Journal of Urban Health

, 86:250

Predictors of Identifying as a Barebacker among High-Risk New England HIV Seronegative Men Who Have Sex with Men

  • Sari L. Reisner
  • Matthew J. Mimiaga
  • Patricia Case
  • Carey V. Johnson
  • Steven A. Safren
  • Kenneth H. Mayer
Article

Abstract

Studies have found that between 14% and 46% of US men who have sex with men (MSM) consistently report “barebacking” behavior (i.e., intentional unprotected anal intercourse) with other men. This is of public health significance because MSM continue to constitute more than 50% of new HIV infections in the USA. Men who self-identify as barebackers may represent a different and unique subset of MSM with distinct HIV prevention needs. In 2007, 227 HIV seronegative MSM recruited through modified respondent-driven sampling completed an interviewer-administered survey which assessed barebacker identity (i.e., personally identifying with the barebacker scene), demographics, sexual risk behaviors, psychosocial variables, and drug/alcohol use. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression procedures were used to examine predictors of barebacker identity in relation to HIV risk behavior. Overall, 31% of participants identified as a barebacker. In bivariate analyses, lower education (OR = 1.76; 95% CI = 0.99–3.13; p < 0.05), a current drinking problem (OR = 2.34, 95% CI = 1.29–4.23; p < 0.01), higher levels of HIV treatment optimism (OR = 1.06; 95% CI = 1.01–1.12; p < 0.05), meeting sexual partners at private sex parties (OR = 2.47; 95% CI = 1.28–4.74; p < 0.01) or at bars/cubs (OR = 1.97; 95% CI = 1.10–3.52; p < 0.05), and engaging in serodiscordant unprotected insertive anal sex (OR = 3.42; 95% CI = 1.27–9.21; p < 0.01) significantly predicted barebacker identification compared to those with no barebacker identification. In a multivariable model, barebackers were more likely to screen in for alcohol abuse (adjusted OR = 2.16; 95% CI = 1.09–4.27; p < 0.05) and engage in serodiscordant unprotected insertive anal sex (adjusted OR = 3.17; 95% CI = 1.09–9.20; p < 0.05) compared to their non-barebacker counterparts. No significant differences were found in serodiscordant unprotected receptive anal sex between barebackers and non-barebackers. These findings suggest that barebacker identity is related to intentional HIV sexual risk taking and alcohol abuse. Furthermore, strategic positioning (i.e., engaging in insertive rather than receptive sex) might be associated with barebacker identification and may indicate a harm-reduction strategy being used among some HIV-uninfected MSM to reduce their risk of becoming infected. Additional research is warranted to understand the social identity of barebacking among MSM in order to develop more nuanced prevention strategies.

