Journal of Urban Health

, Volume 91, Issue 1, pp 136–150 | Cite as

Neighborhoods and Infectious Disease Risk: Acquisition of Chlamydia during the Transition to Young Adulthood

Article

Abstract

Adolescents and young adults have the highest rates of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in the USA despite national priority goals targeting their reduction. Research on the role of neighborhoods in shaping STI risk among youth has increased in recent years, but few studies have explored the longitudinal effects of neighborhoods on STI acquisition during the adolescent to young adult transition. The aims of this study were to examine: (1) the longitudinal relationships between the neighborhood context (poverty, residential instability, and racial/ethnic concentration) of exposure during adolescence and young adults’ acquisition of chlamydia, and (2) the extent to which sexual risk behaviors and depression over the transition from adolescence to young adulthood mediate the relationship between the neighborhood context of exposure during adolescence and young adults’ acquisition of chlamydia. A longitudinal observational design was employed using data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health), waves 1–3 (1994–2002). The sample was composed of 11,460 young adults aged 18 to 27 years. Neighborhood measures during adolescence were derived from the 1990 US Census appended to adolescents’ interview data. Chlamydia infection was measured via urine assay at wave 3 and 4.6 % of the young adults in the sample tested positive for chlamydia. Multilevel logistic regression analyses were conducted adjusting for numerous neighborhood and individual risk factors. Multivariate findings indicated exposure to neighborhood poverty during adolescence increased the likelihood of a positive urine test for chlamydia during young adulthood (AOR = 1.23, 95 % CI = 1.06, 1.42), and the association was not mediated by sexual risk behaviors or depression. Further research is needed to better understand the pathways through which exposure to neighborhood poverty contributes to chlamydia over the life course as are comprehensive STI prevention strategies addressing neighborhood poverty.

Keywords

Neighborhood Chlamydia Sexually transmitted infection Life course 

References

  1. 1.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually transmitted disease surveillance 2010. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2011.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Healthy People 2010. Sexually transmitted infections. Available at: http://www.healthypeople.gov/2010/Document/HTML/Volume2/25STDs.htm Accessed May 5, 2012.
  3. 3.
    Healthy People 2020. Sexually transmitted diseases. Available at: http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/overview.aspx?topicid=37 Accessed May 5, 2012.
  4. 4.
    Shaw CR, McKay HD. Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1969.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sampson RJ, Raudenbush S, Earls F. Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science. 1997; 277(5328): 918–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wilson WJ. The truly disadvantaged: the inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1987.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Krieger N, Waterman PD, Chen JT, et al. Monitoring socioeconomic inequalities in sexually transmitted infections, tuberculosis, and violence: geocoding and choice of area-based socioeconomic measures—the public health disparities geocoding project (US). Public Health Rep. 2003; 118: 240–60.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cohen D, Spear S, Scribner R, et al. “Broken Windows” and the risk of gonorrhea. Am J Public Health. 2000; 90: 230–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cohen DA, Mason K, Bedimo A, et al. Neighborhood physical conditions. Am J Public Health. 2003; 93: 467–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Du P, McNutt LA, O’Campo P, et al. Changes in community socioeconomic status and racial distribution associated with gonorrhea rates: an analysis at the community level. Sex Transm Dis. 2009; 36: 430–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zierler S, Krieger N, Tang Y, et al. Economic deprivation and AIDS incidence in Massachusetts. Am J Public Health. 2000; 90: 1064–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ford JL, Browning CR. Neighborhood social disorganization and the acquisition of trichomoniasis among young adults in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2011; 101: 1696–703.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Biello KB, Pettigrew MM, Niccolai LM. Multiple chlamydia infection among young women: comparing the role of individual- and neighbourhood-level measures of socioeconomic status. Sex Transm Infect. 2011; 87: 560–2.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Adimora AA, Schoenbach VJ. Social context, sexual networks, and racial disparities in rates of sexually transmitted infections. J Infect Dis. 2005; 191(Suppl 1): S115–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kaplan MS, Crespo CJ, Huguet N, Marks G. Ethnic/racial homogeneity and sexually transmitted disease: a study of 77 Chicago community areas. Sex Transm Dis. 2009; 36: 108–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Upchurch DM, Mason WM, Kusonoki Y, Kriechbaum MJ. Social and behavioral determinants of self-reported STD among adolescents. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2004; 36: 276–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Laumann EO, Youm Y. Racial/ethnic group differences in the prevalence of sexually transmitted diseases in the United States: a network explanation. Sex Transm Dis. 1999; 26: 250–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Diez Roux AV, Mair C. Neighborhoods and health. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010; 1186: 125–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Halfon N, Hochstein M. Life course health development: an integrated framework for developing health, policy, and research. Milbank Q. 2002; 80: 433–79.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Browning CR, Burrington LA, Leventhal T, Brooks-Gunn J. Neighborhood structural inequality, collective efficacy, and sexual risk behavior among urban youth. J Health Soc Behav. 2008; 49(3): 269–85.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Browning CR, Leventhal T, Brooks-Gunn J. Neighborhood context and racial differences in early adolescent sexual activity. Demography. 2004; 41(4): 697–720.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Browning CR, Olinger-Wilbon M. Neighborhood structural disadvantage, social organization, and number of short-term sexual partnerships. J Marriage Fam. 2003; 65: 730–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cubbin C, Brindis CD, Jain S, et al. Neighborhood poverty, aspirations and expectations, and initiation of sex. J Adolesc Health. 2010; 47: 399–406.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Aneshensel CS, Sucoff CA. The neighborhood context of adolescent mental health. J Health Soc Behav. 1996; 37: 293–310.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dupéré V, Leventhal T, Lacourse É. Neighborhood poverty and suicidal thoughts and attempts in late adolescence. Psychol Med. 2009; 39: 1295–306.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ford JL, Rechel M. Parental perceptions of the neighborhood context and adolescent depression. Public Health Nurs. 2012; 29: 390–402.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Khan MR, Kaufman JS, Pence BW, et al. Depression, sexually transmitted infection, and sexual risk behavior among young adults in the United States. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009; 163: 644–52.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Brawner BM, Gomes MM, Jemmott LS, Deatrick JA, Coleman CL. Clinical depression and HIV risk-related sexual behaviors among African-American adolescent females: unmasking the numbers. AIDS Care. 2012; 24: 618–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Harris KM. The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health), waves I and II, 1994–1996; wave III, 2001–2002; wave IV, 2007–2009 [machine-readable data file and documentation]. Chapel Hill, NC: Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; 2009.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Harris KM, Halpern CT, Whitsel E, et al. The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health: Research Design. Available at: http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/design. Accessed March 15, 2012.
  31. 31.
    Chantala K, KalsbeekWD, Andraca E. Non-response in wave III of the Add Health Study. Available at: http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/data/guides/W3nonres.pdf. Accessed March 15, 2012.
  32. 32.
    Schmitz, JL. Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) testing. In Biomarkers wave III of the Add Health study. Available at: http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/data/using/guides/biomark.pdf. Accessed March 13, 2012.
  33. 33.
    Burdette AM, Needham BL. Neighborhood environment and body mass index trajectories from adolescence to adulthood. J Adolesc Health. 2012; 50: 30–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Johnson RC, Schoeni RF. Early-life origins of adult disease: national longitudinal population-based study of the United States. Am J Public Health. 2011; 101: 2317–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Acevedo-Garcia D, Lochner KA. Residential segregation and health. In: Kawachi I, Berkman LF, eds. Neighborhoods and Health. New York: Oxford; 2003: 265–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wodtke GT, Harding DJ, Elwert F. Neighborhood effects in temporal perspective. Am Sociol Rev. 2011; 76: 713–36.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Beretvas SN. Cross-classified and multiple-membership models. In: Hox J, Roberts JK, eds. Handbook of advanced multilevel analysis. London: Routledge Academic; 2010: 313–34.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Naess O, Leyland AH. Analysing the effect of area of residence over the life course in multilevel epidemiology. Scand J Public Health. 2010; 38(5 Suppl): 119–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bearman PS, Moody J, Stovel K. Chains of affection: the structure of adolescent romantic and sexual networks. AJS. 2004; 110: 44–91.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Aiello AE, Simanek AM, Galea S. Population levels of psychological stress, herpesvirus reactivation and HIV. AIDS Behav. 2010; 14: 308–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pedersen AF, Bovbjerg DH, Zachariae R. Stress and susceptibility to infectious disease. In: The handbook of stress science: biology, psychology, and health (Eds. Contrada RJ, Baum A). 2011. New York: Springer. 425–446.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Petersen KL, Marsland AL, Flory J, Votruba-Drzal E, Muldoon MF, Manuck SB. Community socioeconomic status is associated with circulating interleukin-6 and c-reactive protein. Psychosom Med. 2008; 70: 646–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Nazmi A, Diez Roux A, Ranjit N, Seeman TE, Jenny NS. Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations of neighborhood characteristics with inflammatory markers: findings from the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Health Place. 2010; 16: 1104–12.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Browning CR, Cagney KA, Iveniuk J. Neighborhood stressors and cardiovascular health: crime and C-reactive protein in Dallas, USA. Soc Sci Med. 2012; 75: 1271–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Do DP, Diez Roux AV, Hajat A, et al. Circadian rhythm of cortisol and neighborhood characteristics in a population-based sample: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Health Place. 2011; 17: 625–32.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Karb RA, Elliott MR, Dowd JB, Morenoff JD. Neighborhood-level stressors, social support, and diurnal patterns of cortisol: the Chicago community adult health study. Soc Sci Med. 2012; 75: 1038–47.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Academy of Medicine 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of NursingOhio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyOhio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations