime incidents) for 4464 adolescent respondents from the California Health Interview Survey (CHIS 2011–2014). We used propensity score-matched regression models to examine associations between these measures and CHIS adolescents’ symptoms of psychological distress. We found that adolescents who perceived their neighborhood to be unsafe were two times more likely than those who perceived their neighborhood to be safe to report serious psychological distress (OR = 2.4, 95 % CI = 1.20, 4.96). Adolescents who lived in areas objectively characterized by high levels of violent crime, however, were no more likely than their peers in safer areas to be distressed (OR = 1.41; 95 % CI = 0.60, 3.32). Our results suggest that, at the population level, adolescents’ perceptions of neighborhood violence, rather than objective levels of neighborhood crime, are most salient for their mental health.

Keywords

Adolescent Mental health Neighborhood Violence 

Supplementary material

11524_2016_79_MOESM1_ESM.docx (172 kb)
ESM 1(DOCX 171 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Turner HA, Shattuck A, Hamby S, Finkelhor D. Community disorder, victimization exposure, and mental health in a national sample of youth. J Health Soc Behav. 2013; 54(2): 258–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fowler PJ, Tompsett CJ, Braciszewski JM, et al. Community violence: a meta-analysis on the effect of exposure and mental health outcomes of children and adolescents. Dev Psychopathol. 2009; 21(1): 227–59.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mrug S, Windle M. Prospective effects of violence exposure across multiple contexts on early adolescents’ internalizing and externalizing problems. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2010; 51(8): 953–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Slopen N, Fitzmaurice GM, Williams DR, Gilman SE. Common patterns of violence experiences and depression and anxiety among adolescents. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2012; 47(10): 1591–605.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Newbury J, Arseneault L, Caspi A, et al. Why are children in urban neighborhoods at increased risk for psychotic symptoms? findings from a UK longitudinal cohort study. Schizophr Bull. 2016; 1–12.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cooley-Strickland M, Quille TJ, Griffin RS, et al. Community violence and youth: affect, behavior, substance use, and academics. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2009; 12(2): 127–56.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kessler RC, Duncan GJ, Gennetian LA, et al. Associations of housing mobility interventions for children in high-poverty neighborhoods with subsequent mental disorders during adolescence. JAMA. 2014; 311(9): 937–48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Diez Roux AV, Mair C. Neighborhoods and health. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010; 1186(1): 125–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Selner-O’Hagan MB, Kindlon DJ, Buka SL, et al. Assessing exposure to violence in urban youth. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1998; 39(2): 215–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sampson RJ, Raudenbush SW. Seeing disorder: neighborhood stigma and the social construction of “broken windows.”. Soc Psychol Q. 2004; 67(4): 319–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hill HM, Madhere S. Exposure to community violence and African American children: a multidimensional model of risks and resources. J Community Psychol. 1996; 24(1): 26–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kneeshaw-Price SH, Saelens BE, Sallis JF, et al. Neighborhood crime-related safety and its relation to children’s physical activity. J Urban Heal. 2015; 92(3): 472–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Meltzer H, Vostanis P, Goodman R, Ford T. Children’s perceptions of neighbourhood trustworthiness and safety and their mental health. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2007; 48(12): 1208–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chung HL, Slocum C, Proverbs T. Objective and perceived community factors: exploring responses to context. Am J Health Behav. 2013; 37(6): 763–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fujiwara T, Kawachi I. A prospective study of individual-level social capital and major depression in the United States. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008; 62(7): 627–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hill HM, Levermore M, Twaite J, Jones LP. Exposure to community violence and social support as predictors of anxiety and social and emotional behavior among African American children. J Child Fam Stud. 1996; 5(4): 399–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Curry A, Latkin C, Davey-Rothwell M. Pathways to depression: the impact of neighborhood violent crime on inner-city residents in Baltimore, Maryland. USA Soc Sci Med. 2008; 67(1): 23–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dustmann C, Fasani F. The effect of local area crime on mental health. Econ J. 2014; 1–40.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    United States Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation. Crime in the United States, 2013. Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation; 2014.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Survey CHI. CHIS 2011–2012 methodology series: report 1—sample design. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Center for Health Policy Research; 2014.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    California Health Interview Survey. CHIS 2011–2012 methodology series: report 2—data collection methods. California Health Interview Survey. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Center for Health Policy Research; 2014.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    California Health Interview Survey. CHIS 2011–2012 methodology series: report 3—data processing procedures. California Health Interview Survey. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Center for Health Policy Research; 2014.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    California Health Interview Survey. CHIS 2011–2012 methodology series: report 4—response rates. California Health Interview Survey. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Center for Health Policy Research; 2014.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    California Health Interview. CHIS 2011–2012 methodology series: report 5—weighting and variance estimation. California Health Interview Survey. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Center for Health Policy Research; 2014.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Diez Roux AV. Investigating neighborhood and area effects on health. Am J Public Health. 2001; 91(11): 1783–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Krieger N, Chen JT, Waterman PD, et al. Geocoding and monitoring of US socioeconomic inequalities in mortality and cancer incidence: does the choice of area-based measure and geographic level matter?: the public health disparities geocoding project. Am J Epidemiol. 2002; 156(5): 471–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kessler RC, Andrews G, Colpe LJ, et al. Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychol Med. 2002; 32(6): 959–76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Blau JR, Blau PM. The cost of inequality: metropolitan structure and violent crime. Am Sociol Rev. 1982; 47(1): 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gove WR, Huges M, Geerken M. Are uniform crime reports a valid indicator of the index crimes? an affirmative answer with minor qualifications. Criminology. 1985; 23(3): 451–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Location I. SecurityGauge commercial property crime risk index: white paper. 2013.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Diez Roux AV, Kiefe CI, Jacobs DR, et al. Area characteristics and individual-level socioeconomic position indicators in three population-based epidemiologic studies. Ann Epidemiol. 2001; 11(6): 395–405.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 1983; 70(1): 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Garrido MM, Kelley AS, Paris J, et al. Methods for constructing and assessing propensity scores. Health Serv Res. 2014; 49(5): 1–20.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dugoff EH, Schuler M, Stuart E. Generalizing observational study results: applying propensity score methods to complex surveys. Health Serv Res. 2014; 49(1): 284–303.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Heckman JJ, Ichimura H, Todd PE. Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: evidence from evaluating a job training programme. Rev Econ Stud. 1997; 64(4): 605–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wilson-Genderson M, Pruchno R. Effects of neighborhood violence and perceptions of neighborhood safety on depressive symptoms of older adults. Soc Sci Med. 2013; 85: 43–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Duncan GJ, Raudenbush SW. Assessing the effects of context in studies of child and youth development. Educ Psychol. 1999; 34(1): 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Duncan GJ, Connell JP, Klebanov PK. Conceptual and methodological issues in estimating causal effects of neighborhoods and family conditions on individual development. In: Brooks-Gunn J, Duncan GJ, Aber JL, eds. Neighborhood poverty: Vol. 1. Context and consequences for children. New York, NY: Russell Sage; 1997: 219–50.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Arseneault L, Bowes L, Shakoor S. Bullying victimization in youths and mental health problems: “Much ado about nothing”? Psychol Med. 2010; 40: 717–29.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Fisher HL, Moffitt TE, Houts RM, et al. Bullying victimisation and risk of self harm in early adolescence: longitudinal cohort study. BMJ. 2012; 344: e2683.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gaylord-Harden NK, Cunningham JA, Zelencik B. Effects of exposure to community violence on internalizing symptoms: does desensitization to violence occur in African American youth? J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2011; 39(5): 711–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mccart MR, Smith DW, Saunders BE, et al. Do urban adolescents become desensitized to community violence? data from a national survey. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2007; 77(3): 434–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Gary TL, Stark SA, Laveist TA. Neighborhood characteristics and mental health among African Americans and whites living in a racially integrated urban community. Heal Place. 2007; 13(2): 569–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mair C, Diez Roux AV, Galea S. Are neighborhood characteristics associated with depressive symptoms? a critical review. J Epidemiol Community Heal. 2008; 62(11): 940–6.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Morenoff JD. Neighborhood mechanisms and the spatial dynamics of birth weight. Am J Sociol. 2003; 108(5): 976–1017.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Earls FJ, Brooks-Gunn J, Raudenbush SW, Sampson RJ. Project on human development in Chicago neighborhoods: community survey, 1994–1995. Ann Arbor, MI: Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR), University of Michigan; 1997.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Gupta RS, Zhang X, Springston EE, et al. The association between community crime and childhood asthma prevalence in Chicago. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2010; 104(4): 299–306.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kennedy BP, Kawachi I, Prothrow-Stith D, et al. Social capital, income inequality, and firearm violent crime. Soc Sci Med. 1998; 47(1): 7–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Sampson RJ, Morenoff JD, Gannon-Rowley T. Assessing “neighborhood effects”: social processes and new directions in research. Annu Rev Sociol. 2002; 28(1): 443–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Coulton CJ, Korbin J, Chan T, Su M. Mapping residents’ perceptions of neighborhood boundaries: a methodological note. Am J Community Psychol. 2001; 29(2): 371–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Academy of Medicine 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Public Health; School of Social SciencesHumanities, and Arts; University of California, MercedMercedUSA
  2. 2.Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Michigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  3. 3.Department of Emergency Medicine; School of MedicineUniversity of California, DavisSacramentoUSA

Personalised recommendations