Keywords

HIV/AIDS STIs MSM Bareback Prevention 

References

  1. 1.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report, 2006. Vol. 18. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2008.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berg RC. Barebacking among MSM Internet users. AIDS Behav. 2008;12:822–833.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Grov C, DeBusk JA, Bimbi DS, Golub SA, Nanin JE, Parsons JT. Barebacking, the Internet, and harm reduction: an intercept survey with gay and bisexual men in Los Angeles and New York City. AIDS Behav. 2007;11:527–536 doi:10.1007/s10461-007-9234-7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Halkitis PN. Behavioral patterns, identity, and health characteristics of self-identified barebackers: implications for HIV prevention and intervention. J LGBT Health Res. 2007;3:37–48 doi:10.1300/J463v03n01_05.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Halkitis PN, Parsons JT, Wilton L. Barebacking among gay and bisexual men in New York City: explanations for the emergence of intentional unsafe behavior. Arch Sex Behav. 2003;32:351–357 doi:10.1023/A:1024095016181.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mansergh G, Marks G, Colfax GN, Guzman R, Radar M, Buchbinder S. “Barebacking” in a diverse sample of men who have sex with men. AIDS. 2002;16:653–659 doi:10.1097/00002030-200203080-00018.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Halkitis PN, Parsons JT. Intentional unsafe sex (barebacking) among HIV-positive gay men who seek sexual partners on the Internet. AIDS Care. 2003;15:367–378 doi:10.1080/0954012031000105423.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Halkitis PN, Wilton L, Wolitsky RJ, Parsons JT, Hoff CC, Bimbi DS. Barebacking identity among HIV-positive gay and bisexual men: demographic, psychological, and behavioral correlates. AIDS. 2005;19:s27–s35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kippax S, Race K. Sustaining safer sex practice: twenty years on. Soc Sci Med. 2003;51:2–12.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Van de Ven P, Kippax S, Crawford J, Rawstorne P, Prestage G, Grulich A, et al. In a minority of gay men, sexual risk practice indicates strategic positioning for perceived risk reduction rather than unbridled sex. AIDS Care. 2002;14:471–480 doi:10.1080/09540120208629666.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wolitski RJ. The emergence of barebacking among gay and bisexual men in the United States: a public health perspective. J Gay Lesbian Psychother. 2005;9:9–34 doi:10.1300/J236v09n03_02.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Parsons JT, Bimbi DS. Intentional unprotected anal intercourse among men who have sex with men: barebacking—from behavior to identity. AIDS Behav. 2007;11:277–287 doi:10.1007/s10461-006-9135-1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Heckathorn D. Respondent-driven sampling: a new approach to the study of hidden populations. Soc Probl. 1997;44:174–199 doi:10.1525/sp.1997.44.2.03x0221m.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mimiaga MJ, Goldhammer H, Belanoff C, Tetu AM, Mayer KH. Men who have sex with men: perceptions about sexual risk, HIV and sexually transmitted disease testing, and provider communication. Sex Transm Dis. 2007;34:113–119 doi:10.1097/01.olq.0000225327.13214.bf.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sanchez T, Finlayson T, Drake A, Behel S, Cribbin M, Dinenno E, et al. Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) risk, prevention, and testing behaviors—United States, National HIV Behavioral Surveillance System: men who have sex with men, November 2003-April 2005. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2006;55:1–16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ewing JA. Detecting alcoholism. The CAGE questionnaire. JAMA. 1984;252:1905–1907 doi:10.1001/jama.252.14.1905.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Knowlton R, McCusker J, Stoddard A, Zapka J, Mayer K. The use of the CAGE questionnaire in a cohort of homosexually active men. J Stud Alcohol. 1994;55:692–694.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mayfield D, McLeod G, Hall P. The CAGE questionnaire: validation of a new alcoholism screening instrument. Am J Psychiatry. 1974;131:1121–1123.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. CES-D Scale. Bethesda, MD: Department of Health and Human Services & National Institute of Health; 2004.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Van de Ven P, Crawford J, Kippax S, Knox S, Prestage G. A scale of optimism-skepticism in the context of HIV treatments. AIDS Care. 2000;12:171–176 doi:10.1080/09540120050001841.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Catania JA, Coates TJ, Kegeles S. A test of the AIDS Risk Reduction Model: psychosocial correlates of condom use in the AMEN Cohort Survey. Health Psychol. 1994;13:548–555 doi:10.1037/0278-6133.13.6.548.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Afifi AA, Clark V, May S. Computer-Aided Multivariate Analysis, Fourth Edition. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2004.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Crossley ML. Making sense of ‘barebacking’: gay men’s narratives, unsafe sex and the ‘resistance habitus’. Br J Soc Psychol. 2004;43:225–244 doi:10.1348/0144666041501679.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Weeks J. Invented Moralities: Sexual Values in an Age of Uncertainty. New York: Columbia University Press; 1995.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Crossley ML. The perils of health promotion and the ‘barebacking’ backlash. Health. 2002;6:47–68.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vincke J, Bolton R, De Vleeschouwer P. The cognitive structure of the domain of safe and unsafe gay sexual behaviour in Belgium. AIDS Care. 2001;13:57–70 doi:10.1080/09540120020018189.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hogg MA, Abrams D. Social Identifications: A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes. New York: Routledge; 1988.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tajfel H, Turner J. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: Worchel S, Austin W, eds. Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Chicago: Nelson-Hall; 1986:7–24.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Koblin BA, Husnik MJ, Colfax G, Huang Y, Madison M, Mayer K, et al. Risk factors for HIV infection among men who have sex with men. AIDS. 2006;20:731–739 doi:10.1097/01.aids.0000216374.61442.55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Stall R, Paul PJ, Greenwwod G, et al. Alcohol use, drug use and alcohol-related problems among men who have sex with men: the Urban Men’s Health Study. Addiction. 2001;96:1589–1601 doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.961115896.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Clatts MC, Goldsamt LA, Yi H. An emerging HIV risk environment: a preliminary epidemiological profile of an MSM POZ Party in New York City. Sex Transm Infect. 2005;81:373–376 doi:10.1136/sti.2005.014894.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dilley JW, Wood WJ, McFarland W. Are advances in treatment changing views about high-risk sex. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:501–502 doi:10.1056/NEJM199708143370715.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kalichman SC, Nachimson D, Cherry C, Williams E. AIDS treatment advances and behavioral prevention setbacks: preliminary assessment of reduced perceived threat of HIV-AIDS. Health Psychol. 1998;17:546–550 doi:10.1037/0278-6133.17.6.546.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kelly JA, Otto-Salaj LL, Sikkema KJ, Pinkerton SD, Bloom FR. Implications of HIV treatment for behavioral research on AIDS: protease inhibitors and new challenges in HIV secondary prevention. Health Psychol. 1998;17:310–319 doi:10.1037/0278-6133.17.4.310.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Vanable PA, Ostrow DG, McKirnan DJ, Taywaditep KJ, Hope BA. Impact of combination therapies on HIV risk perceptions and sexual risk among HIV-positive and HIV-negative gay and bisexual men. Health Psychol. 2000;19:134–145 doi:10.1037/0278-6133.19.2.134.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Suarez T, Miller J. Negotiating risks in context: a perspective on unprotected anal intercourse and barebacking among men who have sex with men—Where do we go from here. Arch Sex Behav. 2001;30:287–300 doi:10.1023/A:1002700130455.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Carballo-Diegez A, Stein Z, Saez H, Dolezal C, Nieves-Rosa L, Diaz F. Frequent use of lubricants for anal sex among men who have sex with men: the HIV prevention potential of a microbicidal gel. Am J Public Health. 2000;90:1117–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Marks G, Mansergh G, Crepaz N, Murphy S, Miller LC, Appleby PR. Future HIV prevention options for men who have sex with men: intention to use a potential microbicide during anal intercourse. AIDS Behav. 2000;4:279–286 doi:10.1023/A:1009572919712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Liu AY, Hittredge PV, Vittinghoff E, Raymond HF, Ahrens K, Matheson T, et al. Limited knowledge and use of HIV-post- and pre-exposure prophylaxis among gay and bisexual men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2008;47:241–247.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mimiaga MJ, Case P, Johnson CV, Safren SA, Mayer KH. Pre-exposure antiretroviral prophylaxis (PrEP) attitudes in high risk Boston area MSM: limited knowledge and experience, but potential for increased utilization after education. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2008; in press.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Voetsch AC, Heffelfinger JD, Begley EB, Jafa-Bhushan K, Sullivan PS. Knowledge and use of preexposure and postexposure prophylaxis among attendees of minority gay pride events, 2005 through 2006. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;46:378–380.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Nodin N, Carballo-Diegez A, Ventuneac AM, Balan IC, Remien R. Knowledge and acceptability of alternative HIV prevention bio-medical products among MSM who bareback. AIDS Care. 2008;20:106–115 doi:10.1080/09540120701449096.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Academy of Medicine 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sari L. Reisner
    • 1
  • Matthew J. Mimiaga
    • 1
    • 2
  • Patricia Case
    • 1
    • 3
  • Carey V. Johnson
    • 1
  • Steven A. Safren
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kenneth H. Mayer
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.The Fenway Institute, Fenway Community HealthBostonUSA
  2. 2.Harvard Medical School/Massachusetts General HospitalBostonUSA
  3. 3.School of Public Health, Boston UniversityBostonUSA
  4. 4.Brown Medical School/Miriam HospitalProvidenceUSA

Personalised recommendations