Advertisement

Journal of Urban Health

, Volume 91, Issue 6, pp 1144–1157 | Cite as

Urban Residential Road Traffic Noise and Hypertension: a Cross-Sectional Study of Adult Population

  • Dibyendu Banerjee
  • Partha P. Das
  • Anjan Fouzdar
Article

Abstract

Results from studies involving exposure to road traffic noise and risk of hypertension are diverse and have seldom reached statistical significance. This study was designed with the aim of investigating whether there is any association between road traffic noise and prevalence of hypertension in an urban adult population. Similar studies have never been reported from India. A cross-sectional study was performed on 909 adults (533 female and 376 male) aged 18–80 years residing in close proximity to roadways in Asansol City. Time-weighted equivalent noise level (L den) was estimated using a standard modeling platform. Odds for hypertension in relation to traffic noise exposure were estimated by univariate and multifactorial logistic regression. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for self-reported hypertension was 1.99 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.66–2.39) per 5 dB(A) increase of L den (range 55.1–77.9). A gender-related risk difference was observed among the male (OR 1.81 (1.42–2.31)) and female (OR 2.18 (1.66–2.88)) respondents. For increase in 9 years of age, the odds of hypertension risk increased by 60 % (OR 1.66 (1.43–1.91) among those exposed above L den 60 dB(A). Vulnerable subgroups were female aged 35–54 years and male aged 45–54 years. The study suggests that a threshold exposure to road traffic noise at L den > 65 dB(A) for men and L den > 60 dB(A) in women may be associated with the occurrence of hypertension.

Keywords

Road traffic noise Hypertension Blood pressure Exposure-response relationship Public health Environmental risk 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors express sincere thanks to the Teacher-in-charge, B.B. College (BBC/RD/ENV/02), Asansol; Chairman, West Bengal Pollution Control Board; and Chairman, Asansol Mines Board of Health for support. The contributions of the household surveyors from VBU are highly acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    Burden of Disease from Environmental Noise—Quantification of Healthy Life Years Lost in Europe; WHO Regional Office for Europe: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2011.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Babisch W. The noise/stress concept, risk assessment and research needs. Noise Health. 2002; 4: 1–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Babisch W. Transportation noise and cardiovascular risk: updated review and synthesis of epidemiological studies indicate that the evidence has increased. Noise Health. 2006; 8: 1–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Babisch W. Transportation noise and cardiovascular risk: Review and synthesis of epidemiological studies, dose-effect curve and risk estimation. WaBoLu-Hefte 01/06. Dessau, Berlin, Brandenburg: Umweltbundesamt; 2006.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Van Kempen EE, Babisch W. The quantitative relationship between road traffic noise and hypertension: a meta-analysis. J Hypertens. 2012; 30: 1075–1186.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davies H, Kamp IV. Noise and cardiovascular diseases: a review of the literature 2008–2011. Noise Health. 2012; 14: 287–291.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bodin T, Albin M, Ardö J, Stroh E, Stroh P, Björk J. Road traffic noise and hypertension: results from a cross-sectional public health survey in southern Sweden. Environ Health. 2009; 8: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chang TY, Liu CS, Bao BY, Li SF, Chen TI, Lin YJ. Characterization of road traffic noise exposure and prevalence of hypertension in central Taiwan. Sci Total Environ. 2011; 409: 1053–1057.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Global health risks: mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks. WHO Press, WHO: Geneva, Switzerland 2009.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kearney PM, Whelton M, Reynolds K, Muntner P, Whelton PK, He J. Global burden of hypertension: analysis of worldwide data. Lancet. 2005; 365: 217–223.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gupta R. Trends in hypertension epidemiology in India. J Hum Hypertens. 2004; 18: 73–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Banerjee D. Research on road traffic noise and human health in India: review of literature from 1991–current. Noise Health. 2012; 14: 113–118.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    The Calculation of Road Traffic Noise, Department of Transport Welsh Office. HMSO: London, London; 1988.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dratva J, Phuleria HC, Foraster M, et al. Transportation noise and blood pressure in a population-based sample of adults. Environ Health Perspect. 2004; 120: 50–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jarup L, Babisch W, Houthuijs D, et al. HYENA study team. hypertension and exposure to noise near airports: the HYENA study. Environ Health Perspect. 2008; 13: 329–333.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Belojevic G, Jakovljevic BD, Stojanov VJ, Slepcevic VZ, Paunovic KZ. Nighttime road-traffic noise and arterial hypertension in an urban population. Hypertens Res. 2008; 31: 775–781.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bluhm LG, Berglind N, Nordling E, Rosenlund M. Road traffic noise and hypertension. Occup Environ Med. 2007; 64: 122–126.PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bendokiene I, Grazuleviciene R, Dedele A. Risk of hypertension related to road traffic noise among reproductive-age women. Noise Health. 2011; 13: 371–377.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    de Kluizenaar Y, Gansevoort RT, Miedema HM, de Jong PE. Hypertension and road traffic noise exposure. Occup Environ Med. 2007; 49: 484–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Barregard L, Bonde E, Ohrstrom E. Risk of hypertension from exposure to road traffic noise in a population-based sample. Occup Environ Med. 2009; 66: 410–415.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Van Kempen EE, Kruize H, Boshuizen HC, Ameling CB, Staatsen BA, de Hollander AE. The association between noise exposure and blood pressure and ischemic heart disease: a meta-analysis. Environ Health Perspect. 2002; 110: 307–317.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Foraster M. Is it traffic-related air pollution or road traffic noise, or both? Key questions not yet settled! Int J Public Health. 2013; 58: 647–648.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Academy of Medicine 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dibyendu Banerjee
    • 1
  • Partha P. Das
    • 2
  • Anjan Fouzdar
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Environment ScienceBanwarilal Bhalotia College (The University of Burdwan)Dist-BurdwanIndia
  2. 2.Asansol Mines Board of HealthBurdwanIndia
  3. 3.West Bengal Pollution Control BoardAsansol Sub-Regional OfficeBurdwanIndia

Personalised recommendations