Journal of Urban Health

, Volume 87, Issue 3, pp 452–466 | Cite as

Sexual Risk Behavior and Drug Use in Two Chicago Samples of Men Who Have Sex with Men: 1997 vs. 2002

  • Michael Fendrich
  • Mary Ellen Mackesy-Amiti
  • Timothy P. Johnson
  • Lance M. Pollack


Employing data from two Chicago-based household probability samples of men who have sex with men (MSM) implemented 5 years apart (the “UMHS 1997” and the “2002 MSM supplement” studies), we evaluated changes in risk behavior as well as the potential viability of two alternative perspectives for explaining these changes—risk management and safe-sex norm abandonment. We found significantly increased rates of unprotected insertive and receptive anal intercourse in the 2002 study. Sixty-eight percent of UMHS men reported having sex with partners having HIV positive or unknown status, compared with 38% of the MSM supplement men (p < .0001). Serosorting mediated and moderated the most extreme forms of risk behavior. Positive statistical associations between drug use and unprotected sex were stronger in the UMHS sample than in the MSM supplement. Findings suggesting that “risk management” strategies have shaped MSM behavior as it emerged in the early part of this decade have considerable implications for HIV prevention strategies.


Epidemiology HIV/AIDS Men who have sex with men Sexual behavior Substance use 


  1. 1.
    Centers for Disease Control. Trends in HIV/AIDS diagnoses-33 states, 2001–2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005;54:1149-1153.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Centers for Disease Control. HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report (Vol. 17., Rev.). Atlanta: Department of Health and Human Services, CDC: 2007-146; 2007. Available at: Accessed February 22, 2008.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gross M. The second wave will drown us. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:872-881.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Huebner DM, Rebchock GM, Kegeles SM. A longitudinal study of the association between treatment optimism and sexual risk behavior in young adult gay and bisexual men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004;37:1514-1519.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cox J, Beauchemin J, Allard R. HIV status of sexual partners is more important than antiretroviral treatment related perceptions for risk taking by HIV positive MSM in Montreal, Canada. Sex Transm Infect. 2004;80:518-523.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Marcus U, Bremer V, Hamouda O, et al. Understanding recent increases in the incidence of sexually transmitted infections in men having sex with men: changes in risk behavior from risk avoidance to risk reduction. Sex Transm Dis. 2006;33:11-17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Osmond DH, Pollack LM, Paul JR, Catania JA. Changes in prevalence of HIV infection and sexual risk behavior in men who have sex with men in San Francisco: 1997–2002. Am J Public Health. 2007;97:1677-1683.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vanable PA, Ostrow DG, McKirnan DJ, Taywaditep KJ, Hope BA. Impact of combination therapies on HIV risk perceptions and sexual risk among HIV-positive and HIV-negative gay and bisexual men. Health Psychol. 2000;19:134-145.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Elford J, Bolding G, Sherr L. High-risk sexual behavior increases among London gay men between 1998-2001: what is the role of HIV optimism? AIDS. 2002;16:1537-1544.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kalichman SC, Eaton L, White D, et al. Beliefs about treatment for HIV/AIDS and sexual risk behaviors among men who have sex with men, 1997-2006. J Behav Med. 2007;30:497-503.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Huebner DM, Gerend MA. The relation between beliefs about drug treatments for HIV and sexual risk behavior in gay and bisexual men. Ann Behav Med. 2001;23:304-312.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ostrow DG. The role of drugs in the sexual lives of men who have sex with men: continuing barriers to researching this question. AIDS Behav. 2000;4:205-219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ostrow DG, Fox KJ, Chmiel JS, et al. Attitudes towards highly active antiretroviral therapy are associated with sexual risk taking among HIV infected and uninfected homosexual men. AIDS. 2002;16:775-780.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mansergh G, Colfax GN, Marx G, Rader M, Guzman R, Buchbinder S. The circuit party men’s health survey: findings and implications for gay and bisexual men. Am J Public Health. 2001;91:953-958.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Colfax GN, Mansergh G, Guzman R, et al. Drug use and sexual risk behavior among gay and bisexual men who attend circuit parties: a venue based comparison. J Acquir Immune Defic Rep. 2001;28:373-379.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    McKirnan DJ, Vanable PA, Ostrow DG, Hope B. Expectancies of sexual “escape” and sexual risk among drug and alcohol-involved gay and bisexual men. J Subst Abuse. 2001;13:137-154.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Catania JA, Paul J, Osmond D, et al. Mediators of childhood sexual abuse and high-risk sex among men-who-have-sex-with-men. Child Abuse Negl. 2008;32:925-940.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Eaton LA, Kalichman SC, Cain D, et al. Serosorting sexual partners and risk for HIV among men who have sex with men. Am J Prev Med. 2007;33:479-485.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Xia Q, Molitor F, Osmond DH, et al. Knowledge of sexual partner’s HIV serostatus and serosorting practices in a California population-based sample of men who have sex with men. AIDS. 2006;20:2081-2089.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jinn F, Prestage GP, Ellard J, Klippax SC, Kaldor JM, Grulich AE. How homosexual men believe they became infected with HIV. The role of risk reduction behaviors. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;46:245-247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Halkitis PN, Zade DD, Shrem M, Marmor M. Beliefs about hiv noninfection and risky sexual behavior among MSM. AIDS Educ Prev. 2004;16:448-458.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Denning P, Campsmith M, Gallagher K. Unprotected anal intercourse between steady male partners with nonconcordant HIV serostatus. Abstract Presented at the 10th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, Boston, Mass. 2003. February 10–14; 10: abstract no. 920.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Niccolai LM, Farley TA, Ayoub MA, Magnus M, Kissinger PJ. HIV-infected persons’ knowledge of their sexual partners’ HIV status. AIDS Educ Prev. 2002;14:183-189.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Truong HM, Kellogg T, Klausner JD, et al. Increases in sexually transmitted infections and sexual risk behavior without a concurrent increase in HIV incidence among men who have sex with men in San Francisco: a suggestion of HIV serosorting? Sex Transm Infect. 2006;82:461-466.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gates G. Same-Sex Couples and the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual Population: New Estimates from the American Community Survey. UCLA School of Law: The Williams Institute on Sexual Orientation Law and Public Policy; 2006.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Catania JA, Osmond D, Stall RD, et al. The continuing HIV epidemic among men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health. 2001;91:907-914.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mackesy-Amiti ME, Fendrich M, Johnson TP. Prevalence of recent illicit substance use and reporting bias among MSM and other urban males. Addict Behav. 2008;33:1055-1060.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chicago Department of Public Health. HIV/AIDS/STD. Chicago; November 2004.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chicago Department of Public Health. Chicago HIV/AIDS Brief. Men who Have Sex With Men. Chicago; December 2005.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Office of Applied Studies. National survey on drug use and health. 2009. Available at: Accessed April 17, 2009.
  31. 31.
    StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 9. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP; 2005.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 1995;57:289-300.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rowniak S. Safe sex fatigue, treatment optimism, and serosorting: new challenges to HIV prevention among men who have sex with me. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2009;20:31-38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Eaton LA, West TV, Kenny DA, Kalichman SC. HIV transmission risk among HIV seroconcordant and serodiscordant couples: dyadic processes of partner selection. AIDS Behav. 2009;13:185-195.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Aquilino W. Interview mode effects in surveys of drug and alcohol use: a field experiment. Public Opin Q. 1994;58:210-240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gribble JN, Miller HG, Cooley PC, Catania JA, Pollack L, Turner CF. The impact of T-ACASI interviewing on reported drug use among men who have sex with men. Subst Use Misuse. 2000;35:869-890.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Tourangeau R, Rips LJ, Rasinksi K. The Psychology of Survey Response. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2000.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Turner CF, Ku L, Rogers SM, Lindberg LD, Pleck JH, Sonenstein F. Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: increased reporting with computer survey technology. Science. 1998;280:867-873.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Academy of Medicine 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Fendrich
    • 1
  • Mary Ellen Mackesy-Amiti
    • 2
  • Timothy P. Johnson
    • 3
  • Lance M. Pollack
    • 4
  1. 1.Center for Addiction and Behavioral Health Research, Helen Bader School of Social WelfareUniversity of Wisconsin-MilwaukeeMilwaukeeUSA
  2. 2.Community Outreach Intervention Projects, Division of Epidemiology and BiostatisticsSchool of Public Health, University of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA
  3. 3.Survey Research Laboratory, College of Urban Planning and Public AffairsUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA
  4. 4.Center for AIDS Prevention StudiesUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations