Journal of Urban Health

, 84:807

Reliability of a Store Observation Tool in Measuring Availability of Alcohol and Selected Foods

  • Deborah A. Cohen
  • Diane Schoeff
  • Thomas A. Farley
  • Ricky Bluthenthal
  • Richard Scribner
  • Adrian Overton
Article

Abstract

Alcohol and food items can compromise or contribute to health, depending on the quantity and frequency with which they are consumed. How much people consume may be influenced by product availability and promotion in local retail stores. We developed and tested an observational tool to objectively measure in-store availability and promotion of alcoholic beverages and selected food items that have an impact on health. Trained observers visited 51 alcohol outlets in Los Angeles and southeastern Louisiana. Using a standardized instrument, two independent observations were conducted documenting the type of outlet, the availability and shelf space for alcoholic beverages and selected food items, the purchase price of standard brands, the placement of beer and malt liquor, and the amount of in-store alcohol advertising. Reliability of the instrument was excellent for measures of item availability, shelf space, and placement of malt liquor. Reliability was lower for alcohol advertising, beer placement, and items that measured the “least price” of apples and oranges. The average kappa was 0.87 for categorical items and the average intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.83 for continuous items. Overall, systematic observation of the availability and promotion of alcoholic beverages and food items was feasible, acceptable, and reliable. Measurement tools such as the one we evaluated should be useful in studies of the impact of availability of food and beverages on consumption and on health outcomes.

Keywords

Alcohol availability Alcohol outlets Price Shelf space 

References

  1. 1.
    McGinnis JM, Foege WH. Actual causes of death in the United States. JAMA. 1993;270(18):2207–2212.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Paine-Andrews A, Francisco VT, Fawcett SB, Johnston J, Coen S. Health marketing in the supermarket: Using prompting, product sampling, and price reduction to increase customer purchases of lower-fat items. Health Market Q. 1996;14(2):85–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Raynor HA, Polley BA, Wing RR, Jeffery RW. Is dietary fat intake related to liking or household availability of high- and low-fat foods? Obes Res. 2004;12(5):816–823.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hausman A. A multi-method investigation of consumer motivations in impulse buying behavior. J Consum Mark. 2000;17:403–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Curhan R. The relationship between shelf space and unit sales in supermarkets. The relationship between shelf space and unit sales in supermarkets. J Mark Res. 1972;9:406–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wilkinson J, Mason J, Paksoy C. Assessing the impact of short-term supermarket strategy variables. J Mark Res. 1982;19:72–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Point-of-purchase alcohol marketing and promotion by store type—United States, 2000–2001. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003;52(14):310–313.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cheadle A, Psaty B, Wagner E, et al. Evaluating community-based nutrition programs: assessing the reliability of a survey of grocery store product displays. Am J Public Health. 1990;80(6):709–711.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Horowitz CR, Colson KA, Hebert PL, Lancaster K. Barriers to buying healthy foods for people with diabetes: evidence of environmental disparities. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(9):1549–1554.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Housemann R, Orenstein D, Mayer J. Inside the community: A validity study examining availability of heart-healthy foods at urban grocers. Prev Med. 2001;33:S27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Academy of Medicine 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deborah A. Cohen
    • 1
  • Diane Schoeff
    • 1
  • Thomas A. Farley
    • 2
  • Ricky Bluthenthal
    • 1
    • 3
  • Richard Scribner
    • 4
  • Adrian Overton
    • 1
  1. 1.RAND CorporationSanta MonicaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Community Health SciencesTulane University School of Public Health and Tropical MedicineNew OrleansUSA
  3. 3.Urban Community Research CenterDepartment of SociologyCarsonUSA
  4. 4.LSU School of Public HealthDepartment of EpidemiologyNew OrleansUSA

Personalised recommendations