Journal of Urban Health

, Volume 88, Issue 2, pp 254–269

Perceived Social Norms, Expectations, and Attitudes toward Corporal Punishment among an Urban Community Sample of Parents

  • Catherine A. Taylor
  • Lauren Hamvas
  • Janet Rice
  • Denise L. Newman
  • William DeJong
Article

Abstract

Despite the fact that corporal punishment (CP) is a significant risk factor for increased aggression in children, child physical abuse victimization, and other poor outcomes, approval of CP remains high in the United States. Having a positive attitude toward CP use is a strong and malleable predictor of CP use and, therefore, is an important potential target for reducing use of CP. The Theory of Planned Behavior suggests that parents’ perceived injunctive and descriptive social norms and expectations regarding CP use might be linked with CP attitudes and behavior. A random-digit-dial telephone survey of parents from an urban community sample (n = 500) was conducted. Perceived social norms were the strongest predictors of having positive attitudes toward CP, as follows: (1) perceived approval of CP by professionals (β = 0.30), (2) perceived descriptive norms of CP use (β = 0.22), and (3) perceived approval of CP by family and friends (β = 0.19); also, both positive (β = 0.13) and negative (β = −0.13) expected outcomes for CP use were strong predictors of these attitudes. Targeted efforts are needed to both assess and shift the attitudes and practices of professionals who influence parents regarding CP use; universal efforts, such as public education campaigns, are needed to educate parents and the general public about the high risk/benefit ratio for using CP and the effectiveness of non-physical forms of child discipline.

Keywords

Corporal punishment Spanking Attitudes Social norms Injunctive norms Descriptive norms Expected outcomes Child development Prevention 

References

  1. 1.
    Appel AE, Holden GW. The co-occurence of spouse and physical child abuse: a review and appraisal. J Fam Psychol. 1998; 12(4): 578–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hazen AL, Connelly CD, Kelleher K, Landsverk J, Barth R. Intimate partner violence among female caregivers of children reported for child maltreatment. Child Abuse Negl. 2004; 28: 301–319.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McGuigan WM, Pratt CC. The predictive impact of domestic violence on three types of child maltreatment. Child Abuse Negl. 2001; 25(7): 869–883.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Taylor CA, Guterman NB, Lee SJ, Rathouz PJ. Intimate partner violence, maternal stress, nativity, and risk for maternal maltreatment of young children. Am J Public Health. 2009; 99(1): 175–183.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gershoff E. Corporal punishment by parents and associated child behaviors and experiences: a meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychol Bull. 2002; 128(4): 539–579.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zolotor AJ, Theodore AD, Chang JJ, Berkoff MC, Runyan DK. Speak softly and forget the stick: corporal punishment and child physical abuse. Am J Prev Med. 2008; 35(4): 364–369.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Slep AMS, O’Leary SG. Parent and partner violence in families with young children: rates, patterns, and connections. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005; 73(3): 435.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Taylor CA, Lee SJ, Guterman NB, Rice J. Use of spanking for 3-year-old children and associated intimate partner aggression or violence. Pediatrics. 2010; 126(3): 415–424.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Taylor CA, Manganello J, Lee SJ, Rice J. Mothers’ spanking of 3-year-old children and subsequent risk of children’s aggressive behavior. Pediatrics. 2010; 125(5): e1057–e1065.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Simons LG, Burt CH, Simons RL. A test of explanations for the effect of harsh parenting on the perpetration of dating violence and sexual coercion among college males. Violence Vict. 2008; 23(1): 66–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ehrensaft MK, Cohen P, Brown J, Smailes E, Chen H, Johnson JG. Intergenerational transmission of partner violence: a 20-year prospective study. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003; 71(4): 741–753.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Straus M, Stewart J. Corporal punishment by American parents: national data on prevalence, chronicity, severity, and duration, in relation to child and family characteristics. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 1999; 2(2): 55–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    SurveyUSA. Disciplining a child. http://www.surveyusa.com/50StateDisciplineChild0805SortedbyTeacher.htm. Accessed November 26, 2010.
  14. 14.
    Child Trends. Attitudes toward spanking. http://www.childtrendsdatabank.org/?q=node/187. 2009. Accessed July 22, 2010.
  15. 15.
    Flynn CP. Regional differences in attitudes toward corporal punishment. J Marriage Fam. 1994; 56(2): 314–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chung E, Mathew L, Rothkopf A, Elo I, Coyne J, Culhane J. Parenting attitudes and infant spanking: the influence of childhood experiences. Pediatrics. 2009; 124(2): e278–286.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gershoff ET, Miller PC, Holden GW. Parenting influences from the pulpit: religious affiliation as a determinant of parental corporal punishment. J Fam Psychol. 1999; 13(3): 307–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Xu X, Tung Y-Y, Dunaway RG. Cultural, human and social capital as determinants of corporal punishment: toward an integrated theoretical model. J Interpers Violence. 2000; 15(6): 603–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gagné M-H, Tourigny M, Joly J, Pouliot-Lapointe J. Predictors of adult attitudes toward corporal punishment of children. J Interpers Violence. 2007; 22(10): 1285–1304.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Deater-Deckard K, Lansford JE, Dodge KA, Pettit GS, Bates JE. The development of attitudes about physical punishment: an 8-year longitudinal study. J Fam Psychol. 2003; 17(3): 351–360.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bower-Russa ME, Knutson JF, Winebarger A. Disciplinary history, adult disciplinary attitudes, and risk for abusive parenting. J Community Psychol. 2001; 29(3): 219–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jackson S, Thompson RA, Christiansen EH, et al. Predicting abuse-prone parental attitudes and discipline practices in a nationally representative sample. Child Abuse Negl. 1999; 23(1): 15–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vittrup B, Holden GW, Buck J. Attitudes predict the use of physical punishment: a prospective study of the emergence of disciplinary practices. Pediatrics. 2006; 117(6): 2055–2064.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ateah C, Durrant J. Maternal use of physical punishment in response to child misbehavior: implications for child abuse prevention. Child Abuse Negl. 2005; 29(2): 169–185.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Socolar R, Stein R. Spanking infants and toddlers: maternal belief and practice. Pediatrics. 1995; 95(1): 105–111.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Graziano A, Hamblen J, Plante W. Subabusive violence in child rearing in middle-class American families. Pediatrics. 1996; 98(4 Pt 2): 845–848.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Holden G, Coleman S, Schmidt K. Why 3-year-old children get spanked—parent and child determinants as reported by college-educated mothers. Merrill-Palmer Quart J Dev Psyc. 1995; 41(4): 431–452.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Omnibus Survey Report. One year on: Public attitudes and New Zealand’s child discipline law. Wellington (New Zealand): Office of the Children’s Commissioner; 14 November 2008.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Durrant JE. Evaluating the success of sweden’s corporal punishment ban. Child Abuse Negl. 1999; 23(5): 435–448.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ajzen I. Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Homewood, IL, US: Dorsey Press; 1988.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cialdini RB, Reno RR, Kallgren CA. A focus theory of normative conduct: recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990; 58(6): 1015–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    De Pelsmacker P, Janssens W. The effect of norms, attitudes and habits on speeding behavior: scale development and model building and estimation. Accident Anal Prev. 2007; 39(1): 6–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Fagan P, Eisenberg M, Stoddard AM, Frazier L, Sorensen G. Social influences, social norms, social support, and smoking behavior among adolescent workers. Am J Health Promot. 2001; 15(6): 414–421.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Henry D, Guerra N, Huesmann R, Tolan P, VanAcker R, Eron L. Normative influences on aggression in urban elementary school classrooms. Am J Community Psychol. 2000; 28(1): 59–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    O’Neil R, Parke RD, McDowell DJ. Objective and subjective features of children’s neighborhoods: relations to parental regulatory strategies and children’s social competence. J Appl Dev Psychol. 2001; 22(2): 135–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pinderhughes EE, Nix R, Foster EM, et al. Parenting in context: impact of neighborhood poverty, residential stability, public services, social networks, and danger on parental behaviors. J Marriage Fam. 2001; 63(4): 941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Molnar BE, Buka SL, Brennan RT, Holton JK, Earls F. A multilevel study of neighborhoods and parent-to-child physical aggression: results from the project on human development in Chicago neighborhoods. Child Maltreat. 2003; 8(2): 84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Holden G, Miller P, Harris S. The instrumental side of corporal punishment: parents’ reported practices and outcome expectancies. J Marriage Fam. 1999; 61(4): 908–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    What Grown-ups Understand About Child Development: A National Benchmark Survey. 2000. http://www.buildinitiative.org/files/grownups.pdf. Accessed November 26, 2010.
  40. 40.
    Dix T, Ruble DN, Zambarano RJ. Mothers’ implicit theories of discipline: child effects, parent effects, and the attribution process. Child Dev. 1989; 60(6): 1373–1391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bronfenbrenner U. The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1979.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Garbarino J, Ganzel B. The human ecology of early risk. In: Shonkoff JP, Meisels SJ, eds. Handbook of early childhood intervention. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2000: 78–93.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Gershoff E, Grogan-Kaylor A, Lansford J, et al. Parent discipline practices in an international sample: associations with child behaviors and moderation by perceived normativeness. Child Dev. 2010; 81(2): 487–502.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Simons RL, Lin K-H, Gordon LC, Brody GH, Murry V, Conger RD. Community differences in the association between parenting practices and child conduct problems. J Marriage Fam. 2002; 64(2): 331–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Silk JS, Sessa FM, Morris AS, Steinberg L, Avenevoli S. Neighborhood cohesion as a buffer against hostile maternal parenting. J Fam Psychol. 2004; 18(1): 135–146.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
  47. 47.
    Holden GW. Attitude Toward Spanking (ATS). In: Touliatos J, Perlmutter BF, Holden GW, eds. Abstracts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2001. Handbook of family measurement techniques; vol 2.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Taylor CA, Moeller W, Hamvas L, Rice J. Parents’ professional sources of advice regarding child discipline and their use of corporal punishment. (Under Review).Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Durrant J, Rose-Krasnor L, Broberg A. Physical punishment and maternal beliefs in Sweden and Canada. J Comp Fam Stud. 2003; 34(4): 585–604.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Reich S. What do mothers know? Maternal knowledge of child development. Infant Ment Health J. 2005; 26(2): 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Walsh W. Spankers and nonspankers: where they get information on spanking. Fam Relat. 2002; 51(1): 81–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Wissow LS, Larson S, Anderson J, Hadjiisky E. Pediatric residents’ responses that discourage discussion of psychosocial problems in primary care. Pediatrics. 2005; 115(6): 1569–1578.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    McCormick KF. Attitudes of primary care physicians toward corporal punishment. JAMA. 1992; 267(23): 3161–3165.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Fargason CA Jr, Chernoff RG, Socolar RR. Attitudes of academic pediatricians with a specific interest in child abuse toward the spanking of children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996; 150(10): 1049–1053.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Wolraich ML, Aceves J, Feldman HM, et al. Guidance for effective discipline. Pediatrics. 1998; 101(4): 723.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Wissow LS, Roter D. Toward effective discussion of discipline and corporal punishment during primary care visits. Pediatrics. 1994; 94(4): 587.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Vaaler ML, Ellison CG, Horton KD, Marcum JP. Spare the rod? Ideology, experience, and attitudes toward child discipline among presbyterian clergy. Pastor Psychol. 2008; 56(5): 533–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Schenck ER, Lyman RD, Bodin SD. Ethical beliefs, attitudes, and professional practices of psychologists regarding parental use of corporal punishment: a survey. Children’s Ser Soc Pol Res Prac. 2000; 3(1): 23–38.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Rodriguez CM, Henderson RC. Who spares the rod? Religious orientation, social conformity, and child abuse potential. Child Abuse Negl. 2010; 34(2): 84–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Tourangeau R. Survey research and societal change. Annu Rev Psychol. 2004; 55: 775–801.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Global Initiative to End All Corporal Punishment of Children. http://www.endcorporalpunishment.org/index.html. Accessed July 26, 2010.
  62. 62.
    Barkin SL, Finch SA, Ip EH, et al. Is office-based counseling about media use, timeouts, and firearm storage effective? Results from a cluster-randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2008; 122: e15–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Sege RD, Perry CF, Stigol L, et al. Short-term effectiveness of anticipatory guidance to reduce early childhood risks for subsequent violence. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997; 151(4): 392–397.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    American Academy of Pediatrics. Connected Kids. http://www.aap.org/connectedkids/. Accessed October 29, 2010.
  65. 65.
    Hanmer S. Child rights organizations and religious communities: powerful partnerships for children1. CrossCurrents. 2010; 60(3): 451–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Karam A. The United Nations Population Fund’s (UNFPA’s) legacy of engaging faith-based organizations as cultural agents of change. CrossCurrents. 2010; 60(3): 432–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Resnicow K, Jackson A, Wang T, et al. A motivational interviewing intervention to increase fruit and vegetable intake through black churches: results of the eat for life trial. Am J Public Health. 2001; 91(10): 1686–1693.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Boyd-Franklin N, Smith Morris T, Bry BH. Parent and family support groups with African American families: the process of family and community empowerment. Cult Divers Ment Health. 1997; 3(2): 83–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Casswell S, Gilmore L, Maguire V, Ransom R. Changes in public support for alcohol policies following a community-based campaign. Addiction. 1989; 84(5): 515–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Sly DF, Heald GR, Ray S. The florida “truth” anti-tobacco media evaluation: design, first year results, and implications for planning future state media evaluations. Tob Control. 2001; 10(1): 9–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Andrews AB, McLeese DG, Curran S. The impact of a media campaign on public action to help maltreated children in addictive families. Child Abuse Negl. 1995; 19(8): 921–932.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Academy of Medicine 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Catherine A. Taylor
    • 1
  • Lauren Hamvas
    • 1
  • Janet Rice
    • 1
  • Denise L. Newman
    • 1
  • William DeJong
    • 2
  1. 1.Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical MedicineNew OrleansUSA
  2. 2.Boston University School of Public HealthBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations