Advertisement

Journal of Urban Health

, Volume 91, Issue 6, pp 1048–1064 | Cite as

Social Vulnerability Index for the Older People—Hong Kong and New York City as Examples

  • Pui Hing ChauEmail author
  • Michael K. Gusmano
  • Joanna O. Y. Cheng
  • Sai Hei Cheung
  • Jean Woo
Article

Abstract

Many world cities have suffered large-scale disasters, causing a significant loss of lives, property damage, and adverse social and economic impact. Those who are most vulnerable during and in the immediate aftermath of disaster crises are the elderly. Therefore, it is imperative to identify them and determine their specific needs in order to support them. Although several Social Vulnerability Indexes (SVIs) have been developed to assess different types of disaster vulnerability across geographic and population levels, few have been tailored to the older population. Building on the research of Gusmano et al., this study modifies and uses an SVI specifically designed to assess the vulnerability of older populations to emergencies and disasters across seven domains, namely, population size, institutionalization, poverty, living alone, disability, communication obstacles, and access to primary care. Moreover, it is acknowledged that availability of data largely depends on the local context and is always a barrier to production of indices across countries. The present study offers suggestions on how modifications can be made for local adaptation such that the SVI can be applied in different cities and localities. The SVI used in this study provides information to stakeholders in emergency preparedness, not only about natural disasters but also about health hazards and emergencies, which few existing SVI address.

Keywords

Social Vulnerability Index Elderly Hong Kong New York City 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Daniel Weisz for his assistance in gathering the New York City data.

References

  1. 1.
    Alirol E, Getaz L, Stoll B, Chappuis F, Loutan L. Urbanisation and infectious diseases in a globalised world. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010; 10: 131–41.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hutton D. Older people in emergencies: considerations for action and policy development: Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland; 2008.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Oven K, Curtis S, Reaney S, et al. Climate change and health and social care: defining future hazard, vulnerability and risk for infrastructure systems supporting older people’s health care in England. Appl Geogr. 2012; 33: 16–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Daito H, Suzuki M, Shiihara J, et al. Impact of the Tohoku earthquake and tsunami on pneumonia hospitalisations and mortality among adults in northern Miyagi, Japan: a multicentre observational study. Thorax. 2013; 68(6): 544–50.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Adams V, Kaufman SR, Van Hattum T, Moody S. Aging disaster: mortality, vulnerability, and long-term recovery among Katrina survivors. Med Anthropol. 2011; 30(3): 247–70.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yip PS, Cheung Y, Chau P, Law Y. The impact of epidemic outbreak: the case of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and suicide among older adults in Hong Kong. Crisis: J Crisis Interv Suicide Prev. 2010; 31(2): 86–92.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    National Association of County and City Health Officials. Project Public Health Ready 2012 Criteria. NACCHO Website http://www.naccho.org/topics/emergency/PPHR/upload/PPHR-Criteria-2012_FINAL.pdf. Published September 2011. Updated May 1, 2012. Accessed April 29, 2014.
  8. 8.
    Tate E. Social vulnerability indices: a comparative assessment using uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Nat Hazards. 2012; 63(2): 325–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yoon DK. Assessment of social vulnerability to natural disasters: a comparative study. Nat Hazards. 2012; 63(2): 823–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, Shirley WL. Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Q. 2003; 84(2): 242–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ngo EB. When disasters and age collide: reviewing vulnerability of the elderly. Nat Hazards Rev. 2001; 2(2): 80–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aldrich N, Benson WF. Disaster preparedness and the chronic disease needs of vulnerable older adults. Preventing Chronic Disease. 2008;5(1) http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2008/jan/07_0135.htm. Accessed April 29, 2014..
  13. 13.
    Cutter SL, Mitchell JT, Scott MS. Revealing the vulnerability of people and places: a case study of Georgetown County, South Carolina. Ann Assoc Am Geogr. 2000; 90(4): 713–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chakraborty J, Tobin GA, Montz BE. Population evacuation: assessing spatial variability in geophysical risk and social vulnerability to natural hazards. Nat Hazards Rev. 2005; 6(1): 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fekete A. Validation of a social vulnerability index in context to river-floods in Germany. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 2009; 9(2): 393–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wood NJ, Burton CG, Cutter SL. Community variations in social vulnerability to Cascadia-related tsunamis in the US Pacific Northwest. Nat Hazards. 2010; 52(2): 369–89, Article 3.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Flanagan BE, Gregory EW, Hallisey EJ, Heitgerd JL, Lewis B. A social vulnerability index for disaster management. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management. 2011;8(1).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zebardast E. Constructing a social vulnerability index to earthquake hazards using a hybrid factor analysis and analytic network process (F’ANP) model. Nat Hazards. 2013; 65(3): 1331–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Crooks D. Development and testing of the Elderly Social Vulnerability Index (ESVI): a composite indicator to measure social vulnerability in the Jamaican elderly population. [PhD’s thesis]. Miami, FL: Florida International University; 2009.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang C, Yarnal B. The vulnerability of the elderly to hurricane hazards in Sarasota, Florida. Nat Hazards. 2012; 63(2): 349–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gusmano MK, Rodwin VG, Cantor M. Urban ecology of old age in New York City (NYC): helping vulnerable older persons. Final Report to the New York Community Trust 11th April 2006.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zahran S, Brody SD, Peacock WG, Vedlitz A, Grover H. Social vulnerability and the natural and built environment: a model of flood casualties in Texas. Disasters. 2008; 32(4): 537–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mustafa D, Ahmed S, Saroch E, Bell H. Pinning down vulnerability: from narratives to numbers. Disasters. 2011; 35(1): 62–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wang C. Trapped in place: the vulnerability of the elderly to hurricane hazards in Sarasota, Florida College of Earth and Mineral Sciences. [master’s thesis]. The Pennsylvania State University: University Park, PA; 2011.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dwyer A, Zoppou C, Nielsen O, Day S, Roberts S. Quantifying social vulnerability: a methodology for identifying those at risk to natural hazards: Geoscience Australia. Australia: Canberra; 2004.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rosenkoetter MM, Covan EK, Cobb BK, Bunting S, Weinrich M. Perceptions of older adults regarding evacuation in the event of a natural disaster. Public Health Nurs. 2007; 24(2): 160–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gibson MJ, Hayunga M. We can do better: lessons learned for protecting older persons in disasters: AARP. 2006Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dosa DM, Hyer K, Brown LM, Artenstein AW, Polivka-West L, Mor V. The controversy inherent in managing frail nursing home residents during complex hurricane emergencies. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2008; 9(8): 599–604.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bascetta C. Disaster preparedness: preliminary observations on the evacuation of vulnerable populations due to hurricanes and other disasters. In: Office GA, ed. United States. 2006Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Johnson DP, Stanforth A, Lulla V, Luber G. Developing an applied extreme heat vulnerability index utilizing socioeconomic and environmental data. Appl Geogr. 2012; 35(1): 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fees BS, Martin P, Poon LW. A model of loneliness in older adults. J Gerontol Ser B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1999; 54(4): P231–9.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Healy JD. Excess winter mortality in Europe: a cross country analysis identifying key risk factors. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003; 57(10): 784–9.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Phillips B. Promoting social and intergenerational equity during disaster recovery. In: Eadie C, ed. Holistic disaster recovery: ideas for building local sustainability after a natural disaster. Colorado, CO: DIANE Publishing; 2001.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zimmerman R, Restrepo CE, Nagorsky B, Culpen AM. Vulnerability of the elderly during natural hazard events; Boulder, CO: 2009. Non-published Research Reports. Paper 44. Available at: http://research.create.usc.edu/nonpublished_reports/44. Accessed April 29, 2014.
  35. 35.
    Myers CA, Slack T, Singelmann J. Social vulnerability and migration in the wake of disaster: the case of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Popul Environ. 2008; 29(6): 271–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Federal Register. The 2005 HHS Poverty Guidelines. In: Services USDoHaH, ed. Vol 70; 2005:8373–8375.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Yeletaysi S, Ozceylan D, Fiedrich F, Harrald JR, Jefferson T. A framework to integrate social vulnerability into catastrophic natural disaster preparedness planning. Paper presented at: The International Emergency Management Society-TIEMS 16th Annual Conference. 2009.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Mutchfer JE, Brallier S. English language proficiency among older Hispanics in the United States. The Gerontologist. 1999; 39(3): 310–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sentell T, Braun KL. Low health literacy, limited English proficiency, and health status in Asians, Latinos, and other racial/ethnic groups in California. J Health Commun. 2012; 17(sup3): 82–99.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Morrow BH. Identifying and mapping community vulnerability. Disasters. 1999; 23(1): 1–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tierney K. Social inequality, hazards, and disasters. On risk and disaster: lessons from Hurricane Katrina. 2006:109–128.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Manton KG, Gu X. Changes in the prevalence of chronic disability in the United States black and nonblack population above age 65 from 1982 to 1999. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2001; 98(11): 6354–9.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    McGuire LC, Ford ES, Okoro CA. Natural disasters and older US adults with disabilities: implications for evacuation. Disasters. 2007; 31(1): 49–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Starfield B. Is primary care essential? Lancet. 1994; 344(8930): 1129–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Weissman JS, Gatsonis C, Epstein AM. Rates of avoidable hospitalization by insurance status in Massachusetts and Maryland. JAMA: J Am Med Assoc. 1992; 268(17): 2388–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Billings J, Zeitel L, Lukomnik J, Carey TS, Blank AE, Newman L. Impact of socioeconomic status on hospital use in New York City. Health Aff. 1993; 12(1): 162–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Millman M. Access to health care in America. Washington DC.: National Academies Press; 1993.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Purdy S, Griffin T, Salisbury C, Sharp D. Ambulatory care sensitive conditions: terminology and disease coding need to be more specific to aid policy makers and clinicians. Public health. 2009; 123(2): 169–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Chau PH, Woo J, Gusmano MK, Weisz D, Rodwin VG, Chan KC. Access to primary care in Hong Kong, Greater London and New York City. Health Econ Policy Law. 2012; 1(1): 1–15.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kirby JB, Kaneda T. Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and access to health care. J Health Soc Behav. 2005; 46(1): 15–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Wong M, Chau P, Goggins W, Woo J. A geographical study of health services utilization among the elderly in Hong Kong: from spatial variations to health care implications. Health Serv Insights. 2009; 2: 1–12.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Census and Statistics Department HK. April, 2014 Hong Kong Monthly Digest of Statistics. 2014:5–7.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Bureau USC. State & County Quick Facts, New York (city), New York United States Census Bureau. 27th March, 2014. Available at: http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/36/3651000.html. Accessed April 29, 2014.
  54. 54.
    Central Registry for Rehabilitation. Statistical Report of the Central Registry for Rehabilitation (1999–2012). Hong Kong 2012Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Ahmad OB, Boschi-Pinto C, Lopez AD, Murray CJ, Lozano R, Inoue M. Age standardization of rates: a new WHO standard. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Leung GM, Wong IOL, Chan WS, Choi S, Lo SV, Health Care Financing Study Group. The ecology of health care in Hong Kong. Soc Sci Med. 2005; 61: 577–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Victor C, Scambler S, Bond J, Bowling A. Being alone in later life: loneliness, social isolation and living alone. Rev Clin Gerontol. 2000; 10(4): 407–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Academy of Medicine 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pui Hing Chau
    • 1
    Email author
  • Michael K. Gusmano
    • 2
  • Joanna O. Y. Cheng
    • 1
  • Sai Hei Cheung
    • 1
  • Jean Woo
    • 3
  1. 1.The University of Hong KongPokfulamHong Kong
  2. 2.The Hastings CenterGarrisonUSA
  3. 3.The Chinese University of Hong KongShatinHong Kong

Personalised recommendations