Advertisement

Journal of Urban Health

, Volume 91, Issue 6, pp 1087–1097 | Cite as

Food Insecurity, Neighborhood Food Access, and Food Assistance in Philadelphia

  • Victoria L. MayerEmail author
  • Amy Hillier
  • Marcus A. Bachhuber
  • Judith A. Long
Article

Abstract

An estimated 17.6 million American households were food insecure in 2012, meaning they were unable to obtain enough food for an active and healthy life. Programs to augment local access to healthy foods are increasingly widespread, with unclear effects on food security. At the same time, the US government has recently enacted major cuts to federal food assistance programs. In this study, we examined the association between food insecurity (skipping or reducing meal size because of budget), neighborhood food access (self-reported access to fruits and vegetables and quality of grocery stores), and receipt of food assistance using the 2008, 2010, and 2012 waves of the Southeastern Pennsylvania Household Health Survey. Of 11,599 respondents, 16.7 % reported food insecurity; 79.4 % of the food insecure found it easy or very easy to find fruits and vegetables, and 60.6 % reported excellent or good quality neighborhood grocery stores. In our regression models adjusting for individual- and neighborhood-level covariates, compared to those who reported very difficult access to fruits and vegetables, those who reported difficult, easy or very easy access were less likely to report food insecurity (OR 0.62: 95 % CI 0.43–0.90, 0.33: 95 % CI 0.23–0.47, and 0.28: 95 % CI 0.20–0.40). Compared to those who reported poor stores, those who reported fair, good, and excellent quality stores were also less likely to report food insecurity (OR 0.81: 95 % CI 0.60–1.08, 0.58: 95 % CI 0.43–0.78, and 0.43: 95 % CI 0.31–0.59). Compared to individuals not receiving food assistance, those receiving Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits were significantly more likely to be food insecure (OR 1.36: 95 % CI 1.11–1.67), while those receiving benefits from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) (OR 1.17: 95 % CI 0.77–1.78) and those receiving both SNAP and WIC (OR 0.84: 95 % CI 0.61–1.17) did not have significantly different odds of food insecurity. In conclusion, better neighborhood food access is associated with lower risk of food insecurity. However, most food insecure individuals reported good access. Improving diet in communities with high rates of food insecurity likely requires not only improved access but also greater affordability.

Keywords

Environment and public health Nutrition policy Hunger Food assistance 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Christopher Wirtalla for assistance with developing Stata programming. V.L.M. was supported with funding from the Division of General Internal Medicine Matt Slap Award from the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania and the National Institutes of Health Institutional Training Grant 5-T32-HP-100296-20-00.

References

  1. 1.
    Coleman-Jensen A, Nord M, Singh A. Household food security in the United States in 2012. http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/err-economic-research-report/err155.aspx#.UqUp4ZNeuw0. United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Published September 2013. Accessed September 12, 2013.
  2. 2.
    Lee JS, Frongillo EA Jr. Nutritional and health consequences are associated with food insecurity among U.S. elderly persons. J Nutr. 2001; 131(5): 1503–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Seligman HK, Laraia BA, Kushel MB. Food insecurity is associated with chronic disease among low-income NHANES participants. J Nutr. 2010; 140(2): 304–10.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Haering SA, Syed SB. Community food security in the United States: a survey of the relevant scientific literature. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Center for a Livable Future; 2009.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bawadi HA, Ammari F, Abu-Jamous D, Khader YS, Bataineh S, Tayyem RF. Food insecurity is related to glycemic control deterioration in patients with type 2 diabetes. Clin Nutr. 2012; 31(2): 250–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gucciardi E, Vogt JA, DeMelo M, Stewart DE. Exploration of the relationship between household food insecurity and diabetes in Canada. Diabetes Care. 2009; 32(12): 2218–24.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dinour LM, Bergen D, Yeh MC. The food insecurity-obesity paradox: a review of the literature and the role food stamps may play. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007; 107(11): 1952–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Seligman HK, Jacobs EA, Lopez A, Tschann J, Fernandez A. Food insecurity and glycemic control among low-income patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2012; 35(2): 233–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brownson RC, Haire-Joshu D, Luke DA. Shaping the context of health: a review of environmental and policy approaches in the prevention of chronic diseases. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006; 27: 341–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    IOM (Institute of Medicine) Accelerating Progress in Obesity Prevention. Solving the weight of the nation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2012.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sallis JF, Glanz K. Physical activity and food environments: solutions to the obesity epidemic. Milbank Q. 2009; 87(1): 123–54.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Auchincloss AH, Mujahid MS, Shen M, Michos ED, Whitt-Glover MC, Diez Roux AV. Neighborhood health-promoting resources and obesity risk (the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis). Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013; 21(3): 621–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Larson NI, Story MT, Nelson MC. Neighborhood environments: disparities in access to healthy foods in the US. Am J Prev Med. 2009; 36(1): 74–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ploeg MV, Breneman V, Farrigan T, et al. Access to affordable and nutritious food - measuring and understanding food deserts and their consequences: report to Congress. http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/ap-administrative-publication/ap-036.aspx. United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Published June 2009. Accessed September 12, 2013.
  15. 15.
    The Pew Charitable Trusts. Philadelphia Research Initiative. Philadelphia 2013: the state of the city. http://www.pewtrusts.org/our_work_report_detail_wide.aspx?id=85899461859. Published March 2013. Accessed September 16, 2013.
  16. 16.
    Public Health Management Corporation. Community Health Database. http://www.chdbdata.org/. Accessed October 1, 2012.
  17. 17.
    Karpyn A, Manon M, Treuhaft S, Giang T, Harries C, McCoubrey K. Policy solutions to the ‘grocery gap’. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010; 29(3): 473–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    The Food Trust and Get Healthy Philly. Philadelphia’s healthy corner store initiative, 2010-2012. Published 2012. http://thefoodtrust.org/uploads/media_items/hcsi-y2report-final.original.pdf. Accessed November 19, 2013.
  19. 19.
    The Philadelphia Department of Public Health, Get Healthy Philly. Walkable access to healthy food in Philadelphia, 2010-2012. Published March 2013. http://www.phila.gov/health/pdfs/Food_access_report.pdf. Accessed September 18, 2013.
  20. 20.
    Bickel, G, Nord, M, Price, C, Hamilton, W, Cook, J. Measuring food security in the United States. Guide to measuring household food security. Revised 2000. http://www.fns.usda.gov/fsec/files/fsguide.pdf. Published March 2000. Accessed October 26, 2012.
  21. 21.
    U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey, 2007-2011. http://factfinder.census.gov/home. Accessed November 23, 2013.
  22. 22.
    Walker RE, Keane CR, Burke JG. Disparities and access to healthy food in the United States: a review of food deserts literature. Health Place. 2010; 16(5): 876–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kirkpatrick SI, Tarasuk V. Assessing the relevance of neighbourhood characteristics to the household food security of low-income Toronto families. Public Health Nutr. 2010; 13(7): 1139–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Coleman-Jensen A, Nord M, Andrews M, and Carlson S. Household food security in the United States in 2011. http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/err-economic-research-report/err141.aspx#.UqU2YJNeuw0. Published September 2012. Accessed October 3, 2012.
  25. 25.
    Cunnyngham K, Sukasih A, Castner L. Mathematica Policy Research. Empirical Bayes shrinkage estimates of state Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participation rates in 2009-2011 for all eligible people and the working poor. http://www.fns.usda.gov/empirical-bayes-shrinkage-estimates-state-supplemental-nutrition-assistance-program-participation-3. Published March 2014. Accessed April 12, 2014.
  26. 26.
    Kreider B, Pepper JV, Gunderson C, Jolliffe D. Identifying the effects of SNAP (food stamps) on child health outcomes when participation is endogenous and misreported. J Am Stat Assoc. 2012; 107(499): 958–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Meyer BD, Mok WKC, Sullivan JX. Under-reporting of transfer in household surveys: its nature and consequences. Working paper 15181. http://www.nber.org/papers/w15181. National Bureau of Economic Research. Published July 2009. Accessed October 29, 2012
  28. 28.
    Saelens BE, Glanz K. Work group I: measures of the food and physical activity environment: instruments. Am J Prev Med. 2009; 36(4 Suppl): S166–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Moore LV, Diez Roux AV, Franco M. Measuring availability of healthy foods: agreement between directly measured and self-reported data. Am J Epidemiol. 2012; 175(10): 1037–44.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Health Impact Project. The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and The Pew Charitable Trusts. White paper: health impact assessment of proposed changes to the supplemental nutrition assistance program. Published July 2013. http://www.rwf.org/en/reserach-publication/find-rwf-research/2013/7/health-impact-assesment-of-proposed-changes-to-the-supplement.html. Accessed September 11, 2013.

Copyright information

© The New York Academy of Medicine 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Victoria L. Mayer
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Amy Hillier
    • 3
  • Marcus A. Bachhuber
    • 2
    • 4
    • 5
  • Judith A. Long
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of MedicinePerelman School of Medicine, University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Leonard Davis Institute of Health EconomicsUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  3. 3.Department of City and Regional Planning, School of DesignUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  4. 4.Center for Health Equity Research and PromotionPhiladelphia Veterans Affairs Medical CenterPhiladelphiaUSA
  5. 5.Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars ProgramUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations