Journal of Urban Health

, Volume 85, Issue 5, pp 744–758 | Cite as

Sexual Negotiation and HIV Serodisclosure among Men who Have Sex with Men with Their Online and Offline Partners

  • Keith J. Horvath
  • J. Michael Oakes
  • B. R. Simon Rosser
Article

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine online profile and in-person communication patterns and their associations with unprotected anal intercourse (UAI) in online and offline partnerships between men who have sex with men (MSM) who have never tested for HIV (“Never Tested”), had been tested at least once for HIV (“Tested”), and had tested positive for HIV. Between September and November 2005, 2,716 MSM participated in a one-time online survey. Although 75% and 72% of the Tested and Never Tested groups disclosed a HIV-negative status in all of their online profiles, 17% of HIV-positive participants did so. Exchanging HIV status information was highest among the Tested group, while HIV-positive men were most likely to negotiate UAI. Serodisclosure was not an independent predictor of UAI, although making an explicit agreement to engage in UAI was. Sexual communication and risk-taking patterns differed by testing status. Explicit agreements to avoid UAI were associated with reduced sexual risk-taking. Misrepresentation of HIV status is an identified challenge for HIV prevention.

Keywords

HIV risk Men who have sex with men Serodisclosure Condom negotiation Internet 

References

  1. 1.
    Jaffe HW, Valdisserri RO, DeCock KM. The reemerging HIV/AIDS epidemic in men who have sex with men. J Am Med Assoc. 2007;298(20):2412–2414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wolitski RJ, Valdiserri RO, Denning PH, Levine WC. Are we headed for a resurgence of the HIV epidemic among men who have sex with men? Am J Public Health. 2001;91(6):883–888.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Halkitis P, Parsons J, Wilton L. Barebacking among gay and bisexual men in New York City: explanations for the emergence of intentional unsafe behavior. Arch Sex Behav. 2003;32(4):351–357.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bull SSPDMPH, McFarlane MPD. Soliciting sex on the internet: what are the risks for sexually transmitted diseases and HIV? Sex Transm Dis. 2000;27(9):545–550.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    McFarlane MPD, Bull SSPDMPH, Reitmeijer CAMDMPH. The internet as a newly emerging risk environment for sexually transmitted diseases. J Am Med Assoc. 2000;284(4):443–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ross MW. Typing, doing, and being: sexuality and the internet. J Sex Res. 2005;42(4):342–352.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davis M, Hart G, Bolding G, Sherr L, Elford J. E-dating, identity and HIV prevention: theorising sexualities, risk and network society. Sociol Health Illn. 2006;28(4):457–478.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liau A, Millett G, Marks G. Meta-analytic examination of online sex-seeking and sexual risk behavior among men who have sex with men. Sex Transm Dis. 2006;33(9):576–584.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Benotsch EG, Kalichman S, Cage M. Men who have met sex partners via the Internet: prevalence, predictors, and implications for HIV prevention. Arch Sex Behav. 2002;31(2):177–183.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Horvath KJ, Bowen AM, Williams ML. Virtual and physical venues as contexts for HIV risk among rural men who have sex with men. Health Psychol. 2006;5(2):237–242, http://www.apa.org/journals/hea.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cooper A. Sexuality and the internet: surfing into the new millenium. Cyberpsychol Behav. 1998;1:187–193.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    King SA. Internet gambling and pornography: illustrative examples of the psychological consequences of communication anarchy. Cyberpsychol Behav. 1999;2:175–193.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tikkanen R, Ross MW. Looking for sexual compatibility: experiences among Swedish men in visiting internet gay chat rooms. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2000;3(4):605–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rosser BRS, Miner MH, Bockting WO, et al. HIV risk and the Internet: results of the Men’s INTernet Study (MINTS). AIDS & Behavior. In Press.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wolitski R, Rietmeijer C, Goldbaum G, Wilson R. HIV serostatus disclosure among gay and bisexual men in four American cities: general patterns and relation to sexual practices. AIDS Care. 1998;10(5):599–610.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Crepaz N, Marks G. Serostatus disclosure, sexual communication and safer sex in HIV-positive men. AIDS Care. 2003;15(3):379–387.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Marks G, Crepaz N. HIV-positive men’s sexual practices in the context of self-disclosure of HIV status. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr: JAIDS. 2001;27(1):79–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kalichman SC, Nachimson D. Self-efficacy and disclosure of HIV-positive serostatus to sex partners. Health Psychol. 1999;18(3):281–287.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Duru OK, Collins RL, Ciccarone DH, et al. Correlates of sex without serostatus disclosure among a national probability sample of HIV patients. AIDS Behav. 2006;10(5):495–507.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hart TA, Wolitski RJ, Purcell DW, Parsons JT, Gomez CA. Partner awareness of the serostatus of HIV-seropositive men who have sex with men: impact on unprotected sexual behavior. AIDS Behav. 2005;9(2):155–166.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kalichman SC, Nachimson D. Self-efficacy and disclosure of HIV-positive serostatus to sex partners. Health Psychol. 1999;18(3):281–287.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Simoni JM, Pantalone DW. Secrets and safety in the age of AIDS: does HIV disclosure lead to safer sex? Top HIV Med. 2004;12(4):109–118.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Parsons J, Schrimshaw E, Bimbi D, Wolitski R, Gomez C, Halkitis P. Consistent, inconsistent, and non-disclosure to casual sexual partners among HIV-seropositive gay and bisexual men. AIDS. 2005;19(Suppl 1):S87–S97.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rosser SBR, Horvath KJ, Hatfield LA, et al. Predictors of HIV disclosure to secondary partners and sexual risk behavior among a high-risk sample of HIV positive MSM: results from six epicenters in the US. AIDS Care. In Press.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Carballo-Dieguez A, Miner M, Dolezal C, Rosser BR, Jacoby S. Sexual negotiation, HIV-status disclosure, and sexual risk behavior among Latino men who use the internet to seek sex with other men. Arch Sex Behav. 2006;35(4):473–481.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ross MW, Rosser BR, Stanton J, Konstan J. Characteristics of latino men who have sex with men on the internet who complete and drop out of an internet-based sexual behavior survey. AIDS Educ Prev. 2004;16(6):526–537.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Greene WH. Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1997.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Marks G, Crepaz N, Janssen R. Estimating sexual transmission of HIV from persons aware and unaware that they are infected with the virus in the USA. AIDS. 2006;20(10):1447–1450.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Albarracin D, Gillette J, Earl A, Glasman L, Durantini M, Ho M. A test of major assumptions about behavior change: a comprehensive look at the effects of passive and active HIV-prevention interventions since the beginning of the epidemic. Psychol Bull. 2005;131(6):856–897.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Parsons J, Schrimshaw E, Wolitski R, et al. Sexual harm reduction practices of HIV-seropositive gay and bisexual men: serosorting, strategic positioning, and withdrawal before ejaculation. AIDS. 2005;19(Suppl 1):S13–S25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Konstan JA, Rosser BRS, Ross MW, Stanton J, Edwards WM. The Story of Subject Naught: A Cautionary but Optimistic Tale of Internet Survey Research. J Comput-Mediat Commun 2005;10(2) Accessed on December 5, 2007. http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/; 2005.
  32. 32.
    Knapp Whittier D, Seeley S, St Lawrence JS. A comparison of Web- with paper-based surveys of gay and bisexual men who vacationed in a gay resort community. AIDS Educ Prev. 2004;16(5):476–485.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ellen JM, Gurvey JE, Patsch L, Tschann J, Nanda JP, Catania J. A randomized comparison of A-CASI and phone interviews to assess STD/HUV-related risk behaviors in teens. J Adolesc Health. 2002;31:26–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ghanem K, Hutton H, Zenilman J, Zimba R, Erbelding E. Audio computer assisted self interview and face to face interview modes in assessing response bias among STD clinic patients. Sex Transm Infect. 2005;81(5):421–425.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gilbert GH, Rose JS, Shelton BJ. A prospective study of the validity of data on self-reported dental visits. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2002;30:352–362.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ajzen I. From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In: Kuhl J, Beckmann J, eds. Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1985:11–39.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    De Wit J, Stroebe W, De Vroome E, Sandfort T, Van Griensven J. Understanding AIDS preventive behavior with casual and primary partners in homosexual men: the theory of planned behavior and the information-motivation-behavioral-skills model. Psychol Health. 2000;15:325–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Academy of Medicine 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Keith J. Horvath
    • 1
  • J. Michael Oakes
    • 1
  • B. R. Simon Rosser
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations