Findings from an Organizational Network Analysis to Support Local Public Health Management
- 339 Downloads
We assessed the feasibility of using organizational network analysis in a local public health organization. The research setting was an urban/suburban county health department with 156 employees. The goal of the research was to study communication and information flow in the department and to assess the technique for public health management. Network data were derived from survey questionnaires. Computational analysis was performed with the Organizational Risk Analyzer. Analysis revealed centralized communication, limited interdependencies, potential knowledge loss through retirement, and possible informational silos. The findings suggested opportunities for more cross program coordination but also suggested the presences of potentially efficient communication paths and potentially beneficial social connectedness. Managers found the findings useful to support decision making. Public health organizations must be effective in an increasingly complex environment. Network analysis can help build public health capacity for complex system management.
KeywordsPublic health Complex systems Network analysis Organizational theory Information management.
The study was funded by National Library of Medicine N01-LM-1-3521 and National Institute of Nursing Research P20 NR 007799. This work was supported in part by CASOS—the Center for Computational Analysis of Social and Organizational Systems at Carnegie Mellon University. Development of the ORA tool used for analysis was supported by Office of Naval Research N00014-06-0104. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the official policies, either expressed or implied of the Office of Naval Research or the US government.
- 2.Galbraith J. Organization design: an information processing view. Interfaces. 1974;4:28–36.Google Scholar
- 3.Galbraith J. Organization Design. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1977.Google Scholar
- 4.March JG, Simon HA. Organizations. New York: Wiley; 1958.Google Scholar
- 5.Simon HA. Rational decision making in business organizations. Am Econ Rev. 1979;69:493–513.Google Scholar
- 10.Center for Analysis of Social and Organizational Systems. ORA: Organizational Risk Analyzer Version 1.9. Pittsburgh: Center for Analysis of Social and Organizational Systems, Carnegie Mellon University; 2008 [computer program].Google Scholar
- 11.Cross R. Organizational Network Analysis. http://www.robcross.org/sna.htm. Accessed February 1, 2005.
- 12.Hubert LJ, Schultz J. Quadratic assignment as a general data analysis strategy. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 1976;29:190–241.Google Scholar
- 15.Marsden PV. Recent developments in network measurement. In: Carrington PJ, Scott J, Wasserman S, eds. Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2005.Google Scholar
- 16.Burt RM. The social capital of structural holes. In: Guillen MF, Collins R, England P, Meyer M, eds. New Directions in Economic Sociology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 2001.Google Scholar
- 19.Chang M, Harrington JE. Agent-based models of organizations. In: Handbook of Computational Economics II: Agent-based Computational Economics. http://www.econ.jhu.edu/People/Harrington/HCE9-04.pdf. Accessed December 12, 2006.
- 20.Scott J. Social Network Analysis: A Handbook. London: Sage; 2000.Google Scholar
- 21.Wasserman S, Faust K. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994.Google Scholar
- 22.Milgram S. The small-world problem. Psychol Today. 1967;2:60–67.Google Scholar
- 25.Newman MEJ. Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks. Phys Rev. 2004;69:066133.Google Scholar
- 26.Association of State and Territorial Health Officials(ASTHO). State Public Health Employee Worker Shortage Report: A Civil Service Recruitment and Retention Crisis. http://www.astho.org/pubs/Workforce-Survey-Report-2.pdf. Accessed November 1, 2006.
- 28.Blau P. Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure. New York: Free; 1977.Google Scholar
- 31.Simmel G. Conflict and the Web of Group Affiliations. Glencoe, IL: Free; 1955.Google Scholar
- 32.Simon HA. The Shape of Automation for Men and Management. New York: Harper & Row; 1965.Google Scholar
- 33.Kilduff M, Tsai W. Social Networks and Organizations. London: Sage; 2003.Google Scholar
- 34.Miller JH. Evolving information processing organizations. In: Lomi A, Larson ER, eds. Dynamics of Organizations: Computational Modeling and Organizational Theory. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI; 2001.Google Scholar
- 38.Doerscher T. Teamwork Design for Success. http://www.chiefprojectofficer.com. Accessed November 1, 2005.
- 39.VonFoerster H. On self-organizing systems and their environments. In: Yovitts MC, Cameron S, eds. Self-organizing Systems. New York: Pergamon; 1960.Google Scholar
- 42.Janis I. Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign-Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 1972.Google Scholar
- 44.Rainey HG. Comparing public and private organizations: empirical research and the power of the a priori. J Public Adm Res Theory. 2000;10:447–469.Google Scholar
- 46.Koo D, Morgan M, Broome C. New means of data collection. In: O’Carroll PW, Yasnoff WA, Ward ME, Ripp LH, Martin EL, eds. Public Health Informatics and Information Systems. Indianapolis: Springer; 2002:379–407.Google Scholar
- 47.Lasker R, Humphreys B, Braithwaite W. Making a Powerful Connection: The Health of the Public and The National Information Infrastructure. Washington, DC: US Public Health Services, Public Health Data Policy Coordinating Committee; 1995.Google Scholar
- 50.Loerch A. Stochastic Models. http://mason.gmu.edu/~aloerch/Model_Intro.pdf. Accessed March 1, 2005.
- 51.Radzicki MJ. Introduction to System Dynamics: A Systems Approach to Understanding Complex Policy Issues. Washington, DC: US Department of Energy. http://www.albany.edu/cpr/sds/DL-IntroSysDyn/start.htm. Accessed December 1, 2005 [Internet Version 1.0].
- 52.Sterman JD. Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. Boston: Irwin McGraw Hill; 2000.Google Scholar
- 53.Turnock B, Handler A. Performance measurement and improvement. In: Novick LF, Mays GP, eds. Public Health Administration. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen; 2001.Google Scholar
- 54.National Association of City and County Health Officials (NACCHO). Operational Definition of a Functional Local Public Health Agency. http://www.naccho.org/. Accessed December 1, 2006.
- 55.Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. RWJF Announces New Investments in the Field of Public Health Systems Research. http://www.rwjf.org/newsroom/newsreleasesdetail.jsp?productid=21928. Accessed January 12, 2007.