Journal of Urban Health

, Volume 87, Issue 1, pp 102–112 | Cite as

Neighborhood Factors Affecting Rates of Sexually Transmitted Diseases in Chicago

  • James C. Thomas
  • Elizabeth A. Torrone
  • Christopher R. Browning
Article

Abstract

High rates of gonorrhea have been shown to be associated with high rates of incarceration in the prior year. One hypothesized chain of events is that there is a negative effect of incarceration on neighborhood social characteristics, which in turn affect behaviors facilitating transmission of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). This study examined whether neighborhood characteristics were associated with the incidence of STDs and homicide rates as a proxy for incarceration rates. Data were from the 1995 Program on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods, the Chicago Health Department, and the Chicago Police Department. Neighborhood gonorrhea rates increased by 192.2 (95% confidence interval (CI) 131.6, 252.9) cases per 100,000 population with a change from the 25th to the 75th percentile of social disorder. This rate difference was a value greater than the median neighborhood gonorrhea rate. Similar increases were observed for other neighborhood measures and for Chlamydia infection. We hypothesize that high rates of incarceration may play a role in undermining neighborhood social cohesion and control. Using homicide rates as a proxy for incarceration, a change from the 25th to the 75th percentile of 1995 neighborhood homicide rates yielded a gonorrhea rate increase of 164.6 (95% CI 124.4, 204.7) cases per 100,000. Factors that undermine the social fabric of a community can become manifest in health outcomes such as STDs. The effects of high rates of incarceration on neighborhoods merit further exploration.

Keywords

Neighborhoods Social disorder Sexually transmitted diseases Incarceration 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The study was funded by National Institute of Mental Health grant number 1R03MH073033. We thank Dr. Carol Ciesielski and Jennifer Broad of the Chicago Department of Public Health for their assistance in providing aggregate-level STD data.

References

  1. 1.
    Thomas JC, Thomas K. Things ain’t what they ought to be: social forces underlying high rates of sexually transmitted diseases in a rural North Carolina county. Soc Sci Med. 1999; 49: 1075–1084.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clear TR. Imprisoning communities: how mass incarceration makes disadvantaged neighborhoods worse. New York: Oxford University Press; 2007.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Thomas JC. From slavery to incarceration: social forces affecting the epidemiology of STDs in the rural South. Sex Transm Dis. 2006; 33(7 Suppl): S6–S10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thomas JC, Torrone E. Incarceration as forced migration: selected community health effects. Am J Public Health. 2006; 96: 1762–1765.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thomas JC, Levandowski B, Torrone E, Isler MR. The effects of incarceration on neighborhood rates of STDs in Durham, North Carolina. J Urban Health. 2008; 85: 90–99.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Porter K, Thomas JC. Variations in the effect of incarceration on community gonorrhea rates. Int J STD AIDS. In press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Thomas JC, Kulik AL, Schoenbach VJ. Syphilis in the south: rural rates surpass urban rates in North Carolina. Am J Public Health. 1995; 85: 1119–1122.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Becker KM, Glass GE, Brathwaite W, Zenilman JM. Geographic epidemiology of gonorrhea in Baltimore, Maryland, using a geographic information system. Am J Epidemiol. 1998; 147: 709–716.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cook RL, Royce RA, Thomas JC, Hanusa BH. What’s driving an epidemic? The spread of syphilis in rural North Carolina along an interstate highway. Am J Public Health. 1999; 89: 369–373.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Krieger N, Waterman PD, Chen JT, Soobader MJ, Subramanian SV. Monitoring socioeconomic inequalities in sexually transmitted infections, tuberculosis, and violence: geocoding and choice of area-based socioeconomic measures—the public health disparities geocoding project (US). Public Health Rep. 2003; 118: 240–260.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ellen JM, Jennings JM, Meyers T, Chung SE, Taylor R. Perceived social cohesion and prevalence of sexually transmitted diseases. Sex Transm Dis. 2004; 31: 117–122.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sampson RJ, Raudenbush SW, Earls F. Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science. 1997; 277: 918–924.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Prevention. Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance, 1996. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, September 1997.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Raudenbush SW, Bryk A. Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 2002. Division of STD.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Browning CR, Leventhal T, Brooks-Gunn J. Neighborhood context and racial differences in early adolescent sexual activity. Demography. 2004; 41: 697–720.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kerrigan D, Witt S, Glass B, Chung SE, Ellen J. Perceived neighborhood social cohesion and condom use among adolescents vulnerable to HIV/STI. AIDS Behav. 2006; 10: 723–729.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Halloran ME. Concepts of transmission and dynamics. In: Thomas JC, Weber DJ, eds. Epidemiologic methods for the study of infectious diseases. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schuster J, Thomas JC, Eng E. Bridging the culture gap in sexually transmitted disease clinics. NC Med J. 1995; 56: 256–269.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Holtgrave DR, Crosby RA. Social capital, poverty, and income inequality as predictors of gonorrhoea, syphilis, chlamydia and AIDS case rates in the United States. Sex Transm Infect. 2003; 79: 62–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Crosby RA, Holtgrave DR. The protective value of social capital against teen pregnancy: a state-level analysis. J Adolesc Health. 2006; 38: 556–559.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sena AC, Muth SQ, Heffelfinger JD, O’Dowd JO, Foust E, Leone P. Factors and the sociosexual network associated with a syphilis outbreak in rural North Carolina. Sex Transm Dis. 2007; 5: 280–287.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cohen D, Spear S, Scribner R, Kissenger P, Mason K, Wildgen J. “Broken windows” and the risk of gonorrhea. Am J Public Health. 2000; 90: 230–236.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kelling GL, Coles CM. Fixing broken windows: restoring order and reducing crime in our communities. Glencoe: Free Press; 1996.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Academy of Medicine 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • James C. Thomas
    • 1
  • Elizabeth A. Torrone
    • 1
  • Christopher R. Browning
    • 1
  1. 1.University of North CarolinaChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations