Journal of Urban Health

, Volume 89, Issue 5, pp 746–757 | Cite as

Trade-Offs Between Commuting Time and Health-Related Activities

Article

Abstract

To further understand documented associations between obesity and urban sprawl, this research describes individuals’ trade-offs between health-related activities and commuting time. A cross-section of 24,861 working-age individuals employed full-time and residing in urban counties is constructed from the American Time Use Survey (2003–2010). Data are analyzed using seemingly unrelated regressions to quantify health-related activity decreases in response to additional time spent commuting. Outcomes are total daily minutes spent in physical activity at a moderate or greater intensity, preparing food, eating meals with family, and sleeping. Commuting time is measured as all travel time between home and work and vice versa. The mean commuting time is 62 min daily, the median is 55 min, and 10.1% of workers commute 120 min or more. Spending an additional 60 min daily commuting above average is associated with a 6% decrease in aggregate health-related activities and spending an additional 120 min is associated with a 12% decrease. The greatest percentage of commuting time comes from sleeping time reductions (28–35%). Additionally, larger proportions of commuting time are taken from physical activity and food preparation relative to the mean commuting length: of 60 min spent commuting, 16.1% is taken from physical activity and 4.1% is taken from food preparation; of 120 min commuting, 20.3% is taken from physical activity and 5.6% is taken from food preparation. The results indicate that longer commutes are associated with behavioral patterns which over time may contribute to obesity and other poor health outcomes. These findings will assist both urban planners and researchers wishing to understand time constraints’ impacts on health.

Keywords

Health behaviors Obesity Commuting Time allocation Time scarcity 

References

  1. 1.
    Wolf A, Colditz G. Current estimates of the economic cost of obesity in the United States. Obes Res. 1998; 6(2): 97–106.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Finkelstein E, Fiebelkom I, Wang G. National medical spending attributable to overweight and obesity: how much, and who’s paying? Heal Aff. 2003; W3: 219–226.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Allison D, Fontaine K, Manson J, Stevens J, VanItallie T. Annual deaths attributable to obesity in the United States. JAMA. 1999; 282(16): 1530–1538.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Black J, Macinko J. Neighborhoods and obesity. Nutr Rev. 2008; 66(1): 2–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ewing R, Schmid T, Killingsworth R, Zlot A, Raudenbush S. Relationship between urban sprawl and physical activity, obesity, and morbidity. Am J Heal Promot. 2003; 18(1): 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Giles-Corti B, Macintyre S, Clarkson J, Pikora T, Donovan R. Environmental and lifestyle factors associated with overweight and obesity in Perth, Australia. Am J Heal Promot. 2003; 18(1): 93–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Saelens B, Sallis J, Black J, Chen D. Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: an environmental scale evaluation. Am J Public Health. 2003; 93(9): 1552–1558.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Frank L, Andresen M, Schmid T. Obesity relationships with community design, physical activity, and time spent in cars. Am J Prev Med. 2004; 27(2): 87–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lopez R. Urban sprawl and risk for being overweight or obese. Am J Public Health. 2004; 94(9): 1574–1579.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rashad I, Eriksen M. Do sprawling counties in Georgia adversely affect health? A focus on obesity and cancer. Urban-Rural Conference Proceedings. 2005;August:299-305.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhao Z, Kaestner R. Effects of urban sprawl on obesity. J Heal Econ. 2010; 29(6): 779–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lopez-Zetina J, Lee H, Friis R. The link between obesity and the built environment. Evidence from an ecological analysis of obesity and vehicle miles of travel in California. Heal Place. 2006; 12(4): 656–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grossman M. The demand for health: a theoretical and empirical investigation. New York: Columbia University Press for the National Bureau of Economic Research; 1972.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cawley J. An economic framework for understanding physical activity and eating behaviors. Am J Prev Med. 2004; 27(3S): 117–125.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wolin K, Bennett G, McHeil L, Sorensen G, Emmons K. Low discretionary time as a barrier to physical activity and intervention uptake. Am J Heal Behav. 2008; 32(6): 563–569.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jekanowski M, Binkley J, Eales J. Convenience, accessibility, and the demand for fast food. J Agric Resour Econ. 2001; 26(1): 58–74.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Devine C, Connors M, Sobal J, Bisogni C. Sandwiching it in: spillover of work onto food choices and family roles in low- and moderate-income urban households. Soc Sci Med. 2003; 56: 617–630.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cutler D, Glaeser E, Shapiro J. Why have Americans become more obese? J Econ Perspect. 2003; 17(3): 93–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gangwisch J, Malaspina D, Borden-Albala B, Heymsfield S. Inadequate sleep as a risk factor for obesity: analyses of the NHANES I. Sleep. 2005; 28(10): 1289–1296.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tudor-Locke C, Washington T, Ainsworth B, Troiano R. Linking the American Time Use Survey (ATUS) and the Compendium of Physical Activities: methods and rationale. J Phys Act Heal. 2009; 6(3): 346–353.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brown C, Borisova T. Understanding commuting and grocery shopping using the American Time Use Survey. Paper prepared for presentation at the International Association of Time Use Research XXIX. 2007.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ruhm C. Healthy living in hard times. J Heal Econ. 2005; 24: 341–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Drewnowski A. Obesity and the food environment: dietary energy density and diet costs. Am J Prev Med. 2004; 27(3): 154–162.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Plantinga A, Bernell S. A spatial economic analysis of urban land use and obesity. J Reg Sci. 2005; 45(3): 473–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Eid J, Overman H, Puga D, Turner M. Fat city: questioning the relationship between urban sprawl and obesity. J Urban Econ. 2008; 63(2): 385–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Academy of Medicine 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Gerontology and HealthCare ResearchBrown UniversityProvidenceUSA

Personalised recommendations