Advertisement

Journal of Urban Health

, Volume 90, Issue 4, pp 653–666 | Cite as

Food Availability en Route to School and Anthropometric Change in Urban Children

  • Lauren M. Rossen
  • Frank C. Curriero
  • Michele Cooley-Strickland
  • Keshia M. Pollack
Article

Abstract

This study examined food availability along children’s paths to and from elementary school, and associations with change in body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference over 1 year. Secondary data from 319 children aged 8–13 years from the “Multiple Opportunities to Reach Excellence” Project was used. Child anthropometry and demographic variables were obtained at baseline (2007) and 1 year follow-up. Food outlet locations (n = 1,410) were obtained from the Baltimore City Health Department and validated by ground-truthing. Secondary data on healthy food availability within select food stores in Baltimore City in 2007 were obtained via a validated food environment assessment measure, the Nutrition Environments Measures Study. Multilevel models were used to examine associations between availability of healthy food and number of various food outlets along paths to school and child anthropometric change over 1 year. Controlling for individual-, neighborhood-, and school-level characteristics, results indicated that higher healthy food availability within a 100 m buffer of paths to school was associated with 0.15 kg/m2 lower BMI gain (p = 0.015) and 0.47 cm smaller waist circumference gain (p = 0.037) over 1 year. Although prior research has illuminated the importance of healthy food choices within school and home environments, the current study suggests that exposure to the food environment along paths to school should be further explored in relation to child health outcomes.

Keywords

Obesity Healthy food Weight Body weight changes Adiposity Abdominal Youth Food environment Anthropometry Overweight 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Sara Bleich for her comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript. The authors also acknowledge the support and cooperation of the Baltimore City Public School System and our partner schools, students, parents, teachers, and administrators. Support and funding for the MORE Project comes from a grant from the National Institute on Drug Abuse to M. Cooley (1R01 DA018318). This work was also funded in part by a grant from Active Living Research, a national program of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation to K. Pollack.

Supplementary material

11524_2012_9785_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (87 kb)
APPENDIX A (PDF 87.1 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, Lamb MM, Flegal KM. Prevalence of obesity and trends in body mass index among US children and adolescents, 1999–2010. JAMA. 2012; 307: 483–490.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Glanz K, Sallis JF, Saelens BE, Frank LD. Healthy nutrition environments: concepts and measures. Am J Health Promot. 2005; 19: 330–333.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Story M, Kaphingst KM, Robinson-O’Brien R, Glanz K. Creating healthy food and eating environments: policy and environmental approaches. Annu Rev Public Health. 2008; 29: 253–272.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Borradaile KE, Sherman S, Vander Veur SS, McCoy T, Sandoval B, Nachmani J, et al. Snacking in children: the role of urban corner stores. Pediatrics. 2009; 124: 1293–1298.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dennisuk LA, Coutinho AJ, Suratkar S, et al. Food expenditures and food purchasing among low-income, urban, black youth. Am J Prev Med. 2011; 40: 625–628.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rossen LM, Pollack KM, Curriero FC, et al. Neighborhood incivilities, perceived neighborhood safety, and walking to school among urban-dwelling children. J Phys Act Health. 2011; 8: 262–271.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sturm R, Datar A. Body mass index in elementary school children, metropolitan area food prices and food outlet density. Public Health. 2005; 119: 1059–1068.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Leung CW, Laraia BA, Kelly M, et al. The influence of neighborhood food stores on change in young girls’ body mass index. Am J Prev Med. 2011; 41: 43–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Franco M, Diez Roux AV, Glass TA, Caballero B, Brancati FL. Neighborhood characteristics and availability of healthy foods in Baltimore. Am J Prev Med. 2008; 35: 561–567.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rose D, Bodor JN, Hutchinson PL, Swalm CM. The importance of a multi-dimensional approach for studying the links between food access and consumption. J Nutr. 2010; 140: 1170–1174.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cooley-Strickland M, Quille TJ, Griffin RS, Stuart EA, Bradshaw CP, Furr-Holden D. Community violence and youth: affect, behavior, substance use, and academics. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2009; 12: 127–156.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    US Census Bureau (2010) Maryland quick facts from the US Census Bureau. Baltimore City, Maryland. Retrieved from http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/24/24510.html.
  13. 13.
    Kristman V, Manno M, Côté P. Loss to follow-up in cohort studies: how much is too much? Eur J Epidemiol. 2004; 19(8): 751–760.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fewtrell MS, Kennedy K, Singhal A, et al. How much loss to follow-up is acceptable in long-term randomised trials and prospective studies? Arch Dis Child. 2008; 93(6): 458–461.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Center for a Livable Future (2010). CLF’s Maryland food system mapping project. Retrieved from http://www.jhsph.edu/bin/a/x/HFAI_Map_Notes.pdf.
  16. 16.
    Baltimore City Health Department (2010). Bureau of Food Control. Retrieved from http://www.baltimorehealth.org/foodcontrol.html.
  17. 17.
    Baltimore City Health Department (2010). Rules and regulations governing the operation of special food service facilities: Baltimore City Code, Health Article 2-106, 6-102, and 6-103. Retrieved from http://www.baltimorehealth.org/info/FoodDistRegulations.pdf
  18. 18.
    US Department of Agriculture and Department of Health and Human Services. Dietary guidelines for Americans 6th ed. Washington DC. 2005.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Franco M, Diez-Roux AV, Nettleton JA, et al. Availability of healthy foods and dietary patterns: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009; 89: 897–904.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Casagrande SS, Franco M, Gittelsohn J, et al. Healthy food availability and the association with BMI in Baltimore, Maryland. Public Health Nutr. 2011; 14: 1001–1007.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rossen LM, Pollack KM, Curriero F. Verification of retail food outlet location data from a local health department using ground-truthing and remote-sensing technology. Health Place. 2012; 18(5): 956–962.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    US Census Bureau. Census of population and housing, 2000: summary tape file 3 technical documentation. Retrieved from http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/DatasetMainPageServlet.
  23. 23.
    Kuczmarski MF, Ogden C, Guo S, National Center for Health Statistics. 2000 CDC growth charts for the United States: methods and development. Vital Health Stat. 2002; 11: 1–190.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mei Z, Grummer-Strawn LM, Pietrobelli A, Goulding A, Goran MI, Dietz WH. Validity of body mass index compared with other body-composition screening indexes for the assessment of body fatness in children and adolescents. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002; 75: 978–985.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Berkey CS, Colditz GA. Adiposity in adolescents: change in actual BMI works better than change in BMI z score for longitudinal studies. Ann Epidemiol. 2007; 17: 44–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cole TJ, Faith MS, Pietrobelli A, Heo M. What is the best measure of adiposity change in growing children: BMI, BMI%, BMI z-score or BMI centile? Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005; 59: 419–425.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Savva SC, Tornaritis M, Savva ME, et al. Waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio are better predictors of cardiovascular disease risk factors in children than body mass index. Int J Obes. 2000; 24: 1453–1458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Messer LC, Laraia BA, Kaufman JS, et al. The development of a standardized neighborhood deprivation index. J Urban Health. 2006; 83(6): 1041–1062.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Environmental Systems Research Institute. ESRI Data & Maps 9.3. Redlands, CA. 2008.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Waller LA, Gotway CA. Applied spatial statistics for public health data. New York: Wiley; 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Environmental Systems Research Institute. ArcGIS network analyst: routing, closest facility, and service area analysis. Redlands, CA; 2008.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Brownson RC, Hoehner CM, Day K, Forsyth A, Sallis JF. Measuring the built environment for physical activity: state of the science. Am J Prev Med. 2009; 36: S99–S123.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Beretvas S, Meyers J, Rodriguez R. The cross-classified multilevel measurement model: an explanation and demonstration. J Appl Meas. 2005; 6: 322–341.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Oliver MN, Matthews KA, Siadaty M, Hauck FR, Pickle LW. Geographic bias related to geocoding in epidemiologic studies. Int J Health Geogr. 2005; 4: 29–37.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    StataCorp. 2009. Stata Statistical Software: Release 11. College Station, TX.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    StataCorp. 2011. XTMIXED manual. Retrieved from http://www.stata.com/bookstore/stata12/pdf/xt_xtmixed.pdf.
  37. 37.
    Curriero FC, James NT, Shields TM et al. Exploring walking path quality as a factor for urban elementary school children’s active transport to school. J Phys Act Health 2012; Jul 9.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Academy of Medicine 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lauren M. Rossen
    • 1
  • Frank C. Curriero
    • 2
  • Michele Cooley-Strickland
    • 3
    • 4
  • Keshia M. Pollack
    • 5
  1. 1.Analysis and Epidemiology, National Center for Health StatisticsCenters for Disease Control and PreventionHyattsvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Environmental Health and the Department of BiostatisticsJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthBaltimoreUSA
  3. 3.Department of BiostatisticsJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthBaltimoreUSA
  4. 4.Center for Culture and Health, Department of Psychiatry, NPI-Semel Institute for NeuroscienceUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  5. 5.Department of Health Policy and ManagementJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations