Journal of Urban Health

, Volume 86, Issue 4, pp 584–601 | Cite as

Incarceration and High-Risk Sex Partnerships among Men in the United States

  • Maria R. Khan
  • Irene A. Doherty
  • Victor J. Schoenbach
  • Eboni M. Taylor
  • Matthew W. Epperson
  • Adaora A. Adimora
Article

Abstract

Incarceration is associated with multiple and concurrent partnerships, which are determinants of sexually transmitted infections (STI), including HIV. The associations between incarceration and high-risk sex partnerships may exist, in part, because incarceration disrupts stable sex partnerships, some of which are protective against high-risk sex partnerships. When investigating STI/HIV risk among those with incarceration histories, it is important to consider the potential role of drug use as a factor contributing to sexual risk behavior. First, incarceration’s influence on sexual risk taking may be further heightened by drug-related effects on sexual behavior. Second, drug users may have fewer economic and social resources to manage the disruption of incarceration than nonusers of drugs, leaving this group particularly vulnerable to the disruptive effects of incarceration on sexual risk behavior. Using the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth, we conducted multivariable analyses to estimate associations between incarceration in the past 12 months and engagement in multiple partnerships, concurrent partnerships, and unprotected sex in the past 12 months, stratified by status of illicit drug use (defined as use of cocaine, crack, or injection drugs in the past 12 months), among adult men in the US. Illicit drug users were much more likely than nonusers of illicit drugs to have had concurrent partnerships (16% and 6%), multiple partnerships (45% and 18%), and unprotected sex (32% and 19%). Analyses adjusting for age, race, educational attainment, poverty status, marital status, cohabitation status, and age at first sex indicated that incarceration was associated with concurrent partnerships among nonusers of illicit drugs (adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR) 1.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06–2.22) and illicit drug users (aPR 2.14, 95% CI 1.07–4.29). While incarceration was also associated with multiple partnerships and unprotected sex among nonusers of illicit drugs (multiple partnerships: aPR 1.66, 95% CI 1.43–1.93; unprotected sex: aPR 1.99, 95% CI 1.45–2.72), incarceration was not associated with these behaviors among illicit drug users (multiple partnerships: aPR 1.03, 95% CI 0.79–1.35; unprotected sex: aPR 0.73, 95% CI 0.41–1.31); among illicit drug users, multiple partnerships and unprotected sex were common irrespective of incarceration history. These findings support the need for correctional facility- and community-based STI/HIV prevention efforts including STI/HIV education, testing, and care for current and former prisoners with and without drug use histories. Men with both illicit drug use and incarceration histories may experience particular vulnerability to STI/HIV, as a result of having disproportionate levels of concurrent partnerships and high levels of unprotected sex. We hypothesize that incarceration works in tandem with drug use and other adverse social and economic factors to increase sexual risk behavior. To establish whether incarceration is causally associated with high-risk sex partnerships and acquisition of STI/HIV, a longitudinal study that accurately measures incarceration, STI/HIV, and illicit drug use should be conducted to disentangle the specific effects of each variable of interest on risk behavior and STI/HIV acquisition.

Keywords

Incarceration Drug use Sexual behavior HIV Sexually transmitted infections US 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This study was supported in part by NICHD 1R21HD054293-01A1 (to AAA). Maria Khan was supported as a postdoctoral fellow and Matthew Epperson was supported as a predoctoral fellow in the Behavioral Sciences Training in Drug Abuse Research program, sponsored by the National Development and Research Institutes, Inc. (NDRI) and Public Health Solutions with funding from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (5T32 DA07233).

References

  1. 1.
    McQuillan GM, Kruszon-Moran D, Kottiri BJ, et al. Prevalence of HIV in the US household population: the National Health and Nutrition Examination surveys, 1988 to 2002. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006;41:651–656 doi: 10.1097/01.qai.0000194235.31078.f6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Maruschak LM. HIV In Prisons, 2005. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics; 2007.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arriola KR, Braithwaite RL, Kennedy S, et al. A collaborative effort to enhance HIV/STI screening in five county jails. Public Health Rep. 2001;116:520–529.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    National Commission on Correctional Health Care. Chapter 3. Prevalence of Communicable Disease, Chronic Disease, and Mental Illness Among the Inmate Population. National Commission on Correctional Health Care; 2002.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mertz KJ, Schwebke JR, Gaydos CA, Beidinger HA, Tulloch SD, Levine WC. Screening women in jails for chlamydial and gonococcal infection using urine tests: feasibility, acceptability, prevalence, and treatment rates. Sex Transm Dis. 2002b;29:271–276 doi: 10.1097/00007435-200205000-00004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen JL, Bovee MC, Kerndt PR. Sexually transmitted diseases surveillance among incarcerated men who have sex with men—An opportunity for HIV prevention. AIDS Educ Prev. 2003;15:117–126 doi: 10.1521/aeap.15.1.5.117.23614.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hardick J, Hsieh YH, Tulloch S, Kus J, Tawes J, Gaydos CA. Surveillance of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections in women in detention in Baltimore, Maryland. Sex Transm Dis. 2003;30:64–70 doi: 10.1097/00007435-200301000-00013.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hammett TM. HIV/AIDS, sexually transmitted diseases, and incarceration among women: national and southern perspectives. Sex Transm Dis. 2006;33:S17–S22 doi: 10.1097/01.olq.0000218852.83584.7f.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Adimora AA, Schoenbach V. Social context, sexual networks, and racial disparities in rates of sexually transmitted infections. J Infect Dis. 2005;191:S115–S122 doi: 10.1086/425280.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schneller D. Prisoner’s families: a study of some social and psychological effects of incarceration on the families of Negro prisoners. Criminology. 1975;12:402–412 doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1975.tb00646.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lowenstein A. Coping with stress: the case of prisoner’s wives. J Marriage Fam. 1984;46:699–708 doi: 10.2307/352611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rindfuss R, Stephen EH. Marital noncohabitation: separation does not make the heart grow fonder. J Marriage Fam. 1990;52:259–270 doi: 10.2307/352856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Browning S, Miller S, Lisa M. Criminal incarceration dividing the ties that bind: black men and their families. J Afr Am Men. 2001;6:87–102.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Comfort M, Grinstead O, McCartney K, Bourgois P, Knight K. “You can’t do nothing in this damn place”: sex and intimacy among couples with an incarcerated male partner. J Sex Res. 2005;42:3–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Adimora AA, Schoenbach VJ, Martinson FE, Donaldson KH, Stancil TR, Fullilove RE. Concurrent partnerships among rural African Americans with recently reported heterosexually transmitted HIV infection. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2003;34:423–429 doi: 10.1097/00126334-200312010-00010.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    MacGowan RJ, Margolis A, Gaiter J, et al. Predictors of risky sex of young men after release from prison. Int J STD AIDS. 2003;14:519–523 doi: 10.1258/095646203767869110.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Adimora AA, Schoenbach VJ, Martinson F, Donaldson KH, Stancil TR, Fullilove RE. Concurrent sexual partnerships among African Americans in the rural south. Ann Epidemiol. 2004;14:155–160 doi: 10.1016/S1047-2797(03)00129-7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stephenson BL, Wohl DA, Golin CE, Tien HC, Stewart P, Kaplan AH. Effect of release from prison and re-incarceration on the viral loads of HIV-infected individuals. Public Health Rep. 2005;120:84–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Grinstead O, Zack B, Faigeles B. Reducing Postrelease Risk Behavior among HIV Seropositive Prison Inmates: The Health Promotion Program. AIDS Educ Prev. 2001;13(2):109–119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Morris M, Kretzschmar M. Concurrent partnerships and the spread of HIV. AIDS. 1997;11:641–648 doi: 10.1097/00002030-199705000-00012.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Manhart LE, Aral SO, Holmes KK, Foxman B. Sex partner concurrency: measurement, prevalence, and correlates among urban 18–39-year-olds. Sex Transm Dis. 2002;29:133–143 doi: 10.1097/00007435-200203000-00003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tyndall MW, Patrick D, Spittal P, Li K, O’Shaughnessy MV, Schechter MT. Risky sexual behaviours among injection drugs users with high HIV prevalence: implications for STD control. Sex Transm Infect. 2002;78(Suppl 1):i170–i175.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Epperson M, El-Bassel N, Gilbert L, Orellana ER, Chang M. Increased HIV risk associated with criminal justice involvement among men on methadone. AIDS Behav. 2008;12:51–57 doi: 10.1007/s10461-007-9298-4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Khan MR, Miller WC, Schoenbach VJ, et al. Timing and duration of incarceration and high-risk sexual partnerships among African Americans in North Carolina. Ann Epidemiol. 2008;18:403–410.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Khan MR, Wohl DA, Weir SS, et al. Incarceration and risky sexual partnerships in a southern US city. J Urban Health. 2008;85:100–113 doi: 10.1007/s11524-007-9237-8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Farley TA. Sexually transmitted diseases in the southern United States: location, race, and social context. Sex Transm Dis. 2006;33:S58–S64 doi: 10.1097/01.olq.0000175378.20009.5a.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Thomas JC. From slavery to incarceration: social forces affecting the epidemiology of sexually transmitted diseases in the rural south. Sex Transm Dis. 2006;33:S6–S10 doi: 10.1097/01.olq.0000221025.17158.26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Flanigan BJ, Hitch MA. Alcohol use, sexual intercourse, and an exploratory study. J Alcohol Drug Educ. 1986;31:6–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Robertson JA, Plant MA. Alcohol, sex and risks of HIV infection. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1988;22:75–78 doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(88)90039-7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Strunin L, Hingson R. Alcohol, drugs, and adolescent sexual behavior. Int J Addict. 1992;27:129–146.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fortenberry JD. Adolescent substance use and sexually transmitted diseases risk: a review. J Adolesc Health. 1995;16:304–308 doi: 10.1016/1054-139X(94)00062-J.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Graves KL, Leigh BC. The relationship of substance use to sexual activity among young adults in the United States. Fam Plann Perspect. 1995;27:18–22, 33 doi: 10.2307/2135972.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hudgins R, McCusker J, Stoddard A. Cocaine use and risky injection and sexual behaviors. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1995;37:7–14 doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(94)01060-X.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shrier L, Emans S, Woods E, Durant R. The association of sexual risk behaviors and problem drug behaviors in high school students. J Adolesc Health. 1996;20:377–383 doi: 10.1016/S1054-139X(96)00180-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Castillo Mezzich A, Tarter RE, Giancola PR, Lu S, Kirisci L, Parks S. Substance use and risky sexual behavior in female adolescents. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1997;44:157–166 doi: 10.1016/S0376-8716(96)01333-6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Dinwiddie SH. Characteristics of injection drug users derived from a large family study of alcoholism. Compr Psychiatry. 1997;38:218–229 doi: 10.1016/S0010-440X(97)90030-4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Iguchi MY, Bux DA Jr. Reduced probability of HIV infection among crack cocaine-using injection drug users. Am J Public Health. 1997;87:1008–1012 doi: 10.2105/AJPH.87.6.1008.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wingood GM, DiClemente RJ. The influence of psychosocial factors, alcohol, drug use on African-American women’s high-risk sexual behavior. Am J Prev Med. 1998;15:54–59 doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00027-0.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Molitor F, Ruiz JD, Flynn N, Mikanda JN, Sun RK, Anderson R. Methamphetamine use and sexual and injection risk behaviors among out-of-treatment injection drug users. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1999;25:475–493 doi: 10.1081/ADA-100101874.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Booth RE, Kwiatkowski CF, Chitwood DD. Sex related HIV risk behaviors: differential risks among injection drug users, crack smokers, and injection drug users who smoke crack. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2000;58:219–226 doi: 10.1016/S0376-8716(99)00094-0.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gorman EM, Carroll RT. Substance abuse and HIV: considerations with regard to methamphetamines and other recreational drugs for nursing practice and research. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2000;11:51–62 doi: 10.1016/S1055-3290(06)60286-0.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kral AH, Bluthenthal RN, Lorvick J, Gee L, Bacchetti P, Edlin BR. Sexual transmission of HIV-1 among injection drug users in San Francisco, USA: risk-factor analysis. Lancet. 2001;357:1397–1401 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04562-1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Strathdee SA, Galai N, Safaiean M, et al. Sex differences in risk factors for HIV seroconversion among injection drug users: a 10-year perspective. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:1281–1288 doi: 10.1001/archinte.161.10.1281.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    CDC. Drug-associated HIV Transmission continues in the United States. Accessed March 1, 2006. http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pubs/facts/idu.htm. National Center for HIV, STD and TB Prevention, Divisions of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2002.
  45. 45.
    Friedman SR, Flom PL, Kottiri BJ, et al. Drug use patterns and infection with sexually transmissible agents among young adults in a high-risk neighbourhood in New York City. Addiction. 2003;98:159–169 doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00271.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Somlai AM, Kelly JA, McAuliffe TL, Ksobiech K, Hackl KL. Predictors of HIV sexual risk behaviors in a community sample of injection drug-using men and women. AIDS Behav. 2003;7:383–393 doi: 10.1023/B:AIBE.0000004730.62934.ed.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Meade CS. Sexual risk behavior among persons dually diagnosed with severe mental illness and substance use disorder. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2006;30:147–157 doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2005.11.005.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Belenko S, Peugh J. Estimating drug treatment needs among state prison inmates. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005;77:269–281 doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.08.023.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Groves RM, Benson G, Mosher WD, et al. Plan and operation of cycle 6 of the National Survey of Family Growth. Vital Health Stat 1. 2005;1–86.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    National Center for Health Statistics CfDCaP, US Department of Health and Human Services. Cycle 6 National Survey of Family Growth. Accessed December 6, 2007. http://wwwcdcgov/nchs/about/major/nsfg/nsfgcycle6htm.
  51. 51.
    Lepkowski JM, Mosher WD, Davis KE, et al. National Survey of Family Growth, cycle 6: sample design, weighting, imputation, and variance estimation; 2006.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Pollner M. The effects of interviewer gender in mental health interviews. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1998;186:369–373 doi: 10.1097/00005053-199806000-00008.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Adimora AA, Schoenbach VJ, Doherty IA. Concurrent sexual partnerships among men in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2007;97:2230–2237 doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.099069.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Doherty IA, Schoenbach VJ, Adimora AA. Condom Use and Duration of Concurrent Partnerships among Men in the United States; Sex Transm Dis. 2009 May;36(5):265–72.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    McNutt LA, Wu C, Xue X, Hafner JP. Estimating the relative risk in cohort studies and clinical trials of common outcomes. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;157:940–943 doi: 10.1093/aje/kwg074.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Zou G. A modified Poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159:702–706 doi: 10.1093/aje/kwh090.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Anderson RM, May RM. Epidemiological parameters of HIV transmission. Nature. 1988;333:514–519 doi: 10.1038/333514a0.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Anderson R. Transmission dynamics of sexually transmitted infections. In: Holmes KK, Sparling PF, Mardh PA, Lemon SM, Stamm WE, Piot P, et al, eds. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 3rd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill, Health Professions Division; 1999:25–37.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Potterat JJ, Zimmerman-Rogers H, Muth SQ, et al. Chlamydia transmission: concurrency, reproduction number, and the epidemic trajectory. Am J Epidemiol. 1999;150:1331–1339.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Rosenberg MD, Gurvey JE, Adler N, Dunlop MB, Ellen JM. Concurrent sex partners and risk for sexually transmitted diseases among adolescents. Sex Transm Dis. 1999;26:208–212 doi: 10.1097/00007435-199904000-00004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Fenton KA, Korovessis C, Johnson AM, et al. Sexual behaviour in Britain: reported sexually transmitted infections and prevalent genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Lancet. 2001;358:1851–1854 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06886-6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Koumans EH, Farley TA, Gibson JJ, et al. Characteristics of persons with syphilis in areas of persisting syphilis in the United States: sustained transmission associated with concurrent partnerships. Sex Transm Dis. 2001;28:497–503 doi: 10.1097/00007435-200109000-00004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Jennings J, Glass B, Parham P, Adler N, Ellen JM. Sex partner concurrency, geographic context, and adolescent sexually transmitted infections. Sex Transm Dis. 2004;31:734–739 doi: 10.1097/01.olq.0000145850.12858.87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Gorbach PM, Drumright LN, Holmes KK. Discord, discordance, and concurrency: comparing individual and partnership-level analyses of new partnerships of young adults at risk of sexually transmitted infections. Sex Transm Dis. 2005;32:7–12 doi: 10.1097/01.olq.0000148302.81575.fc.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Adimora AA, Schoenbach VJ, Bonas DM, Martinson FE, Donaldson KH, Stancil TR. Concurrent sexual partnerships among women in the United States. Epidemiology. 2002;13:320–327 doi: 10.1097/00001648-200205000-00013.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Seal DW, Eldrige GD, Kacanek D, Binson D, Macgowan RJ. A longitudinal, qualitative analysis of the context of substance use and sexual behavior among 18- to 29-year-old men after their release from prison. Soc Sci Med. 2007;65:2394–2406 doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.06.014.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Galea S, Vlahov D. Social determinants and the health of drug users: socioeconomic status, homelessness, and incarceration. Public Health Rep. 2002;117(Suppl 1):S135–S145.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Greenberg GA, Rosenheck RA. Jail incarceration, homelessness, and mental health: a national study. Psychiatr Serv. 2008;59:170–177 doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.59.2.170.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Catania JA, Gibson DR, Chitwood DD, Coates TJ. Methodological problems in AIDS behavioral research: influences on measurement error and participation bias in studies of sexual behavior. Psychol Bull. 1990;108:339–362 doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.339.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Kraut JR, Haddix AC, Carande-Kulis V, Greifinger RB. Cost-effectiveness of routine screening for sexually transmitted disease among inmates in United States prisons and jails. In: The health care needs of soon-to-be-released inmates: a report to the Congress, Volume 2. National Commission on Correctional Health Care; 2002. p. 81–108.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Parece MS, Herrera GA, Voigt RF, Middlekauff SL, Irwin KL. STD testing policies and practices in U.S. city and county jails. Sex Transm Dis. 1999;26:431–437 doi: 10.1097/00007435-199909000-00003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Academy of Medicine 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria R. Khan
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Irene A. Doherty
    • 4
  • Victor J. Schoenbach
    • 1
  • Eboni M. Taylor
    • 1
  • Matthew W. Epperson
    • 2
    • 3
    • 5
  • Adaora A. Adimora
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Epidemiology, School of Public HealthUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  2. 2.National Development and Research InstitutesNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Public Health SolutionsNew YorkUSA
  4. 4.Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, School of MedicineUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  5. 5.School of Social WorkColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations