Advertisement

Journal of Urban Health

, 85:532 | Cite as

Neighborhood Road Environments and Physical Activity Among Youth: The CLAN Study

  • Alison Carver
  • Anna F. Timperio
  • David A. Crawford
Article

Abstract

We examined associations between objective measures of the local road environment and physical activity (including active transport) among youth. There is little empirical evidence of the impact of the road environment on physical activity among children/adolescents in their neighborhoods. Most recent studies have examined perceptions rather than objective measures of the road environment. This was a cross-sectional study of children aged 8–9 years (n = 188) and adolescents aged 13–15 years (n = 346) who were participants in the 3-year follow-up of the Children Living in Active Neighborhoods (CLAN) longitudinal study in Melbourne, Australia. At baseline (2001), they were recruited from 19 state primary schools in areas of varying socioeconomic status across Melbourne. Habitual walking/cycling to local destinations was parent-reported for children and self-reported for adolescents, while moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) outside school hours was recorded using accelerometers. Road environment features in each participant’s neighborhood (area of radius 800 m around the home) were measured objectively using a geographical information system. Regression analyses found no associations between road environment variables and children’s likelihood of making at least seven walking/cycling trips per week to neighborhood destinations. Adolescent girls residing in neighborhoods with two to three traffic/pedestrian lights were more likely to make seven or more walking/cycling trips per week as those whose neighborhoods had fewer traffic lights (OR: 2.7; 95% CI: 1.2–6.2). For adolescent boys, residing on a cul-de-sac, compared with a through road, was associated with increases in MVPA of 9 min after school, 5 min in the evenings, and 22 min on weekend days. Speed humps were positively associated with adolescent boys’ MVPA during evenings. The road environment influences physical activity among youth in different ways, according to age group, sex and type of physical activity.

Keywords

Child Adolescent Physical activity Neighborhood Safety 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council (grant ID: 274309), Australia. Anna Timperio and David Crawford are each supported by Public Health Research Fellowships from the Victorian Health Promotion Foundation.

The authors gratefully acknowledge Rebecca Roberts for her GIS expertise and assistance with creating objective measures of the road environment.

References

  1. 1.
    Tranter P, Doyle J. Reclaiming the residential street as play space. Int Play J. 1996;4:91–97.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hillman M. Children’s rights and adults’ wrongs. Children’s Geographies. 2006;4:61–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hillman M, Adams J, Whitelegg J. One False Move...: A Study of Children’s Independent Mobility. London: PSI Publishing; 1990.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Salmon J, Timperio A, Cleland V, Venn A. Trends in children’s physical activity and weight status in high and low socio-economic status areas of Melbourne, Victoria, 1985–2001. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2005;29:337–332.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tudor-Locke C, Neff LJ, Ainsworth BE, et al. Omission of active commuting to school and the prevalence of children’s health related physical activity levels: the Russian Longitudinal Monitoring Study. Child: Care, Health Dev. 2002;28:507–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Klesges R, Eck L, Hanson C, Haddock C, Klesges L. Effects of obesity, social interactions, and physical environment on physical activity in preschoolers. Health Psychol. 1990;9:435–449.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sallis J, Nader P, Broyles S, et al. Correlates of physical activity at home in Mexican-American and Anglo-American preschool children. Health Psychol. 1993;12:390–398.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Raitakari O, Porkka K, Taimela S, Telama R, Rasanen L, Viikari J. Effects of persistent physical activity and inactivity on coronary risk factors in children and young adults. Am J Epidemiol. 1994;140:195–205.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bailey DA, Martin AD. Physical activity and skeletal health in adolescents. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 1994;6:330–347.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Scott S, Harden J, Jackson S, Backett-Milburn K. Strangers What Kind of Danger? Children’s and Parent’s Constructions of Risk. 2000. Available at: http://www.hull.ac.uk/children5to16programme/conference/scott.pdf. Accessed on August 15, 2006.
  11. 11.
    Burman M, Brown J, Tisdall J, Batchelor S. A View from the Girls: Exploring Violence and Violent Behavior. Economic & Social Research Council; 2000. Available at: http://www1.rhbnc.ac.uk/sociopolitical-science/VRP/Findings/rfburman.PDF. Accessed on August 15, 2006.
  12. 12.
    Valentine G. ‘My son’s a bit dizzy.’ ‘My wife’s a bit soft’: gender, children, and cultures of parenting. Gend Place Cult. 1997;4:37–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Valentine G, McKendrick J. Children’s outdoor play: exploring parental concerns about children’s safety and the changing nature of childhood. Geoforum. 1997;28:219–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Weir L, Etelson D, Brand D. Parents’ perceptions of neighborhood safety and children’s physical activity. Prev Med. 2006;43:212–217.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    UNICEF. A league table of child deaths by injury in rich nations. UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, Florence. 2001. Available at: http://www.unicef-icdc.org/publications/pdf/repcard2e.pdf. Accessed on August 15, 2006.
  16. 16.
    Stevenson M, Lo SK, Laing BA, Jamrozik KD. Childhood pedestrian injuries in the Perth metropolitan area. Med J Aust. 1992;156:234–238.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Petch R, Henson R. Child road safety in the urban environment. J Transp Geogr. 2000;8:197–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Timperio A, Crawford D, Telford A, Salmon J. Perceptions of the local neighbourhood and walking and cycling among children. Prev Med. 2004;38:39–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Carver A, Salmon J, Campbell K, Garnett S, Baur L, Crawford D. Perceptions of the local neighbourhood and walking and cycling among adolescents. Am J Health Promot. 2005;20:139–147.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mota J, Almeida M, Santos P, Ribeiro J. Perceived neighbourhood environments and physical activity in adolescents. Prev Med. 2005;41:834–836.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    VicRoads. Driving in Victoria: rules and responsibilities. 2002:10. Available at: http://www.vicroads.vic.gov.au/vrpdf/rdsafe/DrivinginVicRR.pdf. Accessed on August 15, 2006.
  22. 22.
    Tester JM, Rutherford GW, Wald Z, Rutherford MW. A matched case-control study evaluating the effectiveness of speed humps in reducing child pedestrian injuries. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:646–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Telford A, Salmon J, Timperio A, Crawford D. Reliability and validity of physical activity questionnaires for children: the Children’s Leisure Activities Study Survey (CLASS). Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2004;16:64–78.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Telford A, Salmon J, Timperio A, Crawford D. Examining physical activity among 5- to 6- and 10- to 12-year-old children: the children’s leisure activities study. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2005;17:266–280.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dowda M, Pate R, Sallis JF, Freedson PS. Accelerometer (CSA) count cut points for physical activity intensity ranges in youth. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997;29(suppl):72 (abstr. 413).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    VICMAP Transport. Version 2. Melbourne, Australia: Dept of Sustainability and Environment, State Government of Victoria; 2004.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dill J. Measuring network connectivity for bicycling and walking. In: Transport Research Board Annual Meeting; 2004; Washington DC: Transportation Research Board, 2004 (CD-ROM).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cervero R, Radisch C. Travel choices in pedestrian versus automobile oriented neighbourhoods. Transport Policy. 1996;3:127–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Frank LD. Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures. Ann Behav Med. 2003;25:80–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Veitch J, Bagley S, Ball K, Salmon J. Where do children usually play? A qualitative study of parents’ perceptions of influences on children’s active free-play. Health Place. 2006;12:383–393.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Harvey T. A Review of Current Traffic Calming Techniques. Leeds, UK: Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds; 1992.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics. 3rd edn. New York (NY): Harper-Collins College Publishers; 1996:86–87.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Handy SL. Community Design and Physical Activity: What Do We Know? - and what DON’T we know? National Institute of Environmental Health Service conference on “Obesity and the Built Environment: Improving Public Health through Community Design”; 2004; Washington DC.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Petch R, Henson R. Child Traffic Safety in Urban Areas. Manchester, UK: Telford Research Institute, University of Salford; 1999.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Preston B. Cost effective ways to make walking safer for children and adolescents. Inj Prev. 1995;1:187–190.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pucher J, Dijkstra L. Promoting safe walking and cycling to improve public health: lessons from the Netherlands and Germany. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:1509–1516.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Department of Transport. Travel Advisory Leaflet 04/94 - Speed cushions. 2005. Available at: http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/roads/tpm/tal/trafficmanagement/speedcushions. Accessed on April 24, 2007
  38. 38.
    Giles-Corti B, Timperio A, Bull F, Pikora T. Understanding physical activity environmental correlates: increased specificity for ecological models. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2005;33:175–181.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ekelund U, Sjostrom M, Yngve A, et al. Physical activity assessed by activity monitor and doubly labeled water in children. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33:275–281.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Karsten L. It all used to be better? Different generations on continuity and change in urban children’s daily use of space. Children’s Geographies. 2005;3:275–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Academy of Medicine 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alison Carver
    • 1
  • Anna F. Timperio
    • 1
  • David A. Crawford
    • 1
  1. 1.Deakin UniversityBurwoodAustralia

Personalised recommendations