Sexual Risk Behavior and Drug Use in Two Chicago Samples of Men Who Have Sex with Men: 1997 vs. 2002
Employing data from two Chicago-based household probability samples of men who have sex with men (MSM) implemented 5 years apart (the “UMHS 1997” and the “2002 MSM supplement” studies), we evaluated changes in risk behavior as well as the potential viability of two alternative perspectives for explaining these changes—risk management and safe-sex norm abandonment. We found significantly increased rates of unprotected insertive and receptive anal intercourse in the 2002 study. Sixty-eight percent of UMHS men reported having sex with partners having HIV positive or unknown status, compared with 38% of the MSM supplement men (p < .0001). Serosorting mediated and moderated the most extreme forms of risk behavior. Positive statistical associations between drug use and unprotected sex were stronger in the UMHS sample than in the MSM supplement. Findings suggesting that “risk management” strategies have shaped MSM behavior as it emerged in the early part of this decade have considerable implications for HIV prevention strategies.
KeywordsEpidemiology HIV/AIDS Men who have sex with men Sexual behavior Substance use
- 1.Centers for Disease Control. Trends in HIV/AIDS diagnoses-33 states, 2001–2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005;54:1149-1153.Google Scholar
- 2.Centers for Disease Control. HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report (Vol. 17., Rev.). Atlanta: Department of Health and Human Services, CDC: 2007-146; 2007. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/surveillance/resources/reports/. Accessed February 22, 2008.Google Scholar
- 15.Colfax GN, Mansergh G, Guzman R, et al. Drug use and sexual risk behavior among gay and bisexual men who attend circuit parties: a venue based comparison. J Acquir Immune Defic Rep. 2001;28:373-379.Google Scholar
- 22.Denning P, Campsmith M, Gallagher K. Unprotected anal intercourse between steady male partners with nonconcordant HIV serostatus. Abstract Presented at the 10th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, Boston, Mass. 2003. February 10–14; 10: abstract no. 920.Google Scholar
- 24.Truong HM, Kellogg T, Klausner JD, et al. Increases in sexually transmitted infections and sexual risk behavior without a concurrent increase in HIV incidence among men who have sex with men in San Francisco: a suggestion of HIV serosorting? Sex Transm Infect. 2006;82:461-466.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Gates G. Same-Sex Couples and the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual Population: New Estimates from the American Community Survey. UCLA School of Law: The Williams Institute on Sexual Orientation Law and Public Policy; 2006.Google Scholar
- 28.Chicago Department of Public Health. HIV/AIDS/STD. Chicago; November 2004.Google Scholar
- 29.Chicago Department of Public Health. Chicago HIV/AIDS Brief. Men who Have Sex With Men. Chicago; December 2005.Google Scholar
- 30.Office of Applied Studies. National survey on drug use and health. 2009. Available at: http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/nsduh.htm. Accessed April 17, 2009.
- 31.StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 9. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP; 2005.Google Scholar
- 32.Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 1995;57:289-300.Google Scholar
- 37.Tourangeau R, Rips LJ, Rasinksi K. The Psychology of Survey Response. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2000.Google Scholar