Neighborhood Factors Affecting Rates of Sexually Transmitted Diseases in Chicago
- 336 Downloads
High rates of gonorrhea have been shown to be associated with high rates of incarceration in the prior year. One hypothesized chain of events is that there is a negative effect of incarceration on neighborhood social characteristics, which in turn affect behaviors facilitating transmission of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). This study examined whether neighborhood characteristics were associated with the incidence of STDs and homicide rates as a proxy for incarceration rates. Data were from the 1995 Program on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods, the Chicago Health Department, and the Chicago Police Department. Neighborhood gonorrhea rates increased by 192.2 (95% confidence interval (CI) 131.6, 252.9) cases per 100,000 population with a change from the 25th to the 75th percentile of social disorder. This rate difference was a value greater than the median neighborhood gonorrhea rate. Similar increases were observed for other neighborhood measures and for Chlamydia infection. We hypothesize that high rates of incarceration may play a role in undermining neighborhood social cohesion and control. Using homicide rates as a proxy for incarceration, a change from the 25th to the 75th percentile of 1995 neighborhood homicide rates yielded a gonorrhea rate increase of 164.6 (95% CI 124.4, 204.7) cases per 100,000. Factors that undermine the social fabric of a community can become manifest in health outcomes such as STDs. The effects of high rates of incarceration on neighborhoods merit further exploration.
KeywordsNeighborhoods Social disorder Sexually transmitted diseases Incarceration
The study was funded by National Institute of Mental Health grant number 1R03MH073033. We thank Dr. Carol Ciesielski and Jennifer Broad of the Chicago Department of Public Health for their assistance in providing aggregate-level STD data.
- 2.Clear TR. Imprisoning communities: how mass incarceration makes disadvantaged neighborhoods worse. New York: Oxford University Press; 2007.Google Scholar
- 6.Porter K, Thomas JC. Variations in the effect of incarceration on community gonorrhea rates. Int J STD AIDS. In press.Google Scholar
- 10.Krieger N, Waterman PD, Chen JT, Soobader MJ, Subramanian SV. Monitoring socioeconomic inequalities in sexually transmitted infections, tuberculosis, and violence: geocoding and choice of area-based socioeconomic measures—the public health disparities geocoding project (US). Public Health Rep. 2003; 118: 240–260.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Prevention. Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance, 1996. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, September 1997.Google Scholar
- 14.Raudenbush SW, Bryk A. Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 2002. Division of STD.Google Scholar
- 17.Halloran ME. Concepts of transmission and dynamics. In: Thomas JC, Weber DJ, eds. Epidemiologic methods for the study of infectious diseases. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001.Google Scholar
- 18.Schuster J, Thomas JC, Eng E. Bridging the culture gap in sexually transmitted disease clinics. NC Med J. 1995; 56: 256–269.Google Scholar
- 21.Sena AC, Muth SQ, Heffelfinger JD, O’Dowd JO, Foust E, Leone P. Factors and the sociosexual network associated with a syphilis outbreak in rural North Carolina. Sex Transm Dis. 2007; 5: 280–287.Google Scholar
- 23.Kelling GL, Coles CM. Fixing broken windows: restoring order and reducing crime in our communities. Glencoe: Free Press; 1996.Google Scholar