Advertisement

Journal of Urban Health

, Volume 89, Issue 3, pp 565–586 | Cite as

Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Time–Location Sampling Data

  • John M. Karon
  • Cyprian Wejnert
Article

Abstract

Time–location sampling (TLS) is useful for collecting information on a hard-to-reach population (such as men who have sex with men [MSM]) by sampling locations where persons of interest can be found, and then sampling those who attend. These studies have typically been analyzed as a simple random sample (SRS) from the population of interest. If this population is the source population, as we assume here, such an analysis is likely to be biased, because it ignores possible associations between outcomes of interest and frequency of attendance at the locations sampled, and is likely to underestimate the uncertainty in the estimates, as a result of ignoring both the clustering within locations and the variation in the probability of sampling among members of the population who attend sampling locations. We propose that TLS data be analyzed as a two-stage sample survey using a simple weighting procedure based on the inverse of the approximate probability that a person was sampled and using sample survey analysis software to estimate the standard errors of estimates (to account for the effects of clustering within the first stage [locations] and variation in the weights). We use data from the Young Men’s Survey Phase II, a study of MSM, to show that, compared with an analysis assuming a SRS, weighting can affect point prevalence estimates and estimates of associations and that weighting and clustering can substantially increase estimates of standard errors. We describe data on location attendance that would yield improved estimates of weights. We comment on the advantages and disadvantages of TLS and respondent-driven sampling.

Keywords

Time–location sampling HIV Statistical methods 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Christopher H. Johnson, Nevin Krishna, Lillian S. Lin, Alexandra Oster, and Ryan E. Wiegand, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), for helpful comments on the manuscript. John Karon’s work was done as a contractor for CDC.

References

  1. 1.
    Valleroy L, MacKellar DA, Karon JM, et al. HIV prevalence and associated risks in young men who have sex with men. J Amer Med Assoc. 2000; 284(2): 198–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    MacKellar D, Valleroy L, Karon J, Lemp G, Janssen R. The Young Men’s Survey: methods for estimating HIV seroprevalence and risk factors among young men who have sex with men. Public Health Rep. 1996; 111(Supplement): 138–144.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    MacKellar DA, Gallagher KM, Finlayson T, Sanchez T, Lansky A, Sullivan PS. Surveillance of HIV risk and prevention behaviors of men who have sex with men—a national application of venue-based, time–space sampling. Public Health Rep. 2007; 122(suppl 1): 39–47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Weinbaum CM, Lyerla R, MacKellar DA, et al. The Young Men’s Survey Phase II: hepatitis B immunization and infection among young men who have sex with men. Amer J Public Health. 2008; 98(5): 839–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kish L. Survey Sampling. New York, NY: Wiley; 1965.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zou G, Donner A. Confidence interval estimation of the intraclass correlation coefficient for binary outcome data. Biometrics. 2004; 60(3): 807–811.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cleveland WS. Visualizing Data. Summit, NJ: Hobart; 1993.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kalton G. Methods for oversampling rare subpopulations in social surveys. Surv Methodol. 2009; 35(2): 125–141.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Marpsat M, Razafindratsima N. Survey methods for hard-to-reach populations: introduction to the special issue. Methodol Innov Online. 2010; 5(2): 3–16.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Semaan S. Time-space sampling and respondent-driven sampling with hard-to-reach populations. Methodol Innov Online. 2010; 5(2): 60–75.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevalence and awareness of HIV infection among men who have sex with men—21 cities, United States, 2008. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009; 59(37): 1201–1207.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Oster AM, Wiegand RE, Sionean C, et al. Understanding disparities in HIV infection between black and white MSM in the United States. Epidemiol Soc. 2011; 25(8): 1103–1112.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Geol S, Salganik MJ. Assessing respondent-driven sampling. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2010; 107(15): 6743–6747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Heckathorn DD. Respondent-driven sampling: a new approach to the study of hidden populations. Soc Probl. 1997; 44(2): 174–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kendall C, Kerr LRFS, Gondim RC, et al. An empirical comparison of respondent-driven sampling, time location sampling, and snowball sampling for behavioral surveillance in men who have sex with men, Fortaleza, Brazil. AIDS Behav. 2008; 12(suppl 1): 97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    McKenzie DJ, Mistiaen J. Surveying migrant households: a comparison of census-based, snowball and intercept point surveys. J R Stat Soc A Stat Soc. 2009; 172(2): 339–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Volz E, Heckathorn DD. Probability based estimation theory for respondent driven sampling. J of Official Stat. 2008; 24(1): 79–97.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gile KJ, Handcock MS. Respondent-driven sampling: an assessment of current methodology. Soc Methodol. 2010; 40(1): 285–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wejnert C. An empirical test of respondent-driven sampling: point estimates, variance, degree measures, and out-of-equilibrium data. Soc Methodol. 2009; 39(1): 73–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Becker RA, Chambers JM, Wilks AR. The New S Language: A Programming Environment for Data Analysis and Graphics. Pacific Grove, CA: Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole;1988.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Venables WN, Smith DM, and the R Development Core Team. An Introduction to R, second edition. (No city given) United Kingdom: Network Theory Limited;, 2009.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
  24. 24.
    Lumley T. Complex Surveys: A Guide to Analysis Using R. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2010.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Academy of Medicine 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Emergint CorporationLouisvilleUSA
  2. 2.Division of HIV/AIDS PreventionCenters for Disease Control and PreventionAtlantaUSA
  3. 3.AlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations