Journal of Urban Health

, Volume 88, Issue 6, pp 1052–1062 | Cite as

A Comparison of the Social and Sexual Networks of Crack-Using and Non-Crack Using African American Men who Have Sex with Men

  • Karin Elizabeth Tobin
  • Danielle German
  • Pilgrim Spikes
  • Jocelyn Patterson
  • Carl Latkin
Article

Abstract

The role of crack cocaine in accelerating the HIV epidemic among heterosexual populations has been well documented. Little is known about crack use as an HIV risk factor among African American men who have sex with men (AA MSM), a group disproportionately infected with HIV. We sought to compare the social and sexual network characteristics of crack-using and non-crack using AA MSM in Baltimore, MD, USA and to examine associations of crack use with sexual risk. Participants were recruited using street-based and internet-based outreach, printed advertisements, word of mouth. Inclusion criteria were being aged 18 years or older, African American or of black race/ethnicity, and have self-reported sex with another male in the prior 90 days. Crack use was operationalized as self-report of crack in the prior 90 days. Logistic regression was used to identify variables that were independently associated with crack use. Of 230 enrolled AA MSM, 37% (n = 84) reported crack use. The sexual networks of crack-using AA MSM were composed of a greater number of HIV-positive sex partners, exchange partners, and partners who were both sex and drug partners and fewer networks with whom they always use condoms as compared to non-crack using AA MSM. Crack use was independently associated with increased odds of bisexual identity and networks with a greater number of exchange partners, overlap of drug and sex partners, and lesser condom use. Results of this study highlight sexual network characteristics of crack-smoking AA MSM that may promote transmission of HIV. HIV interventions are needed that are tailored to address the social context of crack-smoking AA MSM risk behaviors.

Keywords

African American men who have sex with men Crack use Social networks HIV risk 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The Latino and African American Mens Project (LAAMP) Study Team also wishes to acknowledge all of the study participants who volunteered for this project and the study staff and facilitators for their commitment to the success of this project. We would like to acknowledge and thank the CDC Study Team: Stephen A. Flores, Heather Joseph, David Purcell, Greg Millett, Cathy Zhang, and Helen Ding. This research was funded through a grant from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1UR6PS000355.

References

  1. 1.
    Marx R, Aral SO, Rolfs RT, Sterk CE, Kahn JG. Crack, sex, and STD. Sex Transm Dis. 1991; 18(2): 92–101.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Inciardi JA, Chitwood DD, McCoy CB. Special risks for the acquisition and transmission of HIV infection during sex in crack houses. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 1992; 5(9): 951–952.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Edlin BR, Irwin KL, Faruque S, et al. Intersecting epidemics—crack cocaine use and HIV infection among inner-city young adults. Multicenter Crack Cocaine and HIV Infection Study Team. N Engl J Med. 1994; 331(21): 1422–1427.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chiasson MA, Stoneburner RL, Hildebrandt DS, Ewing WE, Telzak EE, Jaffe HW. Heterosexual transmission of HIV-1 associated with the use of smokable freebase cocaine (crack). AIDS. 1991; 5(9): 1121–1126.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ober A, Shoptaw S, Wang PC, Gorbach P, Weiss RE. Factors associated with event-level stimulant use during sex in a sample of older, low-income men who have sex with men in Los Angeles. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009; 102(1–3): 123–129.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Campsmith ML, Nakashima AK, Jones JL. Association between crack cocaine use and high-risk sexual behaviors after HIV diagnosis. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2000; 25(2): 192–198.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bachmann LH, Grimley DM, Chen H, et al. Risk behaviours in HIV-positive men who have sex with men participating in an intervention in a primary care setting. Int J STD AIDS. 2009; 20(9): 607–612.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Feist-Price S, Logan TK, Leukefeld C, Moore CL, Ebreo A. Targeting HIV prevention on African American crack and injection drug users. Subst Use Misuse. 2003; 38(9): 1259–1284.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Harzke AJ, Williams ML, Bowen AM. Binge use of crack cocaine and sexual risk behaviors among African-American, HIV-positive users. AIDS Behav. 2009; 13(6): 1106–1118.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Voelker R. Studies illuminate HIV’s inequalities. JAMA. 2008; 299(3): 269–275.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Koblin BA, Torian LV, Guilin V, Ren L, MacKellar DA, Valleroy LA. High prevalence of HIV infection among young men who have sex with men in New York City. AIDS. 2000; 14(12): 1793–1800.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Harawa NT, Greenland S, Bingham TA, et al. Associations of race/ethnicity with HIV prevalence and HIV-related behaviors among young men who have sex with men in 7 urban centers in the United States. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004; 35(5): 526–536.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Celentano DD, Sifakis F, Hylton J, Torian LV, Guillin V, Koblin BA. Race/ethnic differences in HIV prevalence and risks among adolescent and young adult men who have sex with men. J Urban Health. 2005; 82(4): 610–621.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Catania JA, Osmond D, Stall RD, et al. The continuing HIV epidemic among men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health. 2001; 91(6): 907–914.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Valleroy LA, MacKellar DA, Karon JM, et al. HIV prevalence and associated risks in young men who have sex with men. Young Men’s Survey Study Group. JAMA. 2000; 284(2): 198–204.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Millett GA, Peterson JL, Wolitski RJ, Stall R. Greater risk for HIV infection of black men who have sex with men: a critical literature review. Am J Public Health. 2006; 96(6): 1007–1019.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hatfield LA, Horvath KJ, Jacoby SM, Simon Rosser BR. Comparison of substance use and risky sexual behavior among a diverse sample of urban, HIV-positive men who have sex with men. J Addict Dis. 2009; 28(3): 208–218.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mimiaga MJ, Reisner SL, Fontaine YM, et al. Walking the line: stimulant use during sex and HIV risk behavior among Black urban MSM. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010; 110(1–2): 30–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Halkitis PN, Jerome RC. A comparative analysis of methamphetamine use: black gay and bisexual men in relation to men of other races. Addict Behav. 2008; 33(1): 83–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mimiaga MJ, Reisner SL, Cranston K, et al. Sexual mixing patterns and partner characteristics of black MSM in Massachusetts at increased risk for HIV infection and transmission. J Urban Health. 2009; 86(4): 602–623.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mansergh G, Shouse RL, Marks G, et al. Methamphetamine and sildenafil (Viagra) use are linked to unprotected receptive and insertive anal sex, respectively, in a sample of men who have sex with men. Sex Transm Infect. 2006; 82(2): 131–134.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rothenberg RB, Long DM, Sterk CE, et al. The Atlanta Urban Networks Study: a blueprint for endemic transmission. AIDS. 2000; 14(14): 2191–2200.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Friedman SR, Neaigus A, Jose B, et al. Sociometric risk networks and risk for HIV infection. Am J Public Health. 1997; 87(8): 1289–1296.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Adimora AA, Schoenbach VJ, Doherty IA. HIV and African Americans in the southern United States: sexual networks and social context. Sex Transm Dis. 2006; 33(7 Suppl): S39–S45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Peterson JL, Rothenberg R, Kraft JM, Beeker C, Trotter R. Perceived condom norms and HIV risks among social and sexual networks of young African American men who have sex with men. Health Educ Res. 2009; 24(1): 119–127.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tobin KE, Davey-Rothwell M, Latkin CA. Social-level correlates of shooting gallery attendance: a focus on networks and norms. AIDS Behav. 2010; 14(5): 1142–1148.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bohnert AS, Bradshaw CP, Latkin CA. A social network perspective on heroin and cocaine use among adults: evidence of bidirectional influences. Addiction. 2009; 104(7): 1210–1218.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Latkin CA, Mandell W, Oziemkowska M, et al. Using social network analysis to study patterns of drug use among urban drug users at high risk for HIV/AIDS. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1995; 38(1): 1–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kottiri BJ, Friedman SR, Neaigus A, Curtis R, Des Jarlais DC. Risk networks and racial/ethnic differences in the prevalence of HIV infection among injection drug users. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2002; 30(1): 95–104.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Neaigus A, Friedman SR, Jose B, et al. High-risk personal networks and syringe sharing as risk factors for HIV infection among new drug injectors. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1996; 11(5): 499–509.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Latkin CA, Mandell W, Vlahov D. The relationship between risk networks’ patterns of crack cocaine and alcohol consumption and HIV-related sexual behaviors among adult injection drug users: a prospective study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1996; 42(3): 175–181.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Doherty IA, Schoenbach VJ, Adimora AA. Condom use and duration of concurrent partnerships among men in the United States. Sex Transm Dis. 2009; 36(5): 265–272.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Sexually transmitted disease surveillance, 2000. 2001. http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats/.
  34. 34.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). HIV prevalence, unrecognized infection, and HIV testing among men who have sex with men—five U.S. cities, June 2004–April 2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005; 54(24): 597–601.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rhodes F, Deren S, Wood MM, et al. Understanding HIV risks of chronic drug-using men who have sex with men. AIDS Care. 1999; 11(6): 629–648.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Millett GA, Flores SA, Peterson JL, Bakeman R. Explaining disparities in HIV infection among black and white men who have sex with men: a meta-analysis of HIV risk behaviors. AIDS. 2007; 21(15): 2083–2091.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Tieu HV, Murrill C, Xu G, Koblin BA. Sexual partnering and HIV risk among black men who have sex with men: New York City. J Urban Health. 2010; 87(1): 113–121.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Berry M, Raymond HF, McFarland W. Same race and older partner selection may explain higher HIV prevalence among black men who have sex with men. AIDS. 2007; 21(17): 2349–2350.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gorbach PM, Murphy R, Weiss RE, Hucks-Ortiz C, Shoptaw S. Bridging sexual boundaries: men who have sex with men and women in a street-based sample in Los Angeles. J Urban Health. 2009; 86(Suppl 1): 63–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sherman SG, Latkin CA. Intimate relationship characteristics associated with condom use among drug users and their sex partners: a multilevel analysis. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2001; 64(1): 97–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mausbach BT, Semple SJ, Strathdee SA, Zians J, Patterson TL. Efficacy of a behavioral intervention for increasing safer sex behaviors in HIV-positive MSM methamphetamine users: results from the EDGE study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007; 87(2–3): 249–257.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Garfein RS, Metzner M, Cuevas J, Bousman CA, Patterson T. Formative assessment of ARM-U: a modular intervention for decreasing risk behaviors among HIV-positive and HIV-negative methamphetamine-using MSM. Open AIDS J. 2010; 4: 105–115.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Morris M. Concurrent partnerships and syphilis persistence: new thoughts on an old puzzle. Sex Transm Dis. 2001; 28(9): 504–507.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Adimora AA, Schoenbach VJ, Doherty IA. Concurrent sexual partnerships among men in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2007; 97(12): 2230–2237.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Academy of Medicine 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karin Elizabeth Tobin
    • 1
  • Danielle German
    • 1
  • Pilgrim Spikes
    • 2
  • Jocelyn Patterson
    • 2
  • Carl Latkin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Health, Behavior and SocietyJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention–Prevention Research BranchCenters for Disease Control and PreventionAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations