Journal of Urban Health

, Volume 91, Issue 6, pp 1136–1143 | Cite as

Share of Mass Transit Miles Traveled and Reduced Motor Vehicle Fatalities in Major Cities of the United States

  • Jim P. Stimpson
  • Fernando A. Wilson
  • Ozgur M. Araz
  • Jose A. Pagan
Article

Abstract

The USA leads the developed world in motor vehicle fatalities, presenting a critical public health threat. We examined whether an increasing share of mass transit use, relative to vehicle miles traveled on public roads, was associated with reduced motor vehicle fatalities. We used annual city-level data for the USA from 1982–2010 provided by the Fatality Accident Reporting System, the Texas A&M Transportation Institute, the Census Bureau, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to estimate a structural equation model of the factors associated with mass transit miles and motor vehicle fatalities. The final analytic data included 2,900 observations from 100 cities over 29 years. After accounting for climate, year, and the economic costs of driving, an increasing share of mass transit miles traveled per capita was associated with reduced motor vehicle fatalities. The costs of congestion to the average commuter and gas prices were positively associated with increasing the share of mass transit miles traveled. The economic costs of driving increased over time, while both the fatality rate and the share of mass transit miles traveled decreased over time. Increasing the share of mass transit miles traveled may be associated with fewer motor vehicle miles traveled. Increasing mass transit uptake may be an effective public health intervention to reduce motor vehicle fatalities in cities.

Keywords

Motor vehicle Transportation Mortality Automobile driving 

References

  1. 1.
    White House. Department of Treasury with the Council of Economic Advisers. An economic analysis of infrastructure investment. October 11, 2010. Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/infrastructure_investment_report.pdf. Accessed February 18, 2014.
  2. 2.
    Smith TW. Trends in National Spending Priorities, 1973–2008. General Social Survey. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago, National Opinion Research Center; 2009. Available at: http://news.uchicago.edu/static/newsengine/pdf/090210.SPEND08.pdf. Accessed February 18, 2014.
  3. 3.
    World Health Organization. Global status report on road safety: time for action. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2009.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bureau of Transportation Statistics. National transportation statistics. US Department of Transportation. Available at: http://www.rita.dot.gov/bts/sites/rita.dot.gov.bts/files/publications/national_transportation_statistics/index.html. Accessed February 18, 2014.
  5. 5.
    Beck LF, Shults RA, Mack KA, Ryan GW. Associations between sociodemographics and safety belt use in states with and without primary enforcement laws. Am J Public Health. 2007; 97(9): 1619–24.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen LH, Baker SP, Li G. Graduated driver licensing programs and fatal crashes of 16 year old drivers: a national evaluation. Pediatrics. 2006; 118(1): 56–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    McCartt AT, Teoh ER, Fields M, Braitman KA, Hellinga LA. Graduated licensing laws and fatal crashes of teenage drivers: a national study. Traffic Inj Prev. 2010; 11(3): 240–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ivers R, Senserrick T, Boufous S, Stevenson M, Chen HY, Woodward M, Norton R. Novice drivers’ risky driving behavior, risk perception, and crash risk: findings from the DRIVE study. Am J Public Health. 2009; 99(9): 1638–44.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Friedman LS, Hedeker D, Richter ED. Long-term effects of repealing the national maximum speed limit in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2009; 99(9): 1626–31.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Houston DJ, Richardson LE. Motorcycle safety and the repeal of universal helmet laws. Am J Public Health. 2007; 97(11): 2063–9.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tester JM, Rutherford GW, Wald Z, Rutherford MW. A matched case-control study evaluating the effectiveness of speed humps in reducing child pedestrian injuries. Am J Public Health. 2004; 94(4): 646–50.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Retting RA, Ferguson SA, McCartt AT. A review of evidence-based traffic engineering measures designed to reduce pedestrian-motor vehicle crashes. Am J Public Health. 2003; 93: 1456–63.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hingson R, Heeren T, Winter M. Effects of recent 0.08% legal blood alcohol limits on fatal crash involvement. Inj Prev. 2000; 6(2): 109–14.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wagenaar AC, O’Malley PM, LaFond C. Lowered legal blood alcohol limits for young drivers: effects on drinking, driving, and driving-after-drinking behaviors in 30 states. Am J Public Health. 2001; 91(5): 801–4.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Homer J, French M. Motorcycle helmet laws in the United States from 1990 to 2005: politics and public health. Am J Public Health. 2009; 99(3): 415–23.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mertz KJ, Weiss HB. Changes in motorcycle-related head injury deaths, hospitalizations, and hospital charges following repeal of Pennsylvania’s mandatory motorcycle helmet law. Am J Public Health. 2008; 98(8): 1464–7.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McCartt AT, Geary LL. Longer term effects of New York State’s law on drivers’ handheld cell phone use. Inj Prev. 2004; 10: 11–5.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    McCartt AT, Hellinga LA. Longer-term effects of Washington, DC, law on drivers’ hand-held cell phone use. Traffic Inj Prev. 2007; 8(2): 199–204.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Houston DJ, Richardson LE. Safety belt use and the switch to primary enforcement, 1991–2003. Am J Public Health. 2006; 96(11): 1949–54.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Peltzman S. The effects of automobile safety regulation. J Polit Econ. 1975; 83(4): 677–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    McCartt AT, Hellinga LA, Braitman KA. Cell phones and driving: review of research. Traffic Inj Prev. 2006; 7(2): 89–106.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    McEvoy SP, Stevenson MR, McCartt AT, Woodward M, Haworth C, Palamara P, Cercarelli R. Role of mobile phones in motor vehicle crashes resulting in hospital attendance: a case-crossover study. BMJ. 2005; 331(7514): 428.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Caird JK, Willness CR, Steel P, Scialfa C. A meta-analysis of the effects of cell phones on driver performance. Accid Anal Prev. 2008; 40: 1282–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Klauer SG, Dingus TA, Neale VL, Sudweeks JD, Ramsey DJ. The impact of driver inattention on near-crash/crash risk: an analysis using the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Data. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 2006.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Neyens DM, Boyle LN. The influence of driver distraction on the severity of injuries sustained by teenage drivers and their passengers. Accid Anal Prev. 2008; 40(1): 254–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Stutts J, Feaganes J, Reinfurt D. Drivers’ exposure to distractions in their natural driving environment. Accid Anal Prev. 2005; 37(6): 1093–101.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Strayer DL, Drews FA, Johnston WA. Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2003; 9(1): 23–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wilson FA, Stimpson JP. Trends in fatalities from distracted driving in the US, 1999–2008. Am J Public Health. 2010; 100: 2213–9.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ewing R, Schieber RA, Zegeer CV. Urban sprawl as a risk factor in motor vehicle occupant and pedestrian fatalities. Am J Public Health. 2003; 93: 1541–5.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. FARS: analytic reference guide 1975–2010. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 2011.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schrank D, Lomax T, Eisele B. 2012 Urban mobility report. Texas Transportation Institute. December 2012. http:// http://mobility.tamu.edu/ums/. Accessed March 21, 2014.
  32. 32.
    US Census Bureau. Current estimates data. Available at: http://www.census.gov/popest/data/index.html. Accessed March 21, 2014.
  33. 33.
    National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Climatic Data Center. U.S. Historical Climatology Network. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research/ushcn/. Accessed March 21, 2014.
  34. 34.
    US Census Bureau. 2000 Census of population and housing. Summary file 3: technical documentation. Available at: http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2000/doc/sf3.pdf. Accessed February 18, 2014.
  35. 35.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Motor vehicle injuries. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/WinnableBattles/MotorVehicleInjury/. Accessed February 18, 2014.

Copyright information

© The New York Academy of Medicine 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jim P. Stimpson
    • 1
  • Fernando A. Wilson
    • 1
  • Ozgur M. Araz
    • 2
  • Jose A. Pagan
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Health Services Research and Administration, College of Public HealthUniversity of Nebraska Medical CenterNEUSA
  2. 2.Department of Health Promotion, Social & Behavioral Health, College of Public HealthUniversity of Nebraska Medical CenterNEUSA
  3. 3.New York Academy of MedicineNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations