The Impact of Legalizing Syringe Exchange Programs on Arrests Among Injection Drug Users in California
- 280 Downloads
Legislation passed in 2000 allowed syringe exchange programs (SEPs) in California to operate legally if local jurisdictions declare a local HIV public health emergency. Nonetheless, even in locales where SEPs are legal, the possession of drug paraphernalia, including syringes, remained illegal. The objective of this paper is to examine the association between the legal status of SEPs and individual arrest or citation for drug paraphernalia among injection drug users (IDUs) in California from 2001 to 2003. Using data from three annual cross-sections (2001-03) of IDUs attending 24 SEPs in 16 California counties (N = 1,578), we found that overall, 14% of IDUs in our sample reported arrest or citation for paraphernalia in the 6 months before the interview. Further analysis found that 17% of IDUs attending a legal SEP (defined at the county level) reported arrest or citation for drug paraphernalia compared to 10% of IDUs attending an illegal SEP (p = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, the adjusted odds ratio of arrest or citation for drug paraphernalia was 1.6 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.2, 2.3] for IDUs attending legal SEPs compared to IDUs attending illegal SEPs, after controlling for race/ethnicity, age, homelessness, illegal income, injection of amphetamines, years of injection drug use, frequency of SEP use, and number of needles received at last visit. IDUs attending SEPs with legal status may be more visible to police, and hence, more subject to arrest or citation for paraphernalia. These findings suggest that legislative efforts to decriminalize the operation of SEPs without concurrent decriminalization of syringe possession may result in higher odds of arrest among SEP clients, with potentially deleterious implications for the health and well-being of IDUs. More comprehensive approaches to removing barriers to accessing sterile syringes are needed if our public health goals for reducing new HIV/HCV infections are to be obtained.
KeywordsLaw enforcement HIV Arrests Injection drug use Syringe exchange programs Policy
The authors would like to thank the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for funding the California Syringe Exchange Program Study (Grant# R06/CCR918667) and the National Institute of Drug Abuse (Grant #DA14210). We also thank project coordinators Mary-Lou Gilbert and Andrea Scott, the syringe exchange programs and their clients that participated in this study.
- 5.Estebanez P, Zunzunegui MV, Aguilar MD, Russell N, Cifuentes I, Hankins C. The role of prisons in the HIV epidemic among female injecting drug users. Aids Care-Psychological and Socio-Medical Aspects of Aids/Hiv. 2002;14(1):95–104, Feb.Google Scholar
- 10.Wood E, Tyndall MW, Spittal P, et al. Impact of supply-side policies for control of illicit drugs in the face of the AIDS and overdose epidemics: investigation of a massive heroin seizure. Can Med Assoc J. 2003;168:165–169.Google Scholar
- 11.Case P, Meehan T, Jones TS. Arrests and incarceration of injection drug users for syringe possession in Massachusetts: implications for HIV prevention. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Human Retrovirol. 1998;18:S71–S75, Jul.Google Scholar
- 18.Bluthenthal RN, Kral AH, Erringer EA, Edlin BR. Drug paraphernalia laws and injection-related infectious disease risk among drug injectors. J Drug Issues. 1999;29(1):1–16, Win.Google Scholar
- 20.Buavirat A, Sacks R, Chiamwongpaet S. HIV risk behaviors during incarceration among intravenous-drug users in Bangkok, Thailand: A qualitative approach. AIDS Public Policy J. 2002;17(3):77–89, Fal.Google Scholar
- 24.Levi R, Appel J. Collateral Consequences: Denial Of Basic Social Services Based Upon Drug Use. San Francisco: Drug Policy Alliance; 2003, June.Google Scholar
- 30.Needle Exchange Authorization Law in California; 2000.Google Scholar
- 31.Bluthenthal RN, Heinzerling K, Anderson R, Flynn N, Kral AH. Legalization of Syringe Exchange Programs in California: Mixed Results From a Local Approach to HIV Prevention. Am J Public Health. 2005 (in press).Google Scholar
- 32.Collins C, Summers T. Syringe Exchange and AB 136: The Dynamics of Local Consideration in Six California Communities. Menlo Park: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation; 2002.Google Scholar
- 33.Prashad U, Collins B, et al. Crime in California. Criminal Justice Statistics Center Report Series. Sacramento, California Department of Justice, Bureau of Criminal Information and Analysis; 2003:1–7.Google Scholar
- 36.Backes G. Counties authorizing SB1159. In: Martinez AN, ed. Drug Policy Alliance; 2005.Google Scholar