Journal of Urban Health

, Volume 90, Issue 2, pp 262–275 | Cite as

Mass Transit Ridership and Self-Reported Hearing Health in an Urban Population

  • Robyn R. M. Gershon
  • Martin F. Sherman
  • Lori A. Magda
  • Halley E. Riley
  • Tara P. McAlexander
  • Richard Neitzel
Article

Abstract

Information on prevalence and risk factors associated with self-reported hearing health among mass transit riders is extremely limited, even though evidence suggests mass transit may be a source of excessive exposure to noise. Data on mass transit ridership were collected from 756 study participants using a self-administered questionnaire. Hearing health was measured using two symptom items (tinnitus and temporary audiometric threshold shift), two subjective measures (self-rated hearing and hearing ability), and two medical-related questions (hearing testing and physician-diagnosed hearing loss). In logistic regression analyses that controlled for possible confounders, including demographic variables, occupational noise exposure, nonoccupational noise exposure (including MP3 player use) and use of hearing protection, frequent and lengthy mass transit (all forms) ridership (1,100 min or more per week vs. 350 min or less per week) was the strongest predictor of temporary threshold shift symptoms. Noise abatement strategies, such as engineering controls, and the promotion of hearing protection use should be encouraged to reduce the risk of adverse impacts on the hearing health of mass transit users.

Keywords

Noise Mass transit Urban ridership Hearing protection Hearing health 

References

  1. 1.
    Taplin M. A world of trams and urban transit. Available from: http://www.lrta.org/world/worldind.html. [Last accessed on 2011 April 29].
  2. 2.
    Serradell J. World metro database. Available from: http://mic-ro.com/metro/table.html. [Last accessed on 2011 April 29].
  3. 3.
    American Public Transportation Association. Public transportation ridership report: fourth quarter 2009. Washington, DC, March 2, 2010.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fleuranges PJ, Parker DK. NYC transit annual ridership drops in 2009 for first time in 6 years. Available from: http://www.mta.info/mta/news/releases/?en=100220-NYCT29. [Last accessed on 2011 April 29].
  5. 5.
    New York City Transit. New York City transit facts and figures: subways. Available from: http://www.mta.info/nyct/facts/ffsubway.htm. [Last accessed on 2011 April 29].
  6. 6.
    Gershon RR, Stephenson MR, Spitzer J, Rabinowitz P, Neitzel R. Conference on mass transit noise. Papers presented at: conference on mass transit noise; September 19, 2008; Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    World Health Organization. Burden of disease from environmental noise: quantification of healthy life years lost in Europe. Denmark 2011.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    World Health Organization. Guidelines for community noise: WHO expert task force report. Geneva1999.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Protective noise levels: condensed version of EPA levels document. Washington: US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Noise Abatement & Control; 1978.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dinno A, Powell C, King MM. A study of riders’ noise exposure on Bay Area Rapid Transit trains. J Urban Health. 2011; 88: 1–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gershon RR, Neitzel R, Barrera MA, Akram M. Pilot survey of subway and bus stop noise levels. J Urban Health. 2006; 83: 802–812.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Neitzel R, Gershon RR, Zeltser M, Canton A, Akram M. Noise levels associated with New York City’s mass transit systems. Am J Public Health. 2009; 99: 1393–1399.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    World Health Organization. Deafness and hearing impairment fact sheet. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs300/en/index.html. [Last accessed on 2011 May 10].
  14. 14.
    Ristovska G, Gjorgjev D, Pop Jordanova N. Psychosocial effects of community noise: cross sectional study of school children in urban center of Skopje, Macedonia. Croat Med J. 2004; 45: 473–476.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Melamed S, Bruhis S. The effects of chronic industrial noise exposure on urinary cortisol, fatigue and irritability: a controlled field experiment. J Occup Environ Med. 1996; 38: 252–256.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Passchier-Vermeer W, Passchier WF. Noise exposure and public health. Environ Health Perspect. 2000; 108(Suppl 1): 123–131.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bronzaft AL, McCarthy DP. The effect of elevated train noise on reading ability. Environ Behav. 1975; 7: 517–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gunderson E, Moline J, Catalano P. Risks of developing noise-induced hearing loss in employees of urban music clubs. Am J Ind Med. 1997; 31: 75–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    van Kempen EE, Kruize H, Boshuizen HC, Ameling CB, Staatsen BA, de Hollander AE. The association between noise exposure and blood pressure and ischemic heart disease: a meta-analysis. Environ Health Perspect. 2002; 110: 307–317.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chang TY, Su TC, Lin SY, Jain RM, Chan CC. Effects of occupational noise exposure on 24-hour ambulatory vascular properties in male workers. Environ Health Perspect. 2007; 115: 1660–1664.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jarup L, Babisch W, Houthuijs D, Pershagen G, Katsouyanni K, Cadum E, et al. Hypertension and exposure to noise near airports: the HYENA study. Environ Health Perspect. 2008; 116: 329–333.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Leon Bluhm G, Berglind N, Nordling E, Rosenlund M. Road traffic noise and hypertension. Occup Environ Med. 2007; 64: 122–126.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    McNamee R, Burgess G, Dippnall WM, Cherry N. Occupational noise exposure and ischaemic heart disease mortality. Occup Environ Med. 2006; 63: 813–819.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mead MN. The sound behind heart effects. Environ Health Perspect. 2007; 115: A536–A537.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shepherd D, McBride D, Welch D, Dirks KN, Hill EM. Evaluating the impact of wind turbine noise on health-related quality of life. Noise Health. 2011; 13: 333–339.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kincaid JP, Fishburne RP, Rogers RL, Chissom BS, eds. Derivation of new readability formulas (automated readability index, fog count and flesch reading ease formula) for navy enlisted personnel. Research Branch Report 8-75. Memphis: Naval Technical Training, U. S. Naval Air Station; 1975.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rotheram-Borus MJ, Mann T, Newman PA, Grusky O, Frerichs RR, Wight RG, et al. A street intercept survey to assess HIV-testing attitudes and behaviors. AIDS Educ Prev. 2001; 13: 229–238.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Neitzel R, Daniell W, Sheppard L, Davies H, Seixas N. Comparison of perceived and quantitative measures of occupational noise exposure. Ann Occup Hyg. 2009; 53: 41–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Neitzel R, Seixas N, Goldman B, Daniell W. Contributions of non-occupational activities to total noise exposure of construction workers. Ann Occup Hyg. 2004; 48: 463–473.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nondahl DM, Cruickshanks KJ, Wiley TL, Tweed TS, Klein R, Klein BE. Accuracy of self-reported hearing loss. Audiology. 1998; 37: 295–301.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Quaranta A, Portalatini P, Henderson D. Temporary and permanent threshold shift: an overview. Scand Audiol Suppl. 1998; 48: 75–86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Criteria for a recommended standard: occupational noise exposure, revised criteria 1998. Cincinnati: US Dept. of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; 1998.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    SPSS advanced version [computer program]. Version 16.0.1. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.; 2008.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders. Tinnitus. Available from: http://www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/hearing/tinnitus. [Last accessed on 2011 May 10].
  35. 35.
    Tak S, Davis RR, Calvert GM. Exposure to hazardous workplace noise and use of hearing protection devices among US workers—NHANES, 1999–2004. Am J Ind Med. 2009; 52: 358–371.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nondahl DM, Cruickshanks KJ, Dalton DS, Klein BEK, Klein R, Tweed T, et al. The use of hearing protection devices by older adults during recreational noise exposure. Noise Health. 2006; 8: 147–153.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Levey S, Levey T, Fligor BJ. Noise exposure estimates of urban MP3 player users. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011; 54: 263–277.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Nelson DI, Nelson RY, Concha-Barrientos M, Fingerhut M. The global burden of occupational noise-induced hearing loss. Am J Ind Med. 2005; 48: 446–458.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Thorne PR, Ameratunga SN, Stewart J, Reid N, Williams W, Purdy SC, et al. Epidemiology of noise-induced hearing loss in New Zealand. N Z Med J. 2008; 121: 33–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
  41. 41.
    McCullagh MC, Raymond D, Kerr MJ, Lusk SL. Prevalence of hearing loss and accuracy of self-report among factory workers. Noise Health. 2011; 13: 340–347.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Academy of Medicine 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robyn R. M. Gershon
    • 1
  • Martin F. Sherman
    • 2
  • Lori A. Magda
    • 3
  • Halley E. Riley
    • 4
  • Tara P. McAlexander
    • 4
  • Richard Neitzel
    • 5
  1. 1.UCSFSan FranciscoUSA
  2. 2.Loyola UniversityBaltimoreUSA
  3. 3.Fairleigh Dickenson UniversityTeaneckUSA
  4. 4.Columbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  5. 5.University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